Normalized to: Nandra, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.05566 [pdf] - 1347639
On the relation of optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in Seyfert
galaxies
Burtscher, L.;
Davies, R. I.;
Gracia-Carpio, J.;
Koss, M. J.;
Lin, M. -Y.;
Lutz, D.;
Nandra, P.;
Netzer, H.;
de Xivry, G. Orban;
Ricci, C.;
Rosario, D. J.;
Veilleux, S.;
Contursi, A.;
Genzel, R.;
Schnorr-Mueller, A.;
Sternberg, A.;
Sturm, E.;
Tacconi, L. J.
Submitted: 2015-11-17, last modified: 2016-01-12
The optical classification of a Seyfert galaxy and whether it is considered
X-ray absorbed are often used interchangeably. But there are many borderline
cases and also numerous examples where the optical and X-ray classifications
appear to be in conflict. In this article we re-visit the relation between
optical obscuration and X-ray absorption in AGNs. We make use of our "dust
color" method (Burtscher et al. 2015) to derive the optical obscuration A_V and
consistently estimated X-ray absorbing columns using 0.3--150 keV spectral
energy distributions. We also take into account the variable nature of the
neutral gas column N_H and derive the Seyfert sub-classes of all our objects in
a consistent way.
We show in a sample of 25 local, hard-X-ray detected Seyfert galaxies (log
L_X / (erg/s) ~ 41.5 - 43.5) that there can actually be a good agreement
between optical and X-ray classification. If Seyfert types 1.8 and 1.9 are
considered unobscured, the threshold between X-ray unabsorbed and absorbed
should be chosen at a column N_H = 10^22.3 / cm^2 to be consistent with the
optical classification.
We find that N_H is related to A_V and that the N_H/A_V ratio is
approximately Galactic or higher in all sources, as indicated previously. But
in several objects we also see that deviations from the Galactic ratio are only
due to a variable X-ray column, showing that (1) deviations from the Galactic
N_H/A_V can simply be explained by dust-free neutral gas within the broad line
region in some sources, that (2) the dust properties in AGNs can be similar to
Galactic dust and that (3) the dust color method is a robust way to estimate
the optical extinction towards the sublimation radius in all but the most
obscured AGNs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.2264 [pdf] - 1366183
AGN X-ray variability in the XMM-COSMOS survey
Lanzuisi, G.;
Ponti, G.;
Salvato, M.;
Hasinger, G.;
Cappelluti, N.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Brusa, M.;
Lusso, E.;
Nandra, P. K.;
Merloni, A.;
Silverman, J.;
Trump, J.;
Vignali, C.;
Comastri, A.;
Gilli, R.;
Schramm, M.;
Steinhardt, C.;
Sanders, D.;
Kartaltepe, J.;
Rosario, D.;
Trakhtenbrot, B.
Submitted: 2013-12-08
We took advantage of the observations carried out by XMM in the COSMOS field
during 3.5 years, to study the long term variability of a large sample of AGN
(638 sources), in a wide range of redshift (0.1<z<3.5) and X-ray luminosity
($10^{41}<$L(2-10)$<10^{45.5}$). Both a simple statistical method to asses the
significance of variability, and the Normalized Excess Variance
($\sigma^{2}_{rms}$) parameter, where used to obtain a quantitative measurement
of the variability. Variability is found to be prevalent in most AGN, whenever
we have good statistic to measure it, and no significant differences between
type-1 and type-2 AGN were found. A flat (slope -0.23+/-0.03) anti-correlation
between $\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ and X-ray luminosity is found, when significantly
variable sources are considered all together. When divided in three redshift
bins, the anti-correlation becomes stronger and evolving with z, with higher
redshift AGN being more variable. We prove however that this effect is due to
the pre-selection of variable sources: considering all the sources with
available $\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ measurement, the evolution in redshift disappears.
For the first time we were also able to study the long term X-ray variability
as a function of $M_{\rm BH}$ and Eddington ratio, for a large sample of AGN
spanning a wide range of redshift. An anti-correlation between
$\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ and $M_{\rm BH}$ is found, with the same slope of the
anti-correlation between $\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ and X-ray luminosity, suggesting
that the latter can be a byproduct of the former one. No clear correlation is
found between $\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ and the Eddington ratio in our sample.
Finally, no correlation is found between the X-ray $\sigma^{2}_{rms}$ and the
optical variability.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.3230 [pdf] - 1166628
What is on Tap? The Role of Spin in Compact Objects and Relativistic
Jets
Submitted: 2013-05-14
We examine the role of spin in launching jets from compact objects across the
mass scale. Our work includes a total of 37 Seyferts, 11 stellar-mass black
holes, and 13 neutron stars. We find that when the Seyfert reflection lines are
modeled with Gaussian line features (a crude proxy for inner disk radius and
therefore spin), only a slight inverse correlation is found between the
Doppler-corrected radio luminosity at 5 GHz (a proxy for jet power) and line
width. When the Seyfert reflection features are fit with
relativistically-blurred disk reflection models that measure spin, there is a
tentative positive correlation between the Doppler-corrected radio luminosity
and the spin measurement. Further, when we include stellar-mass black holes in
the sample, to examine the effects across the mass scale, we find a slightly
stronger correlation with radio luminosity per unit mass and spin, at a
marginal significance (2.3 sigma confidence level). Finally, when we include
neutron stars, in order to probe lower spin values, we find a positive
correlation (3.3 sigma confidence level) between radio luminosity per unit mass
and spin. Although tentative, these results suggest that spin may have a role
in determining the jet luminosity. In addition, we find a slightly more
significant correlation (4.4 sigma confidence level) between radio luminosity
per Bolometric luminosity and spin, using our entire sample of black holes and
neutrons stars. Again, although tentative, these relations point to the
possibility that the mass accretion rate, i.e. Bolometric luminosity, is also
important in determining the jet luminosity, in addition to spin. Our analysis
suggests that mass accretion rate and disk or coronal magnetic field strength
may be the "throttle" in these compact systems, to which the Eddington limit
and spin may set the maximum jet luminosity that can be achieved.