Normalized to: Mitra, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.11072 [pdf] - 2118349
Constraining HeII Reionization Detection Uncertainties via Fast Radio
Bursts
Submitted: 2020-06-19
Context. The increased detection rate of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) makes it
likely to get samples of sizes $\mathcal{O}(10^2)$ to $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ in
the near future. Because of their extragalactic origin can help us in
understanding the epoch of helium reionization.
Aims. We try to identify the epoch of Helium II (HeII) reionization, via the
observations of early FRBs in range of $z=3$ to $4$.
Methods. We build a model of FRB Dispersion Measure following the HeII
reionization model, density fluctuation in large scale structure, host galaxy
interstellar medium and local environment of FRB contribution. The model is fit
to the ideal intergalactic medium (IGM) dispersion measure model to check the
goodness of constraining the HeII reionization via FRB measurement statistics.
Conclusion. We report our findings under two categories, accuracy in
detection of HeII reionization via FRBs assuming no uncertainty in the redshift
measurement and alternatively assuming a varied level of uncertainty in
redshift measurement of the FRBs. We show that under the first case, a
detection of $N\sim\mathcal{O} (10^2)$ FRBs give an uncertainty of $\sigma
(z_{r, fit})\sim0.5$ from the fit model, and a detection of $N\sim\mathcal{O}
(10^3)$ gives an uncertainty of $\sigma (z_{r, fit})\sim0.1$. While assuming a
redshift uncertainty of level $5-20\%$, changes the $\sigma (z_{r,
fit})\sim0.5$ to $0.6$ for $N\sim 100$ and $\sigma (z_{r, fit})\sim0.1$ to
$0.15$ for $N \sim 1000$ case.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.03474 [pdf] - 1999689
Estimating weak lensing convergence correlation of Type-Ia supernovae
from 5-year SNLS data by internal error estimate technique
Submitted: 2019-11-08, last modified: 2019-11-16
We report non-zero weak lensing convergence correlation signal of Type-Ia
supernovae from 5-year Supernovae Legacy Survey data. For our analysis we
utilize 296 supernovae magnification data from 5-year SNLS in the weak lensing
limit. The data we use consists of measurements from four different patches,
each covering 1 square degree of the sky, merged together. We demonstrate that
it is possible to have a very good estimate of the two point correlation
function from this data using internal error estimate technique. In order to
have a good estimate of the corresponding covariance matrix we apply bootstrap
spatial re-sampling technique where we reshuffle the original data consisting
of 296 data points 100-10000 times and compare the results with that obtained
from original data points. We show that this technique helps us arrive at a
reliable conclusion on weak lensing convergence even though the original
dataset comprises of a small number of data points. This also allows us to
compute the corresponding covariance matrix with great accuracy.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.09014 [pdf] - 1993933
Reconstruction of Convergence power spectrum from SNLS weak lensing data
Submitted: 2018-02-25, last modified: 2019-11-06
We estimate the lensing convergence power spectrum from supernovae
magnification data using real space correlation function technique. For our
analysis we have utilized 296 supernovae from 5-year Supernovae Legacy Survey
in the weak lensing limit. The data we used consists of measurements from four
different patches, each of them covers almost 1 square degree of the sky,
merged together. We demonstrate that it is quite possible to have a good
estimate of the convergence power spectrum from this data. Our primary
intention is to extract meaningful informations from SNLS weak lensing data and
to demonstrate how the power spectrum for convergence can be reconstructed
therefrom, without going into the nitty-gritty of errors, although we have done
some error analysis in the process.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.06815 [pdf] - 1945920
How to distinguish an actual astrophysical magnetized black hole
mimicker from a true (theoretical) black hole
Submitted: 2019-08-07
The tentative evidences for late time "echoes" in LIGO gravitational waves
(GWs) have been claimed to be signatures of horizonless compact objects rather
than vacuum black holes (BHs) possessing horizons. In general, in the past,
many authors have considered the possibility that the so-called BHs might be
only BH mimickers (BHMs). And recently it has been suggested that the true
astrophysical BH having no intrinsic magnetic fields may be differentiated from
magnetized BHMs by studying the radial variations of magnetic fields around
pertinent compact objects (Lobanov, Nat. Astron. 2017). Here we highlight that
close to the surface of BHMs, the magnetic field pattern differs significantly
from the same for non-relativistic Neutron Stars (B\sim r^{-3}). In particular,
we point out that for ultra-compact BHMs, the polar field is weaker than the
equatorial field by an extremely large factor of \sim z_{s}/lnz_{s}, where
z_{s}\gg1 is the surface gravitational redshift. We suggest that by studying
the of radial variation as well as such significant asymmetry of magnetic field
structure near the compact object, future observations may differentiate a
theoretical black hole from a astrophysical BH mimicker (a compact object).
This study also shows that even if some BHMs would be hypothesized to possess
magnetic fields even stronger than that of magnetars, in certain cases, they
may effectively behave as atoll type neutron stars possessing extremely low
magnetic fields.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00985 [pdf] - 1953607
Photometric Supernovae Redshift Systematics Requirements
Submitted: 2019-07-01
Imaging surveys will find many tens to hundreds of thousands of Type Ia
supernovae in the next decade, and measure their light curves. In addition to a
need for characterizing their types and subtypes, a redshift is required to
place them on a Hubble diagram to map the cosmological expansion. We
investigate the requirements on redshift systematics control in order not to
bias cosmological results, in particular dark energy parameter estimation. We
find that additive and multiplicative systematics must be constrained at the
few$\,\times 10^{-3}$ level, effectively requiring spectroscopic followup for
robust use of photometric supernovae. Catastrophic outliers need control at the
subpercent level. We also investigate sculpting the spectroscopic sample.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.04163 [pdf] - 1790711
Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report
Proto-Collaboration, Hyper-Kamiokande;
:;
Abe, K.;
Abe, Ke.;
Aihara, H.;
Aimi, A.;
Akutsu, R.;
Andreopoulos, C.;
Anghel, I.;
Anthony, L. H. V.;
Antonova, M.;
Ashida, Y.;
Aushev, V.;
Barbi, M.;
Barker, G. J.;
Barr, G.;
Beltrame, P.;
Berardi, V.;
Bergevin, M.;
Berkman, S.;
Berns, L.;
Berry, T.;
Bhadra, S.;
Bravo-Berguño, D.;
Blaszczyk, F. d. M.;
Blondel, A.;
Bolognesi, S.;
Boyd, S. B.;
Bravar, A.;
Bronner, C.;
Avanzini, M. Buizza;
Cafagna, F. S.;
Cole, A.;
Calland, R.;
Cao, S.;
Cartwright, S. L.;
Catanesi, M. G.;
Checchia, C.;
Chen-Wishart, Z.;
Choi, J. H.;
Choi, K.;
Coleman, J.;
Collazuol, G.;
Cowan, G.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dealtry, T.;
De Rosa, G.;
Densham, C.;
Dewhurst, D.;
Drakopoulou, E. L.;
Di Lodovico, F.;
Drapier, O.;
Dumarchez, J.;
Dunne, P.;
Dziewiecki, M.;
Emery, S.;
Esmaili, A.;
Evangelisti, A.;
Fernandez-Martinez, E.;
Feusels, T.;
Finch, A.;
Fiorentini, A.;
Fiorillo, G.;
Fitton, M.;
Frankiewicz, K.;
Friend, M.;
Fujii, Y.;
Fukuda, Y.;
Fukuda, D.;
Ganezer, K.;
Giganti, C.;
Gonin, M.;
Grant, N.;
Gumplinger, P.;
Hadley, D. R.;
Hartfiel, B.;
Hartz, M.;
Hayato, Y.;
Hayrapetyan, K.;
Hill, J.;
Hirota, S.;
Horiuchi, S.;
Ichikawa, A. K.;
Iijima, T.;
Ikeda, M.;
Imber, J.;
Inoue, K.;
Insler, J.;
Intonti, R. A.;
Ioannisian, A.;
Ishida, T.;
Ishino, H.;
Ishitsuka, M.;
Itow, Y.;
Iwamoto, K.;
Izmaylov, A.;
Jamieson, B.;
Jang, H. I.;
Jang, J. S.;
Jeon, S. H.;
Jiang, M.;
Jonsson, P.;
Joo, K. K.;
Kaboth, A.;
Kachulis, C.;
Kajita, T.;
Kameda, J.;
Kataoka, Y.;
Katori, T.;
Kayrapetyan, K.;
Kearns, E.;
Khabibullin, M.;
Khotjantsev, A.;
Kim, J. H.;
Kim, J. Y.;
Kim, S. B.;
Kim, S. Y.;
King, S.;
Kishimoto, Y.;
Kobayashi, T.;
Koga, M.;
Konaka, A.;
Kormos, L. L.;
Koshio, Y.;
Korzenev, A.;
Kowalik, K. L.;
Kropp, W. R.;
Kudenko, Y.;
Kurjata, R.;
Kutter, T.;
Kuze, M.;
Labarga, L.;
Lagoda, J.;
Lasorak, P. J. J.;
Laveder, M.;
Lawe, M.;
Learned, J. G.;
Lim, I. T.;
Lindner, T.;
Litchfield, R. P.;
Longhin, A.;
Loverre, P.;
Lou, T.;
Ludovici, L.;
Ma, W.;
Magaletti, L.;
Mahn, K.;
Malek, M.;
Maret, L.;
Mariani, C.;
Martens, K.;
Marti, Ll.;
Martin, J. F.;
Marzec, J.;
Matsuno, S.;
Mazzucato, E.;
McCarthy, M.;
McCauley, N.;
McFarland, K. S.;
McGrew, C.;
Mefodiev, A.;
Mermod, P.;
Metelko, C.;
Mezzetto, M.;
Migenda, J.;
Mijakowski, P.;
Minakata, H.;
Minamino, A.;
Mine, S.;
Mineev, O.;
Mitra, A.;
