Normalized to: Morse, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.03405 [pdf] - 1762882
The Castalia Mission to Main Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro
Snodgrass, C.;
Jones, G. H.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Gibbings, A.;
Homeister, M.;
Andre, N.;
Beck, P.;
Bentley, M. S.;
Bertini, I.;
Bowles, N.;
Capria, M. T.;
Carr, C.;
Ceriotti, M.;
Coates, A. J.;
Della Corte, V.;
Hanna, K. L. Donaldson;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Gutierrez, P. J.;
Hainaut, O. R.;
Herique, A.;
Hilchenbach, M.;
Hsieh, H. H.;
Jehin, E.;
Karatekin, O.;
Kofman, W.;
Lara, L. M.;
Laudan, K.;
Licandro, J.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Marzari, F.;
Masters, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Moreno, F.;
Morse, A.;
Orosei, R.;
Pack, A.;
Plettemeier, D.;
Prialnik, D.;
Rotundi, A.;
Rubin, M.;
Sanchez, J. P.;
Sheridan, S.;
Trieloff, M.;
Winterboer, A.
Submitted: 2017-09-11
We describe Castalia, a proposed mission to rendezvous with a Main Belt Comet
(MBC), 133P/Elst-Pizarro. MBCs are a recently discovered population of
apparently icy bodies within the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter,
which may represent the remnants of the population which supplied the early
Earth with water. Castalia will perform the first exploration of this
population by characterising 133P in detail, solving the puzzle of the MBC's
activity, and making the first in situ measurements of water in the asteroid
belt. In many ways a successor to ESA's highly successful Rosetta mission,
Castalia will allow direct comparison between very different classes of comet,
including measuring critical isotope ratios, plasma and dust properties. It
will also feature the first radar system to visit a minor body, mapping the ice
in the interior. Castalia was proposed, in slightly different versions, to the
ESA M4 and M5 calls within the Cosmic Vision programme. We describe the science
motivation for the mission, the measurements required to achieve the scientific
goals, and the proposed instrument payload and spacecraft to achieve these.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.00235 [pdf] - 1693913
Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations
Mousis, O.;
Atkinson, D. H.;
Cavalié, T.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Amato, M. J.;
Aslam, S.;
Ferri, F.;
Renard, J. -B.;
Spilker, T.;
Venkatapathy, E.;
Wurz, P.;
Aplin, K.;
Coustenis, A.;
Deleuil, M.;
Dobrijevic, M.;
Fouchet, T.;
Guillot, T.;
Hartogh, P.;
Hewagama, T.;
Hofstadter, M. D.;
Hue, V.;
Hueso, R.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Moses, J.;
Orton, G. S.;
Pearl, J. C.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Simon, A.;
Venot, O.;
Waite, J. H.;
Achterberg, R. K.;
Atreya, S.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blanc, M.;
Borget, F.;
Brugger, B.;
Charnoz, S.;
Chiavassa, T.;
Cottini, V.;
d'Hendecourt, L.;
Danger, G.;
Encrenaz, T.;
Gorius, N. J. P.;
Jorda, L.;
Marty, B.;
Moreno, R.;
Morse, A.;
Nixon, C.;
Reh, K.;
Ronnet, T.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Sheridan, S.;
Sotin, C.;
Vernazza, P.;
Villanueva, G. L.
Submitted: 2017-08-01
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets
in our solar system but the most frequently observed type of exoplanets.
Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ~70% heavy
elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and
Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter
and Saturn. Because of the lack of dedicated exploration missions, our
knowledge of the composition and atmospheric processes of these distant worlds
is primarily derived from remote sensing from Earth-based observatories and
space telescopes. As a result, Uranus's and Neptune's physical and atmospheric
properties remain poorly constrained and their roles in the evolution of the
Solar System not well understood. Exploration of an ice giant system is
therefore a high-priority science objective as these systems (including the
magnetosphere, satellites, rings, atmosphere, and interior) challenge our
understanding of planetary formation and evolution. Here we describe the main
scientific goals to be addressed by a future in situ exploration of an ice
giant. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level, about 5 scale
heights beneath the tropopause, would yield insight into two broad themes: i)
the formation history of the ice giants and, in a broader extent, that of the
Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe
would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics,
with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay
station. In addition, possible mission concepts and partnerships are presented,
and a strawman ice-giant probe payload is described. An ice-giant atmospheric
probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA ice-giant
flagship mission.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.00192 [pdf] - 1557861
Decay of COSAC and Ptolemy Mass Spectra at Comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Krüger, Harald;
Goesmann, Fred;
Giri, Chaitanya;
Wright, Ian;
Morse, Andrew;
Bredehöft, Jan Hendrik;
Ulamec, Stephan;
Cozzoni, Barbara;
Ehrenfreund, Pascale;
Gautier, Thomas;
McKenna-Lawlor, Susan;
Raulin, Francois;
Steininger, Harald;
Szopa, Cyril
Submitted: 2017-02-01
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas
analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas
chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both
instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material
through seven measurements in sniffing mode during Philae's hopping and at its
final landing site Abydos. We compare the temporal evolution of intensities of
several ion species identified by both mass spectrometers. For COSAC this is
the first analysis of the temporal behaviour of the measured ion species. All
ion species showed the highest intensities in the first spectra measured by
both instruments about 20 to 30 minutes after Philae's first touchdown at
Agilkia, and a decay during the six consecutive measurements at Abydos. Both
instruments measured a nearly identical decay of the water peak (m/z 18), and
also CO (m/z 28) behaved similarly. In the COSAC measurements the peak at m/z
44 decays much slower than all the other ion species, including the water peak.
In particular, the m/z 44 peak decays much slower in the COSAC measurements
than in the Ptolemy data. This supports our earlier interpretation that COSAC
for the first time analyzed a regolith sample from a cometary nucleus in situ,
while Ptolemy measured cometary gas from the ambient coma. The m/z 44 peak
measured by COSAC was likely dominated by organic species, whereas the peak
measured by Ptolemy was interpreted to be mostly due to $CO_2$. Ion species
heavier than m/z 30 tend to decay somewhat slower in the COSAC measurements
than in the Ptolemy data, which may be related to differences in the exhaust
designs between both instruments.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05893 [pdf] - 1411421
Subsurface characterization of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's Abydos site
Brugger, B.;
Mousis, O.;
Morse, A.;
Marboeuf, U.;
Jorda, L.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Andrews, D.;
Barber, S.;
Lamy, P.;
Luspay-Kuti, A.;
Mandt, K.;
Morgan, G.;
Sheridan, S.;
Vernazza, P.;
Wright, I. P.
Submitted: 2016-03-18
On November 12, 2014, the ESA/Rosetta descent module Philae landed on the
Abydos site of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Aboard this module, the Ptolemy
mass spectrometer measured a CO/CO2 ratio of 0.07 +/- 0.04 which differs
substantially from the value obtained in the coma by the Rosetta/ROSINA
instrument, suggesting a heterogeneity in the comet nucleus. To understand this
difference, we investigated the physico-chemical properties of the Abydos
subsurface leading to CO/CO2 ratios close to that observed by Ptolemy at the
