Normalized to: Nienartowicz, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09382 [pdf] - 2078647
Gaia Data Release 2: Variable stars in the colour-absolute magnitude
diagram
Gaia Collaboration;
Eyer, L.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Audard, M.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Glass, F.;
Marchal, O.;
Grenon, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Holl, B.;
Clementini, G.;
Aerts, C.;
Mazeh, T.;
Evans, D. W.;
Szabados, L.;
co-authors, 438
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2020-04-16
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than 1.6
billion sources with G ~ 21 mag. We showcase stellar variability across the
Galactic colour-absolute magnitude diagram (CaMD), focusing on pulsating,
eruptive, and cataclysmic variables, as well as on stars exhibiting variability
due to rotation and eclipses. We illustrate the locations of variable star
classes, variable object fractions, and typical variability amplitudes
throughout the CaMD and illustrate how variability-related changes in colour
and brightness induce `motions' using 22 months worth of calibrated
photometric, spectro-photometric, and astrometric Gaia data of stars with
significant parallax. To ensure a large variety of variable star classes to
populate the CaMD, we crossmatch Gaia sources with known variable stars. We
also used the statistics and variability detection modules of the Gaia
variability pipeline. Corrections for interstellar extinction are not
implemented in this article. Gaia enables the first investigation of Galactic
variable star populations across the CaMD on a similar, if not larger, scale
than previously done in the Magellanic Clouds. Despite observed colours not
being reddening corrected, we clearly see distinct regions where variable stars
occur and determine variable star fractions to within Gaia's current detection
thresholds. Finally, we show the most complete description of
variability-induced motion within the CaMD to date. Gaia enables novel insights
into variability phenomena for an unprecedented number of stars, which will
benefit the understanding of stellar astrophysics. The CaMD of Galactic
variable stars provides crucial information on physical origins of variability
in a way previously accessible only for Galactic star clusters or external
galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07659 [pdf] - 2015879
Gaia's revolution in stellar variability
Eyer, L.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Rohrbasser, L.;
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Garcia-Lario, P.;
Gavras, P.;
Clementini, G.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ripepi, V.;
Wyrzykowski, L.
Submitted: 2019-12-16
Stellar variability studies are now reaching a completely new level thanks to
ESA's Gaia mission, which enables us to locate many variable stars in the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and determine the various instability strips/bands.
Furthermore, this mission also allows us to detect, characterise and classify
many millions of new variable stars thanks to its very unique nearly
simultaneous multi-epoch survey with different instruments (photometer,
spectro-photometer, radial velocity spectrometer). An overview of what can be
found in literature in terms of mostly data products by the Gaia consortium is
given. This concerns the various catalogues of variable stars derived from the
Gaia time series and also the location and motion of variable stars in the
observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. In addition, we provide a list of a
few thousands of variable white dwarf candidates derived from the DR2 published
data, among them probably many hundreds of new pulsating white dwarfs. On a
very different topic, we also show how Gaia allows us to reveal the 3D
structures of and around the Milky Way thanks to the RR Lyrae stars.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.03919 [pdf] - 1885473
Gaia Data Release 2: All-sky classification of high-amplitude pulsating
stars
Rimoldini, L.;
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Roelens, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Regibo, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Plachy, E.;
Juhász, Á.;
Szabados, L.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Teyssier, D.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-11-09, last modified: 2019-05-14
More than half a million of the 1.69 billion sources in Gaia Data Release 2
(DR2) are published with photometric time series that exhibit light variations
during the 22 months of observation. An all-sky classification of common
high-amplitude pulsators (Cepheids, long-period variables, Delta Scuti / SX
Phoenicis, and RR Lyrae stars) is provided for stars with brightness variations
greater than 0.1 mag in G band. A semi-supervised classification approach was
employed, firstly training multi-stage random forest classifiers with sources
of known types in the literature, followed by a preliminary classification of
the Gaia data and a second training phase that included a selection of the
first classification results to improve the representation of some classes,
before the improved classifiers were applied to the Gaia data. Dedicated
