Normalized to: Miguez, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.06154 [pdf] - 1531664
XENON100 Dark Matter Results from a Combination of 477 Live Days
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-09-20, last modified: 2017-01-12
We report on WIMP search results of the XENON100 experiment, combining three
runs summing up to 477 live days from January 2010 to January 2014. Data from
the first two runs were already published. A blind analysis was applied to the
last run recorded between April 2013 and January 2014 prior to combining the
results. The ultra-low electromagnetic background of the experiment, ~$5 \times
10^{-3}$ events/(keV$_{\mathrm{ee}}\times$kg$\times$day) before electronic
recoil rejection, together with the increased exposure of 48 kg $\times$ yr
improves the sensitivity. A profile likelihood analysis using an energy range
of (6.6 - 43.3) keV$_{\mathrm{nr}}$ sets a limit on the elastic,
spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section for WIMP masses above 8
GeV/$c^2$, with a minimum of 1.1 $\times 10^{-45}$ cm$^2$ at 50 GeV/$c^2$ and
90% confidence level. We also report updated constraints on the elastic,
spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections obtained with the same data. We set
upper limits on the WIMP-neutron (proton) cross section with a minimum of 2.0
$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$ (52$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$) at a WIMP mass of 50
GeV/$c^2$, at 90% confidence level.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.00769 [pdf] - 1542876
Search for Electronic Recoil Event Rate Modulation with 4 Years of
XENON100 Data
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Butikofer, L.;
Calven, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wang, H.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-01-03
We report on a search for electronic recoil event rate modulation signatures
in the XENON100 data accumulated over a period of 4 years, from January 2010 to
January 2014. A profile likelihood method, which incorporates the stability of
the XENON100 detector and the known electronic recoil background model, is used
to quantify the significance of periodicity in the time distribution of events.
There is a weak modulation signature at a period of $431^{+16}_{-14}$ days in
the low energy region of $(2.0-5.8)$ keV in the single scatter event sample,
with a global significance of $1.9\,\sigma$, however no other more significant
modulation is observed. The expected annual modulation of a dark matter signal
is not compatible with this result. Single scatter events in the low energy
region are thus used to exclude the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation as being due
to dark matter electron interactions via axial vector coupling at
$5.7\,\sigma$.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.1455 [pdf] - 1693885
First Axion Results from the XENON100 Experiment
The XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lung, K.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Vitells, O.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2014-04-05, last modified: 2016-12-22
We present the first results of searches for axions and axion-like-particles
with the XENON100 experiment. The axion-electron coupling constant, $g_{Ae}$,
has been probed by exploiting the axio-electric effect in liquid xenon. A
profile likelihood analysis of 224.6 live days $\times$ 34 kg exposure has
shown no evidence for a signal. By rejecting $g_{Ae}$, larger than $7.7 \times
10^{-12}$ (90\% CL) in the solar axion search, we set the best limit to date on
this coupling. In the frame of the DFSZ and KSVZ models, we exclude QCD axions
heavier than 0.3 eV/c$^2$ and 80 eV/c$^2$, respectively. For
axion-like-particles, under the assumption that they constitute the whole
abundance of dark matter in our galaxy, we constrain $g_{Ae}$, to be lower than
$1 \times 10^{-12}$ (90\% CL) for mass range from 1 to 40 keV/c$^2$, and set
the best limit to date as well.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.06262 [pdf] - 1530726
A low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Bruenner, E. Brown S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buss, A.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Linde, F.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-05-20, last modified: 2016-12-19
We perform a low-mass dark matter search using an exposure of
30\,kg$\times$yr with the XENON100 detector. By dropping the requirement of a
scintillation signal and using only the ionization signal to determine the
interaction energy, we lowered the energy threshold for detection to 0.7\,keV
for nuclear recoils. No dark matter detection can be claimed because a complete
background model cannot be constructed without a primary scintillation signal.
Instead, we compute an upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section
under the assumption that every event passing our selection criteria could be a
signal event. Using an energy interval from 0.7\,keV to 9.1\,keV, we derive a
limit on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section that excludes WIMPs
with a mass of 6\,GeV/$c^2$ above $1.4 \times 10^{-41}$\,cm$^2$ at 90\%
confidence level.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07501 [pdf] - 1395004
Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-12-23, last modified: 2016-04-15
The XENON1T experiment is currently in the commissioning phase at the
Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy. In this article we study the
experiment's expected sensitivity to the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon
interaction cross section, based on Monte Carlo predictions of the electronic
and nuclear recoil backgrounds.
The total electronic recoil background in $1$ tonne fiducial volume and ($1$,
$12$) keV electronic recoil equivalent energy region, before applying any
selection to discriminate between electronic and nuclear recoils, is $(1.80 \pm
0.15) \cdot 10^{-4}$ ($\rm{kg} \cdot day \cdot keV)^{-1}$, mainly due to the
decay of $^{222}\rm{Rn}$ daughters inside the xenon target. The nuclear recoil
background in the corresponding nuclear recoil equivalent energy region ($4$,
$50$) keV, is composed of $(0.6 \pm 0.1)$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
radiogenic neutrons, $(1.8 \pm 0.3) \cdot 10^{-2}$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
coherent scattering of neutrinos, and less than $0.01$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$
from muon-induced neutrons.