surface of this region. We used a comet nucleus model that takes into account
different water ice phase changes (amorphous ice, crystalline ice and
clathrates), as well as diffusion of molecules throughout the pores of the
matrix. The input parameters of the model were optimized for the Abydos site
and the ROSINA CO/CO2 measured ratio is assumed to correspond to the bulk value
in the nucleus. We find that all considered structures of water ice are able to
reproduce the Ptolemy observation with a time difference not exceeding ~50
days, i.e. lower than ~2% on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's orbital period. The
suspected heterogeneity of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko's nucleus is also found
possible only if it is constituted of crystalline ices. If the icy phase is
made of amorphous ice or clathrates, the difference between Ptolemy and
ROSINA's measurements would rather originate from the spatial variations in
illumination on the nucleus surface. An eventual new measurement of the CO/CO2
ratio at Abydos by Ptolemy could be decisive to distinguish between the three
water ice structures.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07685 [pdf] - 1470556
The Hera Saturn Entry Probe Mission
Mousis, O.;
Atkinson, D. H.;
Spilker, T.;
Venkatapathy, E.;
Poncy, J.;
Frampton, R.;
Coustenis, A.;
Reh, K.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Hueso, R.;
Amato, M. J.;
Colaprete, A.;
Ferri, F.;
Stam, D.;
Wurz, P.;
Atreya, S.;
Aslam, S.;
Banfield, D. J.;
Calcutt, S.;
Fischer, G.;
Holland, A.;
Keller, C.;
Kessler, E.;
Leese, M.;
Levacher, P.;
Morse, A.;
Munoz, O.;
Renard, J. -B.;
Sheridan, S.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Snik, F.;
Waite, J. H.;
Bird, M.;
Cavalié, T.;
Deleuil, M.;
Fortney, J.;
Gautier, D.;
Guillot, T.;
Lunine, J. I.;
Marty, B.;
Nixon, C.;
Orton, G. S.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
The Hera Saturn entry probe mission is proposed as an M--class mission led by
ESA with a contribution from NASA. It consists of one atmospheric probe to be
sent into the atmosphere of Saturn, and a Carrier-Relay spacecraft. In this
concept, the Hera probe is composed of ESA and NASA elements, and the
Carrier-Relay Spacecraft is delivered by ESA. The probe is powered by
batteries, and the Carrier-Relay Spacecraft is powered by solar panels and
batteries. We anticipate two major subsystems to be supplied by the United
States, either by direct procurement by ESA or by contribution from NASA: the
solar electric power system (including solar arrays and the power management
and distribution system), and the probe entry system (including the thermal
protection shield and aeroshell). Hera is designed to perform in situ
measurements of the chemical and isotopic compositions as well as the dynamics
of Saturn's atmosphere using a single probe, with the goal of improving our
understanding of the origin, formation, and evolution of Saturn, the giant
planets and their satellite systems, with extrapolation to extrasolar planets.
Hera's aim is to probe well into the cloud-forming region of the troposphere,
below the region accessible to remote sensing, to the locations where certain
cosmogenically abundant species are expected to be well mixed. By leading to an
improved understanding of the processes by which giant planets formed,
including the composition and properties of the local solar nebula at the time
and location of giant planet formation, Hera will extend the legacy of the
Galileo and Cassini missions by further addressing the creation, formation, and
chemical, dynamical, and thermal evolution of the giant planets, the entire
solar system including Earth and the other terrestrial planets, and formation
of other planetary systems.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.4811 [pdf] - 1209042
Scientific rationale of Saturn's in situ exploration
Mousis, O.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Wurz, P.;
Cavalié, T.;
Coustenis, A.;
Courtin, R.;
Gautier, D.;
Helled, R.;
Irwin, P. G. J.;
Morse, A. D.;
Nettelmann, N.;
Marty, B.;
Rousselot, P.;
Venot, O.;
Atkinson, D. H.;
Waite, J. H.;
Reh, K. R.;
Simon-Miller, A.;
Atreya, S.;
André, N.;
Blanc, M.;
Daglis, I. A.;
Fischer, G.;
Geppert, W. D.;
Guillot, T.;
Hedman, M. M.;
Hueso, R.;
Lellouch, E.;
Lunine, J. I.;
Murray, C. D.;
O'Donoghue, J.;
Rengel, M.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Spiga, A.;
Spilker, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Tiscareno, M. S.;
Ali-Dib, M.;
Altwegg, K.;
Bouquet, A.;
Briois, C.;
Fouchet, T.;
Guerlet, S.;
Kostiuk, T.;
Lebleu, D.;
Moreno, R.;
Orton, G. S.;
Poncy, J.