validation classifiers were used to reduce the level of contamination in the
published results. A relevant fraction of objects were not yet sufficiently
sampled for reliable Fourier series decomposition, consequently classifiers
were based on features derived from statistics of photometric time series in
the G, BP, and RP bands, as well as from some astrometric parameters. The
published classification results include 195,780 RR Lyrae stars, 150,757
long-period variables, 8550 Cepheids, and 8882 Delta Scuti / SX Phoenicis
stars. All of these results represent candidates whose completeness and
contamination are described as a function of variability type and
classification reliability. Results are expressed in terms of class labels and
classification scores, which are available in the vari_classifier_result table
of the Gaia archive.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02079 [pdf] - 1911148
Gaia Data Release 2: Specific characterisation and validation of all-sky
Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Holl, B.;
Leccia, S.;
Marconi, M.;
Musella, I.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Eyer, L.;
De Ridder, J.;
Regibo, S.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Szabados, L.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-10-29
The Gaia second Data Release (DR2) presents a first mapping of full-sky RR
Lyrae stars and Cepheids observed by the spacecraft during the initial 22
months of science operations. The Specific Object Study (SOS) pipeline,
developed to validate and fully characterise Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars (SOS
Cep&RRL) observed by Gaia, has been presented in the documentation and papers
accompanying the Gaia first Data Release. Here we describe how the SOS pipeline
was modified to allow for processing the Gaia multiband (G, G_BP and G_RP) time
series photometry of all-sky candidate variables and produce specific results
for confirmed RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids that are published in the DR2
catalogue. The SOS Cep&RRL processing uses tools such as the period-amplitude
and the period-luminosity relations in the G band. For the analysis of the Gaia
DR2 candidates we also used tools based on the G_BP and G_RP photometry, such
as the period-Wesenheit relation in (G,G_RP). Multiband time series photometry
and characterisation by the SOS Cep&RRL pipeline are published in Gaia DR2 for
150,359 such variables (9,575 classified as Cepheids and 140,784 as RR Lyrae
stars) distributed all over the sky. The sample includes variables in 87
globular clusters and 14 dwarf galaxies. To the best of our knowledge, as of 25
April 2018, variability of 50,570 of these sources (350 Cepheids and 50,220 RR
Lyrae stars) is not known in the literature, hence likely they are new
discoveries by Gaia. An estimate of the interstellar absorption is published
for 54,272 fundamental-mode RR Lyrae stars from a relation based on the G-band
amplitude and the pulsation period. Metallicities derived from the Fourier
parameters of the light curves are also released for 64,932 RR Lyrae stars and
3,738 fundamental-mode classical Cepheids with period shorter than 6.3 days.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00747 [pdf] - 1799831
Gaia Data Release 2. Short-timescale variability processing and analysis
Roelens, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Guy, L.;
Holl, B.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2018-05-02, last modified: 2018-08-27
The Gaia DR2 sample of short-timescale variable candidates results from the
investigation of the first 22 months of Gaia photometry for a subsample of
sources at the Gaia faint end. For this exercise, we limited ourselves to the
case of suspected rapid periodic variability. Our study combines
fast-variability detection through variogram analysis, high-frequency search by
means of least-squares periodograms, and empirical selection based on the
investigation of specific sources seen through the Gaia eyes (e.g. known
variables or visually identified objects with peculiar features in their light
curves). The progressive definition and validation of this selection criterion
also benefited from supplementary ground-based photometric monitoring of a few
preliminary candidates, performed at the Flemish Mercator telescope (Canary
Islands, Spain) between August and November 2017. We publish a list of 3,018
short-timescale variable candidates, spread throughout the sky, with a
false-positive rate up to 10-20% in the Magellanic Clouds, and a more
significant but justifiable contamination from longer-period variables between
19% and 50%, depending on the area of the sky. Although its completeness is
limited to about 0.05%, this first sample of Gaia short-timescale variables
recovers some very interesting known short-period variables, such as
post-common envelope binaries or cataclysmic variables, and brings to light
some fascinating, newly discovered variable sources. In the perspective of
future Gaia data releases, several improvements of the short-timescale
variability processing are considered, by enhancing the existing variogram and
period-search algorithms or by classifying the identified candidates.
