Normalized to: Muir, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05929 [pdf] - 2089021
Blinding multi-probe cosmological experiments
Muir, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Elsner, F.;
Krause, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Zuntz, J.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13, last modified: 2020-05-04
The goal of blinding is to hide an experiment's critical results -- here the
inferred cosmological parameters -- until all decisions affecting its analysis
have been finalised. This is especially important in the current era of
precision cosmology, when the results of any new experiment are closely
scrutinised for consistency or tension with previous results. In analyses that
combine multiple observational probes, like the combination of galaxy
clustering and weak lensing in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), it is challenging
to blind the results while retaining the ability to check for (in)consistency
between different parts of the data. We propose a simple new blinding
transformation that works by modifying the summary statistics that are input to
parameter estimation, such as two-point correlation functions. The
transformation shifts the measured statistics to new values that are consistent
with (blindly) shifted cosmological parameters, while preserving internal
(in)consistency. We apply the blinding transformation to simulated data for the
projected DES Year 3 galaxy clustering and weak lensing analysis, demonstrating
that practical blinding is achieved without significant perturbation of
internal-consistency checks, as measured here by degradation of the $\chi^2$
between data and best-fitting model. Our blinding method conserves $\chi^2$
more precisely as experiments evolve to higher precision.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02342 [pdf] - 1929685
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations
between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck
Omori, Y.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Porredon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Alarcon, A.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Muir, J.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Simard, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and
Planck data over 1289 sq. deg. When combining measurements across multiple
galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of $0.15<z<0.90$, we reject
the hypothesis of no correlation at 19.9$\sigma$ significance. When removing
small-scale data points where thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal and nonlinear
galaxy bias could potentially bias our results, the detection significance is
reduced to 9.9$\sigma$. We perform a joint analysis of galaxy-CMB lensing
cross-correlations and galaxy clustering to constrain cosmology, finding
$\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.276^{+0.029}_{-0.030}$ and
$S_{8}=\sigma_{8}\sqrt{\mathstrut \Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.800^{+0.090}_{-0.094}$. We also perform two alternate analyses aimed at
constraining only the growth rate of cosmic structure as a function of
redshift, finding consistency with predictions from the concordance
$\Lambda$CDM model. The measurements presented here are part of a joint
cosmological analysis that combines galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing and CMB
lensing using data from DES, SPT and Planck.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.00591 [pdf] - 1751774
New Science, New Media: An Assessment of the Online Education and Public
Outreach Initiatives of The Dark Energy Survey
Wolf, R. C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Nord, B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Biron, L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Ferte, A.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Jennings, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Li, T. S.;
Lingard, T.;
Moller, A.;
Muir, J.;
Nagasawa, D. Q.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-02, last modified: 2018-09-18
As large-scale international collaborations become the standard for astronomy
research, a wealth of opportunities have emerged to create innovative education
and public outreach (EPO) programming. In the past two decades, large
collaborations have focused EPO strategies around published data products.
