Normalized to: Mishra, W.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.09898 [pdf] - 1870891
Mass Loss via Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections During Solar Cycle
23 and 24
Submitted: 2019-04-22
Similar to the Sun, other stars shed mass and magnetic flux via ubiquitous
quasi-steady wind and episodic stellar coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We
investigate the mass loss rate via solar wind and CMEs as a function of solar
magnetic variability represented in terms of sunspot number and solar X-ray
background luminosity. We estimate the contribution of CMEs to the total solar
wind mass flux in the ecliptic and beyond, and its variation over different
phases of the solar activity cycles. The study exploits the number of sunspots
observed, coronagraphic observations of CMEs near the Sun by SOHO/LASCO, in
situ observations of the solar wind at 1 AU by WIND, and GOES X-ray flux during
solar cycle 23 and 24. We note that the X-ray background luminosity, occurrence
rate of CMEs and ICMEs, solar wind mass flux, and associated mass loss rates
from the Sun do not decrease as strongly as the sunspot number from the maximum
of solar cycle 23 to the next maximum. Our study confirms a true physical
increase in CME activity relative to the sunspot number in cycle 24. We show
that the CME occurrence rate and associated mass loss rate can be better
predicted by X-ray background luminosity than the sunspot number. The solar
wind mass loss rate which is an order of magnitude more than the CME mass loss
rate shows no obvious dependency on cyclic variation in sunspot number and
solar X-ray background luminosity. These results have implications to the study
of solar-type stars.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.06794 [pdf] - 1763067
Modeling the thermodynamic evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs)
using their kinematics
Submitted: 2018-08-21
Earlier studies on Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), using remote sensing and in
situ observations, have attempted to determine some of the internal properties
of CMEs, which were limited to a certain position or a certain time. For
understanding the evolution of the internal thermodynamic state of CMEs during
their heliospheric propagation, we improve the self-similar flux rope internal
state (FRIS) model, which is constrained by measured propagation and expansion
speed profiles of a CME. We implement the model to a CME erupted on 2008
December 12 and probe the internal state of the CME. It is found that the
polytropic index of the CME plasma decreased continuously from 1.8 to 1.35 as
the CME moved away from the Sun, implying that the CME released heat before it
reached adiabatic state and then absorbed heat. We further estimate the entropy
changing and heating rate of the CME. We also find that the thermal force
inside the CME is the internal driver of CME expansion while Lorentz force
prevented the CME from expanding. It is noted that centrifugal force due to
poloidal motion decreased with the fastest rate and Lorentz force decreased
slightly faster than thermal pressure force as CME moved away from the Sun. We
also discuss the limitations of the model and approximations made in the study.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.00809 [pdf] - 1822823
Study of Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Response of Filament Associated
CMEs
Submitted: 2018-06-30
It has been established that Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) may have
significant impact on terrestrial magnetic field and lead to space weather
events. In the present study, we selected several CMEs which are associated
with filament eruptions on the Sun. We attempt to identify the presence of
filament material within ICME at 1AU. We discuss how different ICMEs associated
with filaments lead to moderate or major geomagnetic activity on their arrival
at the Earth. Our study also highlights the difficulties in identifying the
filament material at 1AU within isolated and in interacting CMEs.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.07593 [pdf] - 1822800
Solar cycle variation of coronal mass ejections contribution to solar
wind mass flux
Submitted: 2018-05-19
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) contributes to the perturbation of solar wind
in the heliosphere. Thus, depending on the different phases of the solar cycle
and the rate of CME occurrence, contribution of CMEs to solar wind parameters
near the Earth changes. In the present study, we examine the long term
occurrence rate of CMEs, their speeds, angular widths and masses. We attempt to
find correlation between near sun parameters, determined using white light
