Normalized to: Minami, Y.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.15982 [pdf] - 2123753
Simultaneous determination of the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated
polarization angles II: Including cross frequency spectra
Submitted: 2020-06-29
We develop a strategy to determine the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated
polarization angles simultaneously using the observed $EB$ polarization power
spectra of the cosmic microwave background and the Galactic foreground
emission. We extend the methodology of Y. Minami et al. (Prog. Theor. Exp.
Phys. $\mathbf{2019}$, 083E02, 2019), which was developed for auto frequency
power spectra, by including cross frequency spectra. By fitting one global
birefringence angle and independent miscalibration angles at different
frequency bands, we determine both angles with significantly smaller
uncertainties (by more than a factor of two) compared to the auto spectra.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07572 [pdf] - 2114324
Observations and Analysis of Absorption Lines including J = K Rotational
Levels of CH3CN: The Envelope of Sagittarius B2(M)
Submitted: 2020-06-13
Molecules in diffuse and translucent clouds experience cooling as a result of
radiation and less excitation from collisions. However, a rotation around a
molecular axis of acetonitrile, CH3CN, cannot be cooled by radiation, causing
rotational populations to concentrate at the J = K levels. We aim to search for
absorption lines of CH3CN having J = K level concentrations in diffuse and
translucent clouds. The JK = 43-33 transition at 73.6 GHz was investigated
toward Sgr B2(M) in the Galactic Center region and other sources, using the
Nobeyama 45 m telescope. Based on the detected absorption lines toward Sgr
B2(M), a radiation temperature of 2.8 +/- 0.5 K, kinetic temperature of 88 +/-
29 K, and column density of (1.35 +/- 0.14) x 10^14 cm-2 were derived for this
molecule, revealing extremely concentrated J = K levels due to the lower
excitation temperature and the higher kinetic temperature. The absorption lines
occurred at a velocity of 64 km s-1. The results confirm that CH3CN with J = K
level concentrations exists in the envelope of Sgr B2(M).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.06168 [pdf] - 2094669
A measurement of the CMB E-mode angular power spectrum at subdegree
scales from 670 square degrees of POLARBEAR data
Adachi, S.;
Faúndez, M. A. O. Aguilar;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Bianchini, F.;
Chapman, S.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Crowley, K.;
Dobbs, M.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Fujino, T.;
Galitzki, N.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Groh, J.;
Hall, G.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hirose, H.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jeong, O.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Kikuchi, S.;
Kisner, T.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Matsuda, F.;
Matsumura, T.;
Minami, Y.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Segawa, Y.;
Siritanasak, P.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tsai, C.;
Vergès, C.;
Westbrook, B.;
Zhou, Y.
Submitted: 2020-05-13
We report a measurement of the E-mode polarization power spectrum of the
cosmic microwave background (CMB) using 150 GHz data taken from July 2014 to
December 2016 with the POLARBEAR experiment. We reach an effective polarization
map noise level of $32\,\mu\mathrm{K}$-$\mathrm{arcmin}$ across an observation
area of 670 square degrees. We measure the EE power spectrum over the angular
multipole range $500 \leq \ell <3000$, tracing the third to seventh acoustic
peaks with high sensitivity. The statistical uncertainty on E-mode bandpowers
is $\sim 2.3 \mu {\rm K}^2$ at $\ell \sim 1000$ with a systematic uncertainty
of 0.5$\mu {\rm K}^2$. The data are consistent with the standard $\Lambda$CDM
cosmological model with a probability-to-exceed of 0.38. We combine recent CMB
E-mode measurements and make inferences about cosmological parameters in
$\Lambda$CDM as well as in extensions to $\Lambda$CDM. Adding the ground-based
CMB polarization measurements to the Planck dataset reduces the uncertainty on
the Hubble constant by a factor of 1.2 to $H_0 = 67.20 \pm 0.57 {\rm km\,s^{-1}
\,Mpc^{-1}}$. When allowing the number of relativistic species ($N_{eff}$) to
vary, we find $N_{eff} = 2.94 \pm 0.16$, which is in good agreement with the
standard value of 3.046. Instead allowing the primordial helium abundance
($Y_{He}$) to vary, the data favor $Y_{He} = 0.248 \pm 0.012$. This is very
close to the expectation of 0.2467 from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. When varying
both $Y_{He}$ and $N_{eff}$, we find $N_{eff} = 2.70 \pm 0.26$ and $Y_{He} =
0.262 \pm 0.015$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.13832 [pdf] - 2076660
Internal delensing of Cosmic Microwave Background polarization B-modes
with the POLARBEAR experiment
Adachi, S.;
Faúndez, M. A. O. Aguilar;
Akiba, Y.;
Ali, A.;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Bianchini, F.;
Borrill, J.;
Carron, J.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Crowley, K.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Fujino, T.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hill, C. A.;
Howe, L.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Kikuchi, S.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Matsuda, F.;
Matsumura, T.;
Minami, Y.;
Namikawa, T.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Peloton, J.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Segawa, Y.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Siritanasak, P.;
Stompor, R.;
Tajima, O.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Teply, G. P.;
Vergès, C.
