We present a new SCUBA image of the cluster MS0451.6-0305, which exhibits strong, extended sub-mm flux at 850 microns. The most striking feature in the map is an elongated region of bright sub-mm emission, with a flux density of >10 mJy over several beam-sizes. This region is apparently coincident with a previously known optical arc (which turns out to be a strongly lensed Lyman Break Galaxy at z=2.911), as well as with a newly identified multiply-imaged ERO (Extremely Red Object) pair predicted to be at a similar, if not identical redshift. By combing a detailed lensing model with deep images from HST, Chandra, CFHT, JCMT, and spectra from the VLT, we conclude that both the strongly lensed optical arc and ERO systems have properties consistent with known sub-mm emitters. Using a simple model for the two sources, we estimate that the multiply-lensed EROs contribute the majority of the flux in the SCUBA lensed arc. Correcting for the lensing amplification, we estimate that the inherent 850 micron fluxes for both objects are ~0.4 mJy. If the LBG and ERO pair are truly at the same redshift, then they are separated by only ~10 kpc in the source plane, and hence constitute an interacting system at z~2.9. Higher angular resolution observations in sub-mm/mm will permit us to more accurately separate the contribution from each candidate, and better understand the nature of this system.

We present estimates of the confusion limit of measurements of the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZ) increment near its peak intensity based on Monte Carlo simulations of sub-millimetre observations of galaxy clusters. Specifically, we evaluate the contribution of gravitational lensing of high redshift background sources by a target cluster to its inferred SZ signal. We find that the background confusion limit is 0.6 mJy per beam without any lensing. With gravitational lensing, the confusion limit increases to 0.9 mJy per beam. Removing bright sources in the gravitationally lensed fields decreases the confusion limit to 0.7 mJy per beam, essentially background levels. These limits are found by removing exceptionally poor fits to the expected SZ profile, which are due to the different structure of the SZ and lensing angular profiles. We conclude that experiments designed to measure the SZ increment must have high enough angular resolution to identify background point sources while surveying enough of the sky to determine the SZ profile. Observations of the SZ increment with SCUBA, which has sufficient sensitivity and resolution for the task, should be straight forward.

We propose a new, two-stage algorithm for inverting strong gravitational lenses. The key to the algorithm is decoupling the effects of lens magnification and intrinsic structure in the background source in the appearance of lensed arcs. First, the distribution of mass on the deflector plane and the geometry of the source-deflector-observer optical system are established. This is done by numerically simulating the lensing of light past a parametric mass model, and adjusting the handful of model parameters to match the positions and shapes of the observed and simulated lensed arcs. At the same time, this determines the magnification of the background source induced by the lensing process. The predicted magnification is then removed from the data to reveal the intrinsic, though still distorted, background distribution of light. After tracing each lensed ray back to the source plane, the data are combined to produce a surface brightness distribution of the source. This two-stage inversion scheme produces a parametric model of the deflector and a pixelized rendering of the background source which together mimic the observed gravitationally lensed features. We test the viability of scheme itself on a well-studied collection of lensed objects in the galaxy-cluster MS 2137. Confident in the algorithm, we apply it second time to predict the distribution of mass in the galaxy-cluster MS 1455 responsible for an observed triplet of lensed arcs. Our predictions about the lens in MS 1455 make it particularly interesting, for a single background source is responsible for both tangential arcs and a radial arc.