sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Muthukrishna, Daniel

Normalized to: Muthukrishna, D.

14 article(s) in total. 559 co-authors, from 1 to 9 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 23,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.06383  [pdf] - 2124582
Using machine learning for transient classification in searches for gravitational-wave counterparts
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-12-13, last modified: 2020-06-12
The large sky localization regions offered by the gravitational-wave interferometers require efficient follow-up of the many counterpart candidates identified by the wide field-of-view telescopes. Given the restricted telescope time, the creation of prioritized lists of the many identified candidates becomes mandatory. Towards this end, we use \text{\astrorapid}, a multi-band photometric lightcurve classifier, to differentiate between kilonovae, supernovae, and other possible transients. We demonstrate our method on the photometric observations of real events. In addtion, the classification performance is tested on simulated lightcurves, both ideally and realistically sampled. We show that after only a few days of observations of an astronomical object, it is possible to rule out candidates as supernovae and other known transients.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.00014  [pdf] - 1974253
RAPID: Early Classification of Explosive Transients using Deep Learning
Comments: Accepted version. 28 pages, 16 figures, 2 tables, PASP Special Issue on Methods for Time-Domain Astrophysics. Submitted: 13 December 2018, Accepted: 26 March 2019
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-10-07
We present RAPID (Real-time Automated Photometric IDentification), a novel time-series classification tool capable of automatically identifying transients from within a day of the initial alert, to the full lifetime of a light curve. Using a deep recurrent neural network with Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), we present the first method specifically designed to provide early classifications of astronomical time-series data, typing 12 different transient classes. Our classifier can process light curves with any phase coverage, and it does not rely on deriving computationally expensive features from the data, making RAPID well-suited for processing the millions of alerts that ongoing and upcoming wide-field surveys such as the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will produce. The classification accuracy improves over the lifetime of the transient as more photometric data becomes available, and across the 12 transient classes, we obtain an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and 0.98 at early and late epochs, respectively. We demonstrate RAPID's ability to effectively provide early classifications of observed transients from the ZTF data stream. We have made RAPID available as an open-source software package (https://astrorapid.readthedocs.io) for machine learning-based alert-brokers to use for the autonomous and quick classification of several thousand light curves within a few seconds.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.02557  [pdf] - 2009984
DASH: Deep Learning for the Automated Spectral Classification of Supernovae and their Hosts
Comments: 15 pages plus appendices, 8 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-10-07
We present DASH (Deep Automated Supernova and Host classifier), a novel software package that automates the classification of the type, age, redshift, and host galaxy of supernova spectra. DASH makes use of a new approach that does not rely on iterative template matching techniques like all previous software, but instead classifies based on the learned features of each supernova's type and age. It has achieved this by employing a deep convolutional neural network to train a matching algorithm. This approach has enabled DASH to be orders of magnitude faster than previous tools, being able to accurately classify hundreds or thousands of objects within seconds. We have tested its performance on four years of data from the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES). The deep learning models were developed using TensorFlow, and were trained using over 4000 supernova spectra taken from the CfA Supernova Program and the Berkeley SN Ia Program as used in SNID (Supernova Identification software, Blondin & Tonry 2007). Unlike template matching methods, the trained models are independent of the number of spectra in the training data, which allows for DASH's unprecedented speed. We have developed both a graphical interface for easy visual classification and analysis of supernovae, and a Python library for the autonomous and quick classification of several supernova spectra. The speed, accuracy, user-friendliness, and versatility of DASH presents an advancement to existing spectral classification tools. We have made the code publicly available on GitHub and PyPI (pip install astrodash) to allow for further contributions and development. The package documentation is available at https://astrodash.readthedocs.io.