Miura, M.;
Mochizuki, T.;
Monroe, J.;
Moon, D. H.;
Moriyama, S.;
Mueller, T.;
Muheim, F.;
Murase, K.;
Muto, F.;
Nakahata, M.;
Nakajima, Y.;
Nakamura, K.;
Nakaya, T.;
Nakayama, S.;
Nantais, C.;
Needham, M.;
Nicholls, T.;
Nishimura, Y.;
Noah, E.;
Nova, F.;
Nowak, J.;
Nunokawa, H.;
Obayashi, Y.;
O'Keeffe, H. M.;
Okajima, Y.;
Okumura, K.;
Onishchuk, Yu.;
O'Sullivan, E.;
O'Sullivan, L.;
Ovsiannikova, T.;
Owen, R. A.;
Oyama, Y.;
Pac, M. Y.;
Palladino, V.;
Palomino, J. L.;
Paolone, V.;
Parker, W.;
Parsa, S.;
Payne, D.;
Perkin, J. D.;
Pidcott, C.;
Guerra, E. Pinzon;
Playfer, S.;
Popov, B.;
Posiadala-Zezula, M.;
Poutissou, J. M.;
Pritchard, A.;
Prouse, N. W.;
Pronost, G.;
Przewlocki, P.;
Quilain, B.;
Radicioni, E.;
Ratoff, P. N.;
Retiere, F.;
Riccio, C.;
Richards, B.;
Rondio, E.;
Rose, H. J.;
Rott, C.;
Rountree, S. D.;
Ruggeri, A. C.;
Rychter, A.;
Sacco, R.;
Sakuda, M.;
Sanchez, M. C.;
Scantamburlo, E.;
Scott, M.;
Sedgwick, S. M.;
Seiya, Y.;
Sekiguchi, T.;
Sekiya, H.;
Seo, S. H.;
Sgalaberna, D.;
Shah, R.;
Shaikhiev, A.;
Shimizu, I.;
Shiozawa, M.;
Shitov, Y.;
Short, S.;
Simpson, C.;
Sinnis, G.;
Smy, M. B.;
Snow, S.;
Sobczyk, J.;
Sobel, H. W.;
Sonoda, Y.;
Spina, R.;
Stewart, T.;
Stone, J. L.;
Suda, Y.;
Suwa, Y.;
Suzuki, Y.;
Suzuki, A. T.;
Svoboda, R.;
Taani, M.;
Tacik, R.;
Takeda, A.;
Takenaka, A.;
Taketa, A.;
Takeuchi, Y.;
Takhistov, V.;
Tanaka, H. A.;
Tanaka, H. K. M.;
Tanaka, H.;
Terri, R.;
Thiesse, M.;
Thompson, L. F.;
Thorpe, M.;
Tobayama, S.;
Touramanis, C.;
Towstego, T.;
Tsukamoto, T.;
Tsui, K. M.;
Tzanov, M.;
Uchida, Y.;
Vagins, M. R.;
Vasseur, G.;
Vilela, C.;
Vogelaar, R. B.;
Walding, J.;
Walker, J.;
Ward, M.;
Wark, D.;
Wascko, M. O.;
Weber, A.;
Wendell, R.;
Wilkes, R. J.;
Wilking, M. J.;
Wilson, J. R.;
Xin, T.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yanagisawa, C.;
Yano, T.;
Yen, S.;
Yershov, N.;
Yeum, D. N.;
Yokoyama, M.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yu, I.;
Yu, M.;
Zalipska, J.;
Zaremba, K.;
Ziembicki, M.;
Zito, M.;
Zsoldos, S.
Submitted: 2018-05-09, last modified: 2018-11-28
On the strength of a double Nobel prize winning experiment (Super)Kamiokande
and an extremely successful long baseline neutrino programme, the third
generation Water Cherenkov detector, Hyper-Kamiokande, is being developed by an
international collaboration as a leading worldwide experiment based in Japan.
The Hyper-Kamiokande detector will be hosted in the Tochibora mine, about 295
km away from the J-PARC proton accelerator research complex in Tokai, Japan.
The currently existing accelerator will be steadily upgraded to reach a MW beam
by the start of the experiment. A suite of near detectors will be vital to
constrain the beam for neutrino oscillation measurements. A new cavern will be
excavated at the Tochibora mine to host the detector. The experiment will be
the largest underground water Cherenkov detector in the world and will be
instrumented with new technology photosensors, faster and with higher quantum
efficiency than the ones in Super-Kamiokande. The science that will be
developed will be able to shape the future theoretical framework and
generations of experiments. Hyper-Kamiokande will be able to measure with the
highest precision the leptonic CP violation that could explain the baryon
asymmetry in the Universe. The experiment also has a demonstrated excellent
capability to search for proton decay, providing a significant improvement in
discovery sensitivity over current searches for the proton lifetime. The
atmospheric neutrinos will allow to determine the neutrino mass ordering and,
together with the beam, able to precisely test the three-flavour neutrino
oscillation paradigm and search for new phenomena. A strong astrophysical
programme will be carried out at the experiment that will detect supernova
neutrinos and will measure precisely solar neutrino oscillation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.10375 [pdf] - 1706641
Gravitational Lensing of the supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey
(SNLS)
Submitted: 2018-06-27
The presence of mass inhomogeneities along the line of sight of propagation
of light fromdistant objects can induce deflection in the flight path of the
photon. This phenomenon is called as gravitational lensing. Lensing can have
both distortion (shear) and isotropic magnification effects on the source. We
studied the effect of lensing magnification on supernova (SN) Ia in this
thesis. Presence of lensing would introduce a source of contamination to the
brightness distribution of the source (SN Ia in our case). Thus it also enables
one to compute the lensing effect indirectly from the Hubble diagram (i.e. from
the residual to the Hubble diagram). In this thesis we computed the correlation
between these two effects : the Hubble residual and the computed lensing
magnification for the SN by the line of sight foreground dark matter haloes. A
detection of positive correlation between these two would signify the
positivity of lensing signal detection. The data sample is the spectroscopic
SNe Ia sample from the five years full SNLS data and the Hubble residuals are
those of the preliminary cosmology analysis performed on SNLS5 data. We obtain
a signal of \rho = 0.177 at 2.51 \sigma. This result is consistent with the
previous SNLS three years data lensing analysis results.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.07697 [pdf] - 1716932
Dependence of Type Ia supernova luminosities on their local environment
Roman, Matthieu;
Hardin, Delphine;
Betoule, Marc;
Astier, Pierre;
Balland, Christophe;
Ellis, Richard S.;
Fabbro, Sébastien;
Guy, Julien;
Hook, Isobel M.;
Howell, D. Andrew;
Lidman, Chris;
Mitra, Ayan;
Möller, Anais;
Mourão, Ana M.;
Neveu, Jérémy;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Pritchet, Chris J.;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Ruhlmann-Kleider, Vanina;
Saunders, Clare;
Sullivan, Mark
Submitted: 2017-06-23, last modified: 2018-03-05
We present a fully consistent catalog of local and global properties of host
galaxies of 882 Type Ia supernov\ae\ (SNIa) that were selected based on their
light-curve properties, spanning the redshift range $0.01 < z < 1.\text{}$ This
catalog corresponds to a preliminary version of the compilation sample and
includes Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) 5-year data, Sloan Digital Sky Survey
(SDSS), and low-redshift surveys. We measured low- and moderate-redshift host
galaxy photometry in SNLS and SDSS images and used spectral energy distribution
(SED) fitting techniques to derive host properties such as stellar mass and
$U-V$ rest-frame colors; the latter are an indicator of the luminosity-weighted
age of the stellar population in a galaxy. We also estimated the local observed
fluxes at the supernova location within a proper distance radius of 3 kpc, and
transposed them into local $U-V$ rest-frame colors. Selecting SNIa based on
host photometry quality, we then performed cosmological fits using local color
as a third standardization variable, for which we split the sample at the
median value. We find a local color step as significant as the maximum mass
step effect. Correcting for the maximum mass step correction, we still find a
significant local color effect, which shows that additional information is
provided by the close environment of SNIa. Departures from the initial choices
were investigated, and we discuss the possible implications for cosmology. This
will be of tremendous importance for the forthcoming SNIa surveys, and in
particular for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), for which
uncertainties on the dark energy equation of state will be comparable to the
effects reported here.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07379 [pdf] - 1709300
The ESO's VLT Type Ia supernova spectral set of the final two years of
SNLS
Balland, C.;
Cellier-Holzem, F.;
Lidman, C.;
Astier, P.;
Betoule, M.;
Carlberg, R. G.;
Conley, A.;
Ellis, R. S.;
Guy, J.;
Hardin, D.;
Hook, I. M.;
Howell, D. A.;
Pain, R.;
Pritchet, C. J.;
Regnault, N.;
Sullivan, M.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Baumont, S.;
El-Hage, P.;
Fabbro, S.;
Fouchez, D.;
Mitra, A.;
Möller, A.;
Mourão, A. M.;
Neveu, J.;
Roman, M.;
Ruhlmann-Kleider, V.
Submitted: 2017-12-20
We aim to present 70 spectra of 68 new high-redshift type Ia supernovae
(SNeIa) measured at ESO's VLT during the final two years of operation
(2006-2008) of the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS). We use the full five year
SNLS VLT spectral set to investigate a possible spectral evolution of SNeIa
populations with redshift and study spectral properties as a function of
lightcurve fit parameters and the mass of the host-galaxy.
Reduction and extraction are based on both IRAF standard tasks and our own
reduction pipeline. Redshifts are estimated from host-galaxy lines whenever
possible or alternatively from supernova features. We used the
spectrophotometric SNIa model SALT2 combined with a set of galaxy templates
that model the host-galaxy contamination to assess the type Ia nature of the
candidates.
