Normalized to: Nalson, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.5106 [pdf] - 1217019
A short note on the curvature perturbation at second order
Submitted: 2014-09-17, last modified: 2015-02-28
Working with perturbations about an FLRW spacetime, we compute the
gauge-invariant curvature perturbation to second order solely in terms of
scalar field fluctuations. Using the curvature perturbation on uniform density
hypersurfaces as our starting point, we give our results in terms of field
fluctuations in the flat gauge, incorporating both large and small scale
behaviour. For ease of future numerical implementation we give our result in
terms of the scalar field fluctuations and their time derivatives.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.6504 [pdf] - 868728
Effects of non-linearities on magnetic field generation
Submitted: 2013-12-23, last modified: 2014-08-19
Magnetic fields are present on all scales in the Universe. While we
understand the processes which amplify the fields fairly well, we do not have a
"natural" mechanism to generate the small initial seed fields. By using fully
relativistic cosmological perturbation theory and going beyond the usual
confines of linear theory we show analytically how magnetic fields are
generated. This is the first analytical calculation of the magnetic field at
second order, using gauge-invariant cosmological perturbation theory, and
including all the source terms. To this end, we have rederived the full set of
governing equations independently. Our results suggest that magnetic fields of
the order of $10^{-30}$ G can be generated (although this depends on the small
scale cut-off of the integral), which is largely in agreement with previous
results that relied upon numerical calculations. These fields are likely too
small to act as the primordial seed fields for dynamo mechanisms.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.6940 [pdf] - 630576
Quantifying the behaviour of curvature perturbations during inflation
Submitted: 2011-11-29, last modified: 2013-01-31
How much does the curvature perturbation change after it leaves the horizon,
and when should one evaluate the power spectrum? To answer these questions we
study single field inflation models numerically, and compare the evolution of
different curvature perturbations from horizon crossing to the end of
inflation. In particular we calculate the number of efolds it takes for the
curvature perturbation at a given wavenumber to settle down to within a given
fraction of their value at the end of inflation. We find that e.g. in chaotic
inflation, the amplitude of the comoving and the curvature perturbation on
uniform density hypersurfaces differ by up to 180 % at horizon crossing
assuming the same amplitude at the end of inflation, and that it takes
approximately 3 efolds for the curvature perturbation to be within 1 % of its
value at the end of inflation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.7613 [pdf] - 1530118
Quantifying the behaviour of curvature perturbations near Horizon
Crossing
Submitted: 2013-01-31
How much does the curvature perturbation change after it leaves the horizon,
and when should one evaluate the power spectrum? To answer these questions we
study single field inflation models numerically, and compare the evolution of
different curvature perturbations from horizon crossing to the end of
inflation. We find that e.g. in chaotic inflation, the amplitude of the
comoving and the curvature perturbation on uniform density hypersurfaces differ
by up to 180 \% at horizon crossing assuming the same amplitude at the end of
inflation, and that it takes approximately 3 efolds for the curvature
perturbation to be within 1 \% of its value at the end of inflation.