images from coronagraphs, with solar wind measurements near the Earth from
in-situ instruments. Importantly, we attempt to find what fraction of the
averaged solar wind mass near the Earth is provided by the CMEs during
different phases of the solar cycles.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.08408 [pdf] - 1622402
Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Consequences of Interacting CMEs of 13-14
June 2012
Submitted: 2017-12-22
We report on the kinematics of two interacting CMEs observed on 13 and 14
June 2012. Both CMEs originated from the same active region NOAA 11504. After
their launches which were separated by several hours, they were observed to
interact at a distance of 100 Rs from the Sun. The interaction led to a
moderate geomagnetic storm at the Earth with Dst index of approximately, -86
nT. The kinematics of the two CMEs is estimated using data from the Sun Earth
Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI) onboard the Solar
Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO). Assuming a head-on collision
scenario, we find that the collision is inelastic in nature. Further, the
signatures of their interaction are examined using the in situ observations
obtained by Wind and the Advance Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. It is
also found that this interaction event led to the strongest sudden storm
commencement (SSC) (approximately 150 nT) of the present Solar Cycle 24. The
SSC was of long duration, approximately 20 hours. The role of interacting CMEs
in enhancing the geoeffectiveness is examined.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.08299 [pdf] - 1586401
Assessing the collision nature of coronal mass ejections in the inner
heliosphere
Submitted: 2017-07-26
There have been few attempts in the past to understand the collision of
individual cases of interacting Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). We selected 8
cases of interacting CMEs and estimated their propagation and expansion speeds,
direction of impact and masses exploiting coronagraphic and heliospheric
imaging observations. Using these estimates with ignoring the errors therein,
we find that the nature of collision is perfectly inelastic for 2 cases (e.g.,
2012 March and November), inelastic for 2 cases (e.g., 2012 June and 2011
August), elastic for 1 case (e.g., 2013 October) and super-elastic for 3 cases
(e.g., 2011 February, 2010 May and 2012 September). Admitting large
uncertainties in the estimated directions, angular widths and pre-collision
speeds; the probability of perfectly inelastic collision for 2012 March and
November cases diverge from 98%-60% and 100%-40%, respectively, reserving some
probability for other nature of collision. Similarly, the probability of
inelastic collision diverge from 95%-50% for 2012 June case, 85%-50% for 2011
August case, and 75%-15% for 2013 October case. We note that probability of
super-elastic collision for 2011 February, 2010 May and 2012 September CMEs
diverge from 90%-75%, 60%-45% and 90%-50%, respectively. Although the sample
size is small, we find a good dependence of nature of collision on CMEs
parameters. The crucial pre-collision parameters of the CMEs responsible for
increasing the probability of super-elastic collision, in descending order of
priority, are their lower approaching speed, higher expansion speed of the
following CME over the preceding one, and longer duration of collision phase.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.07692 [pdf] - 1510298
On Understanding the Nature of Collision of Coronal Mass Ejections
Observed by \textit{STEREO}
Submitted: 2016-07-26
Our study attempts to understand the collision characteristics of two coronal
mass ejections (CMEs) launched successively from the Sun on 2013 October 25.
The estimated kinematics, from three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techniques
applied to observations of CMEs by SECCHI/Coronagraphic (COR) and Heliospheric
Imagers (HIs), reveal their collision around 37 $R_\sun$ from the Sun. In the
analysis, we take into account the propagation and expansion speeds, impact
direction, angular size as well as the masses of the CMEs. These parameters are
derived from imaging observations, but may suffer from large uncertainties.
Therefore, by adopting head-on as well as oblique collision scenarios, we have
quantified the range of uncertainties involved in the calculation of the
coefficient of restitution for expanding magnetized plasmoids. Our study shows
that the comparatively large expansion speed of the following CME than that of
the preceding CME, results in a higher probability of super-elastic collision.