Submitted: 2019-09-30, last modified: 2020-04-01
Using only cosmic microwave background polarization data from the POLARBEAR
experiment, we measure $B$-mode polarization delensing on subdegree scales at
more than $5\sigma$ significance. We achieve a 14% $B$-mode power variance
reduction, the highest to date for internal delensing, and improve this result
to 2% by applying for the first time an iterative maximum a posteriori
delensing method. Our analysis demonstrates the capability of internal
delensing as a means of improving constraints on inflationary models, paving
the way for the optimal analysis of next-generation primordial $B$-mode
experiments.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.10980 [pdf] - 2085075
Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing
Power Spectrum from Two Years of POLARBEAR Data
Faúndez, Mario Aguilar;
Arnold, Kam;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Barron, Darcy;
Beck, Dominic;
Beckman, Shawn;
Bianchini, Federico;
Carron, Julien;
Cheung, Kolen;
Chinone, Yuji;
Bouhargani, Hamza El;
Elleflot, Tucker;
Errard, Josquin;
Fabbian, Giulio;
Feng, Chang;
Fujino, Takuro;
Goeckner-Wald, Neil;
Hamada, Takaho;
Hasegawa, Masaya;
Hazumi, Masashi;
Hill, Charles A.;
Hirose, Haruaki;
Jeong, Oliver;
Katayama, Nobuhiko;
Keating, Brian;
Kikuchi, Shuhei;
Kusaka, Akito;
Lee, Adrian T.;
Leon, David;
Linder, Eric;
Lowry, Lindsay Ng;
Matsuda, Frederick;
Matsumura, Tomotake;
Minami, Yuto;
Navaroli, Martin;
Nishino, Haruki;
Pham, Anh Thi Phuong;
Poletti, Davide;
Puglisi, Giuseppe;
Reichardt, Christian L;
Segawa, Yuuko;
Sherwin, Blake D;
Silva-Feaver, Maximiliano;
Siritanasak, Praween;
Stompor, Radek;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tajima, Osamu;
Takatori, Sayuri;
Tanabe, Daiki;
Teply, Grant P.;
Tsai, Calvin
Submitted: 2019-11-25, last modified: 2020-03-06
We present a measurement of the gravitational lensing deflection power
spectrum reconstructed with two seasons cosmic microwave background
polarization data from the POLARBEAR experiment. Observations were taken at 150
GHz from 2012 to 2014 which survey three patches of sky totaling 30 square
degrees. We test the consistency of the lensing spectrum with a Cold Dark
Matter (CDM) cosmology and reject the no-lensing hypothesis at a confidence of
10.9 sigma including statistical and systematic uncertainties. We observe a
value of A_L = 1.33 +/- 0.32 (statistical) +/- 0.02 (systematic) +/- 0.07
(foreground) using all polarization lensing estimators, which corresponds to a
24% accurate measurement of the lensing amplitude. Compared to the analysis of
the first year data, we have improved the breadth of both the suite of null
tests and the error terms included in the estimation of systematic
contamination.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.03572 [pdf] - 2123347
Determination of miscalibrated polarization angles from observed CMB and
foreground $EB$ power spectra: Application to partial-sky observation
Submitted: 2020-02-10
We study a strategy to determine miscalibrated polarization angles of cosmic
microwave background (CMB) experiments using the observed $EB$ polarization
power spectra of CMB and Galactic foreground emission. We apply the methodology
of Minami et al.(2019) developed for full-sky observations to ground-based
experiments such as Simons Observatory. We take into account the $E$-to-$B$
leakage and $\ell$-to-$\ell$ covariance due to partial sky coverage using the
public code NaMaster. We show that our method yields an unbiased estimate of
miscalibrated angles. Our method also enables simultaneous determination of
miscalibrated angles and the intrinsic $EB$ power spectrum of polarized dust
emission when the latter is proportional to $\sqrt{C_\ell^{EE}C_\ell^{BB}}$ and
$C_\ell^{BB}$ is proportional to $C_\ell^{EE}$.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.01724 [pdf] - 2026608
