sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Mishra, Wageesh

Normalized to: Mishra, W.

15 article(s) in total. 16 co-authors, from 1 to 12 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.09898  [pdf] - 1870891
Mass Loss via Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections During Solar Cycle 23 and 24
Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures, Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
Submitted: 2019-04-22
Similar to the Sun, other stars shed mass and magnetic flux via ubiquitous quasi-steady wind and episodic stellar coronal mass ejections (CMEs). We investigate the mass loss rate via solar wind and CMEs as a function of solar magnetic variability represented in terms of sunspot number and solar X-ray background luminosity. We estimate the contribution of CMEs to the total solar wind mass flux in the ecliptic and beyond, and its variation over different phases of the solar activity cycles. The study exploits the number of sunspots observed, coronagraphic observations of CMEs near the Sun by SOHO/LASCO, in situ observations of the solar wind at 1 AU by WIND, and GOES X-ray flux during solar cycle 23 and 24. We note that the X-ray background luminosity, occurrence rate of CMEs and ICMEs, solar wind mass flux, and associated mass loss rates from the Sun do not decrease as strongly as the sunspot number from the maximum of solar cycle 23 to the next maximum. Our study confirms a true physical increase in CME activity relative to the sunspot number in cycle 24. We show that the CME occurrence rate and associated mass loss rate can be better predicted by X-ray background luminosity than the sunspot number. The solar wind mass loss rate which is an order of magnitude more than the CME mass loss rate shows no obvious dependency on cyclic variation in sunspot number and solar X-ray background luminosity. These results have implications to the study of solar-type stars.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1808.06794  [pdf] - 1763067
Modeling the thermodynamic evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) using their kinematics
Comments: 29 pages, 7 figures, accepted in Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2018-08-21
Earlier studies on Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), using remote sensing and in situ observations, have attempted to determine some of the internal properties of CMEs, which were limited to a certain position or a certain time. For understanding the evolution of the internal thermodynamic state of CMEs during their heliospheric propagation, we improve the self-similar flux rope internal state (FRIS) model, which is constrained by measured propagation and expansion speed profiles of a CME. We implement the model to a CME erupted on 2008 December 12 and probe the internal state of the CME. It is found that the polytropic index of the CME plasma decreased continuously from 1.8 to 1.35 as the CME moved away from the Sun, implying that the CME released heat before it reached adiabatic state and then absorbed heat. We further estimate the entropy changing and heating rate of the CME. We also find that the thermal force inside the CME is the internal driver of CME expansion while Lorentz force prevented the CME from expanding. It is noted that centrifugal force due to poloidal motion decreased with the fastest rate and Lorentz force decreased slightly faster than thermal pressure force as CME moved away from the Sun. We also discuss the limitations of the model and approximations made in the study.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.00809  [pdf] - 1822823
Study of Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Response of Filament Associated CMEs
Comments: 2 pages, 1 figure, Accepted for publication in IAU proceeding series, Cambridge university press (CUP)
Submitted: 2018-06-30
It has been established that Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) may have significant impact on terrestrial magnetic field and lead to space weather events. In the present study, we selected several CMEs which are associated with filament eruptions on the Sun. We attempt to identify the presence of filament material within ICME at 1AU. We discuss how different ICMEs associated with filaments lead to moderate or major geomagnetic activity on their arrival at the Earth. Our study also highlights the difficulties in identifying the filament material at 1AU within isolated and in interacting CMEs.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1805.07593  [pdf] - 1822800
Solar cycle variation of coronal mass ejections contribution to solar wind mass flux
Comments: 3 Pages, 1 Figure, Accepted for publication in IAU proceeding series, Cambridge university press (CUP)
Submitted: 2018-05-19
Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) contributes to the perturbation of solar wind in the heliosphere. Thus, depending on the different phases of the solar cycle and the rate of CME occurrence, contribution of CMEs to solar wind parameters near the Earth changes. In the present study, we examine the long term occurrence rate of CMEs, their speeds, angular widths and masses. We attempt to find correlation between near sun parameters, determined using white light images from coronagraphs, with solar wind measurements near the Earth from in-situ instruments. Importantly, we attempt to find what fraction of the averaged solar wind mass near the Earth is provided by the CMEs during different phases of the solar cycles.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.08408  [pdf] - 1622402
Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Consequences of Interacting CMEs of 13-14 June 2012
Comments: 17 pages, 5 figures, Accepted in Solar Physics Journal
Submitted: 2017-12-22
We report on the kinematics of two interacting CMEs observed on 13 and 14 June 2012. Both CMEs originated from the same active region NOAA 11504. After their launches which were separated by several hours, they were observed to interact at a distance of 100 Rs from the Sun. The interaction led to a moderate geomagnetic storm at the Earth with Dst index of approximately, -86 nT. The kinematics of the two CMEs is estimated using data from the Sun Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI) onboard the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO). Assuming a head-on collision scenario, we find that the collision is inelastic in nature. Further, the signatures of their interaction are examined using the in situ observations obtained by Wind and the Advance Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. It is also found that this interaction event led to the strongest sudden storm commencement (SSC) (approximately 150 nT) of the present Solar Cycle 24. The SSC was of long duration, approximately 20 hours. The role of interacting CMEs in enhancing the geoeffectiveness is examined.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.08299  [pdf] - 1586401
Assessing the collision nature of coronal mass ejections in the inner heliosphere
Comments: 38 pages, 13 figures, accepted in ApJ Supplement Series
Submitted: 2017-07-26
There have been few attempts in the past to understand the collision of individual cases of interacting Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). We selected 8 cases of interacting CMEs and estimated their propagation and expansion speeds, direction of impact and masses exploiting coronagraphic and heliospheric imaging observations. Using these estimates with ignoring the errors therein, we find that the nature of collision is perfectly inelastic for 2 cases (e.g., 2012 March and November), inelastic for 2 cases (e.g., 2012 June and 2011 August), elastic for 1 case (e.g., 2013 October) and super-elastic for 3 cases (e.g., 2011 February, 2010 May and 2012 September). Admitting large uncertainties in the estimated directions, angular widths and pre-collision speeds; the probability of perfectly inelastic collision for 2012 March and November cases diverge from 98%-60% and 100%-40%, respectively, reserving some probability for other nature of collision. Similarly, the probability of inelastic collision diverge from 95%-50% for 2012 June case, 85%-50% for 2011 August case, and 75%-15% for 2013 October case. We note that probability of super-elastic collision for 2011 February, 2010 May and 2012 September CMEs diverge from 90%-75%, 60%-45% and 90%-50%, respectively. Although the sample size is small, we find a good dependence of nature of collision on CMEs parameters. The crucial pre-collision parameters of the CMEs responsible for increasing the probability of super-elastic collision, in descending order of priority, are their lower approaching speed, higher expansion speed of the following CME over the preceding one, and longer duration of collision phase.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.07692  [pdf] - 1510298
On Understanding the Nature of Collision of Coronal Mass Ejections Observed by \textit{STEREO}
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures, Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2016-07-26
Our study attempts to understand the collision characteristics of two coronal mass ejections (CMEs) launched successively from the Sun on 2013 October 25. The estimated kinematics, from three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction techniques applied to observations of CMEs by SECCHI/Coronagraphic (COR) and Heliospheric Imagers (HIs), reveal their collision around 37 $R_\sun$ from the Sun. In the analysis, we take into account the propagation and expansion speeds, impact direction, angular size as well as the masses of the CMEs. These parameters are derived from imaging observations, but may suffer from large uncertainties. Therefore, by adopting head-on as well as oblique collision scenarios, we have quantified the range of uncertainties involved in the calculation of the coefficient of restitution for expanding magnetized plasmoids. Our study shows that the comparatively large expansion speed of the following CME than that of the preceding CME, results in a higher probability of super-elastic collision. We also infer that a relative approaching speed of the CMEs lower than the sum of their expansion speeds increases the chance of super-elastic collision. The analysis under a reasonable errors in observed parameters of the CME, reveals the larger probability of occurrence of an inelastic collision for the selected CMEs. We suggest that the collision nature of two CMEs should be discussed in 3D, and the calculated value of the coefficient of restitution may suffer from a large uncertainty.