Normalized to: Muthukrishna, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.06383 [pdf] - 2124582
Using machine learning for transient classification in searches for
gravitational-wave counterparts
Submitted: 2019-12-13, last modified: 2020-06-12
The large sky localization regions offered by the gravitational-wave
interferometers require efficient follow-up of the many counterpart candidates
identified by the wide field-of-view telescopes. Given the restricted telescope
time, the creation of prioritized lists of the many identified candidates
becomes mandatory. Towards this end, we use \text{\astrorapid}, a multi-band
photometric lightcurve classifier, to differentiate between kilonovae,
supernovae, and other possible transients. We demonstrate our method on the
photometric observations of real events. In addtion, the classification
performance is tested on simulated lightcurves, both ideally and realistically
sampled. We show that after only a few days of observations of an astronomical
object, it is possible to rule out candidates as supernovae and other known
transients.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.00014 [pdf] - 1974253
RAPID: Early Classification of Explosive Transients using Deep Learning
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-10-07
We present RAPID (Real-time Automated Photometric IDentification), a novel
time-series classification tool capable of automatically identifying transients
from within a day of the initial alert, to the full lifetime of a light curve.
Using a deep recurrent neural network with Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), we
present the first method specifically designed to provide early classifications
of astronomical time-series data, typing 12 different transient classes. Our
classifier can process light curves with any phase coverage, and it does not
rely on deriving computationally expensive features from the data, making RAPID
well-suited for processing the millions of alerts that ongoing and upcoming
wide-field surveys such as the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), and the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will produce. The classification accuracy
improves over the lifetime of the transient as more photometric data becomes
available, and across the 12 transient classes, we obtain an average area under
the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 and 0.98 at early and late
epochs, respectively. We demonstrate RAPID's ability to effectively provide
early classifications of observed transients from the ZTF data stream. We have
made RAPID available as an open-source software package
(https://astrorapid.readthedocs.io) for machine learning-based alert-brokers to
use for the autonomous and quick classification of several thousand light
curves within a few seconds.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02557 [pdf] - 2009984
DASH: Deep Learning for the Automated Spectral Classification of
Supernovae and their Hosts
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-10-07
We present DASH (Deep Automated Supernova and Host classifier), a novel
software package that automates the classification of the type, age, redshift,
and host galaxy of supernova spectra. DASH makes use of a new approach that
does not rely on iterative template matching techniques like all previous
software, but instead classifies based on the learned features of each
supernova's type and age. It has achieved this by employing a deep
convolutional neural network to train a matching algorithm. This approach has
enabled DASH to be orders of magnitude faster than previous tools, being able
to accurately classify hundreds or thousands of objects within seconds. We have
tested its performance on four years of data from the Australian Dark Energy
Survey (OzDES). The deep learning models were developed using TensorFlow, and
were trained using over 4000 supernova spectra taken from the CfA Supernova
Program and the Berkeley SN Ia Program as used in SNID (Supernova
Identification software, Blondin & Tonry 2007). Unlike template matching
methods, the trained models are independent of the number of spectra in the
training data, which allows for DASH's unprecedented speed. We have developed
both a graphical interface for easy visual classification and analysis of
supernovae, and a Python library for the autonomous and quick classification of
several supernova spectra. The speed, accuracy, user-friendliness, and
versatility of DASH presents an advancement to existing spectral classification
tools. We have made the code publicly available on GitHub and PyPI (pip install
astrodash) to allow for further contributions and development. The package
documentation is available at https://astrodash.readthedocs.io.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.11756 [pdf] - 1924999
Models and Simulations for the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series
Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC)
Kessler, R.;
Narayan, G.;
Avelino, A.;
Bachelet, E.;
Biswas, R.;
Brown, P. J.;
Chernoff, D. F.;
Connolly, A. J.;
Dai, M.;
Daniel, S.;
Di Stefano, R.;
Drout, M. R.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Graham, M. L.;
Hložek, R.;
Ishida, E. E. O.;
Guillochon, J.;
Jha, S. W.;
Jones, D. O.;
Mandel, K. S.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
O'Grady, A.;
Peters, C. M.;
Pierel, J. R.;
Ponder, K. A.;
Prša, A.;
Rodney, S.;
Villar, V. A.