Nonetheless, the encouraging outcome of our Gaia DR2 analysis demonstrates the
power of this mission for such fast-variability studies, and opens great
perspectives for this domain of astrophysics.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02035 [pdf] - 1767420
Gaia Data Release 2: The first Gaia catalogue of long-period variable
candidates
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lorenz, D.;
Audard, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Regibo, S.;
Roelens, M.;
Sarro, L. M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-07-27
Gaia DR2 provides a unique all-sky catalogue of 550'737 variable stars, of
which 151'761 are long-period variable (LPV) candidates with G variability
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag (5-95% quantile range). About one-fifth of the
LPV candidates are Mira candidates, the majority of the rest are semi-regular
variable candidates. For each source, G, BP , and RP photometric time-series
are published, together with some LPV-specific attributes for the subset of
89'617 candidates with periods in G longer than 60 days. We describe this first
Gaia catalogue of LPV candidates, and present various validation checks.
Various samples of LPVs were used to validate the catalogue: a sample of
well-studied very bright LPVs with light curves from the AAVSO that are partly
contemporaneous with Gaia light curves, a sample of Gaia LPV candidates with
good parallaxes, the ASAS_SN catalogue of LPVs, and the OGLE catalogues of LPVs
towards the Magellanic Clouds and the Galactic bulge. The analyses of these
samples show a good agreement between Gaia DR2 and literature periods. The same
is globally true for bolometric corrections of M-type stars. The main
contaminant of our DR2 catalogue comes from young stellar objects (YSOs) in the
solar vicinity (within ~1 kpc), although their number in the whole catalogue is
only at the percent level. A cautionary note is provided about
parallax-dependent LPV attributes published in the catalogue. This first Gaia
catalogue of LPVs approximately doubles the number of known LPVs with
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag, despite the conservative candidate selection
criteria that prioritise low contamination over high completeness, and despite
the limited DR2 time coverage compared to the long periods characteristic of
LPVs. It also contains a small set of YSO candidates, which offers the
serendipitous opportunity to study these objects at an early stage of the Gaia
data releases.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09373 [pdf] - 1767409
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the variability processing & analysis
results
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Clementini, G.;
De Ridder, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Roelens, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Garofalo, A.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lopez, M.;
Molinaro, R.;
Muraveva, T.;
Panahi, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Aerts, C.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Charnas, J.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Busso, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
Glass, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Kochoska, A.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Leccia, S.;
Lorenz, D.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalk, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
Messina, S.;
Mignard, F.;
Moitinho, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Musella, I.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Ordóñez, D.;
Pagano, I.;
Palaversa, L.;
Pawlak, M.;
Plachy, E.;
Prša, A.;
Riello, M.;
Süveges, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Votruba, V.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-07-06
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): we summarise the processing and results of the
identification of variable source candidates of RR Lyrae stars, Cepheids, long
period variables (LPVs), rotation modulation (BY Dra-type) stars, delta Scuti &
SX Phoenicis stars, and short-timescale variables. In this release we aim to
provide useful but not necessarily complete samples of candidates.
The processed Gaia data consist of the G, BP, and RP photometry during the
first 22 months of operations as well as positions and parallaxes. Various
methods from classical statistics, data mining and time series analysis were
applied and tailored to the specific properties of Gaia data, as well as
various visualisation tools.
The DR2 variability release contains: 228'904 RR Lyrae stars, 11'438
Cepheids, 151'761 LPVs, 147'535 stars with rotation modulation, 8'882 delta
Scuti & SX Phoenicis stars, and 3'018 short-timescale variables. These results
are distributed over a classification and various Specific Object Studies (SOS)
tables in the Gaia archive, along with the three-band time series and
associated statistics for the underlying 550'737 unique sources. We estimate
that about half of them are newly identified variables. The variability type
completeness varies strongly as function of sky position due to the non-uniform
sky coverage and intermediate calibration level of this data. The probabilistic
and automated nature of this work implies certain completeness and
contamination rates which are quantified so that users can anticipate their
effects. This means that even well-known variable sources can be missed or
misidentified in the published data.
