Normalized to: Moraitis, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.01698 [pdf] - 2077005
Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations
Submitted: 2020-03-03
Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and
nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be
decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and
volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a
coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D
magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. We present the
general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in
resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and
compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one
another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the
impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the
energy and helicity-related quantities. Despite general similarities in their
overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that
cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar
in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the
helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution
of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity
transfer, depending on the simulation. The eruption takes place for the same
value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in
all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be
reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating
for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the
pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruption-onset helicity-related
threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less
efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.06563 [pdf] - 2026014
Magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions prolific of eruptive
and confined flares
Submitted: 2019-10-15
We compare the coronal magnetic energy and helicity of two solar active
regions (ARs), prolific in major eruptive (AR~11158) and confined (AR~12192)
flaring, and analyze the potential of deduced proxies to forecast upcoming
flares. Based on nonlinear force-free (NLFF) coronal magnetic field models with
a high degree of solenoidality, and applying three different computational
methods to investigate the coronal magnetic helicity, we are able to draw
conclusions with a high level of confidence. Based on real observations of two
solar ARs we checked trends regarding the potential eruptivity of the
active-region corona, as suggested earlier in works that were based on
numerical simulations, or solar observations. Our results support that the
ratio of current-carrying to total helicity, $|H_\mathrm{J}|/|H_\mathrm{V}|$,
shows a strong ability to indicate the eruptive potential of a solar AR.
However, $|H_\mathrm{J}|/|H_\mathrm{V}|$ seems not to be indicative for the
magnitude or type of an upcoming flare (confined or eruptive). Interpreted in
context with earlier observational studies, our findings furthermore support
that the total relative helicity normalized to the magnetic flux at the NLFF
model's lower boundary, $H_\mathrm{V}/\phi^2$, represents no indicator for the
eruptivity.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06365 [pdf] - 1929886
Magnetic helicity and eruptivity in active region 12673
Submitted: 2019-07-15
Context. In September 2017 the largest X-class flare of Solar Cycle 24
occurred from the most active region (AR) of this cycle, AR 12673. The AR
attracted much interest because of its unique morphological and evolution
characteristics. Among the parameters examined in the AR was magnetic helicity,
but either only approximately, and/or intermittently. Aims. This work is
interested in studying the evolution of the relative magnetic helicity and of
the two components of its decomposition, the non-potential, and the
volume-threading one, in the time interval around the highest activity of AR
12673. Special emphasis is given on the study of the ratio of the non-potential
to total helicity, that was recently proposed as an indicator of ARs
eruptivity. Methods. For these, we first approximate the coronal magnetic field
of the AR with two different optimization-based extrapolation procedures, and
choose the one that produces the most reliable helicity value at each instant.
Moreover, in one of these methods, we weight the optimization by the
uncertainty estimates derived from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI)
instrument, for the first time. We then follow an accurate method to compute
all quantities of interest. Results. The first observational determination of
the evolution of the non-potential to total helicity ratio seems to confirm the
quality it has in indicating eruptivity. This ratio increases before the major
flares of AR 12673, and afterwards it relaxes to smaller values. Additionally,
the evolution patterns of the various helicity, and energy budgets of AR 12673
are discussed and compared with other works.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.10410 [pdf] - 1864003
Relative magnetic field line helicity
Submitted: 2019-02-27
Context. Magnetic helicity is an important quantity in studies of magnetized
plasmas as it provides a measure of the geometrical complexity of the magnetic
field in a given volume. A more detailed description of the spatial
distribution of magnetic helicity is given by the field line helicity that
expresses the amount of helicity associated to individual field lines, rather
than in the full analysed volume. Aims. Magnetic helicity is not a
gauge-invariant quantity in general, unless it is computed with respect to a
reference field, yielding the so called relative magnetic helicity. The field
line helicity corresponding to the relative magnetic helicity has only been
examined under specific conditions so far. This work aims to define the field
line helicity corresponding to relative magnetic helicity in the most general
way. In addition to its general form, we provide the expression for the
relative magnetic field line helicity in a few commonly used gauges, and
reproduce known results as a limit of our general formulation. Methods. By
starting from the definition of relative magnetic helicity, we derive the
corresponding field line helicity, and we note the assumptions it is based on.
