sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Ndugu, Nelson

Normalized to: Ndugu, N.

2 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1906.11491  [pdf] - 1917002
Are the observed gaps in protoplanetary discs caused by growing planets?
Comments: 9 pages, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-06-27
Recent detailed observations of protoplanetary discs revealed a lot of sub-structures which are mostly ring-like. One interpretation is that these rings are caused by growing planets. These potential planets are not yet opening very deep gaps in their discs. These planets instead form small gaps in the discs to generate small pressure bumps exterior to their orbits that stop the inflow of the largest dust particles. In the pebble accretion paradigm, this planetary mass corresponds to the pebble isolation mass, where pebble accretion stops and efficient gas accretion starts. We perform planet population synthesis via pebble and gas accretion including type-I and type-II migration. In the first stage of our simulations, we investigate the conditions necessary for planets to reach the pebble isolation mass and compare their position to the observed gaps. We find that in order to match the gap structures 2000 M E in pebbles is needed, which would be only available for the most metal rich stars. We then follow the evolution of these planets for a few My to compare the resulting population with the observed exoplanet populations. Planet formation in discs with these large amounts of pebbles result in mostly forming gas giants and only very little super-Earths, contradicting observations. This leads to the conclusions that either (i) the observed discs are exceptions, (ii) not all gaps in observed discs are caused by planets or (iii) that we miss some important ingredients in planet formation related to gas accretion and/or planet migration.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.10863  [pdf] - 1605047
Planet population synthesis driven by pebble accretion in cluster environments
Comments: 12 pages, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-10-30, last modified: 2017-11-14
The evolution of protoplanetary discs embedded in stellar clusters depends on the age and the stellar density in which they are embedded. Stellar clusters of young age and high stellar surface density destroy protoplanetary discs by external photoevaporation and stellar encounters. Here we consider the effect of background heating from newly formed stellar clusters on the structure of protoplanetary discs and how it affects the formation of planets in these discs. Our planet formation model is build on the core accretion scenario including pebble accretion. We synthesize planet populations that we compare to observations. The giant planets in our simulations migrate over large distances due to the fast type-II migration regime induced by a high disc viscosity ($\alpha=5.4 \times 10^{-3}$). Cold Jupiters (r>1 AU) originate preferably from the outer disc, while hot Jupiters (r<0.1 AU) preferably form in the inner disc. We find that the formation of gas giants via pebble accretion is in agreement with the metallicity correlation, meaning that more gas giants are formed at larger metallicity. However, our synthetic population of isolated stars host a significant amount of giant planets even at low metallicity, in contradiction to observations where giant planets are preferably found around high metallicity stars, indicating that pebble accretion is very efficient in the standard pebble accretion framework. On the other hand, discs around stars embedded in cluster environments hardly form any giant planets at low metallicity in agreement with observations, where these changes originate from the increased temperature in the outer parts of the disc, which prolongs the core accretion time-scale of the planet. We therefore conclude that the outer disc structure and the planet's formation location determines the giant planet occurrence rate and the formation efficiency of cold and hot Jupiters.