Normalized to: Moorhead, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14039 [pdf] - 2122124
Forbidden mass ranges for shower meteoroids
Submitted: 2020-06-24
Burns et al. (1979) use the parameter beta to describe the ratio of radiation
pressure to gravity experienced by a small particle in the solar system. The
central potential that these particles experience is effectively reduced by a
factor of (1 - beta), lowering the escape velocity. Burns et al. (1979) also
provide a simple expression for the value of beta at which particles ejected
from a comet follow parabolic orbits and thus leave the solar system; this
paper expands on this to calculate critical beta values that take ejection
velocity into account. We first derive an expression for the speed at which
particles are ejected from a comet that is valid at all particle sizes. We then
calculate beta values for both idealized and real materials to determine which
particles will be lost from meteor streams. We perform these calculations for
cometary ejecta leading, trailing, and following the parent comet's nucleus for
10 major meteor showers. These values bound mass regimes within which
meteoroids are ejected from the solar system and therefore cannot contribute to
meteor showers.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.05458 [pdf] - 2069117
Realistic gravitational focusing of meteoroid streams
Submitted: 2020-03-11
The number density and flux of a meteoroid stream is enhanced near a massive
body due to the phenomenon known as gravitational focusing. The greatest
enhancement occurs directly opposite the massive body from the stream radiant:
as an observer approaches this location, the degree of focusing is unbound for
a perfectly collimated stream. However, real meteoroid streams exhibit some
dispersion in radiant and speed that will act to eliminate this singularity. In
this paper, we derive an analytic approximation for this smoothing that can be
used in meteoroid environment models and is based on real measurements of
meteor shower radiant dispersion.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.10729 [pdf] - 1985808
Meteor shower activity profiles and the use of orbital dissimilarity (D)
criteria
Submitted: 2019-10-23
Orbital dissimilarity, or D, criteria are often used to select members of a
meteor shower from a set of meteor observations. These criteria provide a
quantitative description of the degree to which two orbits differ; if the
degree of dissimilarity between a shower's reference orbit and an individual
meteor does not exceed a selected threshold, the meteor is considered to be a
member of that shower. However, members of a meteor shower tend to disperse in
longitude of the ascending node (and thus in solar longitude) while preserving
a common Sun-centered ecliptic radiant. Employing dissimilarity criteria to
judge shower membership may therefore make the shower appear briefer than it
actually is. We demonstrate this effect for two simulated meteor showers and
assess the maximum permitted deviation in solar longitude as a function of
radiant and velocity measurement error.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.05947 [pdf] - 1969641
NASA's Meteoroid Engineering Model (MEM) 3 and its ability to replicate
spacecraft impact rates
Submitted: 2019-09-12, last modified: 2019-09-27
Meteoroids pose one of the largest risks to spacecraft outside of low Earth
orbit. In order to correctly predict the rate at which meteoroids impact and
damage spacecraft, environment models must describe the mass, directionality,
velocity, and density distributions of meteoroids. NASA's Meteoroid Engineering
Model (MEM) is one such model; MEM 3 is an updated version of the code that
better captures the correlation between directionality and velocity and
incorporates a bulk density distribution. This paper describes MEM 3 and
compares its predictions with the rate of large particle impacts seen on the
Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) and the Pegasus II and III satellites.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.12185 [pdf] - 1886611
Meteor Shower Modeling: Past and Future Draconid Outbursts
Submitted: 2019-04-27
This work presents numerical simulations of meteoroid streams released by
comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner over the period 1850-2030. The initial methodology,
based on Vaubaillon et al. (2005), has been updated and modified to account for
the evolution of the comet's dust production along its orbit. The peak time,
intensity, and duration of the shower were assessed using simulated activity
profiles that are calibrated to match observations of historic Draconid
outbursts. The characteristics of all the main apparitions of the shower are
reproduced, with a peak time accuracy of half an hour and an intensity estimate
correct to within a factor of 2 (visual showers) or 3 (radio outbursts). Our
model also revealed the existence of a previously unreported strong radio
outburst on October 9 1999, that has since been confirmed by archival radar
measurements. The first results of the model, presented in Egal et al. (2018),
provided one of the best predictions of the recent 2018 outburst. Three future
radio outbursts are predicted in the next decade, in 2019, 2025 and 2029. The
strongest activity is expected in 2025 when the Earth encounters the young 2012
trail. Because of the dynamical uncertainties associated with comet 21P's
orbital evolution between the 1959 and 1965 apparitions, observations of the
2019 radio outburst would be particularly helpful to improve the confidence of
subsequent forecasts.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.06370 [pdf] - 1867268
Meteor shower forecasting in near-Earth space
Submitted: 2019-04-12
NASA's Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) produces an annual meteor shower
forecast in order to help spacecraft operators assess the risk posed by
meteoroid streams. Previously, this forecast focused on the International Space
Station and therefore reported meteoroid fluxes and enhancement factors at an
orbital altitude of 400 km. This paper presents an updated forecast algorithm
that has an improved calculation of the flux enhancement produced by showers
and can calculate fluxes at any selected Earth or lunar orbital altitude.