We identify 68 new SNeIa with redshift ranging from z=0.207 to z=0.98
(<z>=0.62). Each spectrum is presented individually along with its best-fit
SALT2 model. The five year dataset contains 209 spectra corresponding to 192
SNeIa identified at the VLT. We also publish the redshifts of other candidates
(host galaxies or other transients) whose spectra were obtained at the same
time as the spectra of live SNe Ia. Using the full VLT SNeIa sample, we build
composite spectra around maximum light with cuts in color, lightcurve shape
parameter ('stretch'), host-galaxy mass and redshift. We find that high-z SNeIa
are bluer, brighter and have weaker intermediate mass element absorption lines
than their low-z counterparts at a level consistent with what is expected from
selection effects. We also find a flux excess in the range [3000-3400] A for
SNeIa in low mass host-galaxies or with locally blue U-V colors, and suggest
that the UV flux (or local color) may be used in future cosmological studies as
a third standardization parameter in addition to stretch and color.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.04644 [pdf] - 1585961
LSQ14efd: observations of the cooling of a shock break-out event in a
type Ic Supernova
Barbarino, C.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Dall'Ora, M.;
Della Valle, M.;
Benetti, S.;
Lyman, J. D.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Arcavi, I.;
Baltay, C.;
Bersier, D.;
Dennefeld, M.;
Ellman, N.;
Fraser, M.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Hosseinzadeh, G.;
Howell, D. A.;
Inserra, C.;
Kankare, E.;
Leloudas, G.;
Maguire, K.;
McCully, C.;
Mitra, A.;
McKinnon, R.;
E., F. Olivares;
Pignata, G.;
Rabinowitz, D.;
Rostami, S.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sullivan, M.;
Valenti, S.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D.
Submitted: 2017-07-14
We present the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of the type Ic
supernova LSQ14efd, discovered by the La Silla QUEST survey and followed by
PESSTO. LSQ14efd was discovered few days after explosion and the observations
cover up to ~100 days. The early photometric points show the signature of the
cooling of the shock break-out event experienced by the progenitor at the time
of the supernova explosion, one of the first for a type Ic supernova. A
comparison with type Ic supernova spectra shows that LSQ14efd is quite similar
to the type Ic SN 2004aw. These two supernovae have kinetic energies that are
intermediate between standard Ic explosions and those which are the most
energetic explosions known (e.g. SN 1998bw). We computed an analytical model
for the light-curve peak and estimated the mass of the ejecta 6.3 +/- 0.5 Msun,
a synthesized nickel mass of 0.25 Msun and a kinetic energy of Ekin = 5.6 +/-
0.5 x 10^51 erg. No connection between LSQ14efd and a GRB event could be
established. However we point out that the supernova shows some spectroscopic
similarities with the peculiar SN-Ia 1999ac and the SN-Iax SN 2008A. A
core-collapse origin is most probable considering the spectroscopic,
photometric evolution and the detection of the cooling of the shock break-out.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.01120 [pdf] - 1534147
Sensitivity estimate of the MACE gamma ray telescope
Submitted: 2017-01-04
The MACE (Major Atmospheric Cherenkov Experiment) is a 21 m diameter
gamma-ray telescope which is presently being installed at Hanle in Ladakh,
India (32^0 46^' 46^" N, 78^0 58^' 35^" E) at an altitude of 4270 m a.s.l. Once
operational, it will become the highest altitude very high energy (VHE)
gamma-ray telescope in the world based on Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov
Technique (IACT). In the present work, we discuss the sensitivity estimate of
the MACE telescope by using a substantially large Monte Carlo simulation
database at 5^0 zenith angle. The sensitivity of MACE telescope is estimated by
carrying out the gamma-hadron segregation using the Random Forest method. It is
estimated that the MACE telescope will have an analysis energy threshold of 38
GeV for image intensities above 50 photoelectrons. The integral sensitivity for
point like sources with Crab Nebula-like spectrum above 38 GeV is ~2.7% of Crab
Nebula flux at 5 sigma statistical significance level in 50 hrs of observation.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04156 [pdf] - 1483264
Pan-STARRS and PESSTO search for an optical counterpart to the LIGO
gravitational wave source GW150914
Smartt, S. J.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Smith, K. W.;
Huber, M. E.;
Young, D. R.;
Cappellaro, E.;
Wright, D. E.;
Coughlin, M.;
Schultz, A. S. B.;
Denneau, L.;
Flewelling, H.;
Heinze, A.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Primak, N.;
Rest, A.;
Sherstyuk, A.;
Stalder, B.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J.;
Waters, C.;
Willman, M.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Baltay, C.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Campbell, H.;
Dennefeld, M.;
Chen, T. -W.;
Della Valle, M.;
Elias-Rosa, N.;
Fraser, M.;
Inserra, C.;
Kankare, E.;
Kotak, R.;
Kupfer, T.;
Harmanen, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Guillou, L. Le;
Lyman, J. D.;
Maguire, K.;
Mitra, A.;
Nicholl, M.;
Olivares, F. E;
Rabinowitz, D.;
Razza, A.;
Sollerman, J.;
Smith, M.;
Terreran, G.;
Valenti, S.;
Gibson, B.;
Goggia, T.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-07-28
We searched for an optical counterpart to the first gravitational wave source
discovered by LIGO (GW150914), using a combination of the Pan-STARRS1
wide-field telescope and the PESSTO spectroscopic follow-up programme. As the
final LIGO sky maps changed during analysis, the total probability of the
source being spatially coincident with our fields was finally only 4.2 per
cent. Therefore we discuss our results primarily as a demonstration of the
survey capability of Pan-STARRS and spectroscopic capability of PESSTO. We
mapped out 442 square degrees of the northern sky region of the initial map. We
discovered 56 astrophysical transients over a period of 41 days from the
discovery of the source. Of these, 19 were spectroscopically classified and a
further 13 have host galaxy redshifts. All transients appear to be fairly
normal supernovae and AGN variability and none is obviously linked with
GW150914. We illustrate the sensitivity of our survey by defining parameterised
lightcurves with timescales of 4, 20 and 40 days and use the sensitivity of the
Pan-STARRS1 images to set limits on the luminosities of possible sources. The
Pan-STARRS1 images reach limiting magnitudes of i = 19.2, 20.0 and 20.8
respectively for the three timescales. For long timescale parameterised
lightcurves (with FWHM=~40d) we set upper limits of M_i <= -17.2 -0.9/+1.4 if
the distance to GW150914 is D = 400 +/- 200Mpc. The number of type Ia SN we
find in the survey is similar to that expected from the cosmic SN rate,
indicating a reasonably complete efficiency in recovering supernova like
transients out to D = 400 +/- 200 Mpc.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.04748 [pdf] - 1442030
SN 2015bn: a detailed multi-wavelength view of a nearby superluminous
supernova
Nicholl, M.;
Berger, E.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Margutti, R.;
Kamble, A.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Chen, T. -W.;
Inserra, C.;
Arcavi, I.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Cartier, R.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Childress, M. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Drout, M.;
Flewelling, H. A.;
Fraser, M.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Galbany, L.;
Harmanen, J.;
Holoien, T. W. -S.;
Hosseinzadeh, G.;
Howell, D. A.;
Huber, M. E.;
Jerkstrand, A.;
Kankare, E.;
Kochanek, C. S.;
Lin, Z. -Y.;
Lunnan, R.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Maguire, K.;
McCully, C.;
McDonald, M.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Mitra, A.;
Reynolds, T.;
Saario, J.;
Shappee, B. J.;
Smith, K. W.;
Valenti, S.;
Villar, V. A.;
Waters, C.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2016-03-15, last modified: 2016-07-22
We present observations of SN 2015bn (= PS15ae = CSS141223-113342+004332 =
MLS150211-113342+004333), a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN) at redshift
$z=0.1136$. As well as being one of the closest SLSNe I yet discovered, it is
intrinsically brighter ($M_U\approx-23.1$) and in a fainter galaxy
($M_B\approx-16.0$) than other SLSNe at $z\sim0.1$. We used this opportunity to
collect the most extensive dataset for any SLSN I to date, including
densely-sampled spectroscopy and photometry, from the UV to the NIR, spanning
$-$50 to +250 days from optical maximum. SN 2015bn fades slowly, but exhibits
surprising undulations in the light curve on a timescale of 30-50 days,
especially in the UV. The spectrum shows extraordinarily slow evolution except
for a rapid transformation between +7 and +20-30 days. No narrow emission lines
from slow-moving material are observed at any phase. We derive physical
properties including the bolometric luminosity, and find slow velocity
evolution and non-monotonic temperature and radial evolution. A deep radio
limit rules out a healthy off-axis gamma-ray burst, and places constraints on
the pre-explosion mass loss. The data can be consistently explained by a
$\gtrsim10\,{\rm M}_\odot$ stripped progenitor exploding with $\sim
10^{51}\,$erg kinetic energy, forming a magnetar with a spin-down timescale of
$\sim20$ days (thus avoiding a gamma-ray burst) that reheats the ejecta and
drives ionization fronts. The most likely alternative scenario -- interaction
with $\sim20\,{\rm M}_\odot$ of dense, inhomogeneous circumstellar material --
can be tested with continuing radio follow-up.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.5125 [pdf] - 1222651
Gamma/hadron segregation for a ground based imaging atmospheric
Cherenkov telescope using machine learning methods: Random Forest leads
Submitted: 2014-10-19
A detailed case study of $\gamma$-hadron segregation for a ground based
atmospheric Cherenkov telescope is presented. We have evaluated and compared
various supervised machine learning methods such as the Random Forest method,
Artificial Neural Network, Linear Discriminant method, Naive Bayes
Classifiers,Support Vector Machines as well as the conventional dynamic
supercut method by simulating triggering events with the Monte Carlo method and
applied the results to a Cherenkov telescope. It is demonstrated that the
Random Forest method is the most sensitive machine learning method for
$\gamma$-hadron segregation.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.2260 [pdf] - 1222477
Validation of a new background discrimination method for the TACTIC TeV
$\gamma$-ray telescope with Markarian 421 data
Submitted: 2014-10-08
This paper describes the validation of a new background discrimination method
based on Random Forest technique by re-analysing the Markarian 421 (Mrk 421)
observations performed by the TACTIC (TeV Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope with
Imaging Camera) gamma-ray telescope. The Random Forest technique is a flexible
multivariate method which combines Bagging and Random Split Selection to
construct a large collection of decision trees and then combines them to
construct a common classifier. Markarian 421 in a high state was observed by
TACTIC during December 07, 2005 - April 30, 2006 for 202 h. Previous analysis
of this data led to a detection of flaring activity from the source at Energy $
>$ 1 TeV. Within this data set, a spell of 97 h revealed strong detection of a
gamma-ray signal with daily flux of > 1 Crab unit on several days. Here we
re-analyze this spell as well as the data from the entire observation period
with the Random Forest method. Application of this method led to an improvement
in the signal detection strength by $\sim 26\%$ along with a $\sim 18\%$
increase in detected $\gamma$ rays compared to the conventional Dynamic
Supercuts method. The resultant differential spectrum obtained is represented
by a power law with an exponential cut off $\Gamma = -2.51 \pm 0.10$ and $E_{0}
= 4.71 \pm 2.20$ TeV. Such a spectrum is consistent with previously reported
results and justifies the use of Random Forest method for analyzing data from
atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.2984 [pdf] - 1116620
TeV Gamma-ray Observations of Markarian 421 using TACTIC during 2009-10
Chandra, P.;
Rannot, R. C.;
Yadav, K. K.;
Tickoo, A. K.;
Singh, K. K.;
Chanchalani, K.;
Kothari, M.;
Agarwal, N. K.;
Goyal, A.;
Goyal, H. C.;
Kotwal, S.;
Kumar, N.;
Marandi, P.;
Venugopal, K.;
Bhat, C. K.;
Bhatt, N.;
Bhattacharya, S.;
Borwankar, C.;
Chouhan, N.;
Dhar, V. K.;
Kaul, S. R.;
Koul, S. K.;
Koul, M. K.;
Koul, R.;
Mitra, A. K.;
Sahayanathan, S.;
Sharma, M.