Submitted: 2014-04-18
Remote sensing observations meet some limitations when used to study the bulk
atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. A remarkable
example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements is illustrated by the
exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the
noble gases abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio
have only been made available through in situ measurements by the Galileo
probe. This paper describes the main scientific goals to be addressed by the
future in situ exploration of Saturn placing the Galileo probe exploration of
Jupiter in a broader context and before the future probe exploration of the
more remote ice giants. In situ exploration of Saturn's atmosphere addresses
two broad themes that are discussed throughout this paper: first, the formation
history of our solar system and second, the processes at play in planetary
atmospheres. In this context, we detail the reasons why measurements of
Saturn's bulk elemental and isotopic composition would place important
constraints on the volatile reservoirs in the protosolar nebula. We also show
that the in situ measurement of CO (or any other disequilibrium species that is
depleted by reaction with water) in Saturn's upper troposphere would constrain
its bulk O/H ratio. We highlight the key measurements required to distinguish
competing theories to shed light on giant planet formation as a common process
in planetary systems with potential applications to most extrasolar systems. In
situ measurements of Saturn's stratospheric and tropospheric dynamics,
chemistry and cloud-forming processes will provide access to phenomena
unreachable to remote sensing studies. Different mission architectures are
envisaged, which would benefit from strong international collaborations.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.3980 [pdf] - 322777
Measurement of the atmospheric neutrino energy spectrum from 100 GeV to
400 TeV with IceCube
IceCube Collaboration;
Abbasi, R.;
Abdou, Y.;
Abu-Zayyad, T.;
Adams, J.;
Aguilar, J. A.;
Ahlers, M.;
Andeen, K.;
Auffenberg, J.;
Bai, X.;
Baker, M.;
Barwick, S. W.;
Bay, R.;
Alba, J. L. Bazo;
Beattie, K.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Bechet, S.;
Becker, J. K.;
Becker, K. -H.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
BenZvi, S.;
Berdermann, J.;
Berghaus, P.;
Berley, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Bertrand, D.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Bissok, M.;
Blaufuss, E.;
Blumenthal, J.;
Boersma, D. J.;
Bohm, C.;
Bose, D.;
Böser, S.;
Botner, O.;
Braun, J.;
Buitink, S.;
Carson, M.;
Chirkin, D.;
Christy, B.;
Clem, J.;
Clevermann, F.;
Cohen, S.;
Colnard, C.;
Cowen, D. F.;
D'Agostino, M. V.;
Danninger, M.;
Davis, J. C.;
De Clercq, C.;
Demirörs, L.;
Depaepe, O.;
Descamps, F.;
Desiati, P.;
de Vries-Uiterweerd, G.;
DeYoung, T.;
Díaz-Vélez, J. C.;
Dierckxsens, M.;
Dreyer, J.;
Dumm, J. P.;
Duvoort, M. R.;
Ehrlich, R.;
Eisch, J.;
Ellsworth, R. W.;
Engdegård, O.;
Euler, S.;
Evenson, P. A.;
Fadiran, O.;
Fazely, A. R.;
Fedynitch, A.;
Feusels, T.;
Filimonov, K.;
Finley, C.;
Foerster, M. M.;
Fox, B. D.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Franke, R.;
Gaisser, T. K.;
Gallagher, J.;
Geisler, M.;
Gerhardt, L.;
Gladstone, L.;
Glüsenkamp, T.;
Goldschmidt, A.;
Goodman, J. A.;
Grant, D.;
Griesel, T.;
Groß, A.;
Grullon, S.;
Gurtner, M.;
Ha, C.;
Hallgren, A.;
Halzen, F.;
Han, K.;