Submitted: 2019-03-27, last modified: 2019-07-10
We describe the simulated data sample for the "Photometric LSST Astronomical
Time Series Classification Challenge" (PLAsTiCC), a publicly available
challenge to classify transient and variable events that will be observed by
the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), a new facility expected to start in
the early 2020s. The challenge was hosted by Kaggle, ran from 2018 September 28
to 2018 December 17, and included 1,094 teams competing for prizes. Here we
provide details of the 18 transient and variable source models, which were not
revealed until after the challenge, and release the model libraries at
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2612896. We describe the LSST Operations
Simulator used to predict realistic observing conditions, and we describe the
publicly available SNANA simulation code used to transform the models into
observed fluxes and uncertainties in the LSST passbands (ugrizy). Although
PLAsTiCC has finished, the publicly available models and simulation tools are
being used within the astronomy community to further improve classification,
and to study contamination in photometrically identified samples of type Ia
supernova used to measure properties of dark energy. Our simulation framework
will continue serving as a platform to improve the PLAsTiCC models, and to
develop new models.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02377 [pdf] - 1893288
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Analysis, Systematic Uncertainties, and Validation
Brout, D.;
Scolnic, D.;
Kessler, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Andersen, P.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Brown, P.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Miranda, V.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wester, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-06-01
We present the analysis underpinning the measurement of cosmological
parameters from 207 spectroscopically classified type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia)
from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN), spanning a redshift range of 0.017<$z$<0.849. We combine the DES-SN
sample with an external sample of 122 low-redshift ($z$<0.1) SNe Ia, resulting
in a "DES-SN3YR" sample of 329 SNe Ia. Our cosmological analyses are blinded:
after combining our DES-SN3YR distances with constraints from the Cosmic
Microwave Background (CMB; Planck Collaboration 2016), our uncertainties in the
measurement of the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w$, are .042
(stat) and .059 (stat+syst) at 68% confidence. We provide a detailed systematic
uncertainty budget, which has nearly equal contributions from photometric
calibration, astrophysical bias corrections, and instrumental bias corrections.
We also include several new sources of systematic uncertainty. While our sample
is <1/3 the size of the Pantheon sample, our constraints on $w$ are only larger
by 1.4$\times$, showing the impact of the DES SN Ia light curve quality. We
find that the traditional stretch and color standardization parameters of the
DES SNe Ia are in agreement with earlier SN Ia samples such as Pan-STARRS1 and
the Supernova Legacy Survey. However, we find smaller intrinsic scatter about
the Hubble diagram (0.077 mag). Interestingly, we find no evidence for a Hubble
residual step ( 0.007 $\pm$ 0.018 mag) as a function of host galaxy mass for
the DES subset, in 2.4$\sigma$ tension with previous measurements. We also
present novel validation methods of our sample using simulated SNe Ia inserted
in DECam images and using large catalog-level simulations to test for biases in
our analysis pipelines.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374 [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Angus, C.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kovacs, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swann, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wiseman, P.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe
Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of
122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is
based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia
discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias
corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model
we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and
combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m
= 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia,
CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa =
-0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant
and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02379 [pdf] - 1880992
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernova from the Dark Energy
Survey: Simulations to Correct Supernova Distance Biases
Kessler, R.;
Brout, D.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Davis, T. M.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Lasker, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Andersen, P.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crawford, S.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-09
We describe catalog-level simulations of Type Ia supernova (SN~Ia) light
curves in the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN), and in
low-redshift samples from the Center for Astrophysics (CfA) and the Carnegie
Supernova Project (CSP). These simulations are used to model biases from
selection effects and light curve analysis, and to determine bias corrections
for SN~Ia distance moduli that are used to measure cosmological parameters. To
generate realistic light curves, the simulation uses a detailed SN~Ia model,
incorporates information from observations (PSF, sky noise, zero point), and
uses summary information (e.g., detection efficiency vs. signal to noise ratio)
based on 10,000 fake SN light curves whose fluxes were overlaid on images and
processed with our analysis pipelines. The quality of the simulation is
illustrated by predicting distributions observed in the data. Averaging within
redshift bins, we find distance modulus biases up to 0.05~mag over the redshift
ranges of the low-z and DES-SN samples. For individual events, particularly
those with extreme red or blue color, distance biases can reach 0.4~mag.