Submitted: 2012-02-14
We have observed the blazar Markarian 421 with the TACTIC $\gamma$-ray
telescope at Mt. Abu, India, from 22 November 2009 to 16 May 2010 for 265
hours. Detailed analysis of the data so recorded revealed presence of a TeV
$\gamma$-ray signal with a statistical significance of 12.12$\sigma$ at
$E_{\gamma}\geq$ 1 TeV. We have estimated the time averaged differential energy
spectrum of the source in the energy range 1.0 - 16.44 TeV. The spectrum fits
well with the power law function of the form ($dF/dE=f_0 E^{-\Gamma}$) with
$f_0=(1.39\pm0.239)\times 10^{-11}cm^{-2}s^{-1}TeV^{-1}$ and
$\Gamma=2.31\pm0.14$.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2715 [pdf] - 1091581
Low frequency radio spectrum of LS 5039 during periastron and apastron
passages
Submitted: 2011-11-11
We have recently studied LS 5039, a gamma-ray binary, with Giant Meterwave
Radio Telescope (GMRT) during its periastron and apastron passage. The results
presented here show that the spectra are inverted at the low frequency and the
flux densities do not differ significantly for two different orbital phases.
Assuming that the free-free absorption of radio in stellar wind environment is
responsible for the optically thick radio emission we calculated the free-free
absorption optical depth and constrained the height of the radio emitting
region from the orbital plane. The height is found to be around 1.6 AU for a
spherical stellar wind geometry. This estimate may change if the stellar wind
is focussed or the radio absorption is due to synchrotron self-absorption.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.3518 [pdf] - 152812
Likely formation of general relativistic radiation pressure supported
stars or "eternally collapsing objects"
Submitted: 2010-03-18, last modified: 2010-04-21
Hoyle and Folwler showed that there could be Radiation Pressure Supported
Stars (RPSS) even in Newtonian gravity. Much later, Mitra found that one could
also conceive of their General Relativistic (GR) version, "Relativistic
Radiation Pressure Supported Stars" (RRPSSs). While RPSSs have $z\ll 1$, RRPSSs
have $z \gg 1$, where $z$ is the surface gravitational redshift. Here we
elaborate on the formation of RRPSSs during continued gravitational collapse by
recalling that a contracting massive star must start trapping radiation as it
would enter its {\em photon sphere}. It is found that, irrespective of the
details of the contraction process, the trapped radiation flux should attain
the corresponding Eddington value at sufficiently large $z\gg 1$. This means
that continued GR collapse may generate an intermediate RRPSS with $z\gg 1$
before a true BH state with $z=\infty$ is formed asymptotically. An exciting
consequence of this is that the stellar mass black hole candidates, at present
epoch, should be hot balls of quark gluon plasma, as has been discussed by
Royzen in a recent article entitled "{\it QCD against black holes?}".
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0607087 [pdf] - 1237441
Does Pressure Increase or Decrease Active Gravitational Mass Density?
Submitted: 2006-07-21, last modified: 2006-10-27
It is known that, for a static fluid sphere, the GeneralRelativistic (GR)
Effective Mass Energy Density (EMD) appears to be (rho + 3 p), where rho is the
bare mass density, p is the isotropic pressure, from a purely localized view
point. But since there is no truly local definition of ``gravitational field'',
such a notion could actually be misleading. On the other hand, by using the
Tolman mass formula, we point out that, from a global perspective, the Active
Gravitational Mass Energy Density (AGMD) is sqrt{g_{00}} (rho + 3 p) and which
is obviously smaller than (rho + 3p) because g_{00} < 1. Then we show that the
AGMD eventually is (rho - 3p), i.e., exactly opposite to what is generally
believed. We further identify the AGMD to be proportional to the Ricci Scalar.
By using this fundamental and intersting property, we obtain the GR virial
theorem in terms of appropriate ``proper energies''.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608178 [pdf] - 84055
Sources of Stellar Energy, Einstein- Eddington Timescale of
Gravitational Contraction and Eternally Collapsing Objects
Submitted: 2006-08-08, last modified: 2006-09-03
We point out that although conventional stars are primarily fed by burning of
nuclear fuel at their cores, in a strict sense, the process of release of
stored gravitational energy, known as, Kelvin - Helmholtz (KH) process is
either also operational albeit at an arbitrary slow rate, or lying in wait to
take over at the disruption of the nuclear channel. In fact, the latter mode of
energy release is the true feature of any self-gravity bound object including
stars. We also highligh the almost forgotten fact that Eddington was the first
physicist to introduce Special Relativity into the problem and correctly insist
that, actually, total energy stored in a star is not the mere Newtonian energy
but the total mass energy (E = M c^2). Accordingly, Eddington defined an
``Einstein Time Scale'' of Evolution where the maximum age of the Sun turned
out to be t_E = 1.4. 10^{13} yr. We extend this concept by introducing General
Relativity and show that the minimum value of depletion of total mass-energy is
t_E =infty not only for Sun but for and sufficiently massive or dense object.
We propose that this time scale be known in the name of ``Einstein -
Eddington''. We also point out that, recently, it has been shown that as
massive stars undergo continued collapse to become a Black Hole, first they
become extremely relativistic Radiation Pressure Supported Stars. And the life
time of such relativistic radiation pressure supported compact stars is indeed
dictated by this Einstein -Eddington time scale whose concept is formally
developed here. Since this observed time scale of this radiation pressure
supported quasistatic state turns out to be infinite, such objects are called
Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECO).
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510162 [pdf] - 76658
On the non-occurrence of Type I X-ray bursts from the Black Hole
Candidates
Submitted: 2005-10-06, last modified: 2006-08-27
It has been justifiably questioned that if the Black Hole Candidates (BHCs)
have a ``hard surface'' why Type I X-ray bursts are not seen from them
(Nayayan, R., Black Holes in Astrophysics, New J. Phys., 7, 199-218, 2005). It
is pointed out that a ``physical surface'' need not always be ``hard'' and in
could be ``gaseous'' in case the compact object is sufficiently hot (Mitra, A.,
The day of reckoning: the value of the integration constant in the vacuum
Schwarzschild solution, physics/0504076, p1-p6; BHs or Eternally Collapsing
Objects: A review of 90 years of misconceptions, in Focus on Black Hole
Research, Nova Sc. Pub., NY, p1-p94, 2006). Even if a ``hard surface'' would be
there, presence of strong strong intrinsic magnetic field could inhibit Type I
X-ray burst from a compact object as is the case for Her X-1. Thus,
non-occurrence of Type I bursts actually rules out those alternatives of BHs
which are either non-magnetized or cold and, hence, is no evidence for
existence of Event Horizons (EHs). On the other hand, from the first principle,
we again show that the BHCs being uncharged and having finite masses cannot be
BHs, because uncharged BHs have a unique mass M=0. Thus the previous results
that the so-called BHCs are actually extremely hot, ultramagnetized,
Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECOs) (Robertson, S. & Leiter,
D., Astrophys. J. 565, 447-451, 2002; MECO Model of galactic BH Candidates and
active galactic nuclei, in: New Developments in BLack Hole Research, NOva Sc.
Pub., NY, p1-p44, 2006) rather than anything else get reconfirmed by
non-occurrence of Type I X-ray bursts in BHCs.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0605066 [pdf] - 112193
Why Gravitational Contraction Must be Accompanied by Emission of
Radiation Both in Newtonian and Einstein Gravity
Submitted: 2006-05-11, last modified: 2006-07-10
By using virial theorem, Helmholtz and Kelvin showed that the contraction of
a bound self-gravitating system must be accompanied by release of radiation
energy irrespective of the details of the contraction process. This happens
because the total Newtonian energy of the system E_N (and not just the
Newtonian gravitational potential energy E_g^N) decreases for such contraction.