Hanson, K.;
Helbing, K.;
Herquet, P.;
Hickford, S.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hoffman, K. D.;
Homeier, A.;
Hoshina, K.;
Hubert, D.;
Huelsnitz, W.;
Hülß, J. -P.;
Hulth, P. O.;
Hultqvist, K.;
Hussain, S.;
Ishihara, A.;
Jacobsen, J.;
Japaridze, G. S.;
Johansson, H.;
Joseph, J. M.;
Kampert, K. -H.;
Karg, T.;
Karle, A.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kemming, N.;
Kenny, P.;
Kiryluk, J.;
Kislat, F.;
Klein, S. R.;
Köhne, J. -H.;
Kohnen, G.;
Kolanoski, H.;
Köpke, L.;
Koskinen, D. J.;
Kowalski, M.;
Kowarik, T.;
Krasberg, M.;
Krings, T.;
Kroll, G.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuwabara, T.;
Labare, M.;
Lafebre, S.;
Laihem, K.;
Landsman, H.;
Larson, M. J.;
Lauer, R.;
Lehmann, R.;
Lünemann, J.;
Madsen, J.;
Majumdar, P.;
Marotta, A.;
Maruyama, R.;
Mase, K.;
Matis, H. S.;
Matusik, M.;
Meagher, K.;
Merck, M.;
Mészáros, P.;
Meures, T.;
Middell, E.;
Milke, N.;
Miller, J.;
Montaruli, T.;
Morse, A. R.;
Movit, S. M.;
Nahnhauer, R.;
Nam, J. W.;
Naumann, U.;
Nießen, P.;
Nygren, D. R.;
Odrowski, S.;
Olivas, A.;
Olivo, M.;
O'Murchadha, A.;
Ono, M.;
Panknin, S.;
Paul, L.;
Heros, C. Pérez de los;
Petrovic, J.;
Piegsa, A.;
Pieloth, D.;
Porrata, R.;
Posselt, J.;
Price, P. B.;
Prikockis, M.;
Przybylski, G. T.;
Rawlins, K.;
Redl, P.;
Resconi, E.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribordy, M.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rodrigues, J. P.;
Roth, P.;
Rothmaier, F.;
Rott, C.;
Ruhe, T.;
Rutledge, D.;
Ruzybayev, B.;
Ryckbosch, D.;
Sander, H. -G.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Schatto, K.;
Schlenstedt, S.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schukraft, A.;
Schultes, A.;
Schulz, O.;
Schunck, M.;
Seckel, D.;
Semburg, B.;
Seo, S. H.;
Sestayo, Y.;
Seunarine, S.;
Silvestri, A.;
Singh, K.;
Slipak, A.;
Spiczak, G. M.;
Spiering, C.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Stanev, B. T.;
Stephens, G.;
Stezelberger, T.;
Stokstad, R. G.;
Stoyanov, S.;
Strahler, E. A.;
Straszheim, T.;
Sullivan, G. W.;
Swillens, Q.;
Taavola, H.;
Taboada, I.;
Tamburro, A.;
Tarasova, O.;
Tepe, A.;
Ter-Antonyan, S.;
Tilav, S.;
Toale, P. A.;
Toscano, S.;
Tosi, D.;
Turčan, D.;
van Eijndhoven, N.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Van Overloop, A.;
van Santen, J.;
Voge, M.;
Voigt, B.;
Walck, C.;
Waldenmaier, T.;
Wallraff, M.;
Walter, M.;
Weaver, Ch.;
Wendt, C.;
Westerhoff, S.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wiebe, K.;
Wiebusch, C. H.;
Wikström, G.;
Williams, D. R.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wissing, H.;
Wolf, M.;
Woschnagg, K.;
Xu, C.;
Xu, X. W.;
Yodh, G.;
Yoshida, S.;
Zarzhitsky, P.
Submitted: 2010-10-19, last modified: 2010-12-17
A measurement of the atmospheric muon neutrino energy spectrum from 100 GeV
to 400 TeV was performed using a data sample of about 18,000 up-going
atmospheric muon neutrino events in IceCube. Boosted decision trees were used
for event selection to reject mis-reconstructed atmospheric muons and obtain a
sample of up-going muon neutrino events. Background contamination in the final
event sample is less than one percent. This is the first measurement of
atmospheric neutrinos up to 400 TeV, and is fundamental to understanding the
impact of this neutrino background on astrophysical neutrino observations with
IceCube. The measured spectrum is consistent with predictions for the
atmospheric muon neutrino plus muon antineutrino flux.