Normalized to: Naumov, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.15386 [pdf] - 2129460
Search For Electron-Antineutrinos Associated With Gravitational-Wave
Events GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608, GW170814, and
GW170817 at Daya Bay
An, F. P.;
Balantekin, A. B.;
Band, H. R.;
Bishai, M.;
Blyth, S.;
Cao, G. F.;
Cao, J.;
Chang, J. F.;
Chang, Y.;
Chen, H. S.;
Chen, S. M.;
Chen, Y.;
Chen, Y. X.;
Cheng, J.;
Cheng, Z. K.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Chu, M. C.;
Cummings, J. P.;
Dalager, O.;
Deng, F. S.;
Ding, Y. Y.;
Diwan, M. V.;
Dohnal, T.;
Dove, J.;
Dvorak, M.;
Dwyer, D. A.;
Gallo, J. P.;
Gonchar, M.;
Gong, G. H.;
Gong, H.;
Gu, W. Q.;
Guo, J. Y.;
Guo, L.;
Guo, X. H.;
Guo, Y. H.;
Guo, Z.;
Hackenburg, R. W.;
Hans, S.;
He, M.;
Heeger, K. M.;
Heng, Y. K.;
Higuera, A.;
Hor, Y. K.;
Hsiung, Y. B.;
Hu, B. Z.;
Hu, J. R.;
Hu, T.;
Hu, Z. J.;
Huang, H. X.;
Huang, X. T.;
Huang, Y. B.;
Huber, P.;
Jaffe, D. E.;
Jen, K. L.;
Ji, X. L.;
Ji, X. P.;
Johnson, R. A.;
Jones, D.;
Kang, L.;
Kettell, S. H.;
Kohn, S.;
Kramer, M.;
Langford, T. J.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, J. H. C.;
Lei, R. T.;
Leitner, R.;
Leung, J. K. C.;
Li, F.;
Li, J. J.;
Li, Q. J.;
Li, S.;
Li, S. C.;
Li, W. D.;
Li, X. N.;
Li, X. Q.;
Li, Y. F.;
Li, Z. B.;
Liang, H.;
Lin, C. J.;
Lin, G. L.;
Lin, S.;
Ling, J. J.;
Link, J. M.;
Littenberg, L.;
Littlejohn, B. R.;
Liu, J. C.;
Liu, J. L.;
Lu, C.;
Lu, H. Q.;
Lu, J. S.;
Luk, K. B.;
Ma, X. B.;
Ma, X. Y.;
Ma, Y. Q.;
Marshall, C.;
Caicedo, D. A. Martinez;
McDonald, K. T.;
McKeown, R. D.;
Meng, Y.;
Napolitano, J.;
Naumov, D.;
Naumova, E.;
Ochoa-Ricoux, J. P.;
Olshevskiy, A.;
Pan, H. -R.;
Park, J.;
Patton, S.;
Peng, J. C.;
Pun, C. S. J.;
Qi, F. Z.;
Qi, M.;
Qian, X.;
Raper, N.;
Ren, J.;
Reveco, C. Morales;
Rosero, R.;
Roskovec, B.;
Ruan, X. C.;
Steiner, H.;
Sun, J. L.;
Tmej, T.;
Treskov, K.;
Tse, W. -H.;
Tull, C. E.;
Viren, B.;
Vorobel, V.;
Wang, C. H.;
Wang, J.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, N. Y.;
Wang, R. G.;
Wang, W.;
Wang, W.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Wang, Z.;
Wang, Z.;
Wang, Z. M.;
Wei, H. Y.;
Wei, L. H.;
Wen, L. J.;
Whisnant, K.;
White, C. G.;
Wong, H. L. H.;
Worcester, E.;
Wu, D. R.;
Wu, F. L.;
Wu, Q.;
Wu, W. J.;
Xia, D. M.;
Xie, Z. Q.;
Xing, Z. Z.;
Xu, J. L.;
Xu, T.;
Xue, T.;
Yang, C. G.;
Yang, L.;
Yang, Y. Z.;
Yao, H. F.;
Ye, M.;
Yeh, M.;
Young, B. L.;
Yu, H. Z.;
Yu, Z. Y.;
Yue, B. B.;
Zeng, S.;
Zeng, Y.;
Zhan, L.;
Zhang, C.;
Zhang, F. Y.;
Zhang, H. H.;
Zhang, J. W.;
Zhang, Q. M.;
Zhang, X. T.;
Zhang, Y. M.;
Zhang, Y. X.;
Zhang, Y. Y.;
Zhang, Z. J.;
Zhang, Z. P.;
Zhang, Z. Y.;
Zhao, J.;
Zhou, L.;
Zhuang, H. L.;
Zou, J. H.
