Normalized to: Mignard, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07325 [pdf] - 2099691
GaiaNIR: Combining optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) capabilities with
Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) sensors for a future Gaia-like mission
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Mora, Alcione;
Crowley, Cian;
McMillan, Paul;
Ranalli, Piero;
Heiter, Ulrike;
Jordi, Carme;
Hambly, Nigel;
Church, Ross;
Anthony, Brown;
Tanga, Paolo;
Chemin, Laurent;
Portell, Jordi;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Klioner, Sergei;
Mignard, Francois;
Fynbo, Johan;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Anderson, Richard I.;
Cellino, Alberto;
Fabricius, Claus;
Davidson, Michael;
Lindegren, Lennart
Submitted: 2016-09-23, last modified: 2020-05-22
ESA recently called for new "Science Ideas" to be investigated in terms of
feasibility and technological developments -- for technologies not yet
sufficiently mature. These ideas may in the future become candidates for M or L
class missions within the ESA Science Program.
With the launch of Gaia in December 2013, Europe entered a new era of space
astrometry following in the footsteps of the very successful Hipparcos mission
from the early 1990s. Gaia is the successor to Hipparcos, both of which
operated in optical wavelengths, and Gaia is two orders of magnitude more
accurate in the five astrometric parameters and is surveying four orders of
magnitude more stars in a vast volume of the Milky Way. The combination of the
Hipparcos/Tycho-2 catalogues with the first early Gaia data release will give
improved proper motions over a long ~25 year baseline. The final Gaia solution
will also establish a new optical reference frame by means of quasars, by
linking the optical counterparts of radio (VLBI) sources defining the
orientation of the reference frame, and by using the zero proper motion of
quasars to determine a non-rotating frame.
A weakness of Gaia is that it only operates at optical wavelengths. However,
much of the Galactic centre and the spiral arm regions, important for certain
studies, are obscured by interstellar extinction and this makes it difficult
for Gaia to deeply probe. Traditionally, this problem is overcome by switching
to the infra-red but this was not possible with Gaia's CCDs. Additionally, to
scan the entire sky and make global absolute parallax measurements the
spacecraft must have a constant rotation and this requires that the CCDs
operate in TDI mode, increasing their complexity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.08977 [pdf] - 2017793
Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems. V. Doubly-imaged QSOs
discovered from entropy and wavelets
Krone-Martins, A.;
Graham, M. J.;
Stern, D.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Delchambre, L.;
Ducourant, C.;
Teixeira, R.;
Drake, A. J.;
Scarano, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Galluccio, L.;
Jalan, P.;
Wertz, O.;
Klüter, J.;
Mignard, F.;
Spindola-Duarte, C.;
Dobie, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Sluse, D.;
Murphy, T.;
Boehm, C.;
Nierenberg, A. M.;
Bastian, U.;
Wambsganss, J.;
LeCampion, J. -F.
Submitted: 2019-12-18
The discovery of multiply-imaged gravitationally lensed QSOs is fundamental
to many astronomical and cosmological studies. However, these objects are rare
and challenging to discover due to requirements of high-angular resolution
astrometric, multiwavelength photometric and spectroscopic data. This has
limited the number of known systems to a few hundred objects. We aim to reduce
the constraints on angular resolution and discover multiply-imaged QSO
candidates by using new candidate selection principles based on unresolved
photometric time-series and ground-based images from public surveys. We
selected candidates for multiply-imaged QSOs based on low levels of entropy
computed from Catalina unresolved photometric time-series or Euclidean
similarity to known lenses in a space defined by the wavelet power spectra of
Pan-STARSS DR2 or DECaLS DR7 images, combined with multiple {\it Gaia} DR2
sources or large astrometric errors and supervised and unsupervised learning
methods. We then confirmed spectroscopically some candidates with the Palomar
Hale, Keck-I, and ESO/NTT telescopes. Here we report the discovery and
confirmation of seven doubly-imaged QSOs and one likely double quasar. This
demonstrates the potential of combining space-astrometry, even if unresolved,
with low spatial-resolution photometric time-series and/or low-spatial
resolution multi-band imaging to discover multiply-imaged lensed QSOs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.09040 [pdf] - 1904224
Astronomical distance scales in the Gaia era
Submitted: 2019-06-21
Overview of the determination of astronomical distances from a metrological
standpoint. Distances are considered from the Solar System (planetary
distances) to extragalactic distances, with a special emphasis on the
fundamental step of the trigonometric stellar distances and the giant leap
recently experienced in this field thanks to the ESA space astrometry missions
Hipparcos and Gaia.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.09022 [pdf] - 1904221
The Gaia Mission and Significance
Submitted: 2019-06-21
I provide a summary of the ESA space astrometry mission Gaia regarding its
main objectives and current status following the 2nd data release (Gaia DR2) in
April 2018. The Gaia achievements in astrometry are assessed with a historical
perspective by comparing the DR2 content to sky surveys or parallax searches
over the last two centuries. One shows that Gaia sounds more like a big leap
into a new world than an incremental progress in this field.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.08902 [pdf] - 1842421
Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2 -
Binarity from proper motion anomaly
Submitted: 2018-11-21, last modified: 2019-02-07
The census of stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars is largely
incomplete. It is, however, fundamentally important in the understanding of the
stellar and planetary formation and evolution mechanisms. We aim to
characterize the presence of physical companions in orbit around nearby stars.