Updated design of the CMB polarization experiment satellite LiteBIRD
Sugai, H.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Akiba, Y.;
Alonso, D.;
Arnold, K.;
Aumont, J.;
Austermann, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Basak, S.;
Beall, J.;
Beckman, S.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Calabrese, E.;
Casas, F. J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chan, V.;
Chinone, Y.;
Cliche, J. -F.;
Columbro, F.;
Cukierman, A.;
Curtis, D.;
Danto, P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Haan, T.;
De Petris, M.;
Dickinson, C.;
Dobbs, M.;
Dotani, T.;
Duband, L.;
Ducout, A.;
Duff, S.;
Duivenvoorden, A.;
Duval, J. -M.;
Ebisawa, K.;
Elleflot, T.;
Enokida, H.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Errard, J.;
Essinger-Hileman, T.;
Finelli, F.;
Flauger, R.;
Franceschet, C.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Ganga, K.;
Gao, J. -R.;
Génova-Santos, R.;
Ghigna, T.;
Gomez, A.;
Gradziel, M. L.;
Grain, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Hargrave, P.;
Hasebe, T.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hattori, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hill, C.;
Hilton, G.;
Hirota, Y.;
Hivon, E.;
Hlozek, R.;
Hoang, D. -T.;
Hubmayr, J.;
Ichiki, K.;
Iida, T.;
Imada, H.;
Ishimura, K.;
Ishino, H.;
Jaehnig, G. C.;
Jones, M.;
Kaga, T.;
Kashima, S.;
Kataoka, Y.;
Katayama, N.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kibayashi, A.;
Kikuchi, T.;
Kimura, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kobayashi, Y.;
Kogiso, N.;
Kogut, A.;
Kohri, K.;
Komatsu, E.;
Komatsu, K.;
Konishi, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Kurinsky, N.;
Kushino, A.;
Kuwata-Gonokami, M.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lee, A. T.;
Linder, E.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Maki, M.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Mathon, R.;
Matsumura, T.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Minami, Y.;
Mistuda, K.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mot, B.;
Murata, Y.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Nagai, M.;
Nagata, R.;
Nakamura, S.;
Namikawa, T.;
Natoli, P.;
Nerva, S.;
Nishibori, T.;
Nishino, H.;
Nomura, Y.;
Noviello, F.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Ochi, H.;
Ogawa, H.;
Ogawa, H.;
Ohsaki, H.;
Ohta, I.;
Okada, N.;
Okada, N.;
Pagano, L.;
Paiella, A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Piacentini, F.;
Pisano, G.;
Polenta, G.;
Poletti, D.;
Prouvé, T.;
Puglisi, G.;
Rambaud, D.;
Raum, C.;
Realini, S.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Roudil, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Russell, M.;
Sakurai, H.;
Sakurai, Y.;
Sandri, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Sekimoto, Y.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Shirron, P.;
Signorelli, G.;
Smecher, G.;
Spizzi, P.;
Stever, S. L.;
Stompor, R.;
Sugiyama, S.;
Suzuki, A.;
Suzuki, J.;
Switzer, E.;
Takaku, R.;
Takakura, H.;
Takakura, S.;
Takeda, Y.;
Taylor, A.;
Taylor, E.;
Terao, Y.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Thorne, B.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tomida, H.;
Trappe, N.;
Tristram, M.;
Tsuji, M.;
Tsujimoto, M.;
Tucker, C.;
Ullom, J.;
Uozumi, S.;
Utsunomiya, S.;
Van Lanen, J.;
Vermeulen, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vissers, M.;
Vittorio, N.;
Voisin, F.;
Walker, I.;
Watanabe, N.;
Wehus, I.;
Weller, J.;
Westbrook, B.;
Winter, B.;
Wollack, E.;
Yamamoto, R.;
Yamasaki, N. Y.;
Yanagisawa, M.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yumoto, J.;
Zannoni, M.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-01-06
Recent developments of transition-edge sensors (TESs), based on extensive
experience in ground-based experiments, have been making the sensor techniques