The DR2 variability release only represents a small subset of the processed
data. Future releases will include more variable sources and data products;
however, DR2 shows the (already) very high quality of the data and great
promise for variability studies.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00421 [pdf] - 1736369
Gaia Data Release 2: Rotational modulation in late-type dwarfs
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Distefano, E.;
Messina, S.;
Pagano, I.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, M. Audard G. J.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.
Submitted: 2018-05-01, last modified: 2018-06-27
We present the methods devised to identify the BY Dra variables candidates in
Gaia DR2 and infer their variability parameters. BY Dra candidates are
pre-selected from their position in the HR diagram, built from Gaia parallaxes,
$G$ magnitudes, and $(G_{BP} - G_{RP})$ colours. Since the time evolution of
the stellar active region can disrupt the coherence of the signal, segments not
much longer than their expected evolution timescale are extracted from the
entire photometric time-series and period search algorithms are applied to each
segment. For the Gaia DR2, we select sources having similar period in at least
two segments as candidates BY Dra. Results are further filtered considering the
time series phase coverage and the expected approximate light curve shape. Gaia
DR2 includes rotational periods and modulation amplitudes of 147 535 BY Dra
candidates. The data unveil the existence of two populations with distinctive
period and amplitude distributions. The sample covers 38% of the whole sky when
divided in bins (HEALPix) of $\approx$0.84 square degrees and we estimate that
represents 0.7 -- 5 % of all BY Dra stars potentially detectable by Gaia. The
preliminary data contained in Gaia DR2 illustrate the vast and unique
information that the mission is going to provide on stellar rotation and
magnetic activity. This information, complemented by Gaia exquisite parallaxes,
proper motions, and astrophysical parameter, is opening new and unique
perspectives for our understanding of the evolution of stellar angular momentum
and dynamo action.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.04079 [pdf] - 1664617
All-sky RR Lyrae Stars in the Gaia Data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Holl, Berry;
Audard, Marc;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Marchal, Olivier;
Clementini, Gisella;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Garofalo, Alessia;
Molinaro, Roberto;
Muraveva, Tatiana;
Poretti, Ennio;
Molnár, László;
Plachy, Emese;
Juhász, Áron L.;
Szabados, László;
De Ridder, Joris;
Regibo, Sara;
Baro, Luis Manuel Sarro;
del Fresno, Mauro López
Submitted: 2018-04-11
The second Gaia data release is expected to contain data products from about
22 months of observation. Based on these data, we aim to provide an advance
publication of a full-sky Gaia map of RR Lyrae stars. Although comprehensive,
these data still contain a significant fraction of sources which are
insufficiently sampled for Fourier series decomposition of the periodic light
variations. The challenges in the identification of RR Lyrae candidates with
(much) fewer than 20 field-of-view transits are described. General
considerations of the results, their limitations, and interpretation are
presented together with prospects for improvement in subsequent Gaia data
releases.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.01581 [pdf] - 1582372
Pulsating star research and the Gaia revolution
Eyer, Laurent;
Clementini, Gisella;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Glass, Florian;
Audard, Marc;
Holl, Berry;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Cuypers, Jan;
De Ridder, Joris;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
de Fombelle, Gregory Jevardat;
Lanzafame, Alessandro;
Lecoeur-Taibi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Riello, Marco;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Sarro, Luis;
Süveges, Maria
Submitted: 2017-04-05
In this article we present an overview of the ESA Gaia mission and of the
unprecedented impact that Gaia will have on the field of variable star
research. We summarise the contents and impact of the first Gaia data release
on the description of variability phenomena, with particular emphasis on
pulsating star research. The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution, although limited
to 2.1 million stars, has been used in many studies related to pulsating stars.