Therefore, accurately determining bias corrections is critical for precision
measurements of cosmological parameters. Files used to make these corrections
are available at https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/sn.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02464 [pdf] - 1859121
4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
de Jong, R. S.;
Agertz, O.;
Berbel, A. Agudo;
Aird, J.;
Alexander, D. A.;
Amarsi, A.;
Anders, F.;
Andrae, R.;
Ansarinejad, B.;
Ansorge, W.;
Antilogus, P.;
Anwand-Heerwart, H.;
Arentsen, A.;
Arnadottir, A.;
Asplund, M.;
Auger, M.;
Azais, N.;
Baade, D.;
Baker, G.;
Baker, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Baldry, I. K.;
Banerji, M.;
Barden, S.;
Barklem, P.;
Barthélémy-Mazot, E.;
Battistini, C.;
Bauer, S.;
Bell, C. P. M.;
Bellido-Tirado, O.;
Bellstedt, S.;
Belokurov, V.;
Bensby, T.;
Bergemann, M.;
Bestenlehner, J. M.;
Bielby, R.;
Bilicki, M.;
Blake, C.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Boeche, C.;
Boland, W.;
Boller, T.;
Bongard, S.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bonifacio, P.;
Boudon, D.;
Brooks, D.;
Brown, M. J. I.;
Brown, R.;
Brüggen, M.;
Brynnel, J.;
Brzeski, J.;
Buchert, T.;
Buschkamp, P.;
Caffau, E.;
Caillier, P.;
Carrick, J.;
Casagrande, L.;
Case, S.;
Casey, A.;
Cesarini, I.;
Cescutti, G.;
Chapuis, D.;
Chiappini, C.;
Childress, M.;
Christlieb, N.;
Church, R.;
Cioni, M. -R. L.;
Cluver, M.;
Colless, M.;
Collett, T.;
Comparat, J.;
Cooper, A.;
Couch, W.;
Courbin, F.;
Croom, S.;
Croton, D.;
Daguisé, E.;
Dalton, G.;
Davies, L. J. M.;
Davis, T.;
de Laverny, P.;
Deason, A.;
Dionies, F.;
Disseau, K.;
Doel, P.;
Döscher, D.;
Driver, S. P.;
Dwelly, T.;
Eckert, D.;
Edge, A.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Youssoufi, D. El;
Elhaddad, A.;
Enke, H.;
Erfanianfar, G.;
Farrell, T.;
Fechner, T.;
Feiz, C.;
Feltzing, S.;
Ferreras, I.;
Feuerstein, D.;
Feuillet, D.;
Finoguenov, A.;
Ford, D.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frenk, C.;
Frey, S.;
Gaessler, W.;
Geier, S.;
Fusillo, N. Gentile;
Gerhard, O.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Giannone, D.;
Gibson, B.;
Gillingham, P.;
González-Fernández, C.;
Gonzalez-Solares, E.;
Gottloeber, S.;
Gould, A.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guiglion, G.;
Haehnelt, M.;
Hahn, T.;
Hansen, C. J.;
Hartman, H.;
Hauptner, K.;
Hawkins, K.;
Haynes, D.;
Haynes, R.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Aguayo, C. Hernandez;
Hewett, P.;
Hinton, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hoenig, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Hook, I.;
Hopgood, J.;
Hopkins, A.;
Hourihane, A.;
Howes, L.;
Howlett, C.;
Huet, T.;
Irwin, M.;
Iwert, O.;
Jablonka, P.;
Jahn, T.;
Jahnke, K.;
Jarno, A.;
Jin, S.;
Jofre, P.;
Johl, D.;
Jones, D.;
Jönsson, H.;
Jordan, C.;
Karovicova, I.;
Khalatyan, A.;
Kelz, A.;
Kennicutt, R.;
King, D.;
Kitaura, F.;
Klar, J.;
Klauser, U.;
Kneib, J.;
Koch, A.;
Koposov, S.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Korn, A.;
Kosmalski, J.;
Kotak, R.;
Kovalev, M.;
Kreckel, K.;
Kripak, Y.;
Krumpe, M.;
Kuijken, K.;
Kunder, A.;
Kushniruk, I.;
Lam, M. I;
Lamer, G.;
Laurent, F.;
Lawrence, J.;
Lehmitz, M.;
Lemasle, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, B.;
Lidman, C.;
Lind, K.;
Liske, J.;
Lizon, J. -L.;
Loveday, J.;
Ludwig, H. -G.;
McDermid, R. M.;
Maguire, K.;
Mainieri, V.;
Mali, S.;
Mandel, H.;
Mandel, K.;
Mannering, L.;
Martell, S.;
Delgado, D. Martinez;
Matijevic, G.;
McGregor, H.;
McMahon, R.;
McMillan, P.;
Mena, O.;
Merloni, A.;
Meyer, M. J.;
Michel, C.;
Micheva, G.;
Migniau, J. -E.;
Minchev, I.;
Monari, G.;
Muller, R.;
Murphy, D.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nandra, K.;
Navarro, R.;
Ness, M.;
Nichani, V.;
Nichol, R.;
Nicklas, H.;
Niederhofer, F.;
Norberg, P.;
Obreschkow, D.;
Oliver, S.;
Owers, M.;
Pai, N.;
Pankratow, S.;
Parkinson, D.;
Parry, I.;
Paschke, J.;
Paterson, R.;
Pecontal, A.;
Phillips, D.;
Pillepich, A.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirard, J.;
Piskunov, N.;
Plank, V.;
Plüschke, D.;
Pons, E.;
Popesso, P.;
Power, C.;
Pragt, J.;
Pramskiy, A.;
Pryer, D.;
Quattri, M.;
Queiroz, A. B. de Andrade;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rahurkar, S.;
Raichoor, A.;
Ramstedt, S.;
Rau, A.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Reiss, R.;