mature enough for their application on future satellite CMB polarization
experiments. LiteBIRD is in the most advanced phase among such future
satellites, targeting its launch in Japanese Fiscal Year 2027 (2027FY) with
JAXA's H3 rocket. It will accommodate more than 4000 TESs in focal planes of
reflective low-frequency and refractive medium-and-high-frequency telescopes in
order to detect a signature imprinted on the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
by the primordial gravitational waves predicted in cosmic inflation. The total
wide frequency coverage between 34GHz and 448GHz enables us to extract such
weak spiral polarization patterns through the precise subtraction of our
Galaxy's foreground emission by using spectral differences among CMB and
foreground signals. Telescopes are cooled down to 5Kelvin for suppressing
thermal noise and contain polarization modulators with transmissive half-wave
plates at individual apertures for separating sky polarization signals from
artificial polarization and for mitigating from instrumental 1/f noise. Passive
cooling by using V-grooves supports active cooling with mechanical coolers as
well as adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators. Sky observations from the
second Sun-Earth Lagrangian point, L2, are planned for three years. An
international collaboration between Japan, USA, Canada, and Europe is sharing
various roles. In May 2019, the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science
(ISAS), JAXA selected LiteBIRD as the strategic large mission No. 2.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.07046 [pdf] - 2000185
Cross-correlation of POLARBEAR CMB Polarization Lensing with High-$z$
Sub-mm Herschel-ATLAS galaxies
Faundez, M. Aguilar;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Bianchini, F.;
Boettger, D.;
Borrill, J.;
Carron, J.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Galitzki, N.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Howe, L.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Matsuda, F.;
Minami, Y.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Stompor, R.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tsai, C.;
Verges, C.
Submitted: 2019-03-17, last modified: 2019-11-18
We report a 4.8$\sigma$ measurement of the cross-correlation signal between
the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing convergence reconstructed from
measurements of the CMB polarization made by the POLARBEAR experiment and the
infrared-selected galaxies of the Herschel-ATLAS survey. This is the first
measurement of its kind. We infer a best-fit galaxy bias of $b = 5.76 \pm
1.25$, corresponding to a host halo mass of $\log_{10}(M_h/M_\odot)
=13.5^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$ at an effective redshift of $z \sim 2$ from the
cross-correlation power spectrum. Residual uncertainties in the redshift
distribution of the sub-mm galaxies are subdominant with respect to the
statistical precision. We perform a suite of systematic tests, finding that
instrumental and astrophysical contaminations are small compared to the
statistical error. This cross-correlation measurement only relies on CMB
polarization information that, differently from CMB temperature maps, is less
contaminated by galactic and extra-galactic foregrounds, providing a clearer
view of the projected matter distribution. This result demonstrates the
feasibility and robustness of this approach for future high-sensitivity CMB
polarization experiments.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.02116 [pdf] - 1977965
Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background
Polarization Lensing from POLARBEAR and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper
Suprime-Cam
Namikawa, Toshiya;
Chinone, Yuji;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Oguri, Masamune;
