sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Nagano, M.

Normalized to: Nagano, M.

14 article(s) in total. 330 co-authors, from 1 to 12 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 15,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478  [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO mission
Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Ave, M.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; De Pascale, M. P.; Di Martino, M.; Distratis, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Ferrarese, S.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgrio, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Mannheim, K.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rios, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nakamura, T.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Frias, M. D. Rodriguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Takami, H.; Takeda, M.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tibolla, O.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: published in Astroparticle Physics by the JEM-EUSO Collaboration
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.5065  [pdf] - 554284
The JEM-EUSO Mission: Status and Prospects in 2011
Collaboration, The JEM-EUSO; :; Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; De Pascale, M. P.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; Di Martino, M.; Distrati, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Ferrarese, S.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgro, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rıos, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodrıguez, I.; Frıas, M. D. Rodrıguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieblo, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takami, H.; Nakamura, T.; Takeda, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: 33 contributions plus index
Submitted: 2012-04-23
Contributions of the JEM-EUSO Collaboration to the 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing, August, 2011.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508183  [pdf] - 75072
Fluorescence in damp air and comments on the radiative life time
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures. Proceedings of 29th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC) 2005, Pune, India
Submitted: 2005-08-08
Photon yields in damp air excited by an electron using a Sr90 $\beta$ source are compared withthose in dry air. Water vapors considerably reduce the yields, however, a further study is needed to evaluate the effects on the energy estimation of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays. The relation of fluorescence efficiency to the life time of de-excitation by radiation is discussed.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0406474  [pdf] - 65631
New measurement on photon yields from air and the application to the energy estimation of primary cosmic rays
Comments: 23 pages, 8 figures, LaTeX with elsart.cls, accepted by Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2004-06-21, last modified: 2004-08-20
The air fluorescence technique is used to detect ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR), and to estimate their energy. Of fundamental importance is the photon yield due to excitation by electrons, in air of various densities and temperatures. After our previous report, the experiment has been continued using a Sr90 $\beta$ source to study the pressure dependence of photon yields for radiation in nitrogen and dry air. The photon yields in 15 wave bands between 300 nm and 430 nm have been determined. The total photon yield between 300 nm and 406 nm (used in most experiments) in air excited by a 0.85 MeV electron is 3.81+-0.13 (+-13 % systematics) photons per meter at 1013 hPa and 20 $^{\circ}$C. The air density and temperature dependencies of 15 wave bands are given for application to UHECR observations.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303193  [pdf] - 55432
Photon yields from nitrogen gas and dry air excited by electrons
Comments: 28 pages, 13 figures, LaTeX with elsart.cls, accepted by Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2003-03-10, last modified: 2003-08-25
In order to detect ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR), atmospheric fluorescence light from the trajectory of the extensive air shower may be measured by mirror-photosensor systems. In this type of experiment the photon yield from electrons exciting air of various densities and temperatures is most fundamental information for estimating the primary energy of UHECR. An experiment has been undertaken using a Sr90 $\beta$ source to study the pressure dependence of photon yields, and the life times of the excited states, for radiation in nitrogen and dry air. The photon yield between 300 nm and 406 nm in air excited by 0.85 MeV electrons is 3.73+-0.15 (+-14% systematic) photons per meter at 1000 hPa and 20 $^{\circ}$C. The air density and temperature dependence is given for application to UHECR observations.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0209422  [pdf] - 51828