Finally, we discuss and generate forecasted fluxes for the 2018 Draconid meteor
shower, which is expected to produce meteoroid flux enhancements near the
Sun-Earth L1 and L2 Lagrange points but not at Earth.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.07393 [pdf] - 1767669
The Draconid meteoroid stream 2018: prospects for satellite impact
detection
Submitted: 2018-09-19
Predictions of the 2018 Draconid activity at the Earth and the Sun-Earth L1
and L2 Lagrange points are presented. Numerical simulations of the meteoroids'
ejection and evolution from comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner are performed with a
careful implementation of the results analysis and weighting. Model meteoroid
fluxes at Earth are derived using as calibration the main peak date, intensity,
and shower profiles of previous Draconid outbursts. Good agreement between the
model and measurements is found for the 1933, 1946, 1998 and 2011 showers for a
meteoroid size distribution index at ejection of about 2.6. A less accurate
estimate of the peak time for the 1985, 2005 and 2012 predominantly
radio-observed outbursts was found by considering the contribution of
individual ejection epochs, while the model peak flux estimate was found to
agree with observations to within a factor 3. Despite the promising geometrical
configuration in 2018, our simulations predict low Draconid activity is
expected on Earth, with a maximum of less than a few tens of meteors per hour
around midnight the 9th of October, confirming previous models. At the L1 and
L2 Lagrange points, however, the flux estimates suggest a 'meteoroid storm'.
The Gaia spacecraft at the L2 region might be able to detect small (~ {\mu}g)
Draconid meteoroid impacts centered in a two-hour window around 18h30 UT on the
8th of October, 2018.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.02656 [pdf] - 1648545
Meteor Shower Detection with Density-Based Clustering
Submitted: 2017-02-08
We present a new method to detect meteor showers using the Density-Based
Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise algorithm (DBSCAN; Ester et al.
1996). DBSCAN is a modern cluster detection algorithm that is well suited to
the problem of extracting meteor showers from all-sky camera data because of
its ability to efficiently extract clusters of different shapes and sizes from
large datasets. We apply this shower detection algorithm on a dataset that
contains 25,885 meteor trajectories and orbits obtained from the NASA All-Sky
Fireball Network and the Southern Ontario Meteor Network (SOMN). Using a
distance metric based on solar longitude, geocentric velocity, and Sun-centered
ecliptic radiant, we find 25 strong cluster detections and 6 weak detections in
the data, all of which are good matches to known showers. We include
measurement errors in our analysis to quantify the reliability of cluster
occurrence and the probability that each meteor belongs to a given cluster. We
validate our method through false positive/negative analysis and with a
comparison to an established shower detection algorithm.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.02487 [pdf] - 1327562
Performance of D-criteria in isolating meteor showers from the sporadic
background in an optical data set
Submitted: 2015-11-08
Separating meteor showers from the sporadic meteor background is critical for
the study of both showers and the sporadic complex. The linkage of meteors to
meteor showers, to parent bodies, and to other meteors is done using measures
of orbital similarity. These measures often take the form of so-called
D-parameters and are generally paired with some cutoff value within which two
orbits are considered related. The appropriate cutoff value can depend on the
size of the data-set (Southworth & Hawkins 1963), the sporadic contribution
within the observed size range (Jopek 1995), or the inclination of the shower
(Galligan 2001). If the goal is to minimize sporadic contamination of the
extracted shower, the cutoff value should also reflect the strength of the
shower compared to the local sporadic background. In this paper, we present a
method for determining, on a per-shower basis, the orbital similarity cutoff
value that corresponds to a chosen acceptable false-positive rate. This method
also assists us in distinguishing which showers are significant within a set of
data. We apply these methods to optical meteor observations from the NASA
All-Sky and Southern Ontario Meteor Networks.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.5415 [pdf] - 1093259
Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: IV. Confirmation of 4 Multiple
Planet Systems by Simple Physical Models
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Steffen, Jason H.;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Carter, Joshua A.;
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Borucki, William J.;
Bryson, Steve;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Christiansen, Jessie L.;
Ciardi, David R.;
Cochran, William D.;
Endl, Michael;
Fanelli, Michael N.;
Fischer, Debra;
Fressin, Francois;
Geary, John;
Haas, Michael R.;
