Normalized to: More, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.03512 [pdf] - 1531248
Comment on "Large enhancement in high-energy photoionization of Fe XVII
and missing continuum plasma opacity"
Blancard, C.;
Colgan, J.;
Cossé, Ph.;
Faussurier, G.;
Fontes, C. J.;
Gilleron, F.;
Golovkin, I.;
Hansen, S. B.;
Iglesias, C. A.;
Kilcrease, D. P.;
MacFarlane, J. J.;
More, R. M.;
Pain, J. -C.;
Sherrill, M.;
Wilson, B. G.
Submitted: 2016-08-10
Recent R-matrix calculations claim to produce a significant enhancement in
the opacity of Fe XVII due to atomic core excitations [S. N. Nahar & A.K.
Pradhan, Phys. Rev. Letters 116, 235003 (2016), arXiv:1606.02731] and assert
that this enhancement is consistent with recent measurements of
higher-than-predicted iron opacities [J. E. Bailey et al., Nature 517, 56
(2015)]. This comment shows that the standard opacity models which have already
been directly compared with experimental data produce photon absorption
cross-sections for Fe XVII that are effectively equivalent to (and in fact
larger than) the new R-matrix opacities. Thus, the new R-matrix results cannot
be expected to significantly impact the existing discrepancies between theory
and experiment because they produce neither a "large enhancement" nor account
for "missing continuum plasma opacity" relative to standard models.