We also infer that a relative approaching speed of the CMEs lower than the sum
of their expansion speeds increases the chance of super-elastic collision. The
analysis under a reasonable errors in observed parameters of the CME, reveals
the larger probability of occurrence of an inelastic collision for the selected
CMEs. We suggest that the collision nature of two CMEs should be discussed in
3D, and the calculated value of the coefficient of restitution may suffer from
a large uncertainty.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03811 [pdf] - 1470757
Comparison of magnetic properties in a magnetic cloud and its solar
source on April 11-14 2013
Submitted: 2016-07-13
In the context of Sun-Earth connection of coronal mass ejections and magnetic
flux ropes (MFRs), we studied the solar active region (AR) and the magnetic
properties of magnetic cloud (MC) event during April 14-15, 2013. We use
in-situ observations from the Advanced Composition Explorer and source AR
measurements from the Solar Dynamic Observatory. The MCs magnetic structure is
reconstructed from the Grad-Shafranov method which reveals a northern component
of the axial field with left-handed helicity. The MC invariant axis is highly
inclined to the ecliptic plane pointing northward and is rotated by $117^o$
with respect to the source region PIL. The net axial flux and current in the MC
are comparatively higher than from the source region. Linear force-free alpha
distribution ($10^{-7}-10^{-6}$ m$^{-1}$) at the sigmoid leg matches the range
of twist number in the MC of 1-2 AU MFR. The MFR is non-linear force-free with
decreasing twist from the axis (9 turns/AU) towards the edge. Therefore
Gold-Hoyle (GH) configuration, assuming a constant twist, is more consistent
with the MC structure than the Lundquist configuration of increasing twist from
the axis to boundary. As an indication to that, the GH configuration yields
better fitting to the global trend of in-situ magnetic field components, in
terms of rms, than the Lundquist model. These cylindrical configurations
improved the MC fitting results when considered the effect of self-similar
expansion of MFR. For such twisting behaviour, this study suggests an
alternative fitting procedure to better characterise the MC magnetic structure
and its source region links.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.06970 [pdf] - 1351586
Kinematics of Interacting CMEs of September 25 and 28, 2012
Submitted: 2015-11-22
We have studied two Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) that occurred on September
25 and 28, 2012 and interacted near the Earth. By fitting the Graduated
Cylindrical Shell (GCS) model on the SECCHI/COR2 images and applying the
Stereoscopic Self-Similar Expansion (SSSE) method on the SECCHI/HI images, the
initial direction of both the CMEs is estimated to be west of the Sun-Earth
line. Further, the three-dimensional (3D) heliospheric kinematics of these CMEs
have been estimated using Self-Similar Expansion (SSE) reconstruction method.
We show that use of SSE method with different values of angular extent of the
CMEs, leads to significantly different kinematics estimates for the CMEs
propagating away from the observer. Using the estimated kinematics and true
masses of the CMEs, we have derived the coefficient of restitution for the
collision which is found to be close to elastic. The in situ measurements at 1
AU show two distinct structures of interplanetary CMEs, heating of the
following CME, as well as ongoing interaction between the preceding and the
following CME. We highlight the signatures of interaction in remote and in situ
observations of these CMEs and the role of interaction in producing a major
geomagnetic storm.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.01846 [pdf] - 1289887
A Full Study on the Sun-Earth Connection of an Earth-Directed CME
Magnetic Flux Rope
Submitted: 2015-10-07
We present an investigation of an eruption event of coronal mass ejection
(CME) magnetic flux rope (MFR) from source active region (AR) NOAA 11719 on 11
April 2013 utilizing observations from SDO, STEREO, SOHO, and WIND spacecraft.
