sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Nalson, Ellie

Normalized to: Nalson, E.

4 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 2 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1409.5106  [pdf] - 1217019
A short note on the curvature perturbation at second order
Comments: 10 pages; v2: 11 pgs, added appendix, typos corrected. version to appear in Class. Quantum Grav
Submitted: 2014-09-17, last modified: 2015-02-28
Working with perturbations about an FLRW spacetime, we compute the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation to second order solely in terms of scalar field fluctuations. Using the curvature perturbation on uniform density hypersurfaces as our starting point, we give our results in terms of field fluctuations in the flat gauge, incorporating both large and small scale behaviour. For ease of future numerical implementation we give our result in terms of the scalar field fluctuations and their time derivatives.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1312.6504  [pdf] - 868728
Effects of non-linearities on magnetic field generation
Comments: 21 pages; v2: minor changes, added references; v3: version accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2013-12-23, last modified: 2014-08-19
Magnetic fields are present on all scales in the Universe. While we understand the processes which amplify the fields fairly well, we do not have a "natural" mechanism to generate the small initial seed fields. By using fully relativistic cosmological perturbation theory and going beyond the usual confines of linear theory we show analytically how magnetic fields are generated. This is the first analytical calculation of the magnetic field at second order, using gauge-invariant cosmological perturbation theory, and including all the source terms. To this end, we have rederived the full set of governing equations independently. Our results suggest that magnetic fields of the order of $10^{-30}$ G can be generated (although this depends on the small scale cut-off of the integral), which is largely in agreement with previous results that relied upon numerical calculations. These fields are likely too small to act as the primordial seed fields for dynamo mechanisms.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1111.6940  [pdf] - 630576
Quantifying the behaviour of curvature perturbations during inflation
Comments: Revtex4, 11 pages, 10 figures; v2: added results section E, added references and acknowledgements; v3: clarification added to conclusions, version to appear in CQG
Submitted: 2011-11-29, last modified: 2013-01-31
How much does the curvature perturbation change after it leaves the horizon, and when should one evaluate the power spectrum? To answer these questions we study single field inflation models numerically, and compare the evolution of different curvature perturbations from horizon crossing to the end of inflation. In particular we calculate the number of efolds it takes for the curvature perturbation at a given wavenumber to settle down to within a given fraction of their value at the end of inflation. We find that e.g. in chaotic inflation, the amplitude of the comoving and the curvature perturbation on uniform density hypersurfaces differ by up to 180 % at horizon crossing assuming the same amplitude at the end of inflation, and that it takes approximately 3 efolds for the curvature perturbation to be within 1 % of its value at the end of inflation.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1301.7613  [pdf] - 1530118
Quantifying the behaviour of curvature perturbations near Horizon Crossing
Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure, Proceedings of 13th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Stockholm, July 2012
Submitted: 2013-01-31
How much does the curvature perturbation change after it leaves the horizon, and when should one evaluate the power spectrum? To answer these questions we study single field inflation models numerically, and compare the evolution of different curvature perturbations from horizon crossing to the end of inflation. We find that e.g. in chaotic inflation, the amplitude of the comoving and the curvature perturbation on uniform density hypersurfaces differ by up to 180 \% at horizon crossing assuming the same amplitude at the end of inflation, and that it takes approximately 3 efolds for the curvature perturbation to be within 1 \% of its value at the end of inflation.