Submitted: 2020-06-27, last modified: 2020-07-07
Providing a possible connection between neutrino emission and
gravitational-wave (GW) bursts is important to our understanding of the
physical processes that occur when black holes or neutron stars merge. In the
Daya Bay experiment, using data collected from December 2011 to August 2017, a
search has been performed for electron-antineutrino signals coinciding with
detected GW events, including GW150914, GW151012, GW151226, GW170104, GW170608,
GW170814, and GW170817. We used three time windows of $\mathrm{\pm 10~s}$,
$\mathrm{\pm 500~s}$, and $\mathrm{\pm 1000~s}$ relative to the occurrence of
the GW events, and a neutrino energy range of 1.8 to 100 MeV to search for
correlated neutrino candidates. The detected electron-antineutrino candidates
are consistent with the expected background rates for all the three time
windows. Assuming monochromatic spectra, we found upper limits (90% confidence
level) on electron-antineutrino fluence of $(1.13~-~2.44) \times
10^{11}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 5 MeV to $8.0 \times 10^{7}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ at 100 MeV
for the three time windows. Under the assumption of a Fermi-Dirac spectrum, the
upper limits were found to be $(5.4~-~7.0)\times 10^{9}~\rm{cm^{-2}}$ for the
three time windows.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.07450 [pdf] - 1981331
Proceedings of The Magnificent CE$\nu$NS Workshop 2018
Sierra, D. Aristizabal;
Balantekin, A. B.;
Caratelli, D.;
Cogswell, B.;
Collar, J. I.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Dent, J.;
Dutta, B.;
Engel, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Formaggio, J.;
Gariazzo, S.;
Han, R.;
Hedges, S.;
Huber, P.;
Konovalov, A.;
Lang, R. F.;
Liao, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Machado, P.;
Mahapatra, R.;
Marfatia, D.;
Martinez-Soler, I.;
Miranda, O.;
Misiak, D.;
Naumov, D. V.;
Newby, J.;
Newstead, J.;
Papoulias, D.;
Patton, K.;
Pereverzev, S.;
Pospelov, M.;
Scholberg, K.;
Sinev, G.;
Strauss, R.;
Strigari, L.;
Tayloe, R.;
Tiffenberg, J.;
Vidal, M.;
Vignati, M.;
Wagner, V.;
Walker, J.;
Yu, T. -T.;
Zettlemoyer, J.;
Rich, G. C.
Submitted: 2019-10-16
The Magnificent CE$\nu$NS Workshop (2018) was held November 2 & 3 of 2018 on
the University of Chicago campus and brought together theorists,
phenomenologists, and experimentalists working in numerous areas but sharing a
common interest in the process of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering
(CE$\nu$NS). This is a collection of abstract-like summaries of the talks given
at the meeting, including links to the slides presented. This document and the
slides from the meeting provide an overview of the field and a snapshot of the
robust CE$\nu$NS-related efforts both planned and underway.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478 [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO
mission
Adams, J. H.;
Ahmad, S.;
Albert, J. -N.;
Allard, D.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Anzalone, A.;
Arai, Y.;
Aramo, C.;
Asano, K.;
Ave, M.;
Barrillon, P.;
Batsch, T.;
Bayer, J.;
Belenguer, T.;
Bellotti, R.;
Berlind, A. A.;
Bertaina, M.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Biktemerova, S.;
Blaksley, C.;
Blecki, J.;
Blin-Bondil, S.;
Bluemer, J.;
Bobik, P.;
Bogomilov, M.;
Bonamente, M.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Briz, S.;
Bruno, A.;
Cafagna, F.;
Campana, D.;
Capdevielle, J-N.;
Caruso, R.;
Casolino, M.;
Cassardo, C.;
Castellini, G.;
Catalano, O.;
Cellino, A.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cortes, J. F.;
Crawford, H. J.;
Cremonini, R.;
Csorna, S.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
de Castro, A. J.;
De Donato, C.;
de la Taille, C.;
del Peral, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
De Pascale, M. P.;
Di Martino, M.;
Distratis, G.;
Dupieux, M.;
Ebersoldt, A.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Engel, R.;
Falk, S.;
Fang, K.;
Fenu, F.;
Fernandez-Gomez, I.;
Ferrarese, S.;
Franceschi, A.;
Fujimoto, J.;
Galeotti, P.;
Garipov, G.;
Geary, J.;
Giaccari, U. G.;
Giraudo, G.;
Gonchar, M.;
Alvarado, C. Gonzalez;
Gorodetzky, P.;
Guarino, F.;