The source AR consists of pre-existing sigmoidal structure stacked over a
filament channel which is regarded as MFR system. EUV observations of low
corona suggest a further development of this MFR system by added axial flux
through tether-cutting reconnection of loops at the middle of sigmoid under the
influence of continuous slow flux motions during past two days. Our study
implies that the MFR system in the AR is initiated to upward motion by
kink-instability and further driven by torus-instability. The CME morphology,
captured in simultaneous three-point coronagraph observations, is fitted with
Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) model and discerns an MFR topology with
orientation aligning with magnetic neutral line in the source AR. This MFR
expands self-similarly and is found to have source AR twist signatures in the
associated near Earth magnetic cloud (MC). We further derived kinematics of
this CME propagation by employing a plethora of stereoscopic as well as single
spacecraft reconstruction techniques. While stereoscopic methods perform
relatively poorly compared to other methods, fitting methods worked best in
estimating the arrival time of the CME compared to in-situ measurements.
Supplied with values of constrained solar wind velocity, drag parameter and 3D
kinematics from GCS fit, we construct CME kinematics from the drag based model
consistent with in-situ MC arrival.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.04871 [pdf] - 1043290
Heliospheric tracking of enhanced density structures of the 6 October
2010 CME
Submitted: 2015-05-19
A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) is an inhomogeneous structure consisting of
different features which evolve differently with the propagation of the CME.
Simultaneous heliospheric tracking of different observed features of a CME can
improve our understanding about relative forces acting on them. It also helps
to estimate accurately their arrival times at the Earth and identify them in
in- situ data. This also enables to find association between remotely observed
features and in-situ observations near the Earth. In this paper, we attempt to
continuously track two density enhanced features, one at the front and another
at the rear edge of the 6 October 2010 CME. This is achieved by using
time-elongation maps constructed from STEREO/SECCHI observations. We derive the
kinematics of the tracked features using various reconstruction methods. The
estimated kinematics are used as inputs in the Drag Based Model (DBM) to
estimate the arrival time of the tracked features of the CME at L1. On
comparing the estimated kinematics as well as the arrival times of the remotely
observed features with in-situ observations by ACE and Wind, we find that the
tracked bright feature in the J-map at the rear edge of 6 October 2010 CME
corresponds most probably to the enhanced density structure after the magnetic
cloud detected by ACE and Wind. In-situ plasma and compositional parameters
provide evidence that the rear edge density structure may correspond to a
filament associated with the CME while the density enhancement at the front
corresponds to the leading edge of the CME. Based on this single event study,
we discuss the relevance and significance of heliospheric imager (HI)
observations in identification of the three-part structure of the CME.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4604 [pdf] - 1216414
Morphological and Kinematic Evolution of Three Interacting Coronal Mass
Ejections of 2011 February 13-15
Submitted: 2014-08-20
During 2011 February 13 to 15, three Earth-directed CMEs launched in
successively were recorded as limb CMEs by coronagraphs (COR) of STEREO. These
CMEs provided an opportunity to study their geometrical and kinematic evolution
from multiple vantage points. In this paper, we examine the differences in
geometrical evolution of slow and fast speed CMEs during their propagation in
the heliosphere. We also study their interaction and collision using
STEREO/SECCHI COR and Heliospheric Imager (HI) observations. We have found
evidence of interaction and collision between the CMEs of February 15 and 14 in
COR2 and HI1 FOV, respectively, while the CME of February 14 caught the CME of
February 13 in HI2 FOV. By estimating the true mass of these CMEs and using
their pre and post-collision dynamics, the momentum and energy exchange between
them during collision phase are studied. We classify the nature of observed
collision between CME of February 14 and 15 as inelastic, reaching close to
elastic regime. Relating imaging observations with the in situ measurements, we
find that the CMEs move adjacent to each other after their collision in the
heliosphere and are recognized as distinct structures in in situ observations
by WIND spacecraft at L1. Our results highlight the significance of HI
observations in studying CME-CME collision for the purpose of improved space
weather forecasting.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.0352 [pdf] - 1216078
Evolution and Consequences of Interacting CMEs of 2012 November 9-10
using STEREO/SECCHI and In Situ Observations
Submitted: 2014-08-02
Understanding of the kinematic evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) in
the heliosphere is important to estimate their arrival time at the Earth. It is
found that kinematics of CMEs can change when they interact or collide with
each other as they propagate in the heliosphere. In this paper, we analyze the
collision and post-interaction characteristics of two Earth-directed CMEs,
launched successively on 2012 November 9 and 10, using white light imaging
observations from STEREO/SECCHI and in situ observations taken from WIND
spacecraft. We tracked two density enhanced features associated with leading
and trailing edge of November 9 CME and one density enhanced feature associated
with leading edge of November 10 CME by constructing J-maps. We found that the
leading edge of November 10 CME interacted with the trailing edge of November 9
CME. We also estimated the kinematics of these features of the CMEs and found a
significant change in their dynamics after interaction. In in situ
observations, we identified distinct structures associated with interacted CMEs
and also noticed their heating and compression as signatures of CME-CME
interaction. Our analysis shows an improvement in arrival time prediction of
CMEs using their post-collision dynamics than using pre-collision dynamics.