Furthermore a set of 3,194 Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars with their times series
have been released. Finally we present the plans for the ongoing study of
variable phenomena with Gaia and highlight some of the possible impacts of the
second data release on variable, and specifically, pulsating stars.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10597 [pdf] - 1582256
Gaia eclipsing binary and multiple systems. Two-Gaussian models applied
to OGLE-III eclipsing binary light curves in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Holl, B.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Barblan, F.;
Prsa, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jevardat, G.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L.;
Audard, M.
Submitted: 2017-03-30
The advent of large scale multi-epoch surveys raises the need for automated
light curve (LC) processing. This is particularly true for eclipsing binaries
(EBs), which form one of the most populated types of variable objects. The Gaia
mission, launched at the end of 2013, is expected to detect of the order of few
million EBs over a 5-year mission.
We present an automated procedure to characterize EBs based on the geometric
morphology of their LCs with two aims: first to study an ensemble of EBs on a
statistical ground without the need to model the binary system, and second to
enable the automated identification of EBs that display atypical LCs. We model
the folded LC geometry of EBs using up to two Gaussian functions for the
eclipses and a cosine function for any ellipsoidal-like variability that may be
present between the eclipses. The procedure is applied to the OGLE-III data set
of EBs in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) as a proof of concept. The bayesian
information criterion is used to select the best model among models containing
various combinations of those components, as well as to estimate the
significance of the components.
Based on the two-Gaussian models, EBs with atypical LC geometries are
successfully identified in two diagrams, using the Abbe values of the original
and residual folded LCs, and the reduced $\chi^2$. Cleaning the data set from
the atypical cases and further filtering out LCs that contain non-significant
eclipse candidates, the ensemble of EBs can be studied on a statistical ground
using the two-Gaussian model parameters. For illustration purposes, we present
the distribution of projected eccentricities as a function of orbital period
for the OGLE-III set of EBs in the LMC, as well as the distribution of their
primary versus secondary eclipse widths.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04165 [pdf] - 1535795
Crossmatching variable objects with the Gaia data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Süveges, Maria;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Ordóñez-Blanco, Diego;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2017-02-14
Tens of millions of new variable objects are expected to be identified in
over a billion time series from the Gaia mission. Crossmatching known variable
sources with those from Gaia is crucial to incorporate current knowledge,
understand how these objects appear in the Gaia data, train supervised
classifiers to recognise known classes, and validate the results of the
Variability Processing and Analysis Coordination Unit (CU7) within the Gaia
Data Analysis and Processing Consortium (DPAC). The method employed by CU7 to
crossmatch variables for the first Gaia data release includes a binary
classifier to take into account positional uncertainties, proper motion,
targeted variability signals, and artefacts present in the early calibration of
the Gaia data. Crossmatching with a classifier makes it possible to automate
all those decisions which are typically made during visual inspection. The
classifier can be trained with objects characterized by a variety of attributes
to ensure similarity in multiple dimensions (astrometry, photometry,
time-series features), with no need for a-priori transformations to compare
different photometric bands, or of predictive models of the motion of objects
to compare positions. Other advantages as well as some disadvantages of the
method are discussed. Implementation steps from the training to the assessment
of the crossmatch classifier and selection of results are described.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.03295 [pdf] - 1535694
Gaia Data Release 1: The variability processing & analysis and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Evans, D. W.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Holl, B.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Riello, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Mignard, F.;
Busso, G.;
De Angeli, F.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Dubath, P.;
Beck, M.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Distefano, E.;
Fuchs, J.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Roelens, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Tingley, B.;
Votruba, V.;
Zucker, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Grenon, M.;
Jan, A.;
Lorenz, D.;
Miranda, B.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Palaversa, L.;
Prsa, A.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Hudec, R.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Kutka, A.;
Moniez, M.;
Nicoletti, J. -M.;
Park, P.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Varadi, M.;
Kochoska, A.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalko, G.;
Messina, S.;
Musella, I.;
Pagano, I.;
Sadowski, G.;
Schultheis, M.