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.11756  [pdf] - 1924999
Models and Simulations for the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC)
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-03-27, last modified: 2019-07-10
We describe the simulated data sample for the "Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge" (PLAsTiCC), a publicly available challenge to classify transient and variable events that will be observed by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), a new facility expected to start in the early 2020s. The challenge was hosted by Kaggle, ran from 2018 September 28 to 2018 December 17, and included 1,094 teams competing for prizes. Here we provide details of the 18 transient and variable source models, which were not revealed until after the challenge, and release the model libraries at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2612896. We describe the LSST Operations Simulator used to predict realistic observing conditions, and we describe the publicly available SNANA simulation code used to transform the models into observed fluxes and uncertainties in the LSST passbands (ugrizy). Although PLAsTiCC has finished, the publicly available models and simulation tools are being used within the astronomy community to further improve classification, and to study contamination in photometrically identified samples of type Ia supernova used to measure properties of dark energy. Our simulation framework will continue serving as a platform to improve the PLAsTiCC models, and to develop new models.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.02377  [pdf] - 1893288
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation
Brout, D.; Scolnic, D.; Kessler, R.; D'Andrea, C. B.; Davis, T. M.; Gupta, R. R.; Hinton, S. R.; Kim, A. G.; Lasker, J.; Lidman, C.; Macaulay, E.; Möller, A.; Nichol, R. C.; Sako, M.; Smith, M.; Sullivan, M.; Zhang, B.; Andersen, P.; Asorey, J.; Avelino, A.; Bassett, B. A.; Brown, P.; Calcino, J.; Carollo, D.; Challis, P.; Childress, M.; Clocchiatti, A.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Galbany, L.; Glazebrook, K.; Hoormann, J. K.; Kasai, E.; Kirshner, R. P.; Kuehn, K.; Kuhlmann, S.; Lewis, G. F.; Mandel, K. S.; March, M.; Miranda, V.; Morganson, E.; Muthukrishna, D.; Nugent, P.; Palmese, A.; Pan, Y. -C.; Sharp, R.; Sommer, N. E.; Swann, E.; Thomas, R. C.; Tucker, B. E.; Uddin, S. A.; Wester, W.; Abbott, T. M. C.; Allam, S.; Annis, J.; Avila, S.; Bechtol, K.; Bernstein, G. M.; Bertin, E.; Brooks, D.; Burke, D. L.; Rosell, A. Carnero; Kind, M. Carrasco; Carretero, J.; Castander, F. J.; Cunha, C. E.; da Costa, L. N.; Davis, C.; De Vicente, J.; DePoy, D. L.; Desai, S.; Diehl, H. T.; Doel, P.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; Eifler, T. F.; Estrada, J.; Fernandez, E.; Flaugher, B.; Fosalba, P.; Frieman, J.; García-Bellido, J.; Gruen, D.; Gruendl, R. A.; Gutierrez, G.; Hartley, W. G.; Hollowood, D. L.; Honscheid, K.; Hoyle, B.; James, D. J.; Jarvis, M.; Jeltema, T.; Krause, E.; Lahav, O.; Li, T. S.; Lima, M.; Maia, M. A. G.; Marriner, J.; Marshall, J. L.; Martini, P.; Menanteau, F.; Miller, C. J.; Miquel, R.; Ogando, R. L. C.; Plazas, A. A.; Romer, A. K.; Roodman, A.; Rykoff, E. S.; Sanchez, E.; Santiago, B.; Scarpine, V.; Schubnell, M.; Serrano, S.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Smith, R. C.; Soares-Santos, M.; Sobreira, F.; Suchyta, E.; Swanson, M. E. C.; Tarle, G.; Thomas, D.; Troxel, M. A.; Tucker, D. L.; Vikram, V.; Walker, A. R.; Zhang, Y.
Comments: 30 Pages, 18 Figures, 12 Tables. Submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-06-01
