In the present paper we consider neutrino events due to quasi-elastic scattering (QEL) as the most reliable events among various candidate events to be analyzed, and have carried out the first step of an L/E analysis which aims to confirm the survival probability with a Numerical Computer Experiment. The most important factor in the survival probability is Lnu and Enu, but this cannot be measured for such neutral particles. Instead, Lmu and Emu is utilized in the L/E analysis, where Lnu, Lmu, Enu and Emu denote the flight path lengths of the incident neutrinos, those of the emitted leptons, the energies of the incident neutrinos and those of the emitted leptons, respectively. According to our Computer Numerical Experiment, the relation of Lnu/Enu is nearly equal to Lmu/Emu doesn't hold. In subsequent papers, we show the results on an L/E analysis with the Computer Numerical Experiment based on our results obtained in the present paper.

In the previous paper (Part~1), we have verified that the SK assumption on the direction does not hold in the analysis of neutrino events occurred inside the SK detector. We have made four possible L/E analyses, L_nu/E_nu, L_nu/E_mu, L_mu/E_nu and L_mu/E_mu. Among four kinds of L/E analyses, we have shown that only L_nu/E_nu analysis can give the signature of maximum oscillations clearly, while the L_mu/E_mu analysis which are really done by Super-Kamiokande Collaboration cannot give the maximum oscillation at all. It is thus concluded that Super-Kamiokande type experiment cannot find the maximum oscillation from L/E analysis. Therefore, we would suggest Super-Kamiokande Collaboration to re-analyze the zenith angle distribution of the neutrino events which occur inside the detector carefully.

Quasi Elastic Scattering (QEL) is the dominant mechanism for producing both Fully Contained Events and Partially Contained Events in the SuperKamiokande (SK) detector for atmospheric neutrinos in the range 0.1GeV to 10GeV. In the analysis of SK events, it is assumed that the zenith angle of the incident neutrino is the same as that of the detected charged lepton. In the present paper, we derive the distribution function for the scattering angle of charged leptons and derive the average scattering angles as well as their standard deviation due to QEL. Thus, it is shown that the SK assumption for the scattering angle of the charged lepton in QEL is not valid. Further, for a real analysis of the experimental data, we should examine the correlations between the zenith angle of the charged leptons and those of their incident neutrinos, taking into account the effect of the azimuthal angle of the charged particle over its zenith angle. We conclude that it is not possible to reliably assign the zenith angle of the incident neutrino to that of the charged lepton, and so the zenith angle distribution of charged leptons does not reflect that of the incident neutrinos under the SK assumption. This result has clear implication for attempts to detect neutrino oscillations from an analysis of Fully Contained Events and Partially Contained Events in SuperKamiokande.

Quasi Elastic Scattering (QEL) is the dominant source for producing both Fully Contained Events and Partially Contained Events in the Superkamiokande(SK) detector for the atmospheric neutrinos, in the range 0.1 GeV to 10 GeV. In the analysis of SK events, it is assumed that the direction of the incident neutrino is the same as that of the detected charged lepton. In the present letter, we derive the distribution function for the scattering angle of the charged leptons, their averaged scattering angle and their standard deviation due to QEL. Then, it is shown that the SK assumption for the scattering angle of the charged leptons in the QEL is not valid. Further, we examine the influence of the azimuthal angle of the charged leptons over their zenith angle. As the result, we conclude that the zenith angle distribution of the neutrino under the SK assumption does not reflect the real zenith angle distribution of the atmospheric neutrino which produces Fully Contained Events and Partially Contained Events. This result has clear implication for attempts to detect neutrino oscillations from the analyses of Fully Contained Events and Partially Contained Events in Superkamiokande.