Takahashi, Ryuichi;
Kusaka, Akito;
Katayama, Nobuhiko;
Adachi, Shunsuke;
Aguilar, Mario;
Aihara, Hiroaki;
Ali, Aamir;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arnold, Kam;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Barron, Darcy;
Beck, Dominic;
Beckman, Shawn;
Bianchini, Federico;
Boettger, David;
Borrill, Julian;
Cheung, Kolen;
Corbett, Lance;
Crowley, Kevin T.;
Bouhargani, Hamza El;
Elleflot, Tucker;
Errard, Josquin;
Fabbian, Giulio;
Feng, Chang;
Galitzki, Nicholas;
Goeckner-Wald, Neil;
Groh, John;
Hamada, Takaho;
Hasegawa, Masaya;
Hazumi, Masashi;
Hill, Charles;
Howe, Logan;
Jeong, Oliver;
Kaneko, Daisuke;
Keating, Brian;
Lee, Adrian T.;
Leon, David;
Linder, Eric;
Lowry, Lindsay Ng;
Mangu, Aashrita;
Matsuda, Frederick;
Minami, Yuto;
Miyazaki, Satoshi;
Murayama, Hitoshi;
Navaroli, Martin;
Nishino, Haruki;
Nishizawa, Atsushi J.;
Pham, Anh Thi Phuong;
Poletti, Davide;
Puglisi, Giuseppe;
Reichardt, Christian L.;
Sherwin, Blake D.;
Silva-Feaver, Maximiliano;
Siritanasak, Praween;
Speagle, Joshua S.;
Stompor, Radek;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tait, Philip J.;
Tajima, Osamu;
Takada, Masahiro;
Takakura, Satoru;
Takatori, Sayuri;
Tanabe, Daiki;
Tanaka, Masayuki;
Teply, Grant P.;
Tsai, Calvin;
Verges, Clara;
Westbrook, Ben;
Zhou, Yuyang;
Collaboration, The POLARBEAR;
Collaboration, the Subaru HSC SSP
Submitted: 2019-04-03, last modified: 2019-10-11
We present the first measurement of cross-correlation between the lensing
potential, reconstructed from cosmic microwave background (CMB) {\it
polarization} data, and the cosmic shear field from galaxy shapes. This
measurement is made using data from the POLARBEAR CMB experiment and the Subaru
Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. By analyzing an 11~deg$^2$ overlapping region,
we reject the null hypothesis at 3.5$\sigma$\ and constrain the amplitude of
the {\bf cross-spectrum} to $\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}=1.70\pm 0.48$, where
$\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}$ is the amplitude normalized with respect to the
Planck~2018{} prediction, based on the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter
cosmology. The first measurement of this {\bf cross-spectrum} without relying
on CMB temperature measurements is possible due to the deep POLARBEAR map with
a noise level of ${\sim}$6\,$\mu$K-arcmin, as well as the deep HSC data with a
high galaxy number density of $n_g=23\,{\rm arcmin^{-2}}$. We present a
detailed study of the systematics budget to show that residual systematics in
our results are negligibly small, which demonstrates the future potential of
this cross-correlation technique.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.02608 [pdf] - 1974580
A Measurement of the Degree Scale CMB B-mode Angular Power Spectrum with
POLARBEAR
Adachi, S.;
Faúndez, M. A. O. Aguilar;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Beckman, S.;
Bianchini, F.;
Boettger, D.;
Borrill, J.;
Carron, J.;
Chapman, S.;
Cheung, K.;
Chinone, Y.;
Crowley, K.;
Cukierman, A.;
Dobbs, M.;
Bouhargani, H. El;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feng, C.;
Fujino, T.;
Galitzki, N.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Groh, J.;
Hall, G.;
Halverson, N.;
Hamada, T.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hill, C. A.;
Howe, L.;
Inoue, Y.;
Jaehnig, G.;
Jeong, O.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kikuchi, S.;
Kisner, T.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L. N.;
Mangu, A.;
Matsuda, F.;
Minami, Y.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Segawa, Y.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Siritanasak, P.;
Stebor, N.;
Stompor, R.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tsai, C.;
Verges, C.;
Westbrook, B.;
Zhou, Y.