We present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN), spanning a redshift range of 0.017<$z$<0.849. We combine the DES-SN sample with an external sample of 122 low-redshift ($z$<0.1) SNe Ia, resulting in a "DES-SN3YR" sample of 329 SNe Ia. Our cosmological analyses are blinded: after combining our DES-SN3YR distances with constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB; Planck Collaboration 2016), our uncertainties in the measurement of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w$, are .042 (stat) and .059 (stat+syst) at 68% confidence. We provide a detailed systematic uncertainty budget, which has nearly equal contributions from photometric calibration, astrophysical bias corrections, and instrumental bias corrections. We also include several new sources of systematic uncertainty. While our sample is <1/3 the size of the Pantheon sample, our constraints on $w$ are only larger by 1.4$\times$, showing the impact of the DES SN Ia light curve quality. We find that the traditional stretch and color standardization parameters of the DES SNe Ia are in agreement with earlier SN Ia samples such as Pan-STARRS1 and the Supernova Legacy Survey. However, we find smaller intrinsic scatter about the Hubble diagram (0.077 mag). Interestingly, we find no evidence for a Hubble residual step ( 0.007 $\pm$ 0.018 mag) as a function of host galaxy mass for the DES subset, in 2.4$\sigma$ tension with previous measurements. We also present novel validation methods of our sample using simulated SNe Ia inserted in DECam images and using large catalog-level simulations to test for biases in our analysis pipelines.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374  [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.; Allam, S.; Andersen, P.; Angus, C.; Asorey, J.; Avelino, A.; Avila, S.; Bassett, B. A.; Bechtol, K.; Bernstein, G. M.; Bertin, E.; Brooks, D.; Brout, D.; Brown, P.; Burke, D. L.; Calcino, J.; Rosell, A. Carnero; Carollo, D.; Kind, M. Carrasco; Carretero, J.; Casas, R.; Castander, F. J.; Cawthon, R.; Challis, P.; Childress, M.; Clocchiatti, A.; Cunha, C. E.; D'Andrea, C. B.; da Costa, L. N.; Davis, C.; Davis, T. M.; De Vicente, J.; DePoy, D. L.; Desai, S.; Diehl, H. T.; Doel, P.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; Eifler, T. F.; Evrard, A. E.; Fernandez, E.; Filippenko, A. V.; Finley, D. A.; Flaugher, B.; Foley, R. J.; Fosalba, P.; Frieman, J.; Galbany, L.; Garcia-Bellido, J.; Gaztanaga, E.; Giannantonio, T.; Glazebrook, K.; Goldstein, D. A.; Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.; Gruen, D.; Gruendl, R. A.; Gschwend, J.; Gupta, R. R.; Gutierrez, G.; Hartley, W. G.; Hinton, S. R.; Hollowood, D. L.; Honscheid, K.; Hoormann, J. K.; Hoyle, B.; James, D. J.; Jeltema, T.; Johnson, M. W. G.; Johnson, M. D.; Kasai, E.; Kent, S.; Kessler, R.; Kim, A. G.; Kirshner, R. P.; Kovacs, E.; Krause, E.; Kron, R.; Kuehn, K.; Kuhlmann, S.; Kuropatkin, N.; Lahav, O.; Lasker, J.; Lewis, G. F.; Li, T. S.; Lidman, C.; Lima, M.; Lin, H.; Macaulay, E.; Maia, M. A. G.; Mandel, K. S.; March, M.; Marriner, J.; Marshall, J. L.; Martini, P.; Menanteau, F.; Miller, C. J.; Miquel, R.; Miranda, V.; Mohr, J. J.; Morganson, E.; Muthukrishna, D.; Möller, A.; Neilsen, E.; Nichol, R. C.; Nord, B.; Nugent, P.; Ogando, R. L. C.; Palmese, A.; Pan, Y. -C.; Plazas, A. A.; Pursiainen, M.; Romer, A. K.; Roodman, A.; Rozo, E.; Rykoff, E. S.; Sako, M.; Sanchez, E.; Scarpine, V.; Schindler, R.; Schubnell, M.; Scolnic, D.; Serrano, S.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Sharp, R.; Smith, M.; Soares-Santos, M.; Sobreira, F.; Sommer, N. E.; Spinka, H.; Suchyta, E.; Sullivan, M.; Swann, E.; Tarle, G.; Thomas, D.; Thomas, R. C.; Troxel, M. A.; Tucker, B. E.; Uddin, S. A.; Walker, A. R.; Wester, W.; Wiseman, P.; Wolf, R. C.; Yanny, B.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of 122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m = 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia, CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa = -0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.02379  [pdf] - 1880992
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: Simulations to Correct Supernova Distance Biases
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-09
