Normalized to: Mueller, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.01134 [pdf] - 2088324
A study of daytime convective vortices and turbulence in the martian
Planetary Boundary Layer based on half-a-year of InSight atmospheric
measurements and Large-Eddy Simulations
Spiga, Aymeric;
Murdoch, Naomi;
Lorenz, Ralph;
Forget, François;
Newman, Claire;
Rodriguez, Sébastien;
Pla-Garcia, Jorge;
Viúdez-Moreiras, Daniel;
Banfield, Don;
Perrin, Clément;
Mueller, Nils T.;
Millour, Ehouarn;
Banerdt, W. Bruce
Submitted: 2020-05-03
Studying the atmospheric Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) is crucial to
understand the climate of a planet. The meteorological measurements by the
instruments onboard InSight make a uniquely rich dataset to study the active
turbulent dynamics of the daytime PBL on Mars. Here we use the high-sensitivity
continuous pressure, wind, temperature measurements in the first 400 sols of
InSight operations to analyze convective gusts, cells, and vortices in Mars'
daytime PBL. We compare the InSight measurements to turbulence-resolving
Large-Eddy Simulations (LES). The daytime PBL turbulence at the InSight landing
site is found to be very active, with clearly identified signatures of
convective cells and a vast population of almost 10,000 recorded vortex
encounters, adequately represented by a power-law with a 3.5 exponent in
agreement with LES results. While the daily variability of vortex encounters at
the InSight landing site can be explained by the statistical nature of
turbulence, the seasonal variability is strongly correlated with ambient wind
speed, which is supported by LES. However, wind gustiness is more correlated to
surface temperature than ambient wind speed, confirming the radiative control
of the daytime martian PBL; and fewer convective vortices are forming in LES
when the background wind is doubled. Thus, the long-term seasonal variability
of vortex encounters at the InSight landing site is mainly controlled by the
advection of convective vortices by the ambient wind speed. Typical tracks
followed by vortices forming in the LES show a similar distribution in
direction and length as orbital imagery of the InSight region.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.00763 [pdf] - 2057116
Chirality transfer & chiral turbulence in gauge theories
Submitted: 2020-03-02
Chirality transfer between fermions and gauge fields plays a crucial role for
understanding the dynamics of anomalous transport phenomena such as the Chiral
Magnetic Effect. In this proceeding we present a first principles study of
these processes based on classical-statistical real-time lattice simulations of
strongly coupled QED $(e^2N_f=64)$. Our simulations demonstrate that a
chirality imbalance in the fermion sector triggers chiral plasma instabilities
in the gauge field sector, which ultimately lead to the generation of long
range helical magnetic fields via a self-similar turbulent cascade of the
magnetic helicity.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.01654 [pdf] - 2097214
Chiral instabilities & the onset of chiral turbulence in QED plasmas
Submitted: 2019-10-03
We present a first principles study of chiral plasma instabilities and the
onset of chiral turbulence in QED plasmas far from equilibrium. By performing
classical-statistical lattice simulations of the microscopic theory, we show
that the generation of strong helical magnetic fields from a helicity imbalance
in the fermion sector proceeds via three distinct phases. During the initial
linear instability regime the helicity imbalance of the fermion sector causes
an exponential growth(damping) of magnetic field modes with right(left) handed
polarization, for which we extract the characteristic growth (damping) rates.
Secondary growth of unstable modes accelerates the helicity transfer from
fermions to gauge fields and ultimately leads to the emergence of a
self-similar scaling regime characteristic of decaying turbulence, where
magnetic helicity is efficiently transferred to macroscopic length scales.
Within this turbulent regime the evolution of magnetic helicity spectrum can be
described by an infrared power-spectrum with spectral exponent $\kappa$ and
dynamical scaling exponents $\alpha,\beta$, which we determine from our
simulations.