Guzman, A.;
Hachisu, Y.;
Harlov, B.;
Haungs, A.;
Carretero, J. Hernandez;
Higashide, K.;
Iguchi, T.;
Ikeda, H.;
Inoue, N.;
Inoue, S.;
Insolia, A.;
Isgrio, F.;
Itow, Y.;
Joven, E.;
Judd, E. G.;
Jung, A.;
Kajino, F.;
Kajino, T.;
Kaneko, I.;
Karadzhov, Y.;
Karczmarczyk, J.;
Katahira, K.;
Kawai, K.;
Kawasaki, Y.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Khrenov, B. A.;
Kim, Jeong-Sook;
Kim, Soon-Wook;
Kim, Sug-Whan;
Kleifges, M.;
Klimov, P. A.;
Ko, S. H.;
Kolev, D.;
Kreykenbohm, I.;
Kudela, K.;
Kurihara, Y.;
Kuznetsov, E.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lee, J.;
Licandro, J.;
Lim, H.;
Lopez, F.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Mannheim, K.;
Marcelli, L.;
Marini, A.;
Martin-Chassard, G.;
Martinez, O.;
Masciantonio, G.;
Mase, K.;
Matev, R.;
Maurissen, A.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mernik, T.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Mizumoto, Y.;
Modestino, G.;
Monnier-Ragaigne, D.;
Rios, J. A. Morales de los;
Mot, B.;
Murakami, T.;
Nagano, M.;
Nagata, M.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nakamura, T.;
Nam, J. W.;
Nam, S.;
Nam, K.;
Napolitano, T.;
Naumov, D.;
Neronov, A.;
Nomoto, K.;
Ogawa, T.;
Ohmori, H.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Orleanski, P.;
Osteria, G.;
Pacheco, N.;
Panasyuk, M. I.;
Parizot, E.;
Park, I. H.;
Pastircak, B.;
Patzak, T.;
Paul, T.;
Pennypacker, C.;
Peter, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Pollini, A.;
Prieto, H.;
Reardon, P.;
Reina, M.;
Reyes, M.;
Ricci, M.;
Rodriguez, I.;
Frias, M. D. Rodriguez;
Ronga, F.;
Rothkaehl, H.;
Roudil, G.;
Rusinov, I.;
Rybczynski, M.;
Sabau, M. D.;
Cano, G. Saez;
Saito, A.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakata, M.;
Salazar, H.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santangelo, A.;
Cruz, L. Santiago;
Palomino, M. Sanz;
Saprykin, O.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sato, H.;
Sato, M.;
Schanz, T.;
Schieler, H.;
Scotti, V.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Selmane, S.;
Semikoz, D.;
Serra, M.;
Sharakin, S.;
Shibata, T.;
Shimizu, H. M.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shirahama, T.;
Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.;
Lopez, H. H. Silva;
Sledd, J.;
Slominska, K.;
Sobey, A.;
Sugiyama, T.;
Supanitsky, D.;
Suzuki, M.;
Szabelska, B.;
Szabelski, J.;
Tajima, F.;
Tajima, N.;
Tajima, T.;
Takahashi, Y.;
Takami, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Takizawa, Y.;
Tenzer, C.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tkachev, L.;
Tomida, T.;
Tone, N.;
Trillaud, F.;
Tsenov, R.;
Tsuno, K.;
Tymieniecka, T.;
Uchihori, Y.;
Vaduvescu, O.;
Valdes-Galicia, J. F.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
Vankova, G.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villasenor, L.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Wada, S.;
Watanabe, J.;
Watanabe, S.;
Watts, J.;
Weber, M.;
Weiler, T. J.;
Wibig, T.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wille, M.;
Wilms, J.;
Wlodarczyk, Z.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamamoto, Y.;
Yang, J.;
Yano, H.;
Yashin, I. V.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Yoshida, K.;
Yoshida, S.;
Young, R.;
Zamora, A.;
Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme
Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the
International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme
energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime
atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive
air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we
discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the
annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the
expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the
investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background
light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher
than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.5275 [pdf] - 148512
ESAF: Full Simulation of Space-Based Extensive Air Showers Detectors
Berat, C.;
Bottai, S.;
De Marco, D.;
Moreggia, S.;
Naumov, D.;
Pallavicini, M.;
Pesce, R.;
Petrolini, A.;
Stutz, A.;
Taddei, E.;
Thea, A.