Energy determination in the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array experiment
Comments: accepted to Astroparticle Physics, 29pages, 17+1 figures, elsart.cls The AGASA exposure is 5.1x10^16 m2 sr s until July 2002
Submitted: 2002-09-19, last modified: 2002-11-12
Using data from more than ten-years of observations with the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA), we published a result that the energy spectrum of ultra-high energy cosmic rays extends beyond the cutoff energy predicted by Greisen, and Zatsepin and Kuzmin. In this paper, we reevaluate the energy determination method used for AGASA events with respect to the lateral distribution of shower particles, their attenuation with zenith angle, shower front structure, delayed particles observed far from the core and other factors. The currently assigned energies of AGASA events have an accuracy of $\pm$25% in event-reconstruction resolution and $\pm$18% in systematic errors around 10$^{20}$eV. This systematic uncertainty is independent of primary energy above 10$^{19}$eV. Based on the energy spectrum from 10$^{14.5}$eV to a few times 10$^{20}$eV determined at Akeno, there are surely events above 10$^{20}$eV and the energy spectrum extends up to a few times 10$^{20}$eV without a GZK-cutoff.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008102  [pdf] - 37418
Updated AGASA event list above 4x10^19eV
Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, appendix for ApJ 522(1999) 225
Submitted: 2000-08-06
After our Ap.J. publication of the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA) results in 1999 (Takeda et al., 1999), we observed nine events with energies above 4 $\times$ 10$^{19}$eV until May 2000. This short report lists the coordinates of these events, and shows the updated energy spectrum and arrival direction map. The analysis was carried out with the same procedure employed in the Ap.J. publication.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9902239  [pdf] - 387117
Small-scale anisotropy of cosmic rays above 10^19eV observed with the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array
Comments: 40 pages, 12 figure, AASTeX *** Authors found a typo on Table 2 -- Energy of event 94/07/06 ***
Submitted: 1999-02-17, last modified: 2000-06-20
With the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA), 581 cosmic rays above 10^19eV, 47 above 4 x 10^19eV, and 7 above 10^20eV are observed until August 1998. Arrival direction distribution of these extremely high energy cosmic rays has been studied. While no significant large-scale anisotropy is found on the celestial sphere, some interesting clusters of cosmic rays are observed. Above 4 x 10^19eV, there are one triplet and three doublets within separation angle of 2.5^o and the probability of observing these clusters by a chance coincidence under an isotropic distribution is smaller than 1 %. Especially the triplet is observed against expected 0.05 events. The cos(\theta_GC) distribution expected from the Dark Matter Halo model fits the data as well as an isotropic distribution above 2 x 10^19eV and 4 x 10^19eV, but is a poorer fit than isotropy above 10^19eV. Arrival direction distribution of seven 10^20eV cosmic rays is consistent with that of lower energy cosmic rays and is uniform. Three of seven are members of doublets above about 4 x 10^19eV.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9912222  [pdf] - 1469870
Comparison of AGASA data with CORSIKA simulation
Comments: 30 pages, 15 figures, accepted by Astroparticle Physics at 6. Dec 1999
Submitted: 1999-12-10
An interpretation of AGASA (Akeno Giant Air Shower Array) data by comparing the experimental results with the simulated ones by CORSIKA (COsmic Ray SImulation for KASCADE) has been made. General features of the electromagnetic component and low energy muons observed by AGASA can be well reproduced by CORSIKA. The form of the lateral distribution of charged particles agrees well with the experimental one between a few hundred metres and 2000 m from the core, irrespective of the hadronic interaction model studied and the primary composition (proton or iron). It does not depend on the primary energy between 10^17.5 and 10^20 eV as the experiment shows. If we evaluate the particle density measured by scintillators of 5 cm thickness at 600 m from the core (S_0(600), suffix 0 denotes the vertically incident shower) by taking into account the similar conditions as in the experiment, the conversion relation from S_0(600) to the primary energy is expressed as E [eV] = 2.15 x 10^17 x S_0(600)^1.015, within 10% uncertainty among the models and composition used, which suggests the present AGASA conversion factor is the lower limit. Though the form of the muon lateral distribution fits well to the experiment within 1000 m from the core, the absolute values change with hadronic interaction model and primary composition. The slope of the rho_mu(600) (muon density above 1 GeV at 600 m from the core) vs. S_0(600) relation in experiment is flatter than that in simulation of any hadronic model and primary composition. Since the experimental slope is constant from 10^15 eV to 10^19 eV, we need to study this relation in a wide primary energy range to infer the rate of change of chemical composition with energy. keywords: cosmic ray, extensive air shower, simulation, primary energy estimation PACS number ; 96.40.De, 96.40.Pq