In the era of General Relativity (GR) too, it is justifiably believed that
gravitational contraction must release radiation energy. However no GR version
of (Newtonian) Helmholtz- Kelvin (HK) process has ever been derived. Here, for
the first time, we derive the GR version of the appropriate virial theorem and
Helmholtz Kelvin mechanism by simply equating the well known expressions for
the gravitational mass and the Inertial Mass of a spherically symmetric static
fluid. Simultaneously, we show that the GR counterparts of global ``internal
energy'', ``gravitational potential energy'' and ``binding energy'' are
actually different from what have been used so far. Existence of this GR HK
process asserts that, in Einstein gravity too, gravitational collapse must be
accompanied by emission of radiation irrespective of the details of the
collapse process. Consequently, all studies of strictly adibatic gravitational
collapse are only of academic interest.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0603055 [pdf] - 112126
Radiation Pressure Supported Stars in Einstein Gravity: Eternally
Collapsing Objects
Submitted: 2006-03-14, last modified: 2006-07-07
Even when we consider Newtonian stars, i.e., stars with surface gravitational
redshift, z<< 1, it is well known that, theoretically, it is possible to have
stars, supported against self-gravity, almost entirely by radiation pressure.
However, such Newtonian stars must necessarily be supermassive. We point out
that this requirement for excessive large M, in Newtonian case, is a
consequence of the occurrence of low z<< 1. On the other hand, if we remove
such restrictions, and allow for possible occurrence highly general
relativistic regime, z >> 1, we show that, it is possible to have radiation
pressure supported stars at arbitrary value of M. Since radiation pressure
supported stars necessarily radiate at the Eddington limit, in Einstein
gravity, they are never in strict hydrodynamical equilibrium. Further, it is
believed that sufficiently massive or dense objects undergo continued
gravitational collapse to the Black Hole stage characterized by z =infty. Thus,
late stages of Black Hole formation, by definition, will have, z >> 1, and
hence would be examples of quasi-stable general relativistic RPSSs. This result
is also supported by with our previous finding that that trapped surfaces are
not formed in gravitational collapse and the value of the integration constant
in the vacuum Schwarzschild solution is zero. Hence the supposed observed BHs
are actually ECOs.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510205 [pdf] - 76701
Why the observed black hole candidates do not show spin pulsation
Submitted: 2005-10-07, last modified: 2006-04-22
It is shown here that the so-called spinning Black Hole Candidates (BHCs)
cannot be Black Holes (BHs) at all and, on the other hand, must be spinning hot
Eternally Collapsing Objects (ECOs). The question would then arise why the
spinning BHCs do not reveal their spin pulsation unlike the spinning cold
Neutron Stars (NSs). Even for magnetized NSs with ``hard surfaces'', there may
be no observed spin pulsation if the dipole axis and spin direction are exactly
same. However, spinning ECOs do not show spin pulsation because their surface
gravitational red shift is extremely high, z >> 1 and could be in the range of
10^{7-8} for stellar mass range. In contrast NSs have z ~ 0.1 -0.3. The time
profile of periodic signals generated on the surface of a spinning MECO get
extremely distorted due to extreme general relativistic frame dragging effect
as they traverse through extremely steep gravitational field. However, if any
radiation would be formed in the ECO magnetosphere sufficiently away from the
surface like in the pulsar ``outer slots''(which may happen for isolated
spinning ECOs), it might be a pulsed one.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0601025 [pdf] - 112066
A generic relation between baryonic and radiative energy densities of
stars
Submitted: 2006-01-06, last modified: 2006-02-02
By using elementary astrophysical concepts, we show that for any
self-luminous astrophysical object, the ratio of radiation energy density
inside the body (rho_r) and the baryonic energy density (rho_0) may be crudely
approximated, in the Newtonian limit, as rho_r/rho_0 ~ GM/Rc^2, where G is
constant of gravitation, c is the speed of light, M is gravitational mass, and
R is the radius of the body. The key idea is that radiation quanta must move
out in a diffusive manner rather than free stream inside the body of the star.
When one would move to the extreme General Realtivistic case i.e., if the
surface gravitational redshift, z >> 1, it is found that, rho_r/rho_0 ~ (1+z).
Previous works on gravitational collapse, however, generally assumed
rho_r/rho_0 << 1. On the other hand, actually, during continued general
relativistic gravitational collapse to the Black Hole state (z --> infty), the
collapsing matter may essentially become an extremely hot fireball a la the
very early universe even though the observed luminosity of the body as seen by
a faraway observer, L^\infty ~ (1+z)^{-1} --> 0 as z --> infty, and the
collapse might appear as ``adiabatic''.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507697 [pdf] - 74866
On the Probable Nature of the "Dark Particle Accelerators" Discovered by
HESS
Submitted: 2005-07-29
We estimate that the vacuum electric field associated with a spinning
Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object MECO
(www.phys.uni-sofia.bg/~astro/abbrev.html) could be higher by a factor of ~
10^4 than the corresponding pulsar value because of extreme relativistic Frame
Dragging Effect. Thus isolated spinning MECOs could be source of UHE cosmic ray
acceleration and VHE gamma-ray production. However because of the steeply
varying gravitational field close to the surface of the MECO, any signal
generated there would be both extremely redshifted and distorted. As a result,
there may not be any significant pulsed X-ray or Radio emission from close to
the surface, and consequently, the $\gamma$-ray source may appear as
``Unidentified'' and the particle accelerator may appear as ``Dark''.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0504384 [pdf] - 72481
Comments on the proposal of Dark Energy Stars by Chapline
Submitted: 2005-04-18, last modified: 2005-04-20
We point out that the contentions of Chapline (astro-ph/0503200)[1] that (i)
General Relativity (GR) is in conflict with Quantum Mechanics (QM) and (ii) GR
fails even on macroscopic length scales are incorrect and based on (i)
misunderstanding of GR and (ii) completely misconceived ``thought
experiments''. Even without introduction of any QM, GR actually does not allow
formation of any Event Horizon and is competent to figure out the actual nature
of the supposed Black Hole candidates. The resultant picture is not in conflict
with QM at all.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409049 [pdf] - 1468681
Why the astrophysical Black Hole Candidates may not be black holes at
all
Submitted: 2004-09-02
In a recent paper[1], it has been shown that, there cannot be any rotating
(Kerr) Black Hole (BH) with finite mass in order that the generic properties
associated with the symmetries of stationary axisymmetric Einstein equations
are obeyed, i.e, in order to have m\ge 0, we must have $a=0$. In other words,
all observed chargeless BHs with finite masses must be non-rotating
Schwarzschild BHs. Here, by comparing the invariant 4 volume associated with
original Kerr metric [2] with the Boyer-Lindquist version of the same [3], we
further find that, stationary axisymmetric {\em vacuum} Einstein solutions
actually correspond to m=0 in addition to a=0! This means that if the Kerr
solution is a unique one, the Schwarzschild BHs too correspond to only m=0 and
therefore the observed BH candidates (BHs) with m >0 are not BHs at all. This
is in agreement some detailed analysis of recent observations[4-7] which
suggest the the BHCs have strong intrinsic magnetic moment rather than any
Event Horizon. If one would derive the Boyer-Lindquist metric in a
straightforward manner by using the Backlund transformation, it would follow
that a= m sin phi, where phi is the azimuth angle. This relationship directly
confirms the result that for a supposed rotating BH, actually, both a=m=0.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407501 [pdf] - 66343
Why the astrophysical Black Hole Candidates are not rotating black holes
Submitted: 2004-07-23, last modified: 2004-09-01
It is believed that the basic component of the central engine of quasars,
micro-quasars, and energetic Gamma Ray Bursts are the rotating or the Kerr
Black Holes (BH)[1]. But by using a generic property[2-4] of the metric
components of a stationary axisymmertic rotating metric in its standard form},
namely, g_phi \phi = sin^2 theta g_theta theta, where phi is the azimuth angle
and theta is the polar angle measured from the axis of symmetry, we have found
the unexpected and surprising result that (i) in order to have a mass of a Kerr
BH m ge 0, it is necessary that its rotation parameter a=0 and if one insists
for an a ge 0, one must have m le 0! Thus if the suspected Black Hole
candidates with m >0 are really rotating they cannot be BHs at all which is in
agreement with some detailed analysis of recent observations[5-8]. However, if
it is assumed that such objects are strictly non-rotating, they could be
non-rotating Schwarzschild BHs (a=0) with m ge 0 if we ignore the physical
difficulties associated with the existence of such objects. This result calls
for new theoretical efforts to understand a vast range of astrophysical
phenomenon. If one derives the Kerr Metric in a straightforward manner by using
the Backlund transformation, it is seen that a=m sin phi. This relationship
confirms that a=m=0 for Kerr BHs.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0408323 [pdf] - 66814
A new proof for non-occurrence of trapped surfaces and information
paradox
Submitted: 2004-08-18, last modified: 2004-08-19
We present here a very simple, short and new proof which shows that no
trapped surface is ever formed in spherical gravitational collapse of isolated
bodies. Although this derivation is of purely mathematical nature and without
any assumption, it is shown, in the Appendix, that, physically, trapped
surfaces do not form in order that the 3 speed of the fluid as measured by an
observer at a fixed circumference coordinate $R$ (a scalar), is less than the
speed of light $c$. The consequence of this result is that, mathematically,
even if there would be Schwarzschild Black Holes, they would have unique
gravitational mass M=0. Recall that Schwazschild BHs may be considered as a
special case of rotating Kerr BHs with rotation parameter a=0. If one would
derive the Boyer-Lindquist metric [1] in a straight forward manner by using the
Backlund transformation[2], one would obtain a= M sin phi where phi is the
azimuth angle. This relation demands that BHs have unique mass M=0 (along with
a=0) which in turn confirms that there cannot be any trapped surface in
realistic gravitational collapse where the fluid has real pressure and density.