Renaud, F.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rhode, P.;
Richard, J.;
Richter, A. D.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Robotham, A. S. G.;
Roelfsema, R.;
Romaniello, M.;
Rosario, D.;
Rothmaier, F.;
Roukema, B.;
Ruchti, G.;
Rupprecht, G.;
Rybizki, J.;
Ryde, N.;
Saar, A.;
Sadler, E.;
Sahlén, M.;
Salvato, M.;
Sassolas, B.;
Saunders, W.;
Saviauk, A.;
Sbordone, L.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schnurr, O.;
Scholz, R. -D.;
Schwope, A.;
Seifert, W.;
Shanks, T.;
Sheinis, A.;
Sivov, T.;
Skúladóttir, Á.;
Smartt, S.;
Smedley, S.;
Smith, G.;
Smith, R.;
Sorce, J.;
Spitler, L.;
Starkenburg, E.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stilz, I.;
Storm, J.;
Sullivan, M.;
Sutherland, W.;
Swann, E.;
Tamone, A.;
Taylor, E. N.;
Teillon, J.;
Tempel, E.;
ter Horst, R.;
Thi, W. -F.;
Tolstoy, E.;
Trager, S.;
Traven, G.;
Tremblay, P. -E.;
Tresse, L.;
Valentini, M.;
van de Weygaert, R.;
Ancker, M. van den;
Veljanoski, J.;
Venkatesan, S.;
Wagner, L.;
Wagner, K.;
Walcher, C. J.;
Waller, L.;
Walton, N.;
Wang, L.;
Winkler, R.;
Wisotzki, L.;
Worley, C. C.;
Worseck, G.;
Xiang, M.;
Xu, W.;
Yong, D.;
Zhao, C.;
Zheng, J.;
Zscheyge, F.;
Zucker, D.
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-04-01
We introduce the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), a new
high-multiplex, wide-field spectroscopic survey facility under development for
the four-metre-class Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy
(VISTA) at Paranal. Its key specifications are: a large field of view (FoV) of
4.2 square degrees and a high multiplex capability, with 1624 fibres feeding
two low-resolution spectrographs ($R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 6500$), and
812 fibres transferring light to the high-resolution spectrograph ($R \sim
20\,000$). After a description of the instrument and its expected performance,
a short overview is given of its operational scheme and planned 4MOST
Consortium science; these aspects are covered in more detail in other articles
in this edition of The Messenger. Finally, the processes, schedules, and
policies concerning the selection of ESO Community Surveys are presented,
commencing with a singular opportunity to submit Letters of Intent for Public
Surveys during the first five years of 4MOST operations.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.09565 [pdf] - 1791507
First Cosmology Results Using Type Ia Supernovae From the Dark Energy
Survey: Survey Overview and Supernova Spectroscopy
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Smith, M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Kim, A. G.;
Möller, A.;
Sako, M.;
Castander, F. J.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galbany, L.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Kasai, E.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Lidman, C.;
Scolnic, D.;
Brout, D.;
Davis, T. M.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Kessler, R.;
Lasker, J.;
Macaulay, E.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Zhang, B.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Casas, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crawford, S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Graham, M. L.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Mandel, K. S.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Wiseman, P.;
Zheng, W.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-11-23
We present spectroscopy from the first three seasons of the Dark Energy
Survey Supernova Program (DES-SN). We describe the supernova spectroscopic
program in full: strategy, observations, data reduction, and classification. We
have spectroscopically confirmed 307 supernovae, including 251 type Ia
supernovae (SNe Ia) over a redshift range of $0.017 < z < 0.85$. We determine
the effective spectroscopic selection function for our sample, and use it to
investigate the redshift-dependent bias on the distance moduli of SNe Ia we
have classified. We also provide a full overview of the strategy, observations,
and data products of DES-SN, which has discovered 12,015 likely supernovae
during these first three seasons. The data presented here are used for the
first cosmology analysis by DES-SN ('DES-SN3YR'), the results of which are
given in DES Collaboration (2018a).