The sensitivity of XENON1T is calculated with the Profile Likelihood Ratio
method, after converting the deposited energy of electronic and nuclear recoils
into the scintillation and ionization signals seen in the detector. We take
into account the systematic uncertainties on the photon and electron emission
model, and on the estimation of the backgrounds, treated as nuisance
parameters. The main contribution comes from the relative scintillation
efficiency $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{eff}$, which affects both the signal from WIMPs
and the nuclear recoil backgrounds. After a $2$ y measurement in $1$ t fiducial
volume, the sensitivity reaches a minimum cross section of $1.6 \cdot 10^{-47}$
cm$^2$ at m$_\chi$=$50$ GeV/$c^2$.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07747 [pdf] - 1264865
Exclusion of Leptophilic Dark Matter Models using XENON100 Electronic
Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
Laboratory experiments searching for galactic dark matter particles
scattering off nuclei have so far not been able to establish a discovery. We
use data from the XENON100 experiment to search for dark matter interacting
with electrons. With no evidence for a signal above the low background of our
experiment, we exclude a variety of representative dark matter models that
would induce electronic recoils. For axial-vector couplings to electrons, we
exclude cross-sections above 6x10^(-35) cm^2 for particle masses of m_chi = 2
GeV/c^2. Independent of the dark matter halo, we exclude leptophilic models as
explanation for the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal, such as couplings to
electrons through axial-vector interactions at a 4.4 sigma confidence level,
mirror dark matter at 3.6 sigma, and luminous dark matter at 4.6 sigma.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07748 [pdf] - 1268647
Search for Event Rate Modulation in XENON100 Electronic Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, A. J. Melgarejo Fernandez. Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
We have searched for periodic variations of the electronic recoil event rate
in the (2-6) keV energy range recorded between February 2011 and March 2012
with the XENON100 detector, adding up to 224.6 live days in total. Following a
detailed study to establish the stability of the detector and its background
contributions during this run, we performed an un-binned profile likelihood
analysis to identify any periodicity up to 500 days. We find a global
significance of less than 1 sigma for all periods suggesting no statistically
significant modulation in the data. While the local significance for an annual
modulation is 2.8 sigma, the analysis of a multiple-scatter control sample and
the phase of the modulation disfavor a dark matter interpretation. The
DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation interpreted as a dark matter signature with
axial-vector coupling of WIMPs to electrons is excluded at 4.8 sigma.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.07698 [pdf] - 1342737
Lowering the radioactivity of the photomultiplier tubes for the XENON1T
dark matter experiment
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowksi, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Laubenstein, M.
Submitted: 2015-03-26
The low-background, VUV-sensitive 3-inch diameter photomultiplier tube R11410
has been developed by Hamamatsu for dark matter direct detection experiments
using liquid xenon as the target material. We present the results from the
joint effort between the XENON collaboration and the Hamamatsu company to
produce a highly radio-pure photosensor (version R11410-21) for the XENON1T
dark matter experiment. After introducing the photosensor and its components,
we show the methods and results of the radioactive contamination measurements
of the individual materials employed in the photomultiplier production. We then
discuss the adopted strategies to reduce the radioactivity of the various PMT
versions. Finally, we detail the results from screening 216 tubes with
ultra-low background germanium detectors, as well as their implications for the
expected electronic and nuclear recoil background of the XENON1T experiment.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.2374 [pdf] - 940307
Conceptual design and simulation of a water Cherenkov muon veto for the
XENON1T experiment
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bokeloh, K.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lung, K.;
Lyashenko, A.;
MacMullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Vitells, O.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer., C.
Submitted: 2014-06-09, last modified: 2015-02-25
XENON is a dark matter direct detection project, consisting of a time
projection chamber (TPC) filled with liquid xenon as detection medium. The
construction of the next generation detector, XENON1T, is presently taking
place at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy. It aims at a
sensitivity to spin-independent cross sections of $2 \cdot 10^{-47} ~
\mathrm{cm}^{\mathrm{2}}$ for WIMP masses around 50 GeV/c$^{2}$, which requires
a background reduction by two orders of magnitude compared to XENON100, the
current generation detector. An active system that is able to tag muons and
muon-induced backgrounds is critical for this goal. A water Cherenkov detector
of $\sim$10 m height and diameter has been therefore developed, equipped with 8
inch photomultipliers and cladded by a reflective foil. We present the design
and optimization study for this detector, which has been carried out with a
series of Monte Carlo simulations. The muon veto will reach very high detection
efficiencies for muons ($>99.5%$) and showers of secondary particles from muon
interactions in the rock ($>70%$). Similar efficiencies will be obtained for
XENONnT, the upgrade of XENON1T, which will later improve the WIMP sensitivity
by another order of magnitude. With the Cherenkov water shield studied here,
the background from muon-induced neutrons in XENON1T is negligible.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0181 [pdf] - 471352
Estimations of the Distances of Stellar Collapses in the Galaxy by
Analyzing the Energy Spectrum of Neutrino Bursts
Submitted: 2012-02-01
The neutrino telescopes of the present generation, depending on their
specific features, can reconstruct the neutrino spectra from a galactic burst.
Since the optical counterpart could be not available, it is desirable to have
at hand alternative methods to estimate the distance of the supernova explosion
using only the neutrino data. In this work we present preliminary results on
the method we are proposing to estimate the distance from a galactic supernova
based only on the spectral shape of the neutrino burst and assumptions on the
gravitational binding energy released an a typical supernova explosion due to
stellar collapses.