sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Modestino, G.

Normalized to: Modestino, G.

13 article(s) in total. 333 co-authors, from 1 to 9 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 13,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1902.03905  [pdf] - 1840788
Multimessenger Research before GW170817
Comments: 11 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables
Submitted: 2019-02-07, last modified: 2019-03-01
Linking the previous research that occurred over the last decades, I will try to provide some objective elements to evaluate the innovation of the joint observation of GW170817 and GRB 170817A and their occurrence detection, in light of preceding experiences regarding the experimental research of association between gamma-ray bursts and gravitational waves. Without debating about the phenomenological properties of astrophysical events, I propose a comparison between that result and the previous experimental research by the interferometer GW community, using a fundamental energy emission law, and including about fifteen years of accredited results regarding coincident detection. From the present review, an intense and old pre-existing activity in the field of multimessenger observations emerges giving a first interesting fact. The widespread opinion that joint detection of GW170817 and GRB 170817A has opened a new method in astrophysics does not find a robust reason. Moreover, some critical points highlight. In the past, applying the same multimessenger method, numerous measures have been taken towards much brighter and much closer sources. Then, it would have been plausible to see joint signals even taking into account a worse sensitivity of the instruments of the time. At current time, there is only one event associated to a subthreshold GRB, compared to a long list of candidate events that would have been much more revealing. If these inconsistencies are admissible enough to lead to a claim, then the question arises about the interpretation of the long previous measurements carried out applying the same multimessenger observation method but without positive responses.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478  [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO mission
Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Ave, M.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; De Pascale, M. P.; Di Martino, M.; Distratis, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Ferrarese, S.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgrio, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Mannheim, K.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rios, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nakamura, T.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Frias, M. D. Rodriguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Takami, H.; Takeda, M.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tibolla, O.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: published in Astroparticle Physics by the JEM-EUSO Collaboration
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1212.0368  [pdf] - 1158220
Measurement of the thermal expansion coefficient of an Al-Mg alloy at ultra-low temperatures
Comments: 13 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2012-12-03, last modified: 2013-03-11
We describe a result coming from an experiment based on an Al-Mg alloy (~ 5% Mg) suspended bar hit by an electron beam and operated above and below the termperature of transition from superconducting to normal state of the material. The amplitude of the bar first longitudinal mode of oscillation, excited by the beam interacting with the bulk, and the energy deposited by the beam in the bar are the quantities measured by the experiment. These quantities, inserted in the equations describing the mechanism of the mode excitation and complemented by an independent measurement of the specific heat, allow us to determine the linear expansion coefficient of the material.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1204.5065  [pdf] - 554284
The JEM-EUSO Mission: Status and Prospects in 2011