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.11145 [pdf] - 1979510
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge
(PLAsTiCC): Selection of a performance metric for classification
probabilities balancing diverse science goals
Malz, Alex;
Hložek, Renée;
Allam, Tarek;
Bahmanyar, Anita;
Biswas, Rahul;
Dai, Mi;
Galbany, Lluís;
Ishida, Emille;
Jha, Saurabh;
Jones, David;
Kessler, Rick;
Lochner, Michelle;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Mandel, Kaisey;
Martínez-Galarza, Rafael;
McEwen, Jason;
Muthukrishna, Daniel;
Narayan, Gautham;
Peiris, Hiranya;
Peters, Christina;
Setzer, Christian;
Collaboration, The LSST Dark Energy Science;
Transients, The LSST;
Collaboration, Variable Stars Science
Submitted: 2018-09-28
Classification of transient and variable light curves is an essential step in
using astronomical observations to develop an understanding of their underlying
physical processes. However, upcoming deep photometric surveys, including the
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), will produce a deluge of low
signal-to-noise data for which traditional labeling procedures are
inappropriate. Probabilistic classification is more appropriate for the data
but are incompatible with the traditional metrics used on deterministic
classifications. Furthermore, large survey collaborations intend to use these
classification probabilities for diverse science objectives, indicating a need
for a metric that balances a variety of goals. We describe the process used to
develop an optimal performance metric for an open classification challenge that
seeks probabilistic classifications and must serve many scientific interests.
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge
(PLAsTiCC) is an open competition aiming to identify promising techniques for
obtaining classification probabilities of transient and variable objects by
engaging a broader community both within and outside astronomy. Using mock
classification probability submissions emulating archetypes of those
anticipated of PLAsTiCC, we compare the sensitivity of metrics of
classification probabilities under various weighting schemes, finding that they
yield qualitatively consistent results. We choose as a metric for PLAsTiCC a
weighted modification of the cross-entropy because it can be meaningfully
interpreted. Finally, we propose extensions of our methodology to ever more
complex challenge goals and suggest some guiding principles for approaching the
choice of a metric of probabilistic classifications.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.00001 [pdf] - 1758753
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-series Classification Challenge
(PLAsTiCC): Data set
The PLAsTiCC team;
Allam, Tarek;
Bahmanyar, Anita;
Biswas, Rahul;
Dai, Mi;
Galbany, Lluís;
Hložek, Renée;
Ishida, Emille E. O.;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
Jones, David O.;
Kessler, Richard;
Lochner, Michelle;
Mahabal, Ashish A.;
Malz, Alex I.;
Mandel, Kaisey S.;
Martínez-Galarza, Juan Rafael;
McEwen, Jason D.;
Muthukrishna, Daniel;
Narayan, Gautham;
Peiris, Hiranya;
Peters, Christina M.;
Ponder, Kara;
Setzer, Christian N.;
Collaboration, The LSST Dark Energy Science;
Transients, The LSST;
Collaboration, Variable Stars Science
Submitted: 2018-09-28
The Photometric LSST Astronomical Time Series Classification Challenge
(PLAsTiCC) is an open data challenge to classify simulated astronomical
time-series data in preparation for observations from the Large Synoptic Survey
Telescope (LSST), which will achieve first light in 2019 and commence its
10-year main survey in 2022. LSST will revolutionize our understanding of the
changing sky, discovering and measuring millions of time-varying objects.