We describe catalog-level simulations of Type Ia supernova (SN~Ia) light curves in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN), and in low-redshift samples from the Center for Astrophysics (CfA) and the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP). These simulations are used to model biases from selection effects and light curve analysis, and to determine bias corrections for SN~Ia distance moduli that are used to measure cosmological parameters. To generate realistic light curves, the simulation uses a detailed SN~Ia model, incorporates information from observations (PSF, sky noise, zero point), and uses summary information (e.g., detection efficiency vs. signal to noise ratio) based on 10,000 fake SN light curves whose fluxes were overlaid on images and processed with our analysis pipelines. The quality of the simulation is illustrated by predicting distributions observed in the data. Averaging within redshift bins, we find distance modulus biases up to 0.05~mag over the redshift ranges of the low-z and DES-SN samples. For individual events, particularly those with extreme red or blue color, distance biases can reach 0.4~mag. Therefore, accurately determining bias corrections is critical for precision measurements of cosmological parameters. Files used to make these corrections are available at https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/sn.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.02464  [pdf] - 1859121
4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
de Jong, R. S.; Agertz, O.; Berbel, A. Agudo; Aird, J.; Alexander, D. A.; Amarsi, A.; Anders, F.; Andrae, R.; Ansarinejad, B.; Ansorge, W.; Antilogus, P.; Anwand-Heerwart, H.; Arentsen, A.; Arnadottir, A.; Asplund, M.; Auger, M.; Azais, N.; Baade, D.; Baker, G.; Baker, S.; Balbinot, E.; Baldry, I. K.; Banerji, M.; Barden, S.; Barklem, P.; Barthélémy-Mazot, E.; Battistini, C.; Bauer, S.; Bell, C. P. M.; Bellido-Tirado, O.; Bellstedt, S.; Belokurov, V.; Bensby, T.; Bergemann, M.; Bestenlehner, J. M.; Bielby, R.; Bilicki, M.; Blake, C.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Boeche, C.; Boland, W.; Boller, T.; Bongard, S.; Bongiorno, A.; Bonifacio, P.; Boudon, D.; Brooks, D.; Brown, M. J. I.; Brown, R.; Brüggen, M.; Brynnel, J.; Brzeski, J.; Buchert, T.; Buschkamp, P.; Caffau, E.; Caillier, P.; Carrick, J.; Casagrande, L.; Case, S.; Casey, A.; Cesarini, I.; Cescutti, G.; Chapuis, D.; Chiappini, C.; Childress, M.; Christlieb, N.; Church, R.; Cioni, M. -R. L.; Cluver, M.; Colless, M.; Collett, T.; Comparat, J.; Cooper, A.; Couch, W.; Courbin, F.; Croom, S.; Croton, D.; Daguisé, E.; Dalton, G.; Davies, L. J. M.; Davis, T.; de Laverny, P.; Deason, A.; Dionies, F.; Disseau, K.; Doel, P.; Döscher, D.; Driver, S. P.; Dwelly, T.; Eckert, D.; Edge, A.; Edvardsson, B.; Youssoufi, D. El; Elhaddad, A.; Enke, H.; Erfanianfar, G.; Farrell, T.; Fechner, T.; Feiz, C.; Feltzing, S.; Ferreras, I.; Feuerstein, D.; Feuillet, D.; Finoguenov, A.; Ford, D.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fouesneau, M.; Frenk, C.; Frey, S.; Gaessler, W.; Geier, S.; Fusillo, N. Gentile; Gerhard, O.; Giannantonio, T.; Giannone, D.; Gibson, B.; Gillingham, P.; González-Fernández, C.; Gonzalez-Solares, E.; Gottloeber, S.; Gould, A.; Grebel, E. K.; Gueguen, A.; Guiglion, G.; Haehnelt, M.; Hahn, T.; Hansen, C. J.; Hartman, H.; Hauptner, K.; Hawkins, K.; Haynes, D.; Haynes, R.; Heiter, U.; Helmi, A.; Aguayo, C. Hernandez; Hewett, P.; Hinton, S.; Hobbs, D.; Hoenig, S.; Hofman, D.; Hook, I.; Hopgood, J.; Hopkins, A.; Hourihane, A.; Howes, L.; Howlett, C.; Huet, T.; Irwin, M.; Iwert, O.; Jablonka, P.; Jahn, T.; Jahnke, K.; Jarno, A.; Jin, S.; Jofre, P.; Johl, D.; Jones, D.; Jönsson, H.; Jordan, C.; Karovicova, I.; Khalatyan, A.; Kelz, A.; Kennicutt, R.; King, D.; Kitaura, F.; Klar, J.; Klauser, U.; Kneib, J.; Koch, A.; Koposov, S.; Kordopatis, G.; Korn, A.; Kosmalski, J.; Kotak, R.; Kovalev, M.; Kreckel, K.; Kripak, Y.; Krumpe, M.; Kuijken, K.; Kunder, A.; Kushniruk, I.; Lam, M. I; Lamer, G.; Laurent, F.; Lawrence, J.; Lehmitz, M.; Lemasle, B.; Lewis, J.; Li, B.; Lidman, C.; Lind, K.; Liske, J.; Lizon, J. -L.; Loveday, J.; Ludwig, H. -G.; McDermid, R. M.; Maguire, K.; Mainieri, V.; Mali, S.; Mandel, H.; Mandel, K.; Mannering, L.; Martell, S.; Delgado, D. Martinez; Matijevic, G.; McGregor, H.; McMahon, R.; McMillan, P.; Mena, O.; Merloni, A.; Meyer, M. J.; Michel, C.; Micheva, G.; Migniau, J. -E.; Minchev, I.; Monari, G.; Muller, R.; Murphy, D.; Muthukrishna, D.; Nandra, K.; Navarro, R.; Ness, M.; Nichani, V.; Nichol, R.; Nicklas, H.; Niederhofer, F.; Norberg, P.; Obreschkow, D.; Oliver, S.; Owers, M.; Pai, N.; Pankratow, S.; Parkinson, D.; Parry, I.; Paschke, J.; Paterson, R.; Pecontal, A.; Phillips, D.; Pillepich, A.; Pinard, L.; Pirard, J.; Piskunov, N.; Plank, V.; Plüschke, D.; Pons, E.; Popesso, P.; Power, C.; Pragt, J.; Pramskiy, A.; Pryer, D.; Quattri, M.; Queiroz, A. B. de Andrade; Quirrenbach, A.; Rahurkar, S.; Raichoor, A.; Ramstedt, S.; Rau, A.