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.03811  [pdf] - 1470757
Comparison of magnetic properties in a magnetic cloud and its solar source on April 11-14 2013
Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures, Accepted in ApJ
Submitted: 2016-07-13
In the context of Sun-Earth connection of coronal mass ejections and magnetic flux ropes (MFRs), we studied the solar active region (AR) and the magnetic properties of magnetic cloud (MC) event during April 14-15, 2013. We use in-situ observations from the Advanced Composition Explorer and source AR measurements from the Solar Dynamic Observatory. The MCs magnetic structure is reconstructed from the Grad-Shafranov method which reveals a northern component of the axial field with left-handed helicity. The MC invariant axis is highly inclined to the ecliptic plane pointing northward and is rotated by $117^o$ with respect to the source region PIL. The net axial flux and current in the MC are comparatively higher than from the source region. Linear force-free alpha distribution ($10^{-7}-10^{-6}$ m$^{-1}$) at the sigmoid leg matches the range of twist number in the MC of 1-2 AU MFR. The MFR is non-linear force-free with decreasing twist from the axis (9 turns/AU) towards the edge. Therefore Gold-Hoyle (GH) configuration, assuming a constant twist, is more consistent with the MC structure than the Lundquist configuration of increasing twist from the axis to boundary. As an indication to that, the GH configuration yields better fitting to the global trend of in-situ magnetic field components, in terms of rms, than the Lundquist model. These cylindrical configurations improved the MC fitting results when considered the effect of self-similar expansion of MFR. For such twisting behaviour, this study suggests an alternative fitting procedure to better characterise the MC magnetic structure and its source region links.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1511.06970  [pdf] - 1351586
Kinematics of Interacting CMEs of September 25 and 28, 2012
Comments: 16 Pages, 7 Figures, Accepted for publication in JGR
Submitted: 2015-11-22
We have studied two Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) that occurred on September 25 and 28, 2012 and interacted near the Earth. By fitting the Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) model on the SECCHI/COR2 images and applying the Stereoscopic Self-Similar Expansion (SSSE) method on the SECCHI/HI images, the initial direction of both the CMEs is estimated to be west of the Sun-Earth line. Further, the three-dimensional (3D) heliospheric kinematics of these CMEs have been estimated using Self-Similar Expansion (SSE) reconstruction method. We show that use of SSE method with different values of angular extent of the CMEs, leads to significantly different kinematics estimates for the CMEs propagating away from the observer. Using the estimated kinematics and true masses of the CMEs, we have derived the coefficient of restitution for the collision which is found to be close to elastic. The in situ measurements at 1 AU show two distinct structures of interplanetary CMEs, heating of the following CME, as well as ongoing interaction between the preceding and the following CME. We highlight the signatures of interaction in remote and in situ observations of these CMEs and the role of interaction in producing a major geomagnetic storm.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.01846  [pdf] - 1289887
A Full Study on the Sun-Earth Connection of an Earth-Directed CME Magnetic Flux Rope
Comments: Accepted in The Astrophysical Journal, 17 figures, 18 pages
Submitted: 2015-10-07