In this challenge, we pose the question: how well can we classify objects in
the sky that vary in brightness from simulated LSST time-series data, with all
its challenges of non-representativity? In this note we explain the need for a
data challenge to help classify such astronomical sources and describe the
PLAsTiCC data set and Kaggle data challenge, noting that while the references
are provided for context, they are not needed to participate in the challenge.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.04780 [pdf] - 1715387
Multi-Messenger Astrophysics: Harnessing the Data Revolution
Allen, Gabrielle;
Anderson, Warren;
Blaufuss, Erik;
Bloom, Joshua S.;
Brady, Patrick;
Burke-Spolaor, Sarah;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Connolly, Andrew;
Couvares, Peter;
Fox, Derek;
Gal-Yam, Avishay;
Gezari, Suvi;
Goodman, Alyssa;
Grant, Darren;
Groot, Paul;
Guillochon, James;
Hanna, Chad;
Hogg, David W.;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Howell, D. Andrew;
Kaplan, David;
Katsavounidis, Erik;
Kowalski, Marek;
Lehner, Luis;
Muthukrishna, Daniel;
Narayan, Gautham;
Peek, J. E. G.;
Saha, Abhijit;
Shawhan, Peter;
Taboada, Ignacio
Submitted: 2018-07-12
The past year has witnessed discovery of the first identified counterparts to
a gravitational wave transient (GW 170817A) and a very high-energy neutrino
(IceCube-170922A). These source identifications, and ensuing detailed studies,
have realized longstanding dreams of astronomers and physicists to routinely
carry out observations of cosmic sources by other than electromagnetic means,
and inaugurated the era of "multi-messenger" astronomy. While this new era
promises extraordinary physical insights into the universe, it brings with it
new challenges, including: highly heterogeneous, high-volume, high-velocity
datasets; globe-spanning cross-disciplinary teams of researchers, regularly
brought together into transient collaborations; an extraordinary breadth and
depth of domain-specific knowledge and computing resources required to
anticipate, model, and interpret observations; and the routine need for
adaptive, distributed, rapid-response observing campaigns to fully exploit the
scientific potential of each source. We argue, therefore, that the time is ripe
for the community to conceive and propose an Institute for Multi-Messenger
Astrophysics that would coordinate its resources in a sustained and strategic
fashion to efficiently address these challenges, while simultaneously serving
as a center for education and key supporting activities. In this fashion, we
can prepare now to realize the bright future that we see, beyond, through these
newly opened windows onto the universe.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.04526 [pdf] - 1587115
OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: Three year
results and first data release
Childress, M. J.;
Lidman, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Asorey, J.;
Yuan, F.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, S. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
James, D. J.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A. L.;
Kovacs, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lagattuta, D. J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marriner, J.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Moller, A.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Mudd, D.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Parkinson, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reed, S. L.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Seymour, N.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, B. R.
Submitted: 2017-08-15
We present results for the first three years of OzDES, a six-year programme
to obtain redshifts for objects in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernova
fields using the 2dF fibre positioner and AAOmega spectrograph on the
Anglo-Australian Telescope. OzDES is a multi-object spectroscopic survey
targeting multiple types of targets at multiple epochs over a multi-year
baseline, and is one of the first multi-object spectroscopic surveys to
dynamically include transients into the target list soon after their discovery.
At the end of three years, OzDES has spectroscopically confirmed almost 100
supernovae, and has measured redshifts for 17,000 objects, including the
redshifts of 2,566 supernova hosts. We examine how our ability to measure
redshifts for targets of various types depends on signal-to-noise, magnitude,
and exposure time, finding that our redshift success rate increases
significantly at a signal-to-noise of 2 to 3 per 1-Angstrom bin. We also find
that the change in signal-to-noise with exposure time closely matches the
Poisson limit for stacked exposures as long as 10 hours. We use these results
to predict the redshift yield of the full OzDES survey, as well as the
potential yields of future surveys on other facilities such as the 4m
Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), the Subaru Prime Focus
Spectrograph (PFS), and the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer (MSE). This work
marks the first OzDES data release, comprising 14,693 redshifts. OzDES is on
target to obtain over a yield of approximately 5,700 supernova host-galaxy
redshifts.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.01884 [pdf] - 1525708
A cosmographic analysis of the transition to acceleration using SN-Ia
and BAO
Submitted: 2016-07-07, last modified: 2016-07-28
We explore the distance-redshift relation using a cosmographic methodology,
and show how the cosmographic parameters can be used to determine the redshift
of transition from deceleration to acceleration. Such a transition at a low
redshift occupies only a small region of the available parameter space, and the
prior assumption of an early period of deceleration can significantly change
the posterior constraints. We use available type Ia Supernovae (SN-Ia) and
Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data sets to determine the cosmographic
deceleration $q_0$, jerk $j_0$, snap $s_0$ and lerk $l_0$ parameters. The
parameters are consistent with the $\Lambda$CDM model for a flat universe
within 2-sigma. We derive constraints on the redshift of transition from
deceleration to acceleration for the different expansions, and find $z_{\rm
acc} > 0.14$ at 95% confidence in the most conservative case.