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908193  [pdf] - 1469810
Cluster Analysis of Extremely High Energy Cosmic Rays in the Northern Sky
Comments: 9 pages, 6 tables, 8 figures. submitted to Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 1999-08-18
The arrival directions of extremely high energy cosmic rays (EHECR) above $4\times10^{19}$ eV, observed by four surface array experiments in the northern hemisphere,are examined for coincidences from similar directions in the sky. The total number of cosmic rays is 92.A significant number of double coincidences (doublet) and triple coincidences (triplet) are observed on the supergalactic plane within the experimental angular resolution. The chance probability of such multiplets from a uniform distribution is less than 1 % if we consider a restricted region within $\pm 10^{\circ}$ of the supergalactic plane. Though there is still a possibility of chance coincidence, the present results on small angle clustering along the supergalactic plane may be important in interpreting EHECR enigma. An independent set of data is required to check our claims.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9906056  [pdf] - 106777
The Anisotropy of Cosmic Ray Arrival Direction around 10^18eV
Comments: 4pages, three figures, to appear in Procedings of 26th ICRC(Salt Lake City)
Submitted: 1999-06-03
Anisotropy in the arrival directions of cosmic rays around 10^{18}eV is studied using data from the Akeno 20 km^2 array and the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA), using a total of about 216,000 showers observed over 15 years above 10^{17}eV. In the first harmonic analysis, we have found significant anisotropy of $\sim$ 4 % around 10^{18}eV, corresponding to a chance probability of $\sim 10^{-5}$ after taking the number of independent trials into account. With two dimensional analysis in right ascension and declination, this anisotropy is interpreted as an excess of showers near the directions of the Galactic Center and the Cygnus region. This is a clear evidence for the existence of the galactic cosmic ray up to the energy of 10^{18}eV. Primary particle which contribute this anisotropy may be proton or neutron.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9807045  [pdf] - 1235241
The Anisotropy of Cosmic Ray Arrival Directions around 10$^{18}$eV
Comments: 17 pages with 16 figures, http://www.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~erina/English.html
Submitted: 1998-07-04, last modified: 1999-05-15
Anisotropy in the arrival directions of cosmic rays with energies above 10$^{17}$eV is studied using data from the Akeno 20 km$^2$ array and the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA), using a total of about 117,000 showers observed during 11 years. In the first harmonic analysis, we have found strong anisotropy of $\sim$ 4% around 10$^{18}$eV, corresponding to a chance probability of 0.2%. With two dimensional analysis in right ascension and declination, this anisotropy is interpreted as an excess of showers near the directions of the Galactic Center and the Cygnus region.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9807193  [pdf] - 102187
Extension of the Cosmic-Ray Energy Spectrum Beyond the Predicted Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz'min Cutoff
Comments: to be published in PRL, 3 figures, REVTEX format
Submitted: 1998-07-18
The cosmic-ray energy spectrum above 10^{18.5} eV is reported using the updated data set of the Akeno Giant Air Shower Array (AGASA) from February 1990 to October 1997. The energy spectrum extends beyond 10^{20} eV and the energy gap between the highest energy event and the others is being filled up with recently observed events. The spectral shape suggests the absence of the 2.7 K cutoff in the energy spectrum or a possible presence of a new component beyond the 2.7 K cutoff.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9706079  [pdf] - 97600
The Detection of TeV Gamma Rays from Crab using the Telescope Array Prototype
Comments: 4 pages, 5 figures, contribution to 25th ICRC Durban
Submitted: 1997-06-08
The Telescope Array prototype detectors were installed at Akeno Observatory and at the Utah Fly's Eye site. Using these detectors, we have observed the Crab Nebula and AGN's since the end of 1995. The successful detections of TeV gamma rays from Crab Nebula and Mkn501 are reported.