Submitted: 2017-02-10
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than one
billion sources brighter than G=20.7 mag. Gaia offers the unprecedented
opportunity to study variability phenomena in the Universe thanks to
multi-epoch G-magnitude photometry in addition to astrometry, blue and red
spectro-photometry, and spectroscopy. Within the Gaia Consortium, Coordination
Unit 7 has the responsibility to detect variable objects, classify them, derive
characteristic parameters for specific variability classes, and provide global
descriptions of variable phenomena.
We describe the variability processing and analysis that we plan to apply to
the successive data releases, and we present its application to the G-band
photometry results of the first 14 months of Gaia operations that comprises 28
days of Ecliptic Pole Scanning Law and 13 months of Nominal Scanning Law.
Out of the 694 million, all-sky, sources that have calibrated G-band
photometry in this first stage of the mission, about 2.3 million sources that
have at least 20 observations are located within 38 degrees from the South
Ecliptic Pole. We detect about 14% of them as variable candidates, among which
the automated classification identified 9347 Cepheid and RR Lyrae candidates.
Additional visual inspections and selection criteria led to the publication of
3194 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, described in Clementini et al. (2016). Under
the restrictive conditions for DR1, the completenesses of Cepheids and RR Lyrae
stars are estimated at 67% and 58%, respectively, numbers that will
significantly increase with subsequent Gaia data releases.
Data processing within the Gaia Consortium is iterative, the quality of the
data and the results being improved at each iteration. The results presented in
this article show a glimpse of the exceptional harvest that is to be expected
from the Gaia mission for variability phenomena. [abridged]
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04269 [pdf] - 1523839
Gaia Data Release 1 - The Cepheid & RR Lyrae star pipeline and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Leccia, S.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Marconi, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Holl, B.;
Busso, G.;
Charnas, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
De Ridder, J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Musella, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Regibo, S.;
Riello, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Suveges, M.
Submitted: 2016-09-14, last modified: 2016-10-14
We present an overview of the Specific Objects Study (SOS) pipeline developed
within the Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) of the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis
Consortium (DPAC), the coordination unit charged with the processing and
analysis of variable sources observed by Gaia, to validate and fully
characterise Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars observed by the spacecraft. We
describe how the SOS for Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars (SOS Cep&RRL) was
specifically tailored to analyse Gaia's G-band photometric time-series with a
South Ecliptic Pole (SEP) footprint, which covers an external region of the
Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). G-band time-series photometry and
characterization by the SOS Cep&RRL pipeline (mean magnitude and pulsation
characteristics) are published in Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) for a total
sample of 3,194 variable stars, 599 Cepheids and 2,595 RR Lyrae stars, of which
386 (43 Cepheids and 343 RR Lyrae stars) are new discoveries by Gaia. All 3,194
stars are distributed over an area extending 38 degrees on either side from a
point offset from the centre of the LMC by about 3 degrees to the north and 4
degrees to the east. The vast majority, but not all, are located within the
LMC. The published sample also includes a few bright RR Lyrae stars that trace
the outer halo of the Milky Way in front of the LMC.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.00782 [pdf] - 1232162
A comparative study of four significance measures for periodicity
detection in astronomical surveys
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Eyer, Laurent;
Cuypers, Jan;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia
Submitted: 2015-04-03
We study the problem of periodicity detection in massive data sets of
photometric or radial velocity time series, as presented by ESA's Gaia mission.
