In this paper, we investigate the effects of galactic extinction close to the south galactic pole and plate--to--plate matching errors. These represent the most probable systematic errors within the Edinburgh/Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue (EDSGC) which could affect the angular correlation function. The distribution of extinction within the EDSGC area was obtained using the Stark {\it et al.} HI map and the IRAS $100\mu\rm{m}$ flux map. We find that the amplitude of the whole EDSGC correlation function varies by less than ${\rm \delta w}=0.003$ for reddening ratios $\rm{R_V}$ in the range $3.25\rightarrow6$. This corresponds to a range in average extinction of ${\rm A_B}=0.12\rightarrow0.24$. Simulations were carried out to assess the contribution to the correlation function from correlated and uncorrelated plate magnitude errors. The only simulation that affected the large--scale power seen in \w was for correlated plate errors with a systematic plate--to--plate offset of ${\rm \Delta m} =0.02$. This represented an overall $0.4$ magnitude difference between the ends of the EDSGC which was inconsistent with checks carried out with external photometry. All other simulations had an insignificant effect on the large--scale form of the correlation function. These tests suggest that the large--scale power seen in the EDSGC correlation function is due to intrinsic clustering and is not an artifact of the construction or location of the catalogue.

We present here the Spatial Two--Point Correlation Function for a complete sample of 67 X--ray selected Abell clusters of galaxies. We find a correlation length of $16.1\pm3.4\mpc$ with no significant clustering beyond $\simeq40\mpc$. This is the lowest uncorrected value for the correlation length ever derived from the Abell catalogue of clusters. In addition, we have investigated the anisotropy of the correlation function between the radial and transverse directions. This can be characterised by the magnitude of pair--wise cluster peculiar velocities such anisotropy predicts, which we find to be $\simeq800{\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ for our sample. Again, this is the lowest uncorrected value ever seen for the Abell catalogue. We therefore, no longer need to invoke high cluster peculiar velocities or line of sight clustering to understand the correlation function as derived from an Abell sample of clusters. Furthermore, our result is consistent with recently published correlation functions computed from automated selections of optical and X--ray clusters. Therefore, we are now approaching a coherent picture for the form of the cluster spatial correlation function which will be used to place confident constraints on theories of galaxy formation.