Hall, Jennifer R.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Koch, David G.;
Latham, David W.;
Li, Jie;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Lucas, Philip;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Mazeh, Tsevi;
McCauliff, Sean;
Quinn, Samuel;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Sasselov, Dimitar;
Shporer, Avi
Submitted: 2012-01-25, last modified: 2012-04-02
Eighty planetary systems of two or more planets are known to orbit stars
other than the Sun. For most, the data can be sufficiently explained by
non-interacting Keplerian orbits, so the dynamical interactions of these
systems have not been observed. Here we present 4 sets of lightcurves from the
Kepler spacecraft, which each show multiple planets transiting the same star.
Departure of the timing of these transits from strict periodicity indicates the
planets are perturbing each other: the observed timing variations match the
forcing frequency of the other planet. This confirms that these objects are in
the same system. Next we limit their masses to the planetary regime by
requiring the system remain stable for astronomical timescales. Finally, we
report dynamical fits to the transit times, yielding possible values for the
planets' masses and eccentricities. As the timespan of timing data increases,
dynamical fits may allow detailed constraints on the systems' architectures,
even in cases for which high-precision Doppler follow-up is impractical.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.5412 [pdf] - 1093258
Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: III. Confirmation of 4 Multiple
Planet Systems by a Fourier-Domain Study of Anti-correlated Transit Timing
Variations
Steffen, Jason H.;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Carter, Joshua A.;
Desert, Jean-Michel;
Fressin, Francois;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Welsh, William F.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Borucki, William J.;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Bryson, Steve;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Charbonneau, David;
Ciardi, David R.;
Cochran, William D.;
Endl, Michael;
Everett, Mark E.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Gilliland, Ron L.;
Girouard, Forrest R.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Horch, Elliott;
Howell, Steve B.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Klaus, Todd C.;
Koch, David G.;
Latham, David W.;
Li, Jie;
Lucas, Philip;
MacQueen, Phillip J.;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
McCauliff, Sean;
Middour, Christopher K.;
Morris, Robert L.;
Mullally, Fergal R.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Quintana, Elisa V.;
Shporer, Avi;
Still, Martin;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Thompson, Susan E.;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Van Cleve, Jeffery
Submitted: 2012-01-25
We present a method to confirm the planetary nature of objects in systems
with multiple transiting exoplanet candidates. This method involves a
Fourier-Domain analysis of the deviations in the transit times from a constant
period that result from dynamical interactions within the system. The
combination of observed anti-correlations in the transit times and mass
constraints from dynamical stability allow us to claim the discovery of four
planetary systems Kepler-25, Kepler-26, Kepler-27, and Kepler-28, containing
eight planets and one additional planet candidate.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.5409 [pdf] - 1093257
Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: II. Confirmation of Two
Multiplanet Systems via a Non-parametric Correlation Analysis
Ford, Eric B.;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Steffen, Jason H.;
Carter, Joshua A.;
Fressin, Francois;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Morehead, Robert C.;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Welsh, William F.;
Allen, Christopher;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Borucki, William J.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Burke, Christopher J.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Charbonneau, David;
Clarke, Bruce D.;
Cochran, William D.;
Désert, Jean-Michel;
Endl, Michael;
Everett, Mark E.;
Fischer, Debra A.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Gilliland, Ron L.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Haas, Michael R.;
Horch, Elliott;
Howell, Steve B.;
Ibrahim, Khadeejah A.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Koch, David G.;
Latham, David W.;
Li, Jie;
Lucas, Philip;
MacQueen, Phillip J.;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
McCauliff, Sean;
Mullally, Fergal R.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Quintana, Elisa;
Shporer, Avi;
Still, Martin;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Thompson, Susan E.;
Torres, Guillermo;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Wohler, Bill
Submitted: 2012-01-25
We present a new method for confirming transiting planets based on the
combination of transit timingn variations (TTVs) and dynamical stability.