Since there is no trapped surface and no horizon there is no Information
Paradox in the first place.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207056 [pdf] - 163481
On the Final State of Spherical Gravitational Collapse
Submitted: 2002-07-02, last modified: 2002-07-03
In a recent paper (FPL 13(6), 543, 2000, astro-ph/9910408), from several
independent considerations we showed that GTR does not allow formation of
trapped surfaces and finite mass BHs. We rediscuss here several subtle issues
involved in this work. So far only the scientific critique to this work was due
to Tereno (astro-ph/9905144, astro-ph/9905298) and which was answered in Mitra
(astro-ph/9905175, astro-ph/9905175, astro-ph/9905329). Now Tereno
(gr-qc/0111073) has also admitted that the local 3-speed of a free particle as
conventionally defined by all previous authors and as measured in any
coordinate system, is indeed c at the EH. Further since the acceleration SCALAR
BLOWS UP at the EH, our result that there cannot be any EH at a finite R is
reconfirmed. We explicitly show here that the final state of spherical collapse
of very massive stars corresponds to a zero mass BH with 2M/R ->0. But at any
finite epoch there would be a Eternally Collapsing Objects (ECO) of finite
mass. However, if quantum back reaction in the strong gravity regime would
cause a phase transition p ~ rho, there could be static ultracompact objects
(UCO) of ~ 10 M (solar). Further, if the phase transition goes proceeds to p=
-rho, there could be UCOs of arbitrary high mass (Mazur & Mottola,
astro-ph/0109035). Both ECOs and UCOs are expected to possess strong internal
magnetic field whereas the the same for a BH is zero. Robertson & Leiter (ApJ
565, 447, 2002, astro-ph/0102381) have shown that the BH candiadates may indeed
possess such strong intrinsic mag field. Thus the BHCs are likely to ECOs/UCOs
rather than BHs. We also discuss that there is no real evidence for detection
of EH.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0205261 [pdf] - 49335
On the nature of the compact condensations at the centre of galaxies
Submitted: 2002-05-16
There are many observational evidences for the existence of massive compact
condensations in the range $10^6 -10^{10} M_\odot$ at the core of various
galaxies. At present such condensations are commonly interpreted as Black Holes
(BHs). However, we point out that while such Black Hole Candidates (BHCs) must
be similar to BHs in many respects they, actually, can not be BHs because
existence of Black Holes would violate the basic tenet of the General Theory of
Relativity (GTR) that the worldline of a material particle must be timelike at
any regular region of spacetime. On the other hand general relativistic
collapse of very massive bodies should lead to Eternally Collapsing
Configurations (ECOs) or Ultra Compact Objects (UCOs). While ECOs/UCOs may
practically be as compact as corresponding BHs, they will have a physical
surface. Also while BHs do not have any intrinsic magnetic field ECOs may have
strong intrinsic magnetic field. We point out that despite many claims actually
there is no real evidence for the ``Event Horizon'' (EH) of supposed BHs and on
the other hand, there are tentative evidence for the existence of strong
magnetic field in several BHCs (or ECOs). The presence of such intrinsic
magnetic field may render the task of explaining high energy radiation
phenomenon in many Active Galactic Nuclei easier.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0105532 [pdf] - 42761
On the question of trapped surfaces and black holes
Submitted: 2001-05-30
There are many observational evidences for the detection of compact objects
with masses significantly larger (in galactic cases) or much larger (in
extragalactic cases) than the upper limits of masses of em cold Neutron Stars.
Such compact objects are commonly interpreted as Black Holes (BHs). However, we
point out that while such Black Hole Candidates (BHCs) must be similar to BHs
in many respects they, actually, can not be BHs because existence of Black
Holes would violate the basic tenet of the General Theory of Relativity that
the worldline of a material particle must be TIMELIKE at any regular region of
spacetime. We arrive at this unique conclusion by approaching the problem from
various directions. We feel that such ``operational'' Black Holes could be able
to explain hard X-ray tail found in the galactic BHCs because Lorentz factor of
the plasma accreting on such objects should be considerably higher than the
corresponding NS case.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803014 [pdf] - 100549
Final State of Spherical Gravitational Collapse and Likely Source of
Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1998-03-03, last modified: 2000-12-11
Following our result that for the final state of continued spherical
gravitational collapse, the gravitational mass of the fluid, $M_f\to 0$, we
show that for a physical fluid the eventual value of $2GM_f/R_f\to 1$ rather
than $2GM_f/R_f <1$, indicating approach to a zero-mass black hole. We also
indicate that as the final state would be approached, the curvature components
tend to blow up, and the proper radial distance $l$ and the proper time $\tau
\to \infty$. This indicates that actually the singularity is never attained for
the collapse of an isolated body. We also identify that, the final state may
correspond to the local 3-speed $v\to c$, eventhough the circumference speed
$U\to 0$. However, at a finite observation epoch, such Eternally Collapsing
Objects (ECOs) may have a modest local speed of collapse $v \ll c$, and the lab
frame speed of collapse should practically be zero because of their extremely
high surface gravitational red-shifts.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9910408 [pdf] - 108962
Non-occurrence of trapped surfaces and Black Holes in spherical
gravitational collapse: An abridged version
Submitted: 1999-10-22, last modified: 2000-12-05
We have shown in that for arbitrary EOS and radiation transport properties,
(even) the idealized spherical gravitational collapse DOES NOT lead to the
formation of trapped surfaces: 2GM(r,t)/R <=1. Hence all singularity theorems
of Hawking, Penrose and Geroch, built on the assumption of formation of trapped
surfaces, get invalidated! And this inequality, demands that M->0 if indeed
R->0. We have shown that the final state corresponds to a zero mass BH state
and, this state would occur only after infinite proper time indicating that GR
is indeed the only naturally singularity free theory for isolated bodies (as
was cherished by Einstein). This M->0 state would materialize after the body
radiates its entire initial mass-energy. Thus there is no event horizon at any
finite R or M, and, therefore all the great theoretical confusions like whether
there could be (i) White Holes, (ii) whether t (R) becomes spacelike (timelike)
inside the EH (iii) Loss of information in gravitational collapse, and (iv)
validity of cosmic censorship conjecture get resolved. At any finite proper
time, the collapsed object would be either static (z<2) or may appear static (R
almost frozen) though, in extreme cases, internally, in terms of proper radial
length, it might be collapsing at a speed ~c! We call the latter as Eternally
Collapsing Objects.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0010311 [pdf] - 38658
General Relativistic Collapse of Neutron Stars to Strange Stars: A
Mechanism for Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2000-10-16
It is known that Neutron Stars may be converted into more compact Strange
Stars (SS) on capture/formation of a ``seed'' of strange matter. It is also
known that the binding energy of the nascent hot SS is likely to be radiated as
$\nu -\bar\nu$s so that an electromagnetic pair fireball (FB) may be created by
neutrino annihilation. And already this process has been considered as a
probable source of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) by several authors, the most notable
of which is due to Cheng & Dai (PRL, 77, 1210, 1996). They mentioned that this
process may generate a FB luminosity (outside the neutrinosphere) of 10**(49)
erg. But we point out here that a SS is a relativistic object with surface
gravitation z=0.5. Accordingly, we present here a Relativistic Model of this
process, and show that, for a massive SS with M=2 solar mass, one may explain a
GRB energy of ~ 10**(53) erg., which is 4 orders higher than previous
non-relativistic estimate. Further since the baryonic mass of the thin crust of
a strange star is negligible, this FB will generate an extremely relativistic
blast wave. Thus this process may be one of the viable routes for the genesis
of hitherto unexplained cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts. While some of the GRBs might
be beamed, many of them do not show any long term spectral break in their
afterglows and are likely to be quasi-spherical. A particular example is GRB
971214 for which estimated GRB energy is 3. 10**(53) erg. Our model may be
useful for understanding the genesis of such powerful and unexplained bursts.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0003399 [pdf] - 354664
Comments on the paper ``Polarimetric Constraints on the Optical
Afterglow Emission from GRB 990123'' by Hjorth et al. (Science, 26 1999)
Submitted: 2000-03-26, last modified: 2000-04-20
GRB 990123 is the most luminous event detected so far, and in an important
paper, Hjorth et al. (1999) reported an upper limit on the degree of linear
polarization of the optical afterglow for this burst (P <2.3%). One of the
interprtations for this small value of P was that the emission was probably due
a relativistic jet with ordered magnetic field, and the viewing angle in the
lab frame theta' <= Gamma^{-1}, where Gamma is the bulk Lorentz factor of the
jet at the time of the optical emission. We point out that this conclusion
resulted from a confusion between the angles measured in the lab frame and in
the plasma rest frame. For ordered magnetic field, one would actually obtain a
large value of P because the above mentioned angle would correspond to a very
large angle, theta <= \pi/2, in the plasma rest frame. And this is probably the
case with the blazars. On the other hand, it is indeed possible to have P ~ 0
if the magnetic field of GRB 990123 was completely chaotic and the viewing
angle was considerably smaller than the semi-angle of the jet.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803013 [pdf] - 100548
Towards the Final State of Spherical Gravitational Collapse and Likely
Source of Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1998-03-03, last modified: 1999-09-23
We invoke the global properties of the actual GTR field equations for
spherical collapse to directly show that the condition for formation of trapped
surfaces, 2GM/R >1 is not allowed by GTR. And therefore all singularity
theorems based on the assumption of formation of trapped surfaces are
invalidated! Our conclusion is in perfect agreement with Einstein's intuitive
idea that a Sch. like surface can not occur in reality. Further as singularity
is approached R ->0, in order that 2GM/R <= 1, we must have M ->0! Harrison, et
al. had also pointed out that collapse should come to a decisive end with M=0.
