sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Morag, Jonathan

Normalized to: Morag, J.

2 article(s) in total. 36 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 16,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1907.11252  [pdf] - 1923587
SN2018fif: The explosion of a large red supergiant discovered in its infancy by the Zwicky Transient Facility
Comments: Submitted to ApJ. Comments are welcome
Submitted: 2019-07-25
High cadence transient surveys are able to capture supernovae closer to their first light than before. Applying analytical models to such early emission, we can constrain the progenitor stars properties. In this paper, we present observations of SN2018fif (ZTF18abokyfk). The supernova was discovered close to first light and monitored by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. Early spectroscopic observations suggest that the progenitor of SN2018fif was surrounded by relatively small amounts of circumstellar material (CSM) compared to all previous cases. This particularity, coupled with the high cadence multiple-band coverage, makes it a good candidate to investigate using shock-cooling models. We employ the SOPRANOS code, an implementation of the model by Sapir & Waxman (2017). Compared with previous implementations, SOPRANOS has the advantage of including a careful account of the limited temporal validity domain of the shock-cooling model. We find that the progenitor of SN2018fif was a large red supergiant, with a radius of R=1174_{-81}^{+208} solar radii, and an ejected mass of M=5.6_{-1.0}^{+9.1} solar masses. Our model also gives information on the explosion epoch, the progenitor inner structure, the shock velocity and the extinction. The large radius differs from previously modeled objects, and the difference could be either intrinsic or due to the relatively small amount of CSM around SN2018fif, perhaps making it a "cleaner" candidate for applying shock-cooling analytical models.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:0907.1686  [pdf] - 1002844
What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'?
Comments: 16 pages, 10 figures, minor revisions, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2009-07-09, last modified: 2010-04-25
We present a critical analysis of the observational constraints on, and of the theoretical modeling of, aspects of cosmic ray (CR) generation and propagation in the Galaxy, which are relevant for the interpretation of recent positron and anti-proton measurements. We give simple, analytic, model independent expressions for the secondary pbar flux, and an upper limit for the secondary e+ flux, obtained by neglecting e+ radiative losses, e+/(e+ + e-)<0.2\pm0.1 up to ~300 GeV. These expressions are completely determined by the rigidity dependent grammage, which is measured from stable CR secondaries up to ~150 GeV/nuc, and by nuclear cross sections measured in the laboratory. pbar and e+ measurements, available up to ~100 GeV, are consistent with these estimates, implying that there is no need for new, non-secondary, pbar or e+ sources. The radiative loss suppression factor f_{s,e+} of the e+ flux depends on the e+ propagation in the Galaxy, which is not understood theoretically. A rough, model independent estimate of f_{s,e+} 1/3 can be obtained at a single energy, E\sim20 GeV, from unstable secondary decay and is found to be consistent with e+ measurements, including the positron fraction measured by PAMELA. We show that specific detailed models, that agree with compositional CR data, agree with our simple expressions for the e+ and pbar flux, and that the claims that the positron fraction measured by PAMELA requires new primary e+ sources are based on assumptions, that are not supported by observations. If PAMELA results are correct, they suggest that f_{s,e+} is slightly increasing with energy, which provides an interesting constraint on CR propagation models. We argue that measurements of the e+ to pbar ratio are more useful for challenging secondary production models than the positron fraction.