Periodicity detection hinges on the estimation of the false alarm probability
(FAP) of the extremum of the periodogram of the time series. We consider the
problem of its estimation with two main issues in mind. First, for a given
number of observations and signal-to-noise ratio, the rate of correct
periodicity detections should be constant for all realized cadences of
observations regardless of the observational time patterns, in order to avoid
sky biases that are difficult to assess. Second, the computational loads should
be kept feasible even for millions of time series. Using the Gaia case, we
compare the $F^M$ method (Paltani 2004, Schwarzenberg-Czerny 2012), the Baluev
method (Baluev 2008) and the GEV method (S\"uveges 2014), as well as a method
for the direct estimation of a threshold. Three methods involve some unknown
parameters, which are obtained by fitting a regression-type predictive model
using easily obtainable covariates derived from observational time series. We
conclude that the GEV and the Baluev methods both provide good solutions to the
issues posed by a large-scale processing. The first of these yields the best
scientific quality at the price of some moderately costly pre-processing. When
this pre-processing is impossible for some reason (e.g. the computational costs
are prohibitive or good regression models cannot be constructed), the Baluev
method provides a computationally inexpensive alternative with slight biases in
regions where time samplings exhibit strong aliases.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.03830 [pdf] - 935393
The variability processing and analysis of the Gaia mission
Eyer, Laurent;
Evans, Dafydd Wyn;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lanzafame, Alessandro;
Cuypers, Jan;
De Ridder, Joris;
Sarro, Luis;
Clementini, Gisella;
Guy, Leanne;
Holl, Berry;
Ordonez, Diego;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Lecoeur-Taibi, Isabelle
Submitted: 2015-02-12
We present the variability processing and analysis that is foreseen for the
Gaia mission within Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) of the Gaia Data Processing and
Analysis Consortium (DPAC). A top level description of the tasks is given.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01165 [pdf] - 931035
Automated eclipsing binary detection: applying the Gaia CU7 pipeline to
Hipparcos
Holl, Berry;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Barblan, Fabio;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne;
Ordoñez-Blanco, Diego;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof
Submitted: 2015-02-04
We demonstrate the eclipsing binary detection performance of the Gaia
variability analysis and processing pipeline using Hipparcos data. The
automated pipeline classifies 1,067 (0.9%) of the 118,204 Hipparcos sources as
eclipsing binary candidates. The detection rate amounts to 89% (732 sources) in
a subset of 819 visually confirmed eclipsing binaries, with the period
correctly identified for 80% of them, and double or half periods obtained in 6%
of the cases.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5943 [pdf] - 904189
Time series data mining for the Gaia variability analysis
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Guy, Leanne;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Süveges, Maria;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2014-11-21
Gaia is an ESA cornerstone mission, which was successfully launched December
2013 and commenced operations in July 2014. Within the Gaia Data Processing and
Analysis consortium, Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) is responsible for the
variability analysis of over a billion celestial sources and nearly 4 billion
associated time series (photometric, spectrophotometric, and spectroscopic),
encoding information in over 800 billion observations during the 5 years of the
mission, resulting in a petabyte scale analytical problem. In this article, we
briefly describe the solutions we developed to address the challenges of time
series variability analysis: from the structure for a distributed data-oriented
scientific collaboration to architectural choices and specific components used.
Our approach is based on Open Source components with a distributed, partitioned
database as the core to handle incrementally: ingestion, distributed
processing, analysis, results and export in a constrained time window.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.1545 [pdf] - 611386
Automated classification of Hipparcos unsolved variables
Rimoldini, L.;
Dubath, P.;
Süveges, M.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Blomme, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Beck, M.;
Jan, A.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2013-01-08
We present an automated classification of stars exhibiting periodic,
non-periodic and irregular light variations. The Hipparcos catalogue of
unsolved variables is employed to complement the training set of periodic
variables of Dubath et al. with irregular and non-periodic representatives,
leading to 3881 sources in total which describe 24 variability types. The
attributes employed to characterize light-curve features are selected according
to their relevance for classification. Classifier models are produced with
random forests and a multistage methodology based on Bayesian networks,
achieving overall misclassification rates under 12 per cent. Both classifiers
are applied to predict variability types for 6051 Hipparcos variables
associated with uncertain or missing types in the literature.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.6196 [pdf] - 1117603