This is possible in GTR if the fluid radiates its entire original mass-energy
during the relentless graviatational contraction process, Q->M c^2! Since the
actual efficiency for gamma ray production by the relevant blast wave may
hardly exceed 10-20% and there could be a stronger (undetected) nu-anti-nu
burst precding GRBs, the actual energy released for GRB 990123, even accounting
for probable weak beaming, or for GRB 971214 (unbeamed) could be ~10^{54-55}
erg. And such energy release may not be properly accountable without realizing
that trapped surfaces are indeed not formed. All authors concerned with this
subject, and particularly those, who would like to differ with our derivation
are requested to send their criticism either directly or express the same
openly for a healthy scientific discussion.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/9909062 [pdf] - 113253
Kruskal Dynamics For Radial Geodesics. I
Submitted: 1999-09-21
The total spacetime manifold for a Schwarzschild black hole (BH) is described
by the Kruskal coordinates u=u(r,t) and v=v(r,t), where r and t are the
conventional Schwarzschild radial and time coordinates respectively. The
relationship between r and t for a test particle moving on a radial or
non-radial geodesic is well known. Similarly, the expression for the vacuum
Schwarzschild derivative for a geodesic, in terms of the constants of motion,
is well known. However, the same is not true for the Kruskal coordinates. Here,
we, first, explicitly obtain the value of the Kruskal coordinates on the Event
Horizon as a function of the constant of motion (E=energy per unit rest mass)
for a test particle on a radial geodesic by directly using the r-t relationship
as obtained by Chandrasekhar and also by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler. It is
found that u_H and v_H are finite for E <1. And then, we derive here the
expression for the Kruskal derivative for a radial geodesic in terms of the
constants of motion. In particular, it is seen that the value of |du/dv| (= 1)
is regular on the Event Horizon of the Black Hole. The regular nature of the
Kruskal derivative is in sharp contrast with the Schwarzschild derivative,
|dt/dr| =infty, at the Event Horizon.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905175 [pdf] - 106501
Comment on ``Velocity at the Schwarzschild Horizon Revisited'' by I.
Tereno
Submitted: 1999-05-14, last modified: 1999-06-14
In a recent preprint (astro-ph/9905144) Tereno has tried to find the physical
3-velocity (V) at the Event Horizon of a Kruskal Black Hole. This has been done
in the backdrop of the recent work by Mitra (astro-ph/9904162) where it was
shown that the radial geodesic of material particle, unphysically, becomes null
at the Event Horizon. Although Tereno stops short of finding the precise value
of V at r=2M, he concludes that V <1. It is pointed out with reference to
Eq.(13) of Tereno's work that since his delta = (r -2M)/r tends to 0 as r tends
to 2M, V indeed tends to 1. It appears that Tereno's conclusion is driven by
his inability to conceive proper limiting value of fractions. Similarly, his
idea that, the velocity addition formula of Sp. Theory of Relativity breaks
down when both the velocities approach unity is due his same inability. In
particular, our central result that Schwarschild BHs must have M=0 has been
obtained independently from three different considerations (gr-qc/9810038,
astro-ph/9904162, 163). And we also offer here the essential physical reason
why the speed of free fall at the Event Horizon must be equal to the speed of
light in coordinate system. Yet we are thankful to Tereno for making the first
attempt to scientifically criticize our relevant work.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905329 [pdf] - 106655
Final Comments on ``Another view on the velocity at the Schwarzschild
horizon'' by Tereno
Submitted: 1999-05-26, last modified: 1999-06-14
We have recently shown that at the Event Horizon of a Schwarzschild BH, the
Kruskal derivative assumes a form du/dv = +,- f(r,t)/f(r,t) = +, - 1.
Corespondingly, du^2 = dv^2, and the geodesic of a material particle becomes
NULL at the EH. Physically this means that the free fall speed measured by the
Kruskal observer V=1 at the EH. However, Tereno has difficulty in accepting
this limiting value of du/dv=1. We point out that Eq.(4) of his paper shows
(1-2M/r) dt/dr =-1, at r=2M, and, indeed, the mod of V=1. However, rather than
accepting this, Tereno has obtained and incorrect expression for t=t(r) and has
tried to find V graphically. We point out that, instead, if he uses the correct
t=t(r) relation by using Eq. (12.2.24) of Shapiro and Teukolsky, he would
indeed find V=1. It is simple to understand, physically, why one must have V=1
at the EH. If the free fall speed measured by the static Sch. Observer is Vs
and the relative velocity of the other observer is Vso with respect to the Sch.
observer, then the velocity of free fall of the test particle, V, can be found
by using the Special Relativistic velocity addition formula (locally). Since Vs
=1 at r=2M, one would always find, V=1 too. We shall not respond to any further
preprint on this line.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-th/9905182 [pdf] - 118264
Why General Theory of Relativity Allows the Existence of Only Extremal
Black Holes
Submitted: 1999-05-25
Supersymmetric String theories find occurrences of extremal Black Holes with
gravitational mass M=Q where Q is the charge (G=c=1). Thus, for the chargeless
cases, they predict M=0. We show that General Theory of Relativity, too,
demands a unique BH mass M=0. And we do this by considering the problem from
various angles, both mathematically and physically. Our analysis may be
understandable even to the readers not having sufficient background in GTR.
Physically, this M=0 result means that, continued gravitational collapse indeed
continues for infinite proper time as the system hopelessly tries to radiate
its entire original mass energy to attain the lowest energy state M=0. Since no
event horizon is formed, the problem of loss of information associated with
creation of finite mass BHs or their evaporation ceases to exist.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9904162 [pdf] - 106059
Kruskal Coordinates and Mass of Schwarzschild Black Holes
Submitted: 1999-04-13, last modified: 1999-04-15
Schwarzschild coordinates (r,t) fail to describe the region within the event
horizon (EH), (r <= 2 M), of a Black Hole (BH) because the metric coefficients
exhibit singularity at r=2 M, and the radial geodesic of a particle appears to
be null (ds^2 =0) when actually it must be timelike (ds^2 >0), if, indeed, r_g
=2 M >0. Thus, both the exterior and the interior regions of BHs are described
by singularity free Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates. However, we show that, in
this case too, ds^2= 0 for r=2M. And this result can be physically reconciled
only if the EH coincides with the central singularity or if the mass of
Schwarzschild black holes M= 0. This conclusion agrees with the result of our
following paper (astro-ph/9904163) which points out that the Oppenheimer-Snyder
paper showing formation of a BH, too, corresponds to a BH of mass M=0. It means
that Schwarzschild singularity and the central singularity are synonymous, and
there is no spacetime beneath the EH. Hence the concept of ``White Holes'' and
``Other Universes'' suggested by the Kruskal diagram naturally ceases to exist.
We insist that our derivation is straightforward and there is no scope for any
ambiguity, any reader may be able to verify it. The proper time for formation
of a zero mass BH may be seen to be infinite. Therefore at any finite epoch
there would not be any BH. On the other hand, there would be such eternally
collapsing configurations with arbitrary high but finite surface red-shifts. If
accretion onto such collapsing configurations is advection dominated, there
would be little radiation output. Observationally, such collapsing
configurations may be identified as ``Black Holes''.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9904163 [pdf] - 106060
The Mass of the Oppenheimer-Snyder Black Hole
Submitted: 1999-04-13, last modified: 1999-04-15
The only instance when the General Relativistic (GTR) collapse equations have
been solved (almost) exactly to explicitly find the metric coefficients is the
case of a homogeneous spherical dust (Oppenheimer and Snyder in 1939 in Phy.
Rev. 56, 455). The equation (37) of their paper showed the formation of an
event horizon for a collapsing homogeneous dust ball of mass M in that the
circumference radius the outermost surface, r_b = r_0= 2M in a proper time
proportional to r_0^{-1/2} in the limit of large Schrarzschild time t=
infinity. But Eq.(37) was approximated from the Eq. (36) whose essential
character is t = log (y+1/y-1), where, at the boundary of the star y=r_b/ r_0 =
r_b /2 M. And since the argument of a logarithmic function can not be negative,
one must have y >= 1 or 2M/r_b <= 1. This shows that, atleast, in this case (i)
trapped surfaces are not formed, (ii) if the collapse indeed proceeds upto r=0,
we must have M=0, and (iii) proper time taken for collapse =infinity. Thus, the
gravitational mass of OS black holes are unique and equal to zero. In the
preceding paper (astro-ph/9904162), we assumed the existence of a finite mass
BH and studied its properties in terms of Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates. And we
showed that the radial geodesic of a material particle which must be timelike
at r=2M, if M >0, actually becomes null. And this independently showed that BHs
have unique mass, M=0.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9812066 [pdf] - 104173
A Model for Most Luminous and Long Duration Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1998-12-03, last modified: 1999-03-10
We exploit the fact that General Theory of Relativity (GTR) predicts the
existence of compact objects having surface gravitational redshift z_s <
=z_c=0.615 when the Equation of State (EOS) has the stringest general
constraint that the speed of sound c_s < = 0.57 c. This z_c can be occur if a
Neutron Star (NS) has a mass of ~2 M (solar) and radius ~8 Km, as is allowed by
most of the existing EOSs. Thus massive spherical stars can indeed collapse to
such (more compact) NSs. We have shown that the efficiency for production of
electron-positron pairs out of the annihilation of resulting
neutrino-antineutrino burst rises dramatically with the value of z_c and can
saturate to ~40%. This may explain a gamma ray burst of energy as high as ~5.