Orbiting secondary bodies influence the proper motion (PM) of their parent star
through their gravitational reflex motion. Using the Hipparcos catalog and
Gaia's second data release (GDR2), we determined the long-term PM of the stars
common to these two catalogs. We then searched for a PM anomaly (PMa) between
the long-term PM vector and the GDR2 (or Hipparcos) measurements, indicative of
the presence of a perturbing secondary object. We focussed our analysis on the
6741 nearby stars located within 50 pc, and we also present a catalog of the
PMa for >99% of the Hipparcos catalog (>117000 stars). 30% of the stars studied
present a PMa greater than 3 sigmas. The PMa allows us to detect orbiting
companions, or set stringent limits on their presence. We present a few
applications to interesting targets. We set upper limits of 0.1-0.3 M_Jup to
potential planets orbiting Proxima between 1 and 10 au (P_orb=3 to 100 years).
We confirm that Proxima is gravitationally bound to alpha Cen. We recover the
masses of the known companions of epsilon Eri, epsilon Ind, Ross 614 and beta
Pic. We also detect a possible planet of a few Jovian masses orbiting tau Ceti.
The combination of the GDR2 with Hipparcos results in very high accuracy PMa
vectors. The detection of tangential velocity anomalies at a median accuracy of
sigma(Delta v_tan)=1.0 m/s per parsec of distance opens the possibility to
identify long period orbital companions otherwise inaccessible. Gaia's
complementarity to radial velocity and transit techniques already appears to be
remarkably powerful.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02845 [pdf] - 1834011
Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems. III. A systematic blind
search for new lensed systems
Delchambre, L.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Wertz, O.;
Ducourant, C.;
Galluccio, L.;
Klüter, J.;
Mignard, F.;
Teixeira, R.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Stern, D.;
Graham, M. J.;
Bastian, U.;
Surdej, J.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Campion, J. -F. Le;
Slezak, E.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2019-01-07
Aims: In this work, we aim to provide a reliable list of gravitational lens
(GL) candidates based on a search performed over the entire Gaia Data Release 2
(Gaia DR2). We also show that the sole astrometric and photometric informations
coming from the Gaia satellite yield sufficient insights for supervised
learning methods to automatically identify GL candidates with an efficiency
that is comparable to methods based on image processing. Methods: We simulated
106,623,188 lens systems composed of more than two images, based on a regular
grid of parameters characterizing a non-singular isothermal ellipsoid lens
model in the presence of an external shear. These simulations are used as an
input for training and testing our supervised learning models consisting of
Extremely Randomized Trees. The latter are finally used to assign to each of
the 2,129,659 clusters of celestial objects a discriminant value that reflects
the ability of our simulations to match the observed relative positions and
fluxes from each cluster. Once complemented with additional constraints, these
discriminant values allowed us to identify GL candidates out of the list of
clusters. Results: We report the discovery of 15 new quadruply-imaged lens
candidates with angular separations less than 6" and assess the performance of
our approach by recovering 12 out of the 13 known quadruply-imaged systems with
all their components detected in Gaia DR2 with a misclassification rate of
fortuitous clusters of stars as lens systems that is below one percent.
Similarly, the identification capability of our method regarding
quadruply-imaged systems where three images are detected in Gaia DR2 is
assessed by recovering 10 out of the 13 known quadruply-imaged systems having
one of their constituting images discarded. The associated misclassification
rate varying then between 5.8% and 20%, depending on the image we decided to
remove.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02624 [pdf] - 1924925
Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems. IV. Keck/LRIS
spectroscopic confirmation of GRAL113100-441959 and model prediction of
time-delays
Wertz, Olivier;
Stern, Daniel;
Krone-Martins, Alberto;
Delchambre, Ludovic;
Ducourant, Christine;
Mignard, François;
Teixeira, Ramachrisna;
Galluccio, Laurent;
Klüter, Jonas;
Djorgovski, George;
Graham, Matthew J.;
Surdej, Jean;
Bastian, Ulrich;
Wambsganss, Joachim;
Boehm, Céline;
LeCampion, Jean-François;
Slezak, Eric
Submitted: 2018-10-05
We report the spectroscopic confirmation and modeling of the quadruply imaged
quasar GRAL113100-441959, the first gravitational lens (GL) to be discovered
mainly from astrometric considerations. Follow-up spectra obtained with
Keck/LRIS reveal the lensing nature of this quadruply-imaged quasar with
redshift $z_s = 1.090 \pm 0.002$, but show no evidence of the central lens
galaxy. Using the image positions and $G$-band flux ratios provided by Gaia
Data Release 2 as constraints, we model the system with a singular power-law
elliptical mass distribution (SPEMD) plus external shear, to different levels
of complexity. We show that relaxing the isothermal constraint of the SPEMD is
not statistically significant, and thus we simplify the SPEMD to a singular
isothermal ellipsoid to estimate the Einstein radius of the main lens galaxy
$\theta_{\text{E}} = 0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}851$, the intensity and position
angle of the external shear $(\gamma,\theta_{\gamma}) =
(0.044,11.\!\!^{\circ}5)$, and we predict the lensing galaxy position to be
$(x_{\text{gal}},y_{\text{gal}}) =
(-0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}424,-0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}744)$ with respect to image A.
