Normalized to: Morag, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.11252 [pdf] - 1923587
SN2018fif: The explosion of a large red supergiant discovered in its
infancy by the Zwicky Transient Facility
Soumagnac, Maayane T.;
Ganot, Noam;
Gal-yam, Avishay;
Ofek, Eran O.;
Yaron, Ofer;
Waxman, Eli;
Schulze, Steve;
Yang, Yi;
Rubin, Adam;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Sollerman, Jesper;
Perley, Daniel A.;
Fremling, Christoffer;
Nugent, Peter;
Neill, James D.;
Karamehmetoglu, Emir;
Bellm, Eric C.;
Bruch, Rachel J.;
Burruss, Rick;
Cunningham, Virginia;
Dekany, Richard;
Golkhou, V. Zach;
Irani, Ido;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Konidaris, Nicholas P;
Kulkarni, Shrinivas R.;
Kupfer, Thomas;
Laher, Russ R.;
Masci, Frank J.;
Morag, Jonathan;
Riddle, Reed;
Rigault, Mickael;
Rusholme, Ben;
van Roestel, Jan;
Zackay, Barak
Submitted: 2019-07-25
High cadence transient surveys are able to capture supernovae closer to their
first light than before. Applying analytical models to such early emission, we
can constrain the progenitor stars properties. In this paper, we present
observations of SN2018fif (ZTF18abokyfk). The supernova was discovered close to
first light and monitored by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) and the Neil
Gehrels Swift Observatory. Early spectroscopic observations suggest that the
progenitor of SN2018fif was surrounded by relatively small amounts of
circumstellar material (CSM) compared to all previous cases. This
particularity, coupled with the high cadence multiple-band coverage, makes it a
good candidate to investigate using shock-cooling models. We employ the
SOPRANOS code, an implementation of the model by Sapir & Waxman (2017).
Compared with previous implementations, SOPRANOS has the advantage of including
a careful account of the limited temporal validity domain of the shock-cooling
model. We find that the progenitor of SN2018fif was a large red supergiant,
with a radius of R=1174_{-81}^{+208} solar radii, and an ejected mass of
M=5.6_{-1.0}^{+9.1} solar masses. Our model also gives information on the
explosion epoch, the progenitor inner structure, the shock velocity and the
extinction. The large radius differs from previously modeled objects, and the
difference could be either intrinsic or due to the relatively small amount of
CSM around SN2018fif, perhaps making it a "cleaner" candidate for applying
shock-cooling analytical models.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.1686 [pdf] - 1002844
What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'?
Submitted: 2009-07-09, last modified: 2010-04-25
We present a critical analysis of the observational constraints on, and of
the theoretical modeling of, aspects of cosmic ray (CR) generation and
propagation in the Galaxy, which are relevant for the interpretation of recent
positron and anti-proton measurements. We give simple, analytic, model
independent expressions for the secondary pbar flux, and an upper limit for the
secondary e+ flux, obtained by neglecting e+ radiative losses, e+/(e+ +
e-)<0.2\pm0.1 up to ~300 GeV. These expressions are completely determined by
the rigidity dependent grammage, which is measured from stable CR secondaries
up to ~150 GeV/nuc, and by nuclear cross sections measured in the laboratory.
pbar and e+ measurements, available up to ~100 GeV, are consistent with these
estimates, implying that there is no need for new, non-secondary, pbar or e+
sources. The radiative loss suppression factor f_{s,e+} of the e+ flux depends
on the e+ propagation in the Galaxy, which is not understood theoretically. A
rough, model independent estimate of f_{s,e+} 1/3 can be obtained at a single
energy, E\sim20 GeV, from unstable secondary decay and is found to be
consistent with e+ measurements, including the positron fraction measured by
PAMELA. We show that specific detailed models, that agree with compositional CR
data, agree with our simple expressions for the e+ and pbar flux, and that the
claims that the positron fraction measured by PAMELA requires new primary e+
sources are based on assumptions, that are not supported by observations. If
PAMELA results are correct, they suggest that f_{s,e+} is slightly increasing
with energy, which provides an interesting constraint on CR propagation models.
We argue that measurements of the e+ to pbar ratio are more useful for
challenging secondary production models than the positron fraction.