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Reiss, R.; Renaud, F.; Revaz, Y.; Rhode, P.; Richard, J.; Richter, A. D.; Rix, H. -W.; Robotham, A. S. G.; Roelfsema, R.; Romaniello, M.; Rosario, D.; Rothmaier, F.; Roukema, B.; Ruchti, G.; Rupprecht, G.; Rybizki, J.; Ryde, N.; Saar, A.; Sadler, E.; Sahlén, M.; Salvato, M.; Sassolas, B.; Saunders, W.; Saviauk, A.; Sbordone, L.; Schmidt, T.; Schnurr, O.; Scholz, R. -D.; Schwope, A.; Seifert, W.; Shanks, T.; Sheinis, A.; Sivov, T.; Skúladóttir, Á.; Smartt, S.; Smedley, S.; Smith, G.; Smith, R.; Sorce, J.; Spitler, L.; Starkenburg, E.; Steinmetz, M.; Stilz, I.; Storm, J.; Sullivan, M.; Sutherland, W.; Swann, E.; Tamone, A.; Taylor, E. N.; Teillon, J.; Tempel, E.; ter Horst, R.; Thi, W. -F.; Tolstoy, E.; Trager, S.; Traven, G.; Tremblay, P. -E.; Tresse, L.; Valentini, M.; van de Weygaert, R.; Ancker, M. van den; Veljanoski, J.; Venkatesan, S.; Wagner, L.; Wagner, K.; Walcher, C. J.; Waller, L.; Walton, N.; Wang, L.; Winkler, R.; Wisotzki, L.; Worley, C. C.; Worseck, G.; Xiang, M.; Xu, W.; Yong, D.; Zhao, C.; Zheng, J.; Zscheyge, F.; Zucker, D.
Comments: Part of the 4MOST issue of The Messenger, published in preparation of 4MOST Community Workshop, see http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2019/4MOST.html
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-04-01
We introduce the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), a new high-multiplex, wide-field spectroscopic survey facility under development for the four-metre-class Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) at Paranal. Its key specifications are: a large field of view (FoV) of 4.2 square degrees and a high multiplex capability, with 1624 fibres feeding two low-resolution spectrographs ($R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 6500$), and 812 fibres transferring light to the high-resolution spectrograph ($R \sim 20\,000$). After a description of the instrument and its expected performance, a short overview is given of its operational scheme and planned 4MOST Consortium science; these aspects are covered in more detail in other articles in this edition of The Messenger. Finally, the processes, schedules, and policies concerning the selection of ESO Community Surveys are presented, commencing with a singular opportunity to submit Letters of Intent for Public Surveys during the first five years of 4MOST operations.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.09565  [pdf] - 1791507
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy Survey: Survey Overview and Supernova Spectroscopy
D'Andrea, C. B.; Smith, M.; Sullivan, M.; Nichol, R. C.; Thomas, R. C.; Kim, A. G.; Möller, A.; Sako, M.; Castander, F. J.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Galbany, L.; González-Gaitán, S.; Kasai, E.; Kirshner, R. P.; Lidman, C.; Scolnic, D.; Brout, D.; Davis, T. M.; Gupta, R. R.; Hinton, S. R.; Kessler, R.; Lasker, J.; Macaulay, E.; Wolf, R. C.; Zhang, B.; Asorey, J.; Avelino, A.; Bassett, B. A.; Calcino, J.; Carollo, D.; Casas, R.; Challis, P.; Childress, M.; Clocchiatti, A.; Crawford, S.; Glazebrook, K.; Goldstein, D. A.; Graham, M. L.; Hoormann, J. K.; Kuehn, K.; Lewis, G. F.; Mandel, K. S.; Morganson, E.; Muthukrishna, D.; Nugent, P.; Pan, Y. -C.; Pursiainen, M.; Sharp, R.; Sommer, N. E.; Swann, E.; Tucker, B. E.; Uddin, S. A.; Wiseman, P.; Zheng, W.; Abbott, T. M. C.; Annis, J.; Avila, S.; Bechtol, K.; Bernstein, G. M.; Bertin, E.; Brooks, D.; Burke, D. L.; Rosell, A. Carnero; Kind, M. Carrasco; Carretero, J.; Cunha, C. E.; da Costa, L. N.; Davis, C.; De Vicente, J.; Diehl, H. T.; Eifler, T. F.; Estrada, J.; Frieman, J.; García-Bellido, J.; Gaztanaga, E.; Gerdes, D. W.; Gruen, D.; Gruendl, R. A.; Gschwend, J.; Gutierrez, G.; Hartley, W. G.; Hollowood, D. L.; Honscheid, K.; Hoyle, B.; James, D. J.; Johnson, M. W. G.; Johnson, M. D.; Kuropatkin, N.; Li, T. S.; Lima, M.; Maia, M. A. G.; Marshall, J. L.; Martini, P.; Menanteau, F.; Miller, C. J.; Miquel, R.; Neilsen, E.; Ogando, R. L. C.; Plazas, A. A.; Romer, A. K.; Sanchez, E.; Scarpine, V.; Schubnell, M.; Serrano, S.; Sevilla-Noarbe, I.; Sobreira, F.; Suchyta, E.; Tarle, G.; Tucker, D. L.; Wester, W.
Comments: 25 pages, 14 figures, 8 tables. Submitted to AJ
Submitted: 2018-11-23