Estimating the true masses and speeds of these colliding CMEs, we investigated
the nature of observed collision which is found to be close to perfectly
inelastic. The investigation also places in perspective the geomagnetic
consequences of the two CMEs and their interaction in terms of occurrence of
geomagnetic storm and triggering of magnetospheric substorms.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.8446 [pdf] - 859486
A comparison of reconstruction methods for the estimation of CME
kinematics based on SECCHI/HI observations
Submitted: 2014-07-31
A study of the kinematics and arrival times of CMEs at Earth, derived from
time-elongation maps (J-maps) constructed from STEREO/Heliospheric Imager (HI)
observations, provides an opportunity to understand the heliospheric evolution
of CMEs in general. We implement various reconstruction techniques, based on
the use of time-elongation profiles of propagating CMEs viewed from single or
multiple vantage points, to estimate the dynamics of three geo-effective CMEs.
We use the kinematic properties, derived from analysis of the elongation
profiles, as inputs to the Drag Based Model for the distance beyond which the
CMEs cannot be tracked unambiguously in the J-maps. The ambient solar wind into
which these CMEs, which travel with different speeds, are launched, is
different. Therefore, these CMEs will evolve differently throughout their
journey from the Sun to 1 AU. We associate the CMEs, identified and tracked in
the J-maps, with signatures observed in situ near 1 AU by the WIND spacecraft.
By deriving the kinematic properties of each CME, using a variety of existing
methods, we assess the relative performance of each method for the purpose of
space weather forecasting. We discuss the limitations of each method, and
identify the major constraints in predicting the arrival time of CMEs near 1 AU
using heliospheric imager observations.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.1397 [pdf] - 784209
Estimating arrival time of Earth-directed CMEs at \textit{in-situ}
spacecraft using COR & HI observations from STEREO
Submitted: 2013-06-06
The prediction of the arrival time and transit speed of CMEs near the Earth
is one of the key problems in understanding the solar terrestrial relationship.
Although, STEREO observations now provide a multiple view of CMEs in the
heliosphere, the true speeds derived from stereoscopic reconstruction of SECCHI
coronagraph data are not quite sufficient in accurate forecasting of arrival
time of a majority of CMEs at the Earth. This is due to many factors which
change the CME kinematics, like interaction of two or more CMEs or the
interaction of CMEs with the pervading solar wind. In order to understand the
propagation of CMEs, we have used the 3D triangulation method on SECCHI
coronagraph (COR2) images, and geometric triangulation on the J-maps
constructed from Heliospheric Imagers HI1 and HI2 images for eight
Earth-directed CMEs observed during 2008-2010. Based on the reconstruction, and
implementing the Drag Based Model for the distance where the CMEs could not be
tracked unambiguously in the interplanetary medium, the arrival time of these
CMEs have been estimated. These arrival times have also been compared with the
actual arrival time as observed by \textit{in-situ} instruments. The analysis
reveals the importance of heliospheric imaging for improved forecasting of the
arrival time and direction of propagation of CMEs in the interplanetary medium.