Search for high-amplitude Delta Scuti and RR Lyrae stars in Sloan
Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 using principal component analysis
Süveges, M.;
Sesar, B.;
Váradi, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Becker, A. C.;
Ivezić, Ž.;
Beck, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Dubath, P.;
Bartholdi, P.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2012-03-28
We propose a robust principal component analysis (PCA) framework for the
exploitation of multi-band photometric measurements in large surveys. Period
search results are improved using the time series of the first principal
component due to its optimized signal-to-noise ratio.The presence of correlated
excess variations in the multivariate time series enables the detection of
weaker variability. Furthermore, the direction of the largest variance differs
for certain types of variable stars. This can be used as an efficient attribute
for classification. The application of the method to a subsample of Sloan
Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 data yielded 132 high-amplitude Delta Scuti
variables. We found also 129 new RR Lyrae variables, complementary to the
catalogue of Sesar et al., 2010, extending the halo area mapped by Stripe 82 RR
Lyrae stars towards the Galactic bulge. The sample comprises also 25
multiperiodic or Blazhko RR Lyrae stars.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.3638 [pdf] - 1078065
Hipparcos Variable Star Detection and Classification Efficiency
Dubath, P.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Blomme, J.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jan, A.;
Beck, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
De Cat, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2011-07-19, last modified: 2011-07-21
A complete periodic star extraction and classification scheme is set up and
tested with the Hipparcos catalogue. The efficiency of each step is derived by
comparing the results with prior knowledge coming from the catalogue or from
the literature. A combination of two variability criteria is applied in the
first step to select 17 006 variability candidates from a complete sample of
115 152 stars. Our candidate sample turns out to include 10 406 known variables
(i.e., 90% of the total of 11 597) and 6600 contaminating constant stars. A
random forest classification is used in the second step to extract 1881 (82%)
of the known periodic objects while removing entirely constant stars from the
sample and limiting the contamination of non-periodic variables to 152 stars
(7.5%). The confusion introduced by these 152 non-periodic variables is
evaluated in the third step using the results of the Hipparcos periodic star
classification presented in a previous study (Dubath et al. [1]).
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2406 [pdf] - 1051376
Random forest automated supervised classification of Hipparcos periodic
variable stars
Dubath, P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Blomme, J.;
López, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
Guy, L.;
Lecoeur, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jan, A.;
Beck, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
De Cat, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2011-01-12, last modified: 2011-07-19
We present an evaluation of the performance of an automated classification of
the Hipparcos periodic variable stars into 26 types. The sub-sample with the
most reliable variability types available in the literature is used to train
supervised algorithms to characterize the type dependencies on a number of
attributes. The most useful attributes evaluated with the random forest
methodology include, in decreasing order of importance, the period, the
amplitude, the V-I colour index, the absolute magnitude, the residual around
the folded light-curve model, the magnitude distribution skewness and the
amplitude of the second harmonic of the Fourier series model relative to that
of the fundamental frequency. Random forests and a multi-stage scheme involving
Bayesian network and Gaussian mixture methods lead to statistically equivalent
results. In standard 10-fold cross-validation experiments, the rate of correct
classification is between 90 and 100%, depending on the variability type. The
main mis-classification cases, up to a rate of about 10%, arise due to
confusion between SPB and ACV blue variables and between eclipsing binaries,
ellipsoidal variables and other variability types. Our training set and the
predicted types for the other Hipparcos periodic stars are available online.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:0901.2835 [pdf] - 276837
Variability type classification of multi-epoch surveys
Submitted: 2009-01-19
The classification of time series from photometric large scale surveys into
variability types and the description of their properties is difficult for
various reasons including but not limited to the irregular sampling, the
usually few available photometric bands, and the diversity of variable objects.
Furthermore, it can be seen that different physical processes may sometimes
produce similar behavior which may end up to be represented as same models. In
this article we will also be presenting our approach for processing the data
resulting from the Gaia space mission. The approach may be classified into
following three broader categories: supervised classification, unsupervised
classifications, and "so-called" extractor methods i.e. algorithms that are
specialized for particular type of sources. The whole process of
classification- from classification attribute extraction to actual
classification- is done in an automated manner.