Correlated TTVs provide evidence that the pair of bodies are in the same
physical system. Orbital stability provides upper limits for the masses of the
transiting companions that are in the planetary regime. This paper describes a
non-parametric technique for quantifying the statistical significance of TTVs
based on the correlation of two TTV data sets. We apply this method to an
analysis of the transit timing variations of two stars with multiple transiting
planet candidates identified by Kepler. We confirm four transiting planets in
two multiple planet systems based on their TTVs and the constraints imposed by
dynamical stability. An additional three candidates in these same systems are
not confirmed as planets, but are likely to be validated as real planets once
further observations and analyses are possible. If all were confirmed, these
systems would be near 4:6:9 and 2:4:6:9 period commensurabilities. Our results
demonstrate that TTVs provide a powerful tool for confirming transiting
planets, including low-mass planets and planets around faint stars for which
Doppler follow-up is not practical with existing facilities. Continued Kepler
observations will dramatically improve the constraints on the planet masses and
orbits and provide sensitivity for detecting additional non-transiting planets.
If Kepler observations were extended to eight years, then a similar analysis
could likely confirm systems with multiple closely spaced, small transiting
planets in or near the habitable zone of solar-type stars.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4047 [pdf] - 388667
A Bayesian Surrogate Model for Rapid Time Series Analysis and
Application to Exoplanet Observations
Submitted: 2011-07-20
We present a Bayesian surrogate model for the analysis of periodic or
quasi-periodic time series data. We describe a computationally efficient
implementation that enables Bayesian model comparison. We apply this model to
simulated and real exoplanet observations. We discuss the results and
demonstrate some of the challenges for applying our surrogate model to
realistic exoplanet data sets. In particular, we find that analyses of real
world data should pay careful attention to the effects of uneven spacing of
observations and the choice of prior for the "jitter" parameter.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.2541 [pdf] - 1052692
Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-type Stars from Kepler
Howard, Andrew W.;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Borucki, William J.;
Koch, David G.;
Dunham, Edward W.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey;
Cochran, William D.;
Latham, David W.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Torres, Guillermo;
Brown, Timothy M.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jorgen;
Ciardi, David;
Fressin, Francois;
Haas, Michael R.;
Howell, Steve B.;
Kjeldsen, Hans;
Seager, Sara;
Rogers, Leslie;
Sasselov, Dimitar D.;
Steffen, Jason H.;
Basri, Gibor S.;
Charbonneau, David;
Christiansen, Jessie;
Clarke, Bruce;
Dupree, Andrea;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Fischer, Debra A.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Fortney, Jonathan J.;
Tarter, Jill;
Girouard, Forrest R.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Johnson, John Asher;
Klaus, Todd C.;
Machalek, Pavel;
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Morehead, Robert C.;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Shporer, Avi;
Lucas, Philip W.;
Walkowicz, Lucianne M.;
Welsh, William F.;
Boss, Alan;
Devore, Edna;
Gould, Alan;
Smith, Jeffrey C.;
Morris, Robert L.;
Prsa, Andrej;
Morton, Timothy D.
Submitted: 2011-03-13
We report the distribution of planets as a function of planet radius (R_p),
orbital period (P), and stellar effective temperature (Teff) for P < 50 day
orbits around GK stars. These results are based on the 1,235 planets (formally
"planet candidates") from the Kepler mission that include a nearly complete set
of detected planets as small as 2 Earth radii (Re). For each of the 156,000
target stars we assess the detectability of planets as a function of R_p and P.