We present an investigation of an eruption event of coronal mass ejection (CME) magnetic flux rope (MFR) from source active region (AR) NOAA 11719 on 11 April 2013 utilizing observations from SDO, STEREO, SOHO, and WIND spacecraft. The source AR consists of pre-existing sigmoidal structure stacked over a filament channel which is regarded as MFR system. EUV observations of low corona suggest a further development of this MFR system by added axial flux through tether-cutting reconnection of loops at the middle of sigmoid under the influence of continuous slow flux motions during past two days. Our study implies that the MFR system in the AR is initiated to upward motion by kink-instability and further driven by torus-instability. The CME morphology, captured in simultaneous three-point coronagraph observations, is fitted with Graduated Cylindrical Shell (GCS) model and discerns an MFR topology with orientation aligning with magnetic neutral line in the source AR. This MFR expands self-similarly and is found to have source AR twist signatures in the associated near Earth magnetic cloud (MC). We further derived kinematics of this CME propagation by employing a plethora of stereoscopic as well as single spacecraft reconstruction techniques. While stereoscopic methods perform relatively poorly compared to other methods, fitting methods worked best in estimating the arrival time of the CME compared to in-situ measurements. Supplied with values of constrained solar wind velocity, drag parameter and 3D kinematics from GCS fit, we construct CME kinematics from the drag based model consistent with in-situ MC arrival.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.04871  [pdf] - 1043290
Heliospheric tracking of enhanced density structures of the 6 October 2010 CME
Comments: 27 pages, 9 figures, accepted for Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (SWSC)
Submitted: 2015-05-19
A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) is an inhomogeneous structure consisting of different features which evolve differently with the propagation of the CME. Simultaneous heliospheric tracking of different observed features of a CME can improve our understanding about relative forces acting on them. It also helps to estimate accurately their arrival times at the Earth and identify them in in- situ data. This also enables to find association between remotely observed features and in-situ observations near the Earth. In this paper, we attempt to continuously track two density enhanced features, one at the front and another at the rear edge of the 6 October 2010 CME. This is achieved by using time-elongation maps constructed from STEREO/SECCHI observations. We derive the kinematics of the tracked features using various reconstruction methods. The estimated kinematics are used as inputs in the Drag Based Model (DBM) to estimate the arrival time of the tracked features of the CME at L1. On comparing the estimated kinematics as well as the arrival times of the remotely observed features with in-situ observations by ACE and Wind, we find that the tracked bright feature in the J-map at the rear edge of 6 October 2010 CME corresponds most probably to the enhanced density structure after the magnetic cloud detected by ACE and Wind. In-situ plasma and compositional parameters provide evidence that the rear edge density structure may correspond to a filament associated with the CME while the density enhancement at the front corresponds to the leading edge of the CME. Based on this single event study, we discuss the relevance and significance of heliospheric imager (HI) observations in identification of the three-part structure of the CME.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.4604  [pdf] - 1216414
Morphological and Kinematic Evolution of Three Interacting Coronal Mass Ejections of 2011 February 13-15
Comments: 40 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal
Submitted: 2014-08-20
During 2011 February 13 to 15, three Earth-directed CMEs launched in successively were recorded as limb CMEs by coronagraphs (COR) of STEREO. These CMEs provided an opportunity to study their geometrical and kinematic evolution from multiple vantage points. In this paper, we examine the differences in geometrical evolution of slow and fast speed CMEs during their propagation in the heliosphere. We also study their interaction and collision using STEREO/SECCHI COR and Heliospheric Imager (HI) observations. We have found evidence of interaction and collision between the CMEs of February 15 and 14 in COR2 and HI1 FOV, respectively, while the CME of February 14 caught the CME of February 13 in HI2 FOV. By estimating the true mass of these CMEs and using their pre and post-collision dynamics, the momentum and energy exchange between them during collision phase are studied. We classify the nature of observed collision between CME of February 14 and 15 as inelastic, reaching close to elastic regime. Relating imaging observations with the in situ measurements, we find that the CMEs move adjacent to each other after their collision in the heliosphere and are recognized as distinct structures in in situ observations by WIND spacecraft at L1. Our results highlight the significance of HI observations in studying CME-CME collision for the purpose of improved space weather forecasting.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1408.0352  [pdf] - 1216078
Evolution and Consequences of Interacting CMEs of 2012 November 9-10 using STEREO/SECCHI and In Situ Observations
Comments: 34 pages, 9 figures, Accepted for publication in "Solar Physics"
