sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Misner, C. W.

Normalized to: Misner, C.

2 article(s) in total. 5 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0405109  [pdf] - 111535
The Dynamics of General Relativity
Comments: 30 pages (LaTeX2e), uses amsfonts, no figures
Submitted: 2004-05-19
This article--summarizing the authors' then novel formulation of General Relativity--appeared as Chapter 7 of an often cited compendium edited by L. Witten in 1962, which is now long out of print. Intentionally unretouched, this posting is intended to provide contemporary accessibility to the flavor of the original ideas. Some typographical corrections have been made: footnote and page numbering have changed--but not section nor equation numbering etc. The authors' current institutional affiliations are encoded in: arnowitt@physics.tamu.edu, deser@brandeis.edu, misner@physics.umd.edu .
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/9801110  [pdf] - 112937
Stable 3-level leapfrog integration in numerical relativity
Comments: 14 pages and 10 postscript figures; different Hamiltonian constraint normalization used, minor alterations to cost analysis and Conclusions section; accepted for publication in Physical Review D
Submitted: 1998-01-30, last modified: 1998-06-26
The 3-level leapfrog time integration algorithm is an attractive choice for numerical relativity simulations since it is time-symmetric and avoids non-physical damping. In Newtonian problems without velocity dependent forces, this method enjoys the advantage of long term stability. However, for more general differential equations, whether ordinary or partial, delayed onset numerical instabilities can arise and destroy the solution. A known cure for such instabilities appears to have been overlooked in many application areas. We give an improved cure ("deloused leapfrog") that both reduces memory demands (important for 3+1 dimensional wave equations) and allows for the use of adaptive timesteps without a loss in accuracy. We show both that the instability arises and that the cure we propose works in highly relativistic problems such as tightly bound geodesics, spatially homogeneous spacetimes, and strong gravitational waves. In the gravitational wave test case (polarized waves in a Gowdy spacetime) the deloused leapfrog method was five to eight times less CPU costly at various accuracies than the implicit Crank-Nicholson method, which is not subject to this instability.