Collaboration, The JEM-EUSO; :; Adams, J. H.; Ahmad, S.; Albert, J. -N.; Allard, D.; Ambrosio, M.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.; Arai, Y.; Aramo, C.; Asano, K.; Barrillon, P.; Batsch, T.; Bayer, J.; Belenguer, T.; Bellotti, R.; Berlind, A. A.; Bertaina, M.; Biermann, P. L.; Biktemerova, S.; Blaksley, C.; Blecki, J.; Blin-Bondil, S.; Bluemer, J.; Bobik, P.; Bogomilov, M.; Bonamente, M.; Briggs, M. S.; Briz, S.; Bruno, A.; Cafagna, F.; Campana, D.; Capdevielle, J-N.; Caruso, R.; Casolino, M.; Cassardo, C.; Castellini, G.; Catalano, O.; Cellino, A.; Chikawa, M.; Christl, M. J.; Connaughton, V.; Cortes, J. F.; Crawford, H. J.; Cremonini, R.; Csorna, S.; D'Olivo, J. C.; Dagoret-Campagne, S.; de Castro, A. J.; De Donato, C.; de la Taille, C.; De Pascale, M. P.; del Peral, L.; Dell'Oro, A.; Di Martino, M.; Distrati, G.; Dupieux, M.; Ebersoldt, A.; Ebisuzaki, T.; Engel, R.; Falk, S.; Fang, K.; Fenu, F.; Ferrarese, S.; Fernandez-Gomez, I.; Franceschi, A.; Fujimoto, J.; Galeotti, P.; Garipov, G.; Geary, J.; Giaccari, U. G.; Giraudo, G.; Gonchar, M.; Alvarado, C. Gonzalez; Gorodetzky, P.; Guarino, F.; Guzman, A.; Hachisu, Y.; Harlov, B.; Haungs, A.; Carretero, J. Hernandez; Higashide, K.; Iguchi, T.; Ikeda, H.; Inoue, N.; Inoue, S.; Insolia, A.; Isgro, F.; Itow, Y.; Joven, E.; Judd, E. G.; Jung, A.; Kajino, F.; Kajino, T.; Kaneko, I.; Karadzhov, Y.; Karczmarczyk, J.; Katahira, K.; Kawai, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Keilhauer, B.; Khrenov, B. A.; Kim, Jeong-Sook; Kim, Soon-Wook; Kim, Sug-Whan; Kleifges, M.; Klimov, P. A.; Ko, S. H.; Kolev, D.; Kreykenbohm, I.; Kudela, K.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuznetsov, E.; La Rosa, G.; Lee, J.; Licandro, J.; Lim, H.; Lopez, F.; Maccarone, M. C.; Marcelli, L.; Marini, A.; Martin-Chassard, G.; Martinez, O.; Masciantonio, G.; Mase, K.; Matev, R.; Maurissen, A.; Medina-Tanco, G.; Mernik, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Mizumoto, Y.; Modestino, G.; Monnier-Ragaigne, D.; Rıos, J. A. Morales de los; Mot, B.; Murakami, T.; Nagano, M.; Nagata, M.; Nagataki, S.; Nam, J. W.; Nam, S.; Nam, K.; Napolitano, T.; Naumov, D.; Neronov, A.; Nomoto, K.; Ogawa, T.; Ohmori, H.; Olinto, A. V.; Orleanski, P.; Osteria, G.; Pacheco, N.; Panasyuk, M. I.; Parizot, E.; Park, I. H.; Pastircak, B.; Patzak, T.; Paul, T.; Pennypacker, C.; Peter, T.; Picozza, P.; Pollini, A.; Prieto, H.; Reardon, P.; Reina, M.; Reyes, M.; Ricci, M.; Rodrıguez, I.; Frıas, M. D. Rodrıguez; Ronga, F.; Rothkaehl, H.; Roudil, G.; Rusinov, I.; Rybczynski, M.; Sabau, M. D.; Cano, G. Saez; Saito, A.; Sakaki, N.; Sakata, M.; Salazar, H.; Sanchez, S.; Santangelo, A.; Cruz, L. Santiago; Palomino, M. Sanz; Saprykin, O.; Sarazin, F.; Sato, H.; Sato, M.; Schanz, T.; Schieler, H.; Scotti, V.; Scuderi, M.; Segreto, A.; Selmane, S.; Semikoz, D.; Serra, M.; Sharakin, S.; Shibata, T.; Shimizu, H. M.; Shinozaki, K.; Shirahama, T.; Siemieniec-Ozieblo, G.; Lopez, H. H. Silva; Sledd, J.; Slominska, K.; Sobey, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Supanitsky, D.; Suzuki, M.; Szabelska, B.; Szabelski, J.; Tajima, F.; Tajima, N.; Tajima, T.; Takami, H.; Nakamura, T.; Takeda, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Takizawa, Y.; Tenzer, C.; Tkachev, L.; Tomida, T.; Tone, N.; Trillaud, F.; Tsenov, R.; Tsuno, K.; Tymieniecka, T.; Uchihori, Y.; Vaduvescu, O.; Valdes-Galicia, J. F.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Vankova, G.; Vigorito, C.; Villasenor, L.; von Ballmoos, P.; Wada, S.; Watanabe, J.; Watanabe, S.; Watts, J.; Weber, M.; Weiler, T. J.; Wibig, T.; Wiencke, L.; Wille, M.; Wilms, J.; Wlodarczyk, Z.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yang, J.; Yano, H.; Yashin, I. V.; Yonetoku, D.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, S.; Young, R.; Zamora, A.; Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Comments: 33 contributions plus index
Submitted: 2012-04-23
Contributions of the JEM-EUSO Collaboration to the 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing, August, 2011.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1105.4724  [pdf] - 1076835
Vibrational excitation induced by electron beam and cosmic rays in normal and superconductive aluminum bars
Comments: 28 pages, 13 figures
Submitted: 2011-05-24, last modified: 2011-08-02
We report new measurements of the acoustic excitation of an Al5056 superconductive bar when hit by an electron beam, in a previously unexplored temperature range, down to 0.35 K. These data, analyzed together with previous results of the RAP experiment obtained for T > 0.54 K, show a vibrational response enhanced by a factor 4.9 with respect to that measured in the normal state. This enhancement explains the anomalous large signals due to cosmic rays previously detected in the NAUTILUS gravitational wave detector.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1103.3668  [pdf] - 353820