Results. We check that the developed quantity reproduces relative magnetic
helicity by using three different numerical simulations. For these cases we
also show the morphology of field line helicity in the volume, and on the
photospheric plane. As an application to solar situations, we compare the
morphology of field line helicity on the photosphere with that of the
connectivity-based helicity flux density in two reconstructions of an active
region's magnetic field. We discuss how the derived relative magnetic field
line helicity has a wide range of applications, notably in solar physics and
magnetic reconnection studies.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.03765 [pdf] - 1763099
Time variations of the non-potential and volume-threading magnetic
helicities
Submitted: 2018-09-11
Relative magnetic helicity is a gauge invariant quantity suitable for the
study of the magnetic helicity content of heliospheric plasmas. Relative
magnetic helicity can be decomposed uniquely into two gauge invariant
quantities, the magnetic helicity of the non-potential component of the field,
and a complementary volume-threading helicity. Recent analysis of numerical
experiments simulating the generation of solar eruptions have shown that the
ratio of the non-potential helicity to the total relative helicity is a clear
marker of the eruptivity of the magnetic system, and that the high value of
that quantity could be a sufficient condition for the onset of the instability
generating the eruptions. The present study introduces the first analytical
examination of the time variations of these non-potential and volume-threading
helicities. The validity of the analytical formulas derived are confirmed with
analysis of three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of
solar coronal dynamics. Both the analytical investigation, and the numerical
application show that, unlike magnetic helicity, the non-potential and the
volume-threading helicities are not conserved quantities, even in the ideal MHD
regime. A term corresponding to the transformation between the non-potential
and volume-threading helicities frequently dominates their dynamics. This
finding has an important consequence for their estimation in the solar corona:
unlike with relative helicity, their volume coronal evolution cannot be
ascertained by the flux of these quantities through the volume's boundaries.
Only techniques extrapolating the 3D coronal field will enable both the proper
study of the non-potential and volume-threading helicities, and the
observational analysis of helicity-based solar-eruptivity proxies.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.03011 [pdf] - 1709520
Computation of Relative Magnetic Helicity in Spherical Coordinates
Submitted: 2018-06-08
Magnetic helicity is a quantity of great importance in solar studies because
it is conserved in ideal magneto-hydrodynamics. While many methods to compute
magnetic helicity in Cartesian finite volumes exist, in spherical coordinates,
the natural coordinate system for solar applications, helicity is only treated
approximately. We present here a method to properly compute relative magnetic
helicity in spherical geometry. The volumes considered are finite, of shell or
wedge shape, and the three-dimensional magnetic field is considered fully known
throughout the studied domain. Testing of the method with well-known,
semi-analytic, force-free magnetic-field models reveals that it has excellent
accuracy. Further application to a set of nonlinear force-free reconstructions
of the magnetic field of solar active regions, and comparison with an
approximate method used in the past, indicates that the proposed methodology
can be significantly more accurate, thus making our method a promising tool in
helicity studies that employ the spherical geometry. Additionally, the range of
applicability of the approximate method is determined and discussed.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02096 [pdf] - 1574725
Magnetic Helicity Estimations in Models and Observations of the Solar
Magnetic Field. Part III: Twist Number Method
Guo, Y.;
Pariat, E.;
Valori, G.;
Anfinogentov, S.;
Chen, F.;
Georgoulis, M.;
Liu, Y.;
Moraitis, K.;
Thalmann, J. K.;
Yang, S.