Newer collaborations have begun to explore other avenues of public engagement
before and after data are made available. We present a case study of the online
EPO program of The Dark Energy Survey, currently one of the largest
international astronomy collaborations actively taking data. DES EPO is unique
at this scale in astronomy, as far as we are aware, as it evolved organically
from scientists' passion for EPO and is entirely organized and implemented by
the volunteer efforts of collaboration scientists. We summarize the strategy
and implementation of eight EPO initiatives. For content distributed via social
media, we present reach and user statistics over the 2016 calendar year. DES
EPO online products reached ~2,500 users per post, and 94% of these users
indicate a predisposition to science-related interests. We find no obvious
correlation between post type and post reach, with the most popular posts
featuring the intersections of science and art and/or popular culture. We
conclude that one key issue of the online DES EPO program was designing
material which would inspire new interest in science. The greatest difficulty
of the online DES EPO program was sustaining scientist participation and
collaboration support; the most successful programs are those which capitalized
on the hobbies of participating scientists. We present statistics and
recommendations, along with observations from individual experience, as a
potentially instructive resource for scientists or EPO professionals interested
in organizing EPO programs and partnerships for large science collaborations or
organizations.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02354 [pdf] - 1721163
Covariance of CMB anomalies
Submitted: 2018-06-06, last modified: 2018-07-18
Several unexpected features are observed at large angular scales in the CMB
temperature anisotropy measurements by both WMAP and Planck. These include the
lack of both variance and correlation, alignment of the lowest multipole
moments with one another, hemispherical power asymmetry, and an odd-to-even
parity excess. In this work, we study the statistics of eight representative
large-angle CMB features in order to evaluate their covariance in LCDM. We do
so using two sets of simulated CMB temperature maps; an ensemble of 100,000
simple Gaussian simulations, and 1000 Full Focal Plane (FFP) simulations
provided by the Planck collaboration. In measuring feature probabilities, we
pay particular attention to analysis choices, making sure that we can reproduce
previous results in the literature, and explain differences where appropriate.
The covariance structure we find is consistent with expectations given that
many of the features studied are functions of the angular power spectrum.
Notably, we find significant differences in the covariance entries associated
with the quadrupole-octopole alignments derived from the Gaussian and FFP
simulations. We additionally perform a principal component analysis to
quantitatively gauge what combinations of features capture the most information
about how simulation measurements vary, and to provide an alternative
assessment of the ways in which the real sky is anomalous. The first four
principal components explain about 90\% of the simulations' variance, with the
first two roughly quantifying the lack of large-angle correlations, and the
next two quantifying the phase-dependent anomalies (multipole alignments and
power asymmetry). Though the results of this analysis are fairly unsurprising,
its comprehensive approach serves to tie together a number of previous results,
and will therefore provide context for future studies of large-angle anomalies.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02515 [pdf] - 1729027
The Quest for the Inflationary Spectral Runnings in the Presence of
Systematic Errors
Submitted: 2018-06-07
Cosmological inflation predicts that the scalar spectral index "runs" with
scale. Constraints on the values of the spectral runnings, $\alpha_s\equiv
\textrm{d} n_s/\textrm{d}\ln k$ and $\beta_s\equiv
\textrm{d}\alpha_s/\textrm{d}\ln k$, therefore provide a fundamental test of
the physics of inflation. Here we study the feasibility of measuring the
runnings when information from upcoming large-volume galaxy surveys is used to
supplement the information provided by a CMB-S4 experiment, particularly
focusing on the effect of including high-$k$, nonlinear scales. Since these
measurements will be sensitive to modeling uncertainties for the nonlinear
power spectrum, we examine how three different ways of parameterizing those
systematics---introducing zero, two, or several hundred nuisance
parameters---affect constraints and protect against parameter biases.