Submitted: 2014-08-02
Understanding of the kinematic evolution of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) in the heliosphere is important to estimate their arrival time at the Earth. It is found that kinematics of CMEs can change when they interact or collide with each other as they propagate in the heliosphere. In this paper, we analyze the collision and post-interaction characteristics of two Earth-directed CMEs, launched successively on 2012 November 9 and 10, using white light imaging observations from STEREO/SECCHI and in situ observations taken from WIND spacecraft. We tracked two density enhanced features associated with leading and trailing edge of November 9 CME and one density enhanced feature associated with leading edge of November 10 CME by constructing J-maps. We found that the leading edge of November 10 CME interacted with the trailing edge of November 9 CME. We also estimated the kinematics of these features of the CMEs and found a significant change in their dynamics after interaction. In in situ observations, we identified distinct structures associated with interacted CMEs and also noticed their heating and compression as signatures of CME-CME interaction. Our analysis shows an improvement in arrival time prediction of CMEs using their post-collision dynamics than using pre-collision dynamics. Estimating the true masses and speeds of these colliding CMEs, we investigated the nature of observed collision which is found to be close to perfectly inelastic. The investigation also places in perspective the geomagnetic consequences of the two CMEs and their interaction in terms of occurrence of geomagnetic storm and triggering of magnetospheric substorms.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1407.8446  [pdf] - 859486
A comparison of reconstruction methods for the estimation of CME kinematics based on SECCHI/HI observations
Comments: 40pages, 10 figures, Published in ApJ
Submitted: 2014-07-31
A study of the kinematics and arrival times of CMEs at Earth, derived from time-elongation maps (J-maps) constructed from STEREO/Heliospheric Imager (HI) observations, provides an opportunity to understand the heliospheric evolution of CMEs in general. We implement various reconstruction techniques, based on the use of time-elongation profiles of propagating CMEs viewed from single or multiple vantage points, to estimate the dynamics of three geo-effective CMEs. We use the kinematic properties, derived from analysis of the elongation profiles, as inputs to the Drag Based Model for the distance beyond which the CMEs cannot be tracked unambiguously in the J-maps. The ambient solar wind into which these CMEs, which travel with different speeds, are launched, is different. Therefore, these CMEs will evolve differently throughout their journey from the Sun to 1 AU. We associate the CMEs, identified and tracked in the J-maps, with signatures observed in situ near 1 AU by the WIND spacecraft. By deriving the kinematic properties of each CME, using a variety of existing methods, we assess the relative performance of each method for the purpose of space weather forecasting. We discuss the limitations of each method, and identify the major constraints in predicting the arrival time of CMEs near 1 AU using heliospheric imager observations.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1306.1397  [pdf] - 784209
Estimating arrival time of Earth-directed CMEs at \textit{in-situ} spacecraft using COR & HI observations from STEREO
Comments: 54 pages, 20 figures, ApJ, in press
Submitted: 2013-06-06
The prediction of the arrival time and transit speed of CMEs near the Earth is one of the key problems in understanding the solar terrestrial relationship. Although, STEREO observations now provide a multiple view of CMEs in the heliosphere, the true speeds derived from stereoscopic reconstruction of SECCHI coronagraph data are not quite sufficient in accurate forecasting of arrival time of a majority of CMEs at the Earth. This is due to many factors which change the CME kinematics, like interaction of two or more CMEs or the interaction of CMEs with the pervading solar wind. In order to understand the propagation of CMEs, we have used the 3D triangulation method on SECCHI coronagraph (COR2) images, and geometric triangulation on the J-maps constructed from Heliospheric Imagers HI1 and HI2 images for eight Earth-directed CMEs observed during 2008-2010. Based on the reconstruction, and implementing the Drag Based Model for the distance where the CMEs could not be tracked unambiguously in the interplanetary medium, the arrival time of these CMEs have been estimated. These arrival times have also been compared with the actual arrival time as observed by \textit{in-situ} instruments. The analysis reveals the importance of heliospheric imaging for improved forecasting of the arrival time and direction of propagation of CMEs in the interplanetary medium.