We provide time delay predictions for pairs of images, assuming a plausible
range of lens redshift values $z_l$ between $0.5$ and $0.9$. We finally examine
the impact on time delays of the so-called Source Position Transformation, a
family of degeneracies existing between different lens density profiles that
reproduce most of the lensing observables equally well. We show that this
effect contributes significantly to the time delay error budget and cannot be
ignored during the modeling. This has implications for robust cosmography
applications of lensed systems. GRAL113100-441959 is the first in a series of
seven new spectroscopically confirmed GLs discovered from Gaia Data Release 2.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09373 [pdf] - 1767409
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the variability processing & analysis
results
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Clementini, G.;
De Ridder, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Roelens, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Garofalo, A.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lopez, M.;
Molinaro, R.;
Muraveva, T.;
Panahi, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Aerts, C.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Charnas, J.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Busso, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
Glass, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Kochoska, A.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Leccia, S.;
Lorenz, D.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalk, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
Messina, S.;
Mignard, F.;
Moitinho, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Musella, I.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Ordóñez, D.;
Pagano, I.;
Palaversa, L.;
Pawlak, M.;
Plachy, E.;
Prša, A.;
Riello, M.;
Süveges, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Votruba, V.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-07-06
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): we summarise the processing and results of the
identification of variable source candidates of RR Lyrae stars, Cepheids, long
period variables (LPVs), rotation modulation (BY Dra-type) stars, delta Scuti &
SX Phoenicis stars, and short-timescale variables. In this release we aim to
provide useful but not necessarily complete samples of candidates.
The processed Gaia data consist of the G, BP, and RP photometry during the
first 22 months of operations as well as positions and parallaxes. Various
methods from classical statistics, data mining and time series analysis were
applied and tailored to the specific properties of Gaia data, as well as
various visualisation tools.
The DR2 variability release contains: 228'904 RR Lyrae stars, 11'438
Cepheids, 151'761 LPVs, 147'535 stars with rotation modulation, 8'882 delta
Scuti & SX Phoenicis stars, and 3'018 short-timescale variables. These results
are distributed over a classification and various Specific Object Studies (SOS)
tables in the Gaia archive, along with the three-band time series and
associated statistics for the underlying 550'737 unique sources. We estimate
that about half of them are newly identified variables. The variability type
completeness varies strongly as function of sky position due to the non-uniform
sky coverage and intermediate calibration level of this data. The probabilistic
and automated nature of this work implies certain completeness and
contamination rates which are quantified so that users can anticipate their
effects. This means that even well-known variable sources can be missed or
misidentified in the published data.
The DR2 variability release only represents a small subset of the processed
data. Future releases will include more variable sources and data products;
however, DR2 shows the (already) very high quality of the data and great
promise for variability studies.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.07359 [pdf] - 1767435
Gaia GraL II - Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems: The Known Multiply
Imaged Quasars
Ducourant, C.;
Wertz, O.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Teixeira, R.;
Campion, J. -F. Le;
Galluccio, L.;
Klüter, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Surdej, J.;
Mignard, F.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Bastian, U.;
Graham, M. J.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Slezak, E.
Submitted: 2018-05-18
Thanks to its spatial resolution the ESA/Gaia space mission offers a unique
opportunity to discover new multiply-imaged quasars and to study the already
known lensed systems at sub-milliarcsecond astrometric precisions. In this
paper, we address the detection of the known multiply-imaged quasars from the
Gaia Data Release 2 and determine the astrometric and photometric properties of
the individually detected images found in the Gaia DR2 catalogue. We have
compiled an exhaustive list of quasar gravitational lenses from the literature
to search for counterparts in the Gaia Data Release 2. We then analyze the
astrometric and photometric properties of these Gaia's detections. To highlight
the tremendous potential of Gaia at the sub-milliarcsecond level we finally
perform a simple Bayesian modeling of the well-known gravitational lens system
HE0435-1223, using Gaia Data Release 2 and HST astrometry. From 478 known
multiply imaged quasars, 200 have at least one image found in the Gaia Data
Release 2. Among the 41 known quadruply-imaged quasars of the list, 26 have at
least one image in the Gaia Data Release 2, 12 of which are fully detected, 6
have three counterparts, 7 have two and 1 has only one. As expected, the
modeling of HE0435-1223 shows that the model parameters are significantly
better constrained when using Gaia astrometry compared to HST astrometry, in
particular the relative positions of the background quasar source and the
centroid of the deflector. The Gaia sub-milliarcsecond astrometry also
significantly reduces the parameter correlations. Besides providing an
up-to-date list of multiply imaged quasars and their detection in the Gaia DR2,
this paper shows that more complex modeling scenarios will certainly benefit
from Gaia sub-milliarcsecond astrometry.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.11051 [pdf] - 1736368
Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems I: New lensed quasar candidates
around known quasars
Krone-Martins, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Wertz, O.;
Ducourant, C.;
Mignard, F.;
Klüter, R. Teixeira J.;
Campion, J. -F. Le;
Galluccio, L.;
Surdej, J.;
Bastian, U.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Graham, M. J.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Slezak, E.
Submitted: 2018-04-30
Context. Strong gravitationally lensed quasars are among the most interesting
and useful observable extragalactic phenomena. Because their study constitutes
a unique tool in various fields of astronomy, they are highly sought, not
without difficulty. Indeed, even in this era of all-sky surveys, their
recognition remains a great challenge, with barely a few hundred currently
known systems. Aims. In this work we aim to detect new strongly lensed quasar
candidates in the recently published Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2), which is the
highest spatial resolution astrometric and photometric all-sky survey,
attaining effective resolutions from 0.4" to 2.2". Methods. We cross-matched a
merged list of quasars and candidates with the Gaia DR2 and found 1,839,143
counterparts within 0.5". We then searched matches with more than two Gaia DR2
counterparts within 6". We further narrowed the resulting list using astrometry
and photometry compatibility criteria between the Gaia DR2 counterparts. A
supervised machine learning method, Extremely Randomized Trees, is finally
adopted to assign to each remaining system a probability of being lensed.