SGR 1806-20 and the gravitational wave detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS
Comments: Accepted by Physical Review D
Submitted: 2011-03-18
The activity of the soft gamma ray repeater SGR 1806-20 is studied in correlation with the EXPLORER and NAUTILUS data, during the year 2004, for gravitational wave (GW) short signal search. Corresponding to the most significant triggers, the bright outburst on October 5th and the giant flare (GF) on December 27th, the associated GW signature is searched. Two methods are employed for processing the data. With the average-modulus algorithm, the presence of short pulses with energy Egw \geq 1.8 x 10^49 erg is excluded with 90% probability, under the hypothesis of isotropic emission. This value is comparable to the upper limits obtained by LIGO regarding similar sources. Using the cross-correlation method, we find a discrepancy from the null-hypothesis of the order of 1%. This statistical excess is not sufficient to claim a systematic association between the gravitational and the electromagnetic radiations, because the estimated GW upper limits are yet several orders of magnitude far away from the theoretically predicted levels, at least three for the most powerful SGR flare.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505600  [pdf] - 73370
Studying the coincidence excess between EXPLORER and NAUTILUS during 1998
Comments: 5 pages, 7 figures, submitted to A & A
Submitted: 2005-05-30
The coincidences between EXPLORER and NAUTILUS during 1998 (Astone et al. 2001) are more deeply studied. It is found that the coincidence excess is greater in the ten-day period 7-17 September 1998 and it occurs at the sidereal hour 4, when the detectors axes are perpendicular to the Galactic Disk. The purpose of this paper is to bring our results with the GW detectors to the attention of scientists working in the astrophysical field, and ask them whether are they aware of any special phenomenon occurring when EXPLORER and NAUTILUS showed a coincidence excess.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0408544  [pdf] - 67035
Cumulative analysis of the association between the gravitational wave detectors NAUTILUS and EXPLORER and the gamma-ray bursts detected by BATSE and BeppoSAX
Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures; minor corrections, added references. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2004-08-30, last modified: 2005-02-10
The statistical association between the output of the Gravitational Wave (GW) detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS and a list of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) detected by the satellite experiments BATSE and BeppoSAX has been analyzed using cumulative algorithms. GW detector data collected between 1991 and 1999 have been correlated to the GRB flux peak times. The cumulative analysis of a large number of GRBs (387) allows to push the upper bound for the corresponding GW burst amplitude down to $h = 2.5\cdot10^{-19}$.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0210053  [pdf] - 398744
Study of the coincidences between the gravitational wave detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS in 2001
Comments:
Submitted: 2002-10-17
We report the result from a search for bursts of gravitational waves using data collected by the cryogenic resonant detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS during the year 2001, for a total measuring time of 90 days. With these data we repeated the coincidence search performed on the 1998 data (which showed a small coincidence excess) applying data analysis algorithms based on known physical characteristics of the detectors. With the 2001 data a new interesting coincidence excess is found when the detectors are favorably oriented with respect to the Galactic Disk.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206431  [pdf] - 50062
Search for correlation between GRB's detected by BeppoSAX and gravitational wave detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS
Comments: 14 pages, 7 figures. Latex file, compiled with cernik.cls (provided in the package)
Submitted: 2002-06-25, last modified: 2002-07-12
