sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Mondragon, Antonio R.

Normalized to: Mondragon, A.

6 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1012.5438  [pdf] - 1394087
Kepler's Orbits and Special Relativity in Introductory Classical Mechanics
Comments: 13 pages, 3 figures. Final draft with less controversial language concerning relativistic mass
Submitted: 2010-12-24, last modified: 2016-04-20
Kepler's orbits with corrections due to Special Relativity are explored using the Lagrangian formalism. A very simple model includes only relativistic kinetic energy by defining a Lagrangian that is consistent with both the relativistic momentum of Special Relativity and Newtonian gravity. The corresponding equations of motion are solved in a Keplerian limit, resulting in an approximate relativistic orbit equation that has the same form as that derived from General Relativity in the same limit and clearly describes three characteristics of relativistic Keplerian orbits: precession of perihelion; reduced radius of circular orbit; and increased eccentricity. The prediction for the rate of precession of perihelion is in agreement with established calculations using only Special Relativity. All three characteristics are qualitatively correct, though suppressed when compared to more accurate general-relativistic calculations. This model is improved upon by including relativistic gravitational potential energy. The resulting approximate relativistic orbit equation has the same form and symmetry as that derived using the very simple model, and more accurately describes characteristics of relativistic orbits. For example, the prediction for the rate of precession of perihelion of Mercury is one-third that derived from General Relativity. These Lagrangian formulations of the special-relativistic Kepler problem are equivalent to the familiar vector calculus formulations. In this Keplerian limit, these models are supposed to be physical based on the likeness of the equations of motion to those derived using General Relativity. The derivation of this orbit equation is approachable by undergraduate physics majors and nonspecialists whom have not had a course dedicated to relativity.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:0906.1221  [pdf] - 25015
Alternative derivation of the relativistic contribution to perihelic precession
Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in the American Journal of Physics
Submitted: 2009-06-07, last modified: 2009-09-03
An alternative derivation of the first-order relativistic contribution to perihelic precession is presented. Orbital motion in the Schwarzschild geometry is considered in the Keplerian limit, and the orbit equation is derived for approximately elliptical motion. The method of solution makes use of coordinate transformations and the correspondence principle, rather than the standard perturbative approach. The form of the resulting orbit equation is similar to that derived from Newtonian mechanics and includes first-order corrections to Kepler's orbits due to general relativity. The associated relativistic contribution to perihelic precession agrees with established first-order results. The reduced radius for the circular orbit is in agreement to first-order with that calculated from the Schwarzschild effective potential. The method of solution is understandable by undergraduate students.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:0809.0850  [pdf] - 15979
A Keplerian Limit to Static Spherical Spacetimes in Curvature Coordinates
Comments: 47 pages, 9 figures, Submitted to American Journal of Physics
Submitted: 2008-09-04
The problem of a test body in the Schwarzschild geometry is investigated in a Keplerian limit. Beginning with the Schwarzschild metric, a solution to the limited case of approximately elliptical (Keplerian) motion is derived in terms of trigonometric functions. This solution is similar in form to that derived from Newtonian mechanics, and includes first-order corrections describing three effects due to general relativity: precession; reduced radial coordinate; and increased eccentricity. The quantitative prediction of increased eccentricity may provide an additional observational test of general relativity. By analogy with Keplerian orbits, approximate orbital energy parameters are defined in terms of a relativistic eccentricity, providing first-order corrections to Newtonian energies for elliptical orbits. The first-order relativistic equation of orbit is demonstrated to be a limiting case of a very accurate self-consistent solution. This self-consistent solution is supported by exact numerical solutions to the Schwarzschild geometry, displaying remarkable agreement. A more detailed energy parameterization is investigated using the relativistic eccentricity together with the apsides derived from the relativistic effective potential in support of the approximate energy parameters defined using only first-order corrections. The methods and approximations describing this Keplerian limit are applied to more general static spherically-symmetric geometries. Specifically, equations of orbit and energy parameters are also derived in this Keplerian limit for the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m and Schwarzschild-de Sitter metrics.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0103161  [pdf] - 41378
The Vacuum Energy from a New Perspective
Comments: 3 pages; to be published in the proceedings of the 20th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, edited by J. C. Wheeler and H. Martel (published by A.I.P.) The treatment in this paper is superseded by that in hep-th/0110208: Although the vacuum energy is viewed from a very different perspective in the present theory, it remains just as big a mystery as in standard field theory and superstring/M theory. (The extremum considered in this paper is not a true extremum with respect to variations in the metric tensor.)
Submitted: 2001-03-12, last modified: 2001-10-22
It is commonly believed that the vacuum energy problem points to the need for (1) a radically new formulation of gravitational physics and (2) a new principle which forces the vacuum stress-energy tensor (as measured by gravity) to be nearly zero. Here we point out that a new fundamental theory contains both features: (1) In this theory the vierbein is interpreted as the "superfluid velocity" associated with the order parameter for a GUT-scale Higgs condensate. (2) The vacuum stress-energy tensor is exactly zero in the vacuum state, because the action is extremalized with respect to variations in the order parameter. With inhomogeneously-distributed matter present, the vacuum stress-energy tensor is shifted away from zero.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0106296  [pdf] - 43092
Dark Matter Equation of Motion and Density Profiles
Comments: 4 pages; to be published in the proceedings of PASCOS 2001, edited by P. H. Frampton (Rinton Press, Princeton, 2001)
Submitted: 2001-06-17
Cold dark matter simulations appear to disagree with the observations on small distance scales. Here we consider a modified description of CDM particles which is implied by a new fundamental theory: In this picture, the dark matter is composed of supersymmetric WIMPs, but they are scalar bosons with an unconventional equation of motion. The modified dynamics leads to much weaker gravitational binding, and therefore to a reduced tendency to form small clumps and central cusps.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-th/9807141  [pdf] - 118232
Observational Tests of Instanton Cosmology
Comments: 4 pages, LaTeX (figure also in LaTeX). Submitted for the proceedings of PASCOS-98 (Sixth International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology; Northeastern University, Boston; March 22-27, 1998)
Submitted: 1998-07-20
A new cosmological model leads to testable predictions that are different from those of both standard cosmology and models with a cosmological constant. The prediction that q_0=0 is the same as in other ``coasting universe'' models, but arises without the need for any exotic form of matter or other ad hoc assumptions.