Results. We report the discovery of three quadruply-imaged quasar candidates
that are fully detected in Gaia DR2. These are the most promising new quasar
lens candidates from Gaia DR2 and a simple singular isothermal ellipsoid lens
model is able to reproduce their image positions to within $\sim$1 mas. This
letter demonstrates the gravitational lens discovery potential of Gaia.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09377 [pdf] - 1993934
Gaia Data Release 2: The Celestial reference frame (Gaia-CRF2)
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second release of Gaia data (Gaia DR2) contains the astrometric
parameters for more than half a million quasars. This set defines a
kinematically non-rotating reference frame in the optical domain referred to as
the Gaia-CRF2. The Gaia-CRF2 is the first realisation of a non-rotating global
optical reference frame that meets the ICRS prescriptions, meaning that it is
built only on extragalactic sources. It consists of the positions of a sample
of 556 869 sources in Gaia DR2, obtained from a positional cross-match with the
ICRF3-prototype and AllWISE AGN catalogues. The sample constitutes a clean,
dense, and homogeneous set of extragalactic point sources in the magnitude
range G from 16 to 21 mag with accurately known optical positions. The median
positional uncertainty is 0.12 mas for G < 18 mag and 0.5 mas at G = 20 mag.
Large-scale systematics are estimated to be in the range 20 to 30 muas. The
accuracy claims are supported by the parallaxes and proper motions of the
quasars in Gaia DR2. The optical positions for a subset of 2820 sources in
common with the ICRF3-prototype show very good overall agreement with the radio
positions, but several tens of sources have significantly discrepant positions.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09379 [pdf] - 1732653
Gaia Data Release 2: Observations of solar system objects
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The Gaia spacecraft of the European Space Agency (ESA) has been securing
observations of solar system objects (SSOs) since the beginning of its
operations. Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) contains the observations of a selected
sample of 14,099 SSOs. These asteroids have been already identified and have
been numbered by the Minor Planet Center. Positions are provided for each Gaia
observation at CCD level. As additional information, the apparent brightness of
SSOs in the unfiltered G band is also provided for selected observations. We
explain the processing of SSO data, and describe the criteria we used to select
the sample published in Gaia DR2. We then explore the data set to assess its
quality. To exploit the epoch astrometry of asteroids in Gaia DR2 it is
necessary to take into account the unusual properties of the uncertainty, as
the position information is nearly one-dimensional. When this aspect is handled
appropriately, an orbit fit can be obtained with post-fit residuals that are
overall consistent with the a-priori error model that was used to define
individual values of the astrometric uncertainty. The distribution of residuals
allowed us to identify possible contaminants in the data set. Photometry in the
G band was compared to computed values from reference asteroid shapes and to
the flux registered at the corresponding epochs by the red and blue photometers
(RP and BP). The overall astrometric performance is close to the expectations,
with an optimal range of brightness G~12-17. In this range, the typical
transit-level accuracy is well below 1 mas. For fainter asteroids, the growing
photon noise deteriorates the performance. Asteroids brighter than G~12 are
affected by a lower performance of the processing of their signals. The
dramatic improvement brought by Gaia DR2 astrometry of SSOs is demonstrated by
preliminary tests on the detection of subtle non-gravitational effects.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.04004 [pdf] - 1698003
Short arc orbit determination and imminent impactors in the Gaia era
Submitted: 2018-01-11, last modified: 2018-02-16
Short-arc orbit determination is crucial when an asteroid is first
discovered. In these cases usually the observations are so few that the
differential correction procedure may not converge. We have developed an
initial orbit computation method, based on the systematic ranging, an orbit
determination techniques which systematically explores a raster in the
topocentric range and range-rate space region inside the admissible region. We
obtain a fully rigorous computation of the probability for the asteroid that
could impact the Earth within few days from the discovery, without any a priori
assumption. We test our method on the two past impactors 2008 TC3 and 2014 AA,
on some very well known cases, and on two particular objects observed by the
ESA Gaia mission.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.06471 [pdf] - 1588555
Ground-based astrometry calibrated by Gaia DR1: new perspectives in
asteroid orbit determination
Spoto, F.;
Tanga, P.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Desmars, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Mignard, F.;
Altmann, M.;
Herald, D.;
Marchant, J.;
Barache, C.;
Carlucci, T.;
Lister, T.;
Taris, F.