We present spectroscopy from the first three seasons of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN). We describe the supernova spectroscopic program in full: strategy, observations, data reduction, and classification. We have spectroscopically confirmed 307 supernovae, including 251 type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) over a redshift range of $0.017 < z < 0.85$. We determine the effective spectroscopic selection function for our sample, and use it to investigate the redshift-dependent bias on the distance moduli of SNe Ia we have classified. We also provide a full overview of the strategy, observations, and data products of DES-SN, which has discovered 12,015 likely supernovae during these first three seasons. The data presented here are used for the first cosmology analysis by DES-SN ('DES-SN3YR'), the results of which are given in DES Collaboration (2018a).
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1809.11145  [pdf] - 1979510
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC): Selection of a performance metric for classification probabilities balancing diverse science goals
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-09-28
Classification of transient and variable light curves is an essential step in using astronomical observations to develop an understanding of their underlying physical processes. However, upcoming deep photometric surveys, including the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), will produce a deluge of low signal-to-noise data for which traditional labeling procedures are inappropriate. Probabilistic classification is more appropriate for the data but are incompatible with the traditional metrics used on deterministic classifications. Furthermore, large survey collaborations intend to use these classification probabilities for diverse science objectives, indicating a need for a metric that balances a variety of goals. We describe the process used to develop an optimal performance metric for an open classification challenge that seeks probabilistic classifications and must serve many scientific interests. The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC) is an open competition aiming to identify promising techniques for obtaining classification probabilities of transient and variable objects by engaging a broader community both within and outside astronomy. Using mock classification probability submissions emulating archetypes of those anticipated of PLAsTiCC, we compare the sensitivity of metrics of classification probabilities under various weighting schemes, finding that they yield qualitatively consistent results. We choose as a metric for PLAsTiCC a weighted modification of the cross-entropy because it can be meaningfully interpreted. Finally, we propose extensions of our methodology to ever more complex challenge goals and suggest some guiding principles for approaching the choice of a metric of probabilistic classifications.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.00001  [pdf] - 1758753
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC): Data set
Comments: Research note to accompany the https://www.kaggle.com/c/PLAsTiCC-2018 challenge
Submitted: 2018-09-28
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC) is an open data challenge to classify simulated astronomical time-series data in preparation for observations from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), which will achieve first light in 2019 and commence its 10-year main survey in 2022. LSST will revolutionize our understanding of the changing sky, discovering and measuring millions of time-varying objects. In this challenge, we pose the question: how well can we classify objects in the sky that vary in brightness from simulated LSST time-series data, with all its challenges of non-representativity? In this note we explain the need for a data challenge to help classify such astronomical sources and describe the PLAsTiCC data set and Kaggle data challenge, noting that while the references are provided for context, they are not needed to participate in the challenge.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.04780  [pdf] - 1715387
Multi-Messenger Astrophysics: Harnessing the Data Revolution
Comments: workshop summary, 20 pages, by the participants of the Cyberinfrastructure for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics NSF-funded Workshop Held on 23-24 May 2018 at the University of Maryland
Submitted: 2018-07-12