We also correct for the geometric probability of transit, R*/a. We consider
first stars within the "solar subset" having Teff = 4100-6100 K, logg =
4.0-4.9, and Kepler magnitude Kp < 15 mag. We include only those stars having
noise low enough to permit detection of planets down to 2 Re. We count planets
in small domains of R_p and P and divide by the included target stars to
calculate planet occurrence in each domain. Occurrence of planets varies by
more than three orders of magnitude and increases substantially down to the
smallest radius (2 Re) and out to the longest orbital period (50 days, ~0.25
AU) in our study. For P < 50 days, the radius distribution is given by a power
law, df/dlogR= k R^\alpha. This rapid increase in planet occurrence with
decreasing planet size agrees with core-accretion, but disagrees with
population synthesis models. We fit occurrence as a function of P to a power
law model with an exponential cutoff below a critical period P_0. For smaller
planets, P_0 has larger values, suggesting that the "parking distance" for
migrating planets moves outward with decreasing planet size. We also measured
planet occurrence over Teff = 3600-7100 K, spanning M0 to F2 dwarfs. The
occurrence of 2-4 Re planets in the Kepler field increases with decreasing
Teff, making these small planets seven times more abundant around cool stars
than the hottest stars in our sample. [abridged]
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.0547 [pdf] - 1051852
The Distribution of Transit Durations for Kepler Planet Candidates and
Implications for their Orbital Eccentricities
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Ford, Eric B.;
Morehead, Robert C.;
Rowe, Jason;
Borucki, William J.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Koch, David G.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Li, Jie;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Lucas, Philip;
Marcy, Geoffrey W.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Quintana, Elisa;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Shporer, Avi;
Still, Martin;
Torres, Guillermo
Submitted: 2011-02-02
Doppler planet searches have discovered that giant planets follow orbits with
a wide range of orbital eccentricities, revolutionizing theories of planet
formation. The discovery of hundreds of exoplanet candidates by NASA's Kepler
mission enables astronomers to characterize the eccentricity distribution of
small exoplanets. Measuring the eccentricity of individual planets is only
practical in favorable cases that are amenable to complementary techniques
(e.g., radial velocities, transit timing variations, occultation photometry).
Yet even in the absence of individual eccentricities, it is possible to study
the distribution of eccentricities based on the distribution of transit
durations (relative to the maximum transit duration for a circular orbit). We
analyze the transit duration distribution of Kepler planet candidates. We find
that for host stars with T_eff > 5100 K we cannot invert this to infer the
eccentricity distribution at this time due to uncertainties and possible
systematics in the host star densities. With this limitation in mind, we
compare the observed transit duration distribution with models to rule out
extreme distributions. If we assume a Rayleigh eccentricity distribution for
Kepler planet candidates, then we find best-fits with a mean eccentricity of
0.1-0.25 for host stars with T_eff < 5100 K. We compare the transit duration
distribution for different subsets of Kepler planet candidates and discuss
tentative trends with planetary radius and multiplicity. High-precision
spectroscopic follow-up observations for a large sample of host stars will be
required to confirm which trends are real and which are the results of
systematic errors in stellar radii. Finally, we identify planet candidates that
must be eccentric or have a significantly underestimated stellar radius.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1006.2763 [pdf] - 270069
Five Kepler target stars that show multiple transiting exoplanet
candidates
Steffen, Jason H.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Borucki, William J.;
Buchhave, Lars A.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Cochran, William D.;
Endl, Michael;
Fabrycky, Daniel C.;
Fressin, François;
Ford, Eric B.;
Fortney, Jonathan J.;
Haas, Michael J.;
Holman, Matthew J.;
Howell, Steve B.;
Isaacson, Howard;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Koch, David;
Latham, David W.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Moorhead, Althea V.;
Morehead, Robert C.;
Marcy, Geoffrey;
MacQueen, Phillip J.;
Quinn, Samuel N.;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Sasselov, Dimitar D.;
Seager, Sara;
Torres, Guillermo;
Welsh, William F.