Submitted: 2017-09-19
The Gaia Data Release 1 (GDR1) is a first, important step on the path of
evolution of astrometric accuracy towards a much improved situation. Although
asteroids are not present in GDR1, this intermediate release already impacts
asteroid astrometry. Our goal is to investigate how the GDR1 can change the
approach to a few typical problems, including the determination of orbits from
short-arc astrometry, the exploitation of stellar occultations, and the impact
risk assessment. We employ optimised asteroid orbit determination tools, and
study the resulting orbit accuracy and post-fit residuals. For this goal, we
use selected ground-based asteroid astrometry, and occultation events observed
in the past. All measurements are calibrated by using GDR1 stars. We show that,
by adopting GDR1, very short measurement arcs can already provide interesting
orbital solutions, capable of correctly identifying Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs)
and providing a much more accurate risk rating. We also demonstrate that
occultations, previously used to derive asteroid size and shapes, now reach a
new level of accuracy at which they can be fruitfully used to obtain astrometry
at the level of accuracy of Gaia star positions.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.00195 [pdf] - 1586609
Gaia Data Release 1: The archive visualisation service
Moitinho, A.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Savietto, H.;
Barros, M.;
Barata, C.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Fernandes, T.;
Alves, J.;
Silva, A. F.;
Gomes, M.;
Bakker, J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jordan, S.;
Luri, X.;
Merin, B.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Navarro, V.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Salgado, J.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Utrilla, E.;
Arenou, F.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Jansen, F.;
McCaughrean, M.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Vallenari, A.
Submitted: 2017-08-01
Context: The first Gaia data release (DR1) delivered a catalogue of
astrometry and photometry for over a billion astronomical sources. Within the
panoply of methods used for data exploration, visualisation is often the
starting point and even the guiding reference for scientific thought. However,
this is a volume of data that cannot be efficiently explored using traditional
tools, techniques, and habits.
Aims: We aim to provide a global visual exploration service for the Gaia
archive, something that is not possible out of the box for most people. The
service has two main goals. The first is to provide a software platform for
interactive visual exploration of the archive contents, using common personal
computers and mobile devices available to most users. The second aim is to
produce intelligible and appealing visual representations of the enormous
information content of the archive.
Methods: The interactive exploration service follows a client-server design.
The server runs close to the data, at the archive, and is responsible for
hiding as far as possible the complexity and volume of the Gaia data from the
client. This is achieved by serving visual detail on demand. Levels of detail
are pre-computed using data aggregation and subsampling techniques. For DR1,
the client is a web application that provides an interactive multi-panel
visualisation workspace as well as a graphical user interface.
Results: The Gaia archive Visualisation Service offers a web-based
multi-panel interactive visualisation desktop in a browser tab. It currently
provides highly configurable 1D histograms and 2D scatter plots of Gaia DR1 and
the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) with linked views. An innovative
feature is the creation of ADQL queries from visually defined regions in plots.
[abridged]
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.03295 [pdf] - 1535694
Gaia Data Release 1: The variability processing & analysis and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Evans, D. W.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Holl, B.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Riello, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Mignard, F.;
Busso, G.;
De Angeli, F.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Dubath, P.;
Beck, M.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Distefano, E.;
Fuchs, J.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Roelens, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Tingley, B.;
Votruba, V.;
Zucker, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Grenon, M.;
Jan, A.;
Lorenz, D.;
Miranda, B.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Palaversa, L.;
Prsa, A.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Hudec, R.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Kutka, A.;
Moniez, M.;
Nicoletti, J. -M.;
Park, P.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Varadi, M.;
Kochoska, A.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalko, G.;
Messina, S.;
Musella, I.;
Pagano, I.;
Sadowski, G.;
Schultheis, M.
Submitted: 2017-02-10
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than one
billion sources brighter than G=20.7 mag. Gaia offers the unprecedented
opportunity to study variability phenomena in the Universe thanks to
multi-epoch G-magnitude photometry in addition to astrometry, blue and red
spectro-photometry, and spectroscopy. Within the Gaia Consortium, Coordination
Unit 7 has the responsibility to detect variable objects, classify them, derive
characteristic parameters for specific variability classes, and provide global
descriptions of variable phenomena.
We describe the variability processing and analysis that we plan to apply to
the successive data releases, and we present its application to the G-band
photometry results of the first 14 months of Gaia operations that comprises 28
days of Ecliptic Pole Scanning Law and 13 months of Nominal Scanning Law.
Out of the 694 million, all-sky, sources that have calibrated G-band
photometry in this first stage of the mission, about 2.3 million sources that
have at least 20 observations are located within 38 degrees from the South
Ecliptic Pole. We detect about 14% of them as variable candidates, among which
the automated classification identified 9347 Cepheid and RR Lyrae candidates.
Additional visual inspections and selection criteria led to the publication of
3194 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, described in Clementini et al. (2016). Under
the restrictive conditions for DR1, the completenesses of Cepheids and RR Lyrae
stars are estimated at 67% and 58%, respectively, numbers that will
significantly increase with subsequent Gaia data releases.
Data processing within the Gaia Consortium is iterative, the quality of the
data and the results being improved at each iteration. The results presented in
this article show a glimpse of the exceptional harvest that is to be expected
from the Gaia mission for variability phenomena. [abridged]
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.06079 [pdf] - 1499606
Close stellar conjunctions of alpha Centauri A and B until 2050 - An mK
= 7.8 star may enter the Einstein ring of alpha Cen A in 2028
Submitted: 2016-10-19
The rapid proper motion of the alpha Cen pair (3.7 arcsec/yr) and its
location close to the galactic plane on a rich stellar background combine to
make them excellent candidates for stellar conjunctions with distant stars.