Submitted: 2019-10-07
We present a measurement of the $B$-mode polarization power spectrum of the
cosmic microwave background (CMB) using taken from July 2014 to December 2016
with the POLARBEAR experiment. The CMB power spectra are measured using
observations at 150 GHz with an instantaneous array sensitivity of
$\mathrm{NET}_\mathrm{array}=23\, \mu \mathrm{K} \sqrt{\mathrm{s}}$ on a 670
square degree patch of sky centered at (RA,
Dec)=($+0^\mathrm{h}12^\mathrm{m}0^\mathrm{s},-59^\circ18^\prime$). A
continuously rotating half-wave plate is used to modulate polarization and to
suppress low-frequency noise. We achieve $32\,\mu\mathrm{K}$-$\mathrm{arcmin}$
effective polarization map noise with a knee in sensitivity of $\ell = 90$,
where the inflationary gravitational wave signal is expected to peak. The
measured $B$-mode power spectrum is consistent with a $\Lambda$CDM lensing and
single dust component foreground model over a range of multipoles $50 \leq \ell
\leq 600$. The data disfavor zero $C_\ell^{BB}$ at $2.2\sigma$ using this
$\ell$ range of POLARBEAR data alone. We cross-correlate our data with Planck
high frequency maps and find the low-$\ell$ $B$-mode power in the combined
dataset to be consistent with thermal dust emission. We place an upper limit on
the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r < 0.90$ at 95% confidence level after
marginalizing over foregrounds.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.12440 [pdf] - 1874648
Simultaneous determination of the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated
polarisation angles from CMB experiments
Submitted: 2019-04-29
We show that the cosmic birefringence and miscalibrated polarisation angles
can be determined simultaneously by cosmic microwave background (CMB)
experiments using the cross-correlation between $E$- and $B$-mode polarisation
data. This is possible because polarisation angles of the CMB are rotated by
both the cosmic birefringence and miscalibration effects,whereas those of the
Galactic foreground emission only by the latter. Our method does not require
prior knowledge of the $E$- and $B$-mode power spectra of the foreground
emission, but uses only the knowledge of the CMB polarisation spectra.
Specifically, we relate the observed $EB$ correlation to the difference between
the $\mathit{observed}$ $E$- and $B$-mode spectra in the sky, and use different
multipole dependence of the CMB (given by theory) and foreground spectra (with
no assumption) to derive the likelihood for the miscalibration angle $\alpha$
and the birefringence angle $\beta$. We show that a future satellite mission
similar to LiteBIRD can determine $\beta$ with a precision of ten arcminutes.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.06556 [pdf] - 1818678
Measurements of tropospheric ice clouds with a ground-based CMB
polarization experiment, POLARBEAR
Takakura, Satoru;
Aguilar-Faúndez, Mario A. O.;
Akiba, Yoshiki;
Arnold, Kam;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Barron, Darcy;
Beck, Dominic;
Bianchini, Federico;
Boettger, David;
Borrill, Julian;
Cheung, Kolen;
Chinone, Yuji;
Elleflot, Tucker;
Errard, Josquin;
Fabbian, Giulio;
Feng, Chang;
Goeckner-Wald, Neil;
Hamada, Takaho;
Hasegawa, Masaya;
Hazumi, Masashi;
Howe, Logan;
Kaneko, Daisuke;
Katayama, Nobuhiko;
Keating, Brian;
Keskitalo, Reijo;
Kisner, Theodore;
Krachmalnicoff, Nicoletta;
Kusaka, Akito;
Lee, Adrian T.;
Lowry, Lindsay N.;
Matsuda, Frederick T.;
May, Andrew J.;
Minami, Yuto;
Navaroli, Martin;
Nishino, Haruki;
Piccirillo, Lucio;
Poletti, Davide;
Puglisi, Giuseppe;
Reichardt, Christian L.;
Segawa, Yuuko;
Silva-Feaver, Maximiliano;
Siritanasak, Praween;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tajima, Osamu;
Takatori, Sayuri;
Tanabe, Daiki;
Teply, Grant P.;
Tsai, Calvin
Submitted: 2018-09-18
The polarization of the atmosphere has been a long-standing concern for
ground-based experiments targeting cosmic microwave background (CMB)
polarization. Ice crystals in upper tropospheric clouds scatter thermal
radiation from the ground and produce a horizontally-polarized signal. We
report the detailed analysis of the cloud signal using a ground-based CMB
experiment, POLARBEAR, located at the Atacama desert in Chile and observing at