Submitted: 2009-07-30, last modified: 2010-02-18
Future detection of Extensive Air Showers (EAS) produced by Ultra High Energy
Cosmic Particles (UHECP) by means of space based fluorescence telescopes will
open a new window on the universe and allow cosmic ray and neutrino astronomy
at a level that is virtually impossible for ground based detectors. In this
paper we summarize the results obtained in the context of the EUSO project by
means of a detailed Monte Carlo simulation of all the physical processes
involved in the fluorescence technique, from the Extensive Air Shower
development to the instrument response. Particular emphasis is given to
modeling the light propagation in the atmosphere and the effect of clouds. Main
results on energy threshold and resolution, direction resolution and Xmax
determination are reported. Results are based on EUSO telescope design, but are
also extended to larger and more sensitive detectors.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703230 [pdf] - 90039
Measurement of air fluorescence light yield induced by an
electromagnetic shower
Colin, P.;
Chukanov, A.;
Grebenyuk, V.;
Naumov, D.;
Nedelec, P.;
Nefedov, Yu.;
Onofre, A.;
Porokhovoi, S.;
Sabirov, B.;
Tkatchev, L.
Submitted: 2007-03-09, last modified: 2008-10-20
For most of the Ultra-High-Energy-Cosmic-Ray (UHECR) experiments and projects
(HiRes, AUGER, TA, JEM-EUSO, TUS,...), the detection technique of Extensive Air
Showers is based, at least, on the measurement of the air-fluorescence-induced
signal. The knowledge of the Fluorescence-Light Yield (FLY) is of paramount
importance for the UHECR energy reconstruction. The MACFLY experiment was
designed to perform absolute measurements of the air FLY and to study its
properties. Here, we report the result of measurement of dry-air FLY induced by
50 GeV electromagnetic showers as a function of the shower age and as a
function of the pressure. The experiment was performed at CERN using a
SPS-electron-test-beam line. The result shows the air FLY is proportional to
the energy deposited in air (E_d). The ratio FLY/E_d and its pressure
dependence remain constant independently of shower age, and more generally,
independently of the excitation source used (single-electron track or air
shower).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612110 [pdf] - 87448
Measurement of air and nitrogen fluorescence light yields induced by
electron beam for UHECR experiments
Colin, P.;
Chukanov, A.;
Grebenyuk, V.;
Naumov, D.;
Nedelec, P.;
Nefedov, Y.;
Onofre, A.;
Porokhovoi, S.;
Sabirov, B.;
Tkatchev, L.
Submitted: 2006-12-04
Most of the Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray (UHECR) experiments and projects
(HiRes, AUGER, TA, EUSO, TUS,...) use air fluorescence to detect and measure
extensive air showers (EAS). The precise knowledge of the Fluorescence Light
Yield (FLY) is of paramount importance for the reconstruction of UHECR. The
MACFLY - Measurement of Air Cherenkov and Fluorescence Light Yield - experiment
has been designed to perform such FLY measurements. In this paper we will
present the results of FLY in the 290-440 nm wavelength range for dry air and
pure nitrogen, both excited by electrons with energy of 1.5 MeV, 20 GeV and 50
GeV. The experiment uses a 90Sr radioactive source for low energy measurement
and a CERN SPS electron beam for high energy. We find that the FLY is
proportional to the deposited energy (E_d) in the gas and we show that the air
fluorescence properties remain constant independently of the electron energy.
At the reference point: atmospheric dry air at 1013 hPa and 23C, the ratio
FLY/E_d=17.6 photon/MeV with a systematic error of 13.2%.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803003 [pdf] - 100538
Electron Screening in the 7Be + p -->8B + photon reaction
Submitted: 1998-03-02, last modified: 1998-09-21
We evaluate the effect of screening by bound electron in the 7Be + p --> 8B +
photon reaction, where 7Be target contains bound electron, in the framework of
the adiabatic representation of the three particle problem. A comparison with
two other approximations (united atom and folding) is presented. A good
agreement between the ``united atom'' approximation and the exact solution is
found. We also discuss the screening corrections induced by two K-shell
electrons on a 7Be target. The bound electron screening effect consequences for
7Be and 8B solar neutrino fluxes are discussed.