10**53 erg. By using the already existing detailed (Newtonian) calculations, it
follows that the neutrino heating driven mass loss should be negligible, and
the bulk Lorentz factor of the initial fireball could be ~1000. Most of the
existing supernova calculations also show that it is extremely difficult to
simulate the direct neutrino driven mass loss, and, the shock is not launched
if the gravitational field becomes stronger. Since the gravitation potential
well of the more compact NS is indded very deep, we do not expect additional
baryonic mass ejection. So, without invoking any exotic physics (like strange
stars) or overstretching any theory, we may explain most of the luminous GRBs
in this simple model.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/9810038 [pdf] - 113070
Non-occurrence of Trapped Surfaces and Black Holes in Spherical
Gravitational Collapse
Submitted: 1998-10-10, last modified: 1999-03-01
We point out that although the pioneering work of Oppenheimer and Snyder
(OS), technically, indicated the formation of an event horizon for a collapsing
homogeneous dust ball of mass $M_b$ and radius $R_b$, the Eqs. (32) and (36) of
their paper actually demand that no trapped surface is formed $ 2GM_b/ R_b c^2
\le 1$, and $M_b \equiv 0$! Anybody may verify it. Further, by analyzing the
general inhomogeneous dust solutions of Tolman in a proper physical
perspective, we show that, all dust solutions are characterized by $M_b=0$.
Next, for a collapsing fluid endowed with radiation pressure, we discover that
the collapse equations obey the same Global Constraint $2GM /R c^2 \le 1$ and
which specifically shows that, contrary to the traditional intuitive Newtonian
idea, which equates the gravitational mass ($M_b$) with the fixed baryonic mass
($M_0$), the trapped surfaces are not allowed in general theory of relativity
(GTR). For continued collapse, the final gravitational mss $M_f \to 0$ as $R\to
0$. Thus we confirm Einstein's and Rosen's idea that Event Horizons and
Schwarzschild Singularities are unphysical and can not occur in Nature. This,
in turn, implies that, if there would be any continued collapse, the initial
gravitational mass energy of the fluid must be radiated away $Q\to M_i c^2$.
This also implies that, gravitational collapse of massive stars should give
rise to Ultra Compact Objects and emission of energy much more than what is
obtained in Supernova Events
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9812135 [pdf] - 104242
On the Nature of the Compact Objects in the AGNs
Submitted: 1998-12-08
If the cores of Galaxies and AGNs comprise Supermassive Stars (SMSs) (Hoyle
and Fowler 1963), nuclear energy generation may not be ignited for masses $M >
6\times 10^4 M_\odot$, and highly supermassive stars are likely to generate
their luminosity, $L_{KH}$ slow gravitational contraction. We show that for
such massive Newtonian SMSs, both the value of $L_{KH}$ and the the accretion
luminosity, $L_{acc}$, could be much less than the appropriate Eddington value.
Such highly SMSs will have a surface density as low as $10^{-14}$ g/cm$^3$ and
they will not behave like a compact object with a ``hard surface'. For all such
reasons, it is indeed possible to have $L_{SMS} \ll L_{ed}$. And this effect
may be incorrectly interpreted as the evidence for the existence of central
Super Massive Black Holes with Event Horizons.
In fact, in a very detailed work, and from various angles, we have recently
shown that, the General Theory of Relativity does not permit the occurrenes of
``trapped surfaces'' and Black Holes (Mitra 1998a, gr-qc/9810038).
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811402 [pdf] - 104028
Maximum Accretion Efficiency in General Theory of Relativity
Submitted: 1998-11-25
We derive here the expression for the accretion luminosity, $L(\infty)$, as
seen by a distant inertial observer $S_\infty$, for the case of spherical
accretion onto a static compact object having a surface gravitational red-shift
$z_x$. It is found that the ``efficiency'' for conversion of mass energy into
accretion energy is given by $\epsilon = z_x/(1+z_x)$. And since the maximum
value of $z_x$ permitted by General Theory of Relativity (GTR) is 2, the
maximum theoretical value of the accretion efficiency is 66.66%.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9807197 [pdf] - 354720
On the true energy budget of GRB970508 and 981214
Submitted: 1998-07-20, last modified: 1998-09-15
We emphasize a that since GRB970508 released an energy of Q_g~10^{51} \Omega
ergs in soft gamma rays alone, the actual energy of the e^+e^- p FB driving the
blast wave could be considerably higher than this value, Q_{FB} >Q_g. For
reasonably large values of \Omega, as is probably suggested by the radio
observations, the value of Q_{FB} ~ 5.10^{51}~t_m^3~n_1 erg, for GRB970508;
here t_m is the epoch in months when the associated radio-blastwave degrades to
become mildly relativistic. We discuss that it is unlikely that this energy,
Q_{FB}~sim 10^{53}erg was liberated by the central engine by a direct
electromagnetic mode. On the other hand, as conceived by several previous
authors and as is suggested by supernova theories, their FB driving the blast
wave is likely to be preceded by a much stronger neutrino burst: \nu + anti
\nu- e^+ +e^-. Although, the efficiency for pair production by this latter
route is usually found to be as low as ~.001, we point out that for very high
values of neutrino energy release Q_\nu >Q_{FB}, it is possible that, its value
increses substantially. By considering that, the value of $Q_{FB}$ for such
GRBs is indeed ~sim 10^{53} erg, we envisage that the energy of the actual
neutrino burst/wind could be as high as ~ 10^{54-55} erg. This energy might be
had from general relativistic collapse of a massive stellar core having INITIAL
gravitational mass, say, M_i~ few~M_sun to a stage having a potential well much
deeper than what is present on a canonican neutron star surface. Accordingly,
we predict that the new generation large nu elescopes may detect neutrino burst
of energy ~10^{54-55} ergs, with neutrino energies touching ~ 1 GeV, in
coincidence with GRBs.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802331 [pdf] - 100502
Comments on the paper ``Bare Quark Surfacees of Strange Stars and
Electron-Positron Pair Emission''
Submitted: 1998-02-26, last modified: 1998-07-22
In a recent paper (Ushov, PRL, 80, 230, 1998), it has been claimed that the
bare surface of a strange star can emit electron-positron pairs of luminosity
\~10^{51} ergs/s for about 10s. If true, obviously, this mechanism may explain
the origin of cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts. However, we point out that such a
mechanism is does not work because (i) if pair production really occurs the
supposed pre-existing supercritical electric field will be quenched and this
discharge process may at best release ~10^{24} ergs of electromagnetic energy,
and (ii) there is no way by which the trapped core thermal energy of few
10^{52} ergs can be transmitted electromagnetically on a time scale of ~10s or
even on a much larger time scale. The only way the hot core can cool on a time
scale of ~10 s or much shorter is by the well known process of emission of
nu-antinu pairs.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802124 [pdf] - 100295
No Massive Black-Hole in Cygnus X-3
Submitted: 1998-02-10
There has been a recent suggestion that Cyg X-3 contains a black hole (BH) of
mass ~17 solar mass. This interpretation is closely linked to a previous claim
that Cyg X-3 contains a Wolf-Rayet star of mass ~ 10 solar mass. The latter
interpretation would imply that the X-ray source in this close binary (P = 4.8
hr) is enshrouded by a relatively cool superstrong wind > 10^{-5} solar
mass/yr. It can be shown that such a wind would be completely opaque to the low
energy X-rays observed from the source and hence the Wolf-Rayet hypothesis can
not be a correct one. By pursuing the same argument it also follows that the
compact object must be of modest mass ruling out the existence of a massive BH
in Cyg X-3. Note, however, that at present we can not strictly rule out the
probable existence of stellar mass BH in Cyg X-3 or any other X-ray binary
which are believed to contain a neutron star as the compact object. Yet, a more
probable scenario for Cyg X-3 would be one where the compact object is a
canonical neutron star (NS) and the companion is an extremely low mass dwarf,
~0.001 solar mass, much like PSR 1957+20.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802125 [pdf] - 100296
Constraining the Magnetic Field in Gamma Ray Burst Blast Waves
Submitted: 1998-02-10
We point out that the already existing literature on relativistic
collisionless MHD shocks show that the parameter sigma= upstream proper
magnetic energy density/upstream rest mass energy density, plays an important
role in determining the structure and accelerating properties of such shocks.
By adopting a value of sigma= 0.002 which corresponds to the relativistic shock
associated with the Crab nebula, and by using appropriate relativistic shock
jump conditions, we obtain here a generous upper-limit on the value of (proper)
the magnetic field, B ~ 1.5 10^{-3} eta n^{1/2} G, for gamma ray burst (GRB)
blast wave. Here, eta= E/Mc^2, where E is the energy and M is the mass of the
baryons entrained in the original fireball (FB), and n is the proper number
density of the ambient medium. Further, we point out that, in realistic cases,
the actual value B could be as low as 5 10^{-6} eta n^{1/2} G. for realistic
cases.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9710063 [pdf] - 98822
The Expected Duration of Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Impulsive Hydrodynamic
Models
Submitted: 1997-10-07
Depending upon the various models and assumptions, the existing literature on
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) mentions that the gross theoretical value of the
duration of the burst in the hydrodynamical models is tau~r^2/(eta^2 c), where
r is the radius at which the blastwave associated with the fireball (FB)
becomes radiative and sufficiently strong. Here eta = E/Mc^2, c is the speed of
light, E is initial lab frame energy of the FB, and M is the baryonic mass of
the same (Rees and Meszaros 1992). However, within the same basic framework,
some authors (like Katz and Piran) have given tau ~ r^2 /(eta c). We intend to
remove this confusion by considering this problem at a level deeper than what
has been considered so far. Our analysis shows that none of the previously
quoted expressions are exactly correct and in case the FB is produced
impulsively and the radiative processes responsible for the generation of the
GRB are sufficiently fast, its expected duration would be tau ~ar^2/(eta^2 c),
where a~O(10^1). We further discuss the probable change, if any, of this
expression, in case the FB propagates in an anisotropic fashion. We also
discuss some associated points in the context of the Meszaros and Rees
scenario.