Adding new astrometry to archival data, we have refined the orbital parameters,
barycentric proper motion and parallax of alpha Cen and compute its apparent
trajectory on sky over the coming decades. We present a catalog of the expected
close conjunctions until 2050. An exceptional event will take place in early
May 2028, when alpha Cen A will come within 0.015 +/- 0.135 arcseconds of the
mK = 7.8 star 2MASS 14392160-6049528 (hereafter S5). In terms of impact
parameter and contrast, this is the most favorable stellar conjunction of alpha
Cen within at least the next three decades. With an angular diameter of LD =
0.47 +/- 0.05 mas, it is likely that S5 is a red giant or supergiant located at
several kiloparsecs. The approached stars will act as moving light probes in
transmission through the environment of alpha Cen. The observation of these
close conjunctions holds great promises to search for planets and other low
mass objects in the alpha Cen system using photometry and astrometry. The
relativistic deflection of the approached star images will be in the
milliarcsecond range. The small impact parameter of the conjunction with S5
means that this star has a probability of 45% of entering the Einstein ring of
alpha Cen A. The gravitational amplification of the flux of S5 could reach a
factor five for the combination of the two lensed images. The proper motion,
orbital parameters and parallax of alpha Cen will be measurable with an extreme
accuracy from differential astrometry with the S stars. This will be valuable,
for example to prepare the Breakthrough Starshot initiative to send
interstellar nanocrafts to alpha Centauri.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07255 [pdf] - 1523853
Gaia Data Release 1: The reference frame and the optical properties of
ICRF sources
Mignard, F.;
Klioner, S.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Bombrun, A.;
Hernandez, J.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Biermann, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmueller, H.;
Andrei, A.;
Bourda, G.;
Charlot, P.
Submitted: 2016-09-23
As part of the data processing for Gaia Data Release~1 (Gaia DR1) a special
astrometric solution was computed, the so-called auxiliary quasar solution.
This gives positions for selected extragalactic objects, including radio
sources in the second realisation of the International Celestial Reference
Frame (ICRF2) that have optical counterparts bright enough to be observed with
Gaia. A subset of these positions was used to align the positional reference
frame of Gaia DR1 with the ICRF2. We describe the properties of the Gaia
auxiliary quasar solution for a subset of sources matched to ICRF2, and compare
their optical and radio positions at the sub-mas level. Their formal standard
errors are better than 0.76~milliarcsec (mas) for 50% of the sources and better
than 3.35~mas for 90%. Optical magnitudes are obtained in Gaia's unfiltered
photometric G band. The comparison with the radio positions of the defining
sources shows no systematic differences larger than a few tenths of a mas. The
fraction of questionable solutions, not readily accounted for by the
statistics, is less than 6%. Normalised differences have extended tails
requiring case-by-case investigations for around 100 sources, but we have not
seen any difference indisputably linked to an optical-radio offset in the
sources.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04172 [pdf] - 1480659
Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey
properties
Submitted: 2016-09-14
At about 1000 days after the launch of Gaia we present the first Gaia data
release, Gaia DR1, consisting of astrometry and photometry for over 1 billion
sources brighter than magnitude 20.7. We summarize Gaia DR1 and provide
illustrations of the scientific quality of the data, followed by a discussion
of the limitations due to the preliminary nature of this release. Gaia DR1
consists of: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions,
parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars
in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues and a secondary astrometric
data set containing the positions for an additional 1.1 billion sources. The
second component is the photometric data set,consisting of mean G-band
magnitudes for all sources. The G-band light curves and the characteristics of
~3000 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, observed at high cadence around the south
ecliptic pole, form the third component. For the primary astrometric data set
the typical uncertainty is about 0.3 mas for the positions and parallaxes, and
about 1 mas/yr for the proper motions. A systematic component of ~0.3 mas
should be added to the parallax uncertainties. For the subset of ~94000
Hipparcos stars in the primary data set, the proper motions are much more
precise at about 0.06 mas/yr. For the secondary astrometric data set, the
typical uncertainty of the positions is ~10 mas. The median uncertainties on
the mean G-band magnitudes range from the mmag level to ~0.03 mag over the
magnitude range 5 to 20.7. Gaia DR1 represents a major advance in the mapping
of the heavens and the availability of basic stellar data that underpin
observational astrophysics. Nevertheless, the very preliminary nature of this
first Gaia data release does lead to a number of important limitations to the
data quality which should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions
from the data.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.08422 [pdf] - 1321474
The daily processing of asteroid observations by Gaia
Tanga, Paolo;
Mignard, Francois;
Oro, Aldo Dell;
Muinonen, Karri;
Pauwels, Thierry;
Thuillot, William;
Berthier, Jerome;
Cellino, Alberto;
Hestroffer, Daniel;
Petit, Jean-Marc;
Carry, Benoit;
David, Pedro;
Delbo, Marco;
Fedorets, Grigori;
Galluccio, Laurent;
Granvik, Mikael;
Ordenovic, Christophe;
Pentikainen, Hanna
Submitted: 2015-11-26, last modified: 2015-12-03
The Gaia mission started its regular observing program in the summer of 2014,
and since then it is regularly obtaining observations of asteroids. This paper
draws the outline of the data processing for Solar System objects, and in
particular on the daily "short-term" processing, from the on-board data
acquisition to the ground-based processing. We illustrate the tools developed
to compute predictions of asteroid observations, we discuss the procedures
implemented by the daily processing, and we illustrate some tests and
validations of the processing of the asteroid observations. Our findings are
overall consistent with the expectations concerning the performances of Gaia
and the effectiveness of the developed software for data reduction.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.0025 [pdf] - 1124514
Analysis of astrometric catalogues with vector spherical harmonics
Submitted: 2012-06-29, last modified: 2012-09-17
Comparison of stellar catalogues with position and proper motion components
using a decomposition on a set of orthogonal vector spherical harmonics. We
show the theoretical and practical advantages of this technique as a result of
invariance properties and the independence of the decomposition from a prior
model. We describe the mathematical principles used to perform the spectral
decomposition, evaluate the level of significance of the multipolar components
and examine the transformation properties under space rotation. The principles
are illustrated with a characterisation of the systematic effects in the FK5
catalogue compared to Hipparcos and with an application to the extraction of
the rotation and dipole acceleration in the astrometric solution of QSOs
expected from Gaia.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0132 [pdf] - 1116306
Gaia Universe Model Snapshot : A statistical analysis of the expected
contents of the Gaia catalogue
Robin, A. C.;
Luri, X.;
Reylé, C.;
Isasi, Y.;
Grux, E.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Arenou, F.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Belcheva, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Jordi, C.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Masana, E.;
Mauduit, J. C.;
Mignard, F.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Slezak, E.;
Sozzetti, A.