Submitted: 2010-06-14, last modified: 2010-11-09
We present and discuss five candidate exoplanetary systems identified with
the Kepler spacecraft. These five systems show transits from multiple exoplanet
candidates. Should these objects prove to be planetary in nature, then these
five systems open new opportunities for the field of exoplanets and provide new
insights into the formation and dynamical evolution of planetary systems. We
discuss the methods used to identify multiple transiting objects from the
Kepler photometry as well as the false-positive rejection methods that have
been applied to these data. One system shows transits from three distinct
objects while the remaining four systems show transits from two objects. Three
systems have planet candidates that are near mean motion
commensurabilities---two near 2:1 and one just outside 5:2. We discuss the
implications that multitransiting systems have on the distribution of orbital
inclinations in planetary systems, and hence their dynamical histories; as well
as their likely masses and chemical compositions. A Monte Carlo study indicates
that, with additional data, most of these systems should exhibit detectable
transit timing variations (TTV) due to gravitational interactions---though none
are apparent in these data. We also discuss new challenges that arise in TTV
analyses due to the presence of more than two planets in a system.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.3336 [pdf] - 23552
Type II migration of planets on eccentric orbits
Submitted: 2009-04-21
The observed extrasolar planets possess both large masses (with a median M
sin i of 1.65 MJ) and a wide range in orbital eccentricity (0 < e < 0.94). As
planets are thought to form in circumstellar disks, one important question in
planet formation is determining whether, and to what degree, a gaseous disk
affects an eccentric planet's orbit. Recent studies have probed the interaction
between a disk and a terrestrial planet on an eccentric orbit, and the
interaction between a disk and a gas giant on a nearly circular orbit, but
little is known about the interaction between a disk and an eccentric gas
giant. Such a scenario could arise due to scattering while the disk is still
present, or perhaps through planet formation via gravitational instability. We
fill this gap with simulations of eccentric, massive (gap-forming) planets in
disks using the hydrodynamical code FARGO. Although the long-term orbital
evolution of the planet depends on disk properties, including the boundary
conditions used, the disk always acts to damp eccentricity when the planet is
released into the disk. This eccentricity damping takes place on a timescale of
40 years, 15 times faster than the migration timescale.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.0335 [pdf] - 3663
Eccentricity evolution of giant planet orbits due to circumstellar disk
torques
Submitted: 2007-08-01
The extrasolar planets discovered to date possess unexpected orbital
elements. Most orbit their host stars with larger eccentricities and smaller
semi-major axes than similarly sized planets in our own solar system do. It is
generally agreed that the interaction between giant planets and circumstellar
disks (Type II migration) drives these planets inward to small radii, but the
effect of these same disks on orbital eccentricity, e, is controversial.
Several recent analytic calculations suggest that disk-planet interactions can
excite eccentricity, while numerical studies generally produce eccentricity
damping. This paper addresses this controversy using a quasi-analytic approach,
drawing on several preceding analytic studies. This work refines the current
treatment of eccentricity evolution by removing several approximations from the
calculation of disk torques. We encounter neither uniform damping nor uniform
excitation of orbital eccentricity, but rather a function de/dt that varies in
both sign and magnitude depending on eccentricity and other solar system
properties. Most significantly, we find that for every combination of disk and
planet properties investigated herein, corotation torques produce negative
values of de/dt for some range in e within the interval [0.1, 0.5]. If
corotation torques are saturated, this region of eccentricity damping
disappears, and excitation occurs on a short timescale of less than 0.08 Myr.
Thus, our study does not produce eccentricity excitation on a timescale of a
few Myr -- we obtain either eccentricity excitation on a short time scale, or
eccentricity damping on a longer time scale. Finally, we discuss the
implications of this result for producing the observed range in extrasolar
planet eccentricity.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505234 [pdf] - 73004
Giant Planet Migration through the Action of Disk Torques and Planet
Scattering
Submitted: 2005-05-11
This paper presents a parametric study of giant planet migration through the
combined action of disk torques and planet-planet scattering. The torques
exerted on planets during Type II migration in circumstellar disks readily
decrease the semi-major axes, whereas scattering between planets increases the
orbital eccentricities. This paper presents a parametric exploration of the
possible parameter space for this migration scenario using two (initial)
planetary mass distributions and a range of values for the time scale of
eccentricity damping (due to the disk). For each class of systems, many
realizations of the simulations are performed in order to determine the
distributions of the resulting orbital elements of the surviving planets; this
paper presents the results of 8500 numerical experiments. Our goal is to study
the physics of this particular migration mechanism and to test it against
observations of extrasolar planets. The action of disk torques and
planet-planet scattering results in a distribution of final orbital elements
that fills the a-e plane, in rough agreement with the orbital elements of
observed extrasolar planets. In addition to specifying the orbital elements, we
characterize this migration mechanism by finding the percentages of ejected and
accreted planets, the number of collisions, the dependence of outcomes on
planetary masses, the time spent in 2:1 and 3:1 resonances, and the effects of
the planetary IMF. We also determine the distribution of inclination angles of
surviving planets and the distribution of ejection speeds for exiled planets.