150 GHz. We observe horizontally-polarized temporal increases of low-frequency
fluctuations ("polarized bursts," hereafter) of $\lesssim$0.1 K when clouds
appear in a webcam monitoring the telescope and the sky. The hypothesis of no
correlation between polarized bursts and clouds is rejected with $>$24$\sigma$
statistical significance using three years of data. We consider many other
possibilities including instrumental and environmental effects, and find no
other reasons other than clouds that can explain the data better. We also
discuss the impact of the cloud polarization on future ground-based CMB
polarization experiments.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.06987 [pdf] - 1698011
The LiteBIRD Satellite Mission - Sub-Kelvin Instrument
Suzuki, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Akiba, Y.;
Alonso, D.;
Arnold, K.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Basak, S.;
Beckman, S.;
Borrill, J.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Calabrese, E.;
Chinone, Y.;
Cho, H-M.;
Cukierman, A.;
Curtis, D. W.;
de Haan, T.;
Dobbs, M.;
Dominjon, A.;
Dotani, T.;
Duband, L.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Duval, J. M.;
Elleflot, T.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Errard, J.;
Fischer, J.;
Fujino, T.;
Funaki, T.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Ganga, K.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Grain, J.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Hamada, T.;
Hasebe, T.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hattori, K.;
Hattori, M.;
Hayes, L.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hidehira, N.;
Hill, C. A.;
Hilton, G.;
Hubmayr, J.;
Ichiki, K.;
Iida, T.;
Imada, H.;
Inoue, M.;
Inoue, Y.;
D., K.;
Ishino, H.;
Jeong, O.;
Kanai, H.;
Kaneko, D.;
Kashima, S.;
Katayama, N.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Kernasovskiy, S. A.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kibayashi, A.;
Kida, Y.;
Kimura, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kohri, K.;
Komatsu, E.;
Komatsu, K.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Kurinsky, N. A.;
Kusaka, A.;
Lazarian, A.;
Lee, A. T.;
Li, D.;
Linder, E.;
Maffei, B.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maki, M.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matsuura, S.;
Meilhan, D.;
Mima, S.;
Minami, Y.;
Mitsuda, K.;
Montier, L.;
Nagai, M.;
Nagasaki, T.;
Nagata, R.;
Nakajima, M.;
Nakamura, S.;
Namikawa, T.;
Naruse, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Nitta, T.;
Noguchi, T.;
Ogawa, H.;
Oguri, S.;
Okada, N.;
Okamoto, A.;
Okamura, T.;
Otani, C.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pisano, G.;
Rebeiz, G.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Richards, P. L.;
Sakai, S.;
Sakurai, Y.;
Sato, Y.;
Sato, N.;
Sawada, M.;
Segawa, Y.;
Sekimoto, Y.;
Seljak, U.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Shimizu, T.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Stompor, R.;
Sugai, H.;
Sugita, H.;
Suzuki, J.;
Tajima, O.;
Takada, S.;
Takaku, R.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Taylor, E.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Thorne, B.;
Tomaru, T.;
Tomida, T.;
Tomita, N.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucker, C.;
Turin, P.;
Tsujimoto, M.;
Uozumi, S.;
Utsunomiya, S.;
Uzawa, Y.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Westbrook, B.;
Willer, M.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yamada, Y.;
Yamamoto, R.;
Yamasaki, N.;
Yamashita, T.;
Yoshida, M.
Submitted: 2018-01-22, last modified: 2018-03-15
Inflation is the leading theory of the first instant of the universe.
Inflation, which postulates that the universe underwent a period of rapid
expansion an instant after its birth, provides convincing explanation for
cosmological observations. Recent advancements in detector technology have
opened opportunities to explore primordial gravitational waves generated by the
inflation through B-mode (divergent-free) polarization pattern embedded in the
Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies. If detected, these signals would
provide strong evidence for inflation, point to the correct model for
inflation, and open a window to physics at ultra-high energies.