Submitted: 2012-02-01, last modified: 2012-02-02
Context. This study has been developed in the framework of the computational
simulations executed for the preparation of the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
Aims. We focus on describing the objects and characteristics that Gaia will
potentially observe without taking into consideration instrumental effects
(detection efficiency, observing errors). Methods. The theoretical Universe
Model prepared for the Gaia simulation has been statistically analyzed at a
given time. Ingredients of the model are described, giving most attention to
the stellar content, the double and multiple stars, and variability. Results.
In this simulation the errors have not been included yet. Hence we estimate the
number of objects and their theoretical photometric, astrometric and
spectroscopic characteristics in the case that they are perfectly detected. We
show that Gaia will be able to potentially observe 1.1 billion of stars (single
or part of multiple star systems) of which about 2% are variable stars, 3% have
one or two exoplanets. At the extragalactic level, observations will be
potentially composed by several millions of galaxies, half million to 1 million
of quasars and about 50,000 supernovas that will occur during the 5 years of
mission. The simulated catalogue will be made publicly available by the DPAC on
the Gaia portal of the ESA web site http://www.rssd.esa.int/gaia/.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.0889 [pdf] - 7801
Gaia: Organisation and challenges for the data processing
Mignard, F.;
Bailer-Jones, C.;
Bastian, U.;
Drimmel, R.;
Eyer, L.;
Katz, D.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Luri, X.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Passot, X.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Prusti, T.
Submitted: 2007-12-06
Gaia is an ambitious space astrometry mission of ESA with a main objective to
map the sky in astrometry and photometry down to a magnitude 20 by the end of
the next decade. While the mission is built and operated by ESA and an
industrial consortium, the data processing is entrusted to a consortium formed
by the scientific community, which was formed in 2006 and formally selected by
ESA one year later. The satellite will downlink around 100 TB of raw telemetry
data over a mission duration of 5 years from which a very complex iterative
processing will lead to the final science output: astrometry with a final
accuracy of a few tens of microarcseconds, epoch photometry in wide and narrow
bands, radial velocity and spectra for the stars brighter than 17 mag. We
discuss the general principles and main difficulties of this very large data
processing and present the organisation of the European Consortium responsible
for its design and implementation.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611885 [pdf] - 87271
Gaia Data Processing Architecture
O'Mullane, W.;
Lammers, U.;
Bailer-Jones, C.;
Bastian, U.;
Brown, A.;
Drimmel, R.;
Eyer, L.;
Huc, C.;
Jansen, F.;
Katz, D.;
Lindegren, L.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.
Submitted: 2006-11-29
Gaia is ESA's ambitious space astrometry mission the main objective of which
is to astrometrically and spectro-photometrically map 1000 Million celestial
objects (mostly in our galaxy) with unprecedented accuracy. The announcement of
opportunity for the data processing will be issued by ESA late in 2006. The
Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) has been formed recently
and is preparing an answer. The satellite will downlink close to 100 TB of raw
telemetry data over 5 years. To achieve its required accuracy of a few 10s of
Microarcsecond astrometry, a highly involved processing of this data is
required.