Submitted: 2017-04-07
We study the writhe, twist and magnetic helicity of different magnetic flux
ropes, based on models of the solar coronal magnetic field structure. These
include an analytical force-free Titov--D\'emoulin equilibrium solution, non
force-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and nonlinear force-free magnetic
field models. The geometrical boundary of the magnetic flux rope is determined
by the quasi-separatrix layer and the bottom surface, and the axis curve of the
flux rope is determined by its overall orientation. The twist is computed by
the Berger--Prior formula that is suitable for arbitrary geometry and both
force-free and non-force-free models. The magnetic helicity is estimated by the
twist multiplied by the square of the axial magnetic flux. We compare the
obtained values with those derived by a finite volume helicity estimation
method. We find that the magnetic helicity obtained with the twist method
agrees with the helicity carried by the purely current-carrying part of the
field within uncertainties for most test cases. It is also found that the
current-carrying part of the model field is relatively significant at the very
location of the magnetic flux rope. This qualitatively explains the agreement
between the magnetic helicity computed by the twist method and the helicity
contributed purely by the current-carrying magnetic field.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.02193 [pdf] - 1513738
Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar
magnetic field. Part I: Finite volume methods
Valori, Gherardo;
Pariat, Etienne;
Anfinogentov, Sergey;
Chen, Feng;
Georgoulis, Manolis K.;
Guo, Yang;
Liu, Yang;
Moraitis, Kostas;
Thalmann, Julia K.;
Yang, Shangbin
Submitted: 2016-10-07
Magnetic helicity is a conserved quantity of ideal magneto-hydrodynamics
characterized by an inverse turbulent cascade. Accordingly, it is often invoked
as one of the basic physical quantities driving the generation and structuring
of magnetic fields in a variety of astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. We
provide here the first systematic comparison of six existing methods for the
estimation of the helicity of magnetic fields known in a finite volume. All
such methods are reviewed, benchmarked, and compared with each other, and
specifically tested for accuracy and sensitivity to errors. To that purpose, we
consider four groups of numerical tests, ranging from solutions of the
three-dimensional, force-free equilibrium, to magneto-hydrodynamical numerical
simulations. Almost all methods are found to produce the same value of magnetic
helicity within few percent in all tests. In the more solar-relevant and
realistic of the tests employed here, the simulation of an eruptive flux rope,
the spread in the computed values obtained by all but one method is only 3%,
indicating the reliability and mutual consistency of such methods in
appropriate parameter ranges. However, methods show differences in the
sensitivity to numerical resolution and to errors in the solenoidal property of
the input fields. In addition to finite volume methods, we also briefly discuss
a method that estimates helicity from the field lines' twist, and one that
exploits the field's value at one boundary and a coronal minimal connectivity
instead of a pre-defined three-dimensional magnetic-field solution.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07129 [pdf] - 1523768
An observationally-driven kinetic approach to coronal heating
Submitted: 2016-03-23, last modified: 2016-09-27
Coronal heating through the explosive release of magnetic energy remains an
open problem in solar physics. Recent hydrodynamical models attempt an
investigation by placing swarms of 'nanoflares' at random sites and times in
modeled one-dimensional coronal loops. We investigate the problem in three
dimensions, using extrapolated coronal magnetic fields of observed solar active
regions. We apply a nonlinear force-free field extrapolation above an observed
photospheric magnetogram of NOAA active region (AR) 11158. We then determine
the locations, energy contents, and volumes of 'unstable' areas, namely areas
prone to releasing magnetic energy due to locally accumulated electric current
density. Statistical distributions of these volumes and their fractal dimension
are inferred, investigating also their dependence on spatial resolution.
Further adopting a simple resistivity model, we infer the properties of the
fractally distributed electric fields in these volumes. Next, we monitor the
evolution of 10^5 particles (electrons and ions) obeying an initial Maxwellian
distribution with a temperature of 10 eV, by following their trajectories and
energization when subjected to the resulting electric fields. For computational
convenience, the length element of the magnetic-field extrapolation is 1
arcsec, much coarser than the particles collisional mean free path in the low
corona. The presence of collisions traps the bulk of the plasma around the
unstable volumes, or current sheets (UCS), with only a tail of the distribution
gaining substantial energy. Assuming that the distance between UCS is similar
to the collisional mean free path we find that the low active-region corona is
heated to 100-200 eV, corresponding to temperatures exceeding 2 MK, within tens
of seconds for electrons and thousands of seconds for ions. Fractally
distributed, nanoflare-triggening fragmented UCS ...
