Normalized to: Moro, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.06651 [pdf] - 1586197
The NuSTAR Serendipitous Survey: Hunting for The Most Extreme Obscured
AGN at >10 keV
Lansbury, G. B.;
Alexander, D. M.;
Aird, J.;
Gandhi, P.;
Stern, D.;
Koss, M.;
Lamperti, I.;
Ajello, M.;
Annuar, A.;
Assef, R. J.;
Ballantyne, D. R.;
Balokovic, M.;
Bauer, F. E.;
Brandt, N.;
Brightman, M.;
Chen, C. -T. J.;
Civano, F.;
Comastri, A.;
Moro, A. D.;
Fuentes, C.;
Harrison, F. A.;
Marchesi, S.;
Masini, A.;
Mullaney, J. R.;
Ricci, C.;
Saez, C.;
Tomsick, J. A.;
Treister, E.;
Walton, D. J.;
Zappacosta, L.
Submitted: 2017-07-20, last modified: 2017-08-16
We identify sources with extremely hard X-ray spectra (i.e., with photon
indices of Gamma<0.6 in the 13 sq. deg. NuSTAR serendipitous survey, to search
for the most highly obscured AGNs detected at >10 keV. Eight extreme NuSTAR
sources are identified, and we use the NuSTAR data in combination with lower
energy X-ray observations (from Chandra, Swift XRT, and XMM-Newton) to
characterize the broad-band (0.5-24 keV) X-ray spectra. We find that all of the
extreme sources are highly obscured AGNs, including three robust Compton-thick
(CT; N_H > 1.5e24 cm^-2) AGNs at low redshift (z<0.1), and a likely-CT AGN at
higher redshift (z=0.16). Most of the extreme sources would not have been
identified as highly obscured based on the low energy (<10 keV) X-ray coverage
alone. The multiwavelength properties (e.g., optical spectra and X-ray/MIR
luminosity ratios) provide further support for the eight sources being
significantly obscured. Correcting for absorption, the intrinsic rest-frame
10-40 keV luminosities of the extreme sources cover a broad range, from ~ 5 x
10^42 to 10^45 erg s^-1. The estimated number counts of CT AGNs in the NuSTAR
serendipitous survey are in broad agreement with model expectations based on
previous X-ray surveys, except for the lowest redshifts (z<0.07) where we
measure a high CT fraction of f_CT^obs = 30 (+16 -12) %. For the small sample
of CT AGNs, we find a high fraction of galaxy major mergers (50 +/- 33%)
compared to control samples of "normal" AGNs.