In addition to the main astrometric instrument Gaia will host a Radial
Velocity instrument, two low-resolution dispersers for multi-color photometry
and two Star Mappers. Gaia is a flying Giga Pixel camera. The various
instruments each require relatively complex processing while at the same time
being interdependent. We describe the overall composition of the DPAC and the
envisaged overall architecture of the Gaia data processing system. We shall
delve further into the core processing - one of the nine, so-called,
coordination units comprising the Gaia processing system.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609110 [pdf] - 84702
Asteroids as radial velocity and resolving power standards for medium
and high resolution spectroscopy
Submitted: 2006-09-05
Echelle spectra of 10 bright asteroids are presented and compared against an
observed twilight spectrum and a computed Solar spectrum. Spectra covering a
2130 A spectral range centered on 5785 A are of high resolving power and high
signal to noise ratio. So we focus on a comparison of detailed properties of
spectral lines and not on albedo variations. It is shown that the normalized
Solar and asteroid spectra are identical except for radial velocity (RV) shifts
which can be predicted at the accuracy level of 1 m/s. So asteroids are
proposed as new and extremely accurate radial velocity standards. Predicted and
measured RVs of observed asteroids indeed match within limits of accuracy of
the instrument. There are numerous absorption lines in the reflected Solar
spectrum. This allows a direct mapping of the resolving power of a spectrograph
between and along echelle spectral orders. So asteroid spectra can be used to
test wavelength calibration and resolving power of spectrographs on the ground
as well as in space, including the Gaia mission of ESA. All spectra are also
given in an electronic form.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608510 [pdf] - 1455142
Deep imaging survey of the environment of Alpha Centauri - I. Adaptive
optics imaging of Alpha Cen B with VLT-NACO
Submitted: 2006-08-24
Context: Alpha Centauri is our closest stellar neighbor, at a distance of
only 1.3 pc, and its two main components have spectral types comparable to the
Sun. This is therefore a favorable target for an imaging search for extrasolar
planets. Moreover, indications exist that the gravitational mass of Alpha Cen B
is higher than its modeled mass, the difference being consistent with a
substellar companion of a few tens of Jupiter masses. Aims: We searched for
faint comoving companions to Alpha Cen B. As a secondary objective, we built a
catalogue of the detected background sources. Methods: We used the NACO
adaptive optics system of the VLT in the J, H, and Ks bands to search for
companions to Alpha Cen B. This instrument allowed us to achieve a very high
sensitivity to point-like sources, with a limiting magnitude of m\_Ks ~ 18 at
7" from the star. We complemented this data set with archival coronagraphic
images from the HST-ACS instrument to obtain an accurate astrometric
calibration. Results: Over the observed area, we did not detect any comoving
companion to Alpha Cen B down to an absolute magnitude of 19-20 in the H and Ks
bands. However, we present a catalogue of 252 background objects within about
15" of the star. This catalogue fills part of the large void area that
surrounds Alpha Cen in sky surveys due to the strong diffused light. We also
present a model of the diffused light as a function of angular distance for the
NACO instrument, that can be used to predict the background level for bright
star observations. Conclusions: According to recent numerical models, the
limiting magnitude of our search sets the maximum mass of possible companions
to 20-30 times Jupiter, between 7 and 20 AU from Alpha Cen B.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512359 [pdf] - 254140
Micro-arcsecond light bending by Jupiter
Submitted: 2005-12-14
The detectors designed for Gaia, the next ESA space astrometry mission to be
launched in 2011, will allow to observe repeatedly stars very close to
Jupiter's limb. This will open a unique opportunity to test General Relativity
by performing many Eddington-like experiments through the comparison between
the pattern of a starfield observed with or without Jupiter. We have derived
the main formulas relevant for the monopole and quadrupole light deflection by
an oblate planet and developed a simulator to investigate the processing of the
Gaia astrometric observation in the vicinity of the planet. The results show
that such an experiment carried out with the Gaia data will provide a new fully
independent determination of the PPN parameter gamma by means of differential
astrometric measurements and, more importantly, for the first time will
evidence the bending effect due to the quadrupole moment with a 3-sigma
confidence level. Given the accuracy of the experiment for the monopole
deflection, this will permit to test alternative modelling of the light bending
by moving masses.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0506397 [pdf] - 73797
Period recovery success rate expected with Gaia
Submitted: 2005-06-16
The Gaia satellite was selected as a cornerstone mission of the European
Space Agency (ESA) in October 2000 and confirmed in 2002 with a current target
launch date of 2011. The Gaia mission will gather on the same observational
principles as Hipparcos detailed astrometric, photometric and spectroscopic
properties of about 1 billion sources brighter than mag V=20. The nature of the
measured objects ranges from NEOs to gamma ray burst afterglows and encompasses
virtually any kind of stars in our Galaxy. Gaia will provide multi-colour (in
about 20 passbands extending over the visible range) photometry with typically
250 observations distributed over 40 well separated epochs during the 5-year
mission. The multi-epoch nature of the project will permit to detect and
analyse variable sources whose number is currently estimated in the range of
several tens of million, among the detectable sources.
In this paper, we assess the performances of Gaia in analysing photometric
periodic phenomena. We first present quickly the overall observational
principle before discussing the implication of the scanning law in the time
sampling. Then from extensive simulations one assesses the performances in the
recovery of periodic signals as a function of the period, signal-to-noise ratio
and position on the sky for simple sinusoidal variability.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101235 [pdf] - 40373
GAIA: Composition, Formation and Evolution of the Galaxy
Perryman, M. A. C.;
de Boer, K. S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Høg, E.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Pace, O.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.
Submitted: 2001-01-15
The GAIA astrometric mission has recently been approved as one of the next
two `cornerstones' of ESA's science programme, with a launch date target of not
later than mid-2012. GAIA will provide positional and radial velocity
measurements with the accuracies needed to produce a stereoscopic and kinematic
census of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy (and into the Local
Group), amounting to about 1 per cent of the Galactic stellar population.
GAIA's main scientific goal is to clarify the origin and history of our Galaxy,
from a quantitative census of the stellar populations. It will advance
questions such as when the stars in our Galaxy formed, when and how it was
assembled, and its distribution of dark matter. The survey aims for
completeness to V=20 mag, with accuracies of about 10 microarcsec at 15 mag.
Combined with astrophysical information for each star, provided by on-board
multi-colour photometry and (limited) spectroscopy, these data will have the
precision necessary to quantify the early formation, and subsequent dynamical,
chemical and star formation evolution of our Galaxy. Additional products
include detection and orbital classification of tens of thousands of
extra-Solar planetary systems, and a comprehensive survey of some 10^5-10^6
minor bodies in our Solar System, through galaxies in the nearby Universe, to
some 500,000 distant quasars. It will provide a number of stringent new tests
of general relativity and cosmology. The complete satellite system was
evaluated as part of a detailed technology study, including a detailed payload
design, corresponding accuracy assesments, and results from a prototype