Data obtained during five months of 2001 with the gravitational wave (GW) detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS were studied in correlation with the gamma ray burst data (GRB) obtained with the BeppoSAX satellite. During this period BeppoSAX was the only GRB satellite in operation, while EXPLORER and NAUTILUS were the only GW detectors in operation. No correlation between the GW data and the GRB bursts was found. The analysis, performed over 47 GRB's, excludes the presence of signals of amplitude h >=1.2 * 10^{-18}, with 95 % probability, if we allow a time delay between GW bursts and GRB within +-400 s, and h >= 6.5 * 10^{-19}, if the time delay is within +- 5 s. The result is also provided in form of scaled likelihood for unbiased interpretation and easier use for further analysis.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110620  [pdf] - 45677
On the crosscorrelation between Gravitational Wave Detectors for detecting association with Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Submitted by Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2001-10-29
Crosscorrelation of the outputs of two Gravitational Wave (GW) detectors has recently been proposed [1] as a method for detecting statistical association between GWs and Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). Unfortunately, the method can be effectively used only in the case of stationary noise. In this work a different crosscorrelation algorithm is presented, which may effectively be applied also in non-stationary conditions for the cumulative analysis of a large number of GRBs. The value of the crosscorrelation at zero delay, which is the only one expected to be correlated to any astrophysical signal, is compared with the distribution of crosscorrelation of the same data for all non-zero delays within the integration time interval. This background distribution is gaussian, so the statistical significance of an experimentally observed excess would be well-defined. Computer simulations using real noise data of the cryogenic GW detectors Explorer and Nautilus with superimposed delta-like signals were performed, to test the effectiveness of the method, and theoretical estimates of its sensitivity compared to the results of the simulation. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is compared to that of other cumulative techniques, finding that the algorithm is particularly effective in the case of non-gaussian noise and of a large (100-1000s) and unpredictable delay between GWs and GRBs.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0009066  [pdf] - 398742
Energetic Cosmic Rays observed by the resonant gravitational wave detector NAUTILUS
Comments: Submitted to Phys. Letters B
Submitted: 2000-09-19
Cosmic ray showers interacting with the resonant mass gravitational wave antenna NAUTILUS have been detected. The experimental results show large signals at a rate much greater than expected. The largest signal corresponds to an energy release in NAUTILUS of 87 TeV. We remark that a resonant mass gravitational wave detector used as particle detector has characteristics different from the usual particle detectors, and it could detect new features of cosmic rays. Among several possibilities, one can invoke unexpected behaviour of superconducting Aluminium as particle detector, producing enhanced signals, the excitation of non-elastic modes with large energy release or anomalies in cosmic rays (for instance, the showers might include exotic particles as nuclearites or Q-balls). Suggestions for explaining these observations are solicited.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0003106  [pdf] - 1943516
Initial operation of the International Gravitational Event Collaboration
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables; Proceeding of the GWDAW'99. Submitted to the International Journal of Modern Physics
Submitted: 2000-03-08
The International Gravitational Event Collaboration, IGEC, is a coordinated effort by research groups operating gravitational wave detectors working towards the detection of millisecond bursts of gravitational waves. Here we report on the current IGEC resonant bar observatory, its data analysis procedures, the main properties of the first exchanged data set. Even though the available data set is not complete, in the years 1997 and 1998 up to four detectors were operating simultaneously. Preliminary results are mentioned.