LiteBIRD is a satellite mission with a goal of detecting
degree-and-larger-angular-scale B-mode polarization. LiteBIRD will observe at
the second Lagrange point with a 400 mm diameter telescope and 2,622 detectors.
It will survey the entire sky with 15 frequency bands from 40 to 400 GHz to
measure and subtract foregrounds.
The U.S. LiteBIRD team is proposing to deliver sub-Kelvin instruments that
include detectors and readout electronics. A lenslet-coupled sinuous antenna
array will cover low-frequency bands (40 GHz to 235 GHz) with four frequency
arrangements of trichroic pixels. An orthomode-transducer-coupled corrugated
horn array will cover high-frequency bands (280 GHz to 402 GHz) with three
types of single frequency detectors. The detectors will be made with Transition
Edge Sensor (TES) bolometers cooled to a 100 milli-Kelvin base temperature by
an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator.The TES bolometers will be read out
using digital frequency multiplexing with Superconducting QUantum Interference
Device (SQUID) amplifiers. Up to 78 bolometers will be multiplexed with a
single SQUID amplidier.
We report on the sub-Kelvin instrument design and ongoing developments for
the LiteBIRD mission.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.02907 [pdf] - 1583212
A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background $B$-Mode Polarization
Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales from 2 years of POLARBEAR Data
The POLARBEAR Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aguilar, M.;
Akiba, Y.;
Arnold, K.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Barron, D.;
Beck, D.;
Bianchini, F.;
Boettger, D.;
Borrill, J.;
Chapman, S.;
Chinone, Y.;
Crowley, K.;
Cukierman, A.;
Dobbs, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dünner, R.;
Elleflot, T.;
Errard, J.;
Fabbian, G.;
Feeney, S. M.;
Feng, C.;
Fujino, T.;
Galitzki, N.;
Gilbert, A.;
Goeckner-Wald, N.;
Groh, J.;
Hamada, T.;
Hall, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Hasegawa, M.;
Hazumi, M.;
Hill, C.;
Howe, L.;
Inoue, Y.;
Jaehnig, G. C.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jeong, O.;
Kaneko, D.;
Katayama, N.;
Keating, B.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kusaka, A.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Leon, D.;
Linder, E.;
Lowry, L.;
Matsuda, F.;
Matsumura, T.;
Minami, Y.;
Montgomery, J.;
Navaroli, M.;
Nishino, H.;
Paar, H.;
Peloton, J.;
Pham, A. T. P.;
Poletti, D.;
Puglisi, G.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Richards, P. L.;
Ross, C.;
Segawa, Y.;
Sherwin, B. D.;
Silva-Feaver, M.;
Siritanasak, P.;
Stebor, N.;
Stompor, R.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tajima, O.;
Takakura, S.;
Takatori, S.;
Tanabe, D.;
Teply, G. P.;
Tomaru, T.;
Tucker, C.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Zahn, A.
Submitted: 2017-05-08, last modified: 2017-10-27
We report an improved measurement of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
$B$-mode polarization power spectrum with the POLARBEAR experiment at 150 GHz.
By adding new data collected during the second season of observations
(2013-2014) to re-analyzed data from the first season (2012-2013), we have
reduced twofold the band-power uncertainties. The band powers are reported over
angular multipoles $500 \leq \ell \leq 2100$, where the dominant $B$-mode
signal is expected to be due to the gravitational lensing of $E$-modes. We
reject the null hypothesis of no $B$-mode polarization at a confidence of
3.1$\sigma$ including both statistical and systematic uncertainties. We test
the consistency of the measured $B$-modes with the $\Lambda$ Cold Dark Matter
($\Lambda$CDM) framework by fitting for a single lensing amplitude parameter
$A_L$ relative to the Planck best-fit model prediction. We obtain $A_L = 0.60
^{+0.26} _{-0.24} ({\rm stat}) ^{+0.00} _{-0.04}({\rm inst}) \pm 0.14 ({\rm
foreground}) \pm 0.04 ({\rm multi})$, where $A_{L}=1$ is the fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM value, and the details of the reported uncertainties are explained
later in the manuscript.