The past year has witnessed discovery of the first identified counterparts to a gravitational wave transient (GW 170817A) and a very high-energy neutrino (IceCube-170922A). These source identifications, and ensuing detailed studies, have realized longstanding dreams of astronomers and physicists to routinely carry out observations of cosmic sources by other than electromagnetic means, and inaugurated the era of "multi-messenger" astronomy. While this new era promises extraordinary physical insights into the universe, it brings with it new challenges, including: highly heterogeneous, high-volume, high-velocity datasets; globe-spanning cross-disciplinary teams of researchers, regularly brought together into transient collaborations; an extraordinary breadth and depth of domain-specific knowledge and computing resources required to anticipate, model, and interpret observations; and the routine need for adaptive, distributed, rapid-response observing campaigns to fully exploit the scientific potential of each source. We argue, therefore, that the time is ripe for the community to conceive and propose an Institute for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics that would coordinate its resources in a sustained and strategic fashion to efficiently address these challenges, while simultaneously serving as a center for education and key supporting activities. In this fashion, we can prepare now to realize the bright future that we see, beyond, through these newly opened windows onto the universe.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.04526  [pdf] - 1587115
OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: Three year results and first data release
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Redshift data release is available at http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/ozdes/DR1
Submitted: 2017-08-15
We present results for the first three years of OzDES, a six-year programme to obtain redshifts for objects in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernova fields using the 2dF fibre positioner and AAOmega spectrograph on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. OzDES is a multi-object spectroscopic survey targeting multiple types of targets at multiple epochs over a multi-year baseline, and is one of the first multi-object spectroscopic surveys to dynamically include transients into the target list soon after their discovery. At the end of three years, OzDES has spectroscopically confirmed almost 100 supernovae, and has measured redshifts for 17,000 objects, including the redshifts of 2,566 supernova hosts. We examine how our ability to measure redshifts for targets of various types depends on signal-to-noise, magnitude, and exposure time, finding that our redshift success rate increases significantly at a signal-to-noise of 2 to 3 per 1-Angstrom bin. We also find that the change in signal-to-noise with exposure time closely matches the Poisson limit for stacked exposures as long as 10 hours. We use these results to predict the redshift yield of the full OzDES survey, as well as the potential yields of future surveys on other facilities such as the 4m Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS), and the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE). This work marks the first OzDES data release, comprising 14,693 redshifts. OzDES is on target to obtain over a yield of approximately 5,700 supernova host-galaxy redshifts.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.01884  [pdf] - 1525708
A cosmographic analysis of the transition to acceleration using SN-Ia and BAO
Comments: 21 pages, 10 figures, 4 tables
Submitted: 2016-07-07, last modified: 2016-07-28
We explore the distance-redshift relation using a cosmographic methodology, and show how the cosmographic parameters can be used to determine the redshift of transition from deceleration to acceleration. Such a transition at a low redshift occupies only a small region of the available parameter space, and the prior assumption of an early period of deceleration can significantly change the posterior constraints. We use available type Ia Supernovae (SN-Ia) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data sets to determine the cosmographic deceleration $q_0$, jerk $j_0$, snap $s_0$ and lerk $l_0$ parameters. The parameters are consistent with the $\Lambda$CDM model for a flat universe within 2-sigma. We derive constraints on the redshift of transition from deceleration to acceleration for the different expansions, and find $z_{\rm acc} > 0.14$ at 95% confidence in the most conservative case.