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.8117 [pdf] - 881986
Validation of the magnetic energy vs. helicity scaling in solar magnetic
structures
Submitted: 2014-09-29
We assess the validity of the free magnetic energy - relative magnetic
helicity diagram for solar magnetic structures. We used two different methods
of calculating the free magnetic energy and the relative magnetic helicity
budgets: a classical, volume-calculation nonlinear force-free (NLFF) method
applied to finite coronal magnetic structures and a surface-calculation NLFF
derivation that relies on a single photospheric or chromospheric vector
magnetogram. Both methods were applied to two different data sets, namely
synthetic active-region cases obtained by three-dimensional
magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and observed active-region cases, which
include both eruptive and noneruptive magnetic structures. The derived
energy--helicity diagram shows a consistent monotonic scaling between relative
helicity and free energy with a scaling index 0.84$\pm$0.05 for both data sets
and calculation methods. It also confirms the segregation between noneruptive
and eruptive active regions and the existence of thresholds in both free energy
and relative helicity for active regions to enter eruptive territory. We
consider the previously reported energy-helicity diagram of solar magnetic
structures as adequately validated and envision a significant role of the
uncovered scaling in future studies of solar magnetism.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.5381 [pdf] - 1215109
Validation and Benchmarking of a Practical Free Magnetic Energy and
Relative Magnetic Helicity Budget Calculation in Solar Magnetic Structures
Submitted: 2014-06-20
In earlier works we introduced and tested a nonlinear force-free (NLFF)
method designed to self-consistently calculate the free magnetic energy and the
relative magnetic helicity budgets of the corona of observed solar magnetic
structures. The method requires, in principle, only a single, photospheric or
low-chromospheric, vector magnetogram of a quiet-Sun patch or an active region
and performs calculations in the absence of three-dimensional magnetic and
velocity-field information. In this work we strictly validate this method using
three-dimensional coronal magnetic fields. Benchmarking employs both synthetic,
three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations and nonlinear force-free
field extrapolations of the active-region solar corona. We find that our
time-efficient NLFF method provides budgets that differ from those of more
demanding semi-analytical methods by a factor of ~3, at most. This difference
is expected from the physical concept and the construction of the method.
Temporal correlations show more discrepancies that, however, are soundly
improved for more complex, massive active regions, reaching correlation
coefficients of the order of, or exceeding, 0.9. In conclusion, we argue that
our NLFF method can be reliably used for a routine and fast calculation of free
magnetic energy and relative magnetic helicity budgets in targeted parts of the
solar magnetized corona. As explained here and in previous works, this is an
asset that can lead to valuable insight into the physics and the triggering of
solar eruptions.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.4511 [pdf] - 1041459
X-ray variability patterns in blazars
Submitted: 2010-10-21
We study the expected variability patterns of blazars within the two-zone
acceleration model putting special emphasis on flare shapes and spectral lags.
We solve semi-analytically the kinetic equations which describe the particle
evolution in the acceleration and radiation zone. We then perturb the solutions
by introducing Lorentzian variations in its key parameters and examine the
flaring behavior of the system. We apply the above to the X-ray observations of
blazar 1ES 1218+304 which exhibited a hard lag behavior during a flaring
episode and discuss possibilities of producing it within the context of our
model. The steady-state radio to X-rays emission of 1ES 1218+304 can be
reproduced with parameters which lie well within the ones generally accepted
from blazar modeling. Additionally, we find that the best way to explain its
flaring behavior is by varying the rate of particles injected in the
acceleration zone.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.2420 [pdf] - 17411
On the rapid TeV flaring activity of Markarian 501
Submitted: 2008-10-14
Aims: We investigate the one-zone SSC model of TeV blazars in the presence of
electron acceleration. In this picture electrons reach a maximum energy where
acceleration saturates from a combination of synchrotron and inverse Compton
scattering losses. Methods: We solve the spatially averaged kinetic equations
which describe the simultaneous evolution of particles and photons, obtaining
the multi-wavelength spectrum as a function of time. Results: We apply the
model to the rapid flare of Mrk 501 of July 9, 2005 as this was observed by the
MAGIC telescope and obtain the relevant parameters for the pre-flare quasi
steady state and the ones during the flare. We show that a hard lag flare can
be obtained with parameters which lie well within the range already accepted
for this source. Especially the choice of a high value of the Doppler factor
seems to be necessary.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610315 [pdf] - 85739
A two-zone model for the emission from RX J1713.7-3946
Submitted: 2006-10-11
We study the acceleration and radiation of charged particles in the shock
waves of supernova remnants using a recent version of the "box model".
According to this, particles are accelerated in an energy-dependent region
around the shock by the first order Fermi mechanism and lose energy through
radiation. The particle distribution function is obtained from a spatially
averaged kinetic equation that treats the energy losses self-consistently.
There exists also a second population that consists of those particles that
escape behind the shock where they also radiate. The energy distribution of
this population is calculated in a similar manner. The application of the model
to the supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946, which was recently confirmed as a TeV
source by H.E.S.S., shows that the X-ray emission can be attributed to electron
synchrotron radiation while in gamma-rays there are contributions from both
electrons and protons, with protons playing the dominant role. Additionally,
there are strong indications that particles diffuse in turbulence that has a
Kolmogorov spectrum.