Considering statistical errors alone, we find that including strongly nonlinear
scales can substantially tighten constraints. However, these constraints weaken
to levels not much better than those from a CMB-S4 experiment alone when we
limit our analysis to scales where estimates are not strongly affected by
systematic biases. Given these considerations, near-future large-scale
structure surveys are unlikely to add much information to the CMB-S4
measurement of the first running $\alpha_s$. There is more potential for
improvement for the second running, $\beta_s$, for which large-scale structure
information will allow constraints to be improved by a factor of 3--4 relative
to using the CMB alone. Though these constraints are still above the value
predicted by slow roll inflation, they do probe regions of parameter space
relevant to nonstandard inflationary models with large runnings, for example
those that can generate an appreciable abundance of primordial black holes.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.08661 [pdf] - 1645843
Integrated Sachs-Wolfe map reconstruction in the presence of systematic
errors
Submitted: 2017-09-25, last modified: 2018-03-06
The decay of gravitational potentials in the presence of dark energy leads to
an additional, late-time contribution to anisotropies in the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) at large angular scales. The imprint of this so-called
integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect to the CMB angular power spectrum has been
detected and studied in detail, but reconstructing its spatial contributions to
the CMB $\textit{map}$, which would offer the tantalizing possibility of
separating the early- from the late-time contributions to CMB temperature
fluctuations, is more challenging. Here we study the technique for
reconstructing the ISW map based on information from galaxy surveys and focus
in particular on how its accuracy is impacted by the presence of photometric
calibration errors in input galaxy maps, which were previously found to be a
dominant contaminant for ISW signal estimation. We find that both including
tomographic information from a single survey and using data from multiple,
complementary galaxy surveys improve the reconstruction by effectively
self-calibrating the estimator against spurious power contributions from
calibration errors. A high-fidelity reconstruction further requires one to
account for the contribution of calibration errors to the observed galaxy power
spectrum in the model used to construct the ISW estimator. We find that if the
photometric calibration errors in galaxy surveys can be independently
controlled at the level required to obtain unbiased dark energy constraints,
then it is possible to reconstruct ISW maps with excellent accuracy using a
combination of maps from two galaxy surveys with properties similar to Euclid
and SPHEREx.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05840 [pdf] - 1589828
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-IR Light Curves and Comparison
to Kilonova Models
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Villar, V. A.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Chornock, R.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Guillochon, J.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen,, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Palmese, A.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Balbinot, E.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Cook, E. R.;
Durret, F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Medina, G. E.;
Muir, J.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days post-merger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Gemini-South/FLAMINGOS-2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{-1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multi-component SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$-process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$-process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$-process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$-process enrichment.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.06586 [pdf] - 1472890
Peeling off the late Universe: Reconstructing the ISW map with galaxy
surveys
Submitted: 2016-03-21, last modified: 2016-09-01
The Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect is a large-angle modulation of the
cosmic microwave background (CMB), generated when CMB photons traverse evolving
potential wells associated with large scale structure (LSS). Recent efforts
have been made to reconstruct maps of the ISW signal using information from
surveys of galaxies and other LSS tracers, but investigation into how survey
systematics affect their reliability has so far been limited. Using simulated
ISW and LSS maps, we study the impact of galaxy survey properties and
systematic errors on the accuracy of reconstructed ISW signal. We find that
systematics that affect the observed distribution of galaxies along the line of
sight, such as photo-z and bias-evolution related errors, have a relatively
minor impact on reconstruction quality. In contrast, however, we find that
direction-dependent calibration errors can be very harmful. Specifically, we
find that in order to avoid significant degradation of our reconstruction
quality statistics, direction-dependent number density fluctuations due to
systematics must be controlled so that their variance is smaller than $10^{-6}$
(which corresponds to a 0.1% calibration). Additionally, we explore the
implications of our results for attempts to use reconstructed ISW maps to shed
light on the origin of large-angle CMB alignments. We find that there is only a
weak correlation between the true and reconstructed angular momentum
dispersion, which quantifies alignment, even for reconstructed ISW maps which
are fairly accurate overall.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.4737 [pdf] - 1203437
Astrophysical black holes in screened modified gravity
Submitted: 2014-02-19, last modified: 2014-09-16
Chameleon, environmentally dependent dilaton, and symmetron gravity are three
models of modified gravity in which the effects of the additional scalar degree
of freedom are screened in dense environments. They have been extensively
studied in laboratory, cosmological, and astrophysical contexts. In this paper,
we present a preliminary investigation into whether additional constraints can
be provided by studying these scalar fields around black holes. By looking at
the properties of a static, spherically symmetric black hole, we find that the
presence of a non-uniform matter distribution induces a non-constant scalar
profile in chameleon and dilaton, but not necessarily symmetron gravity. An
order of magnitude estimate shows that the effects of these profiles on
in-falling test particles will be sub-leading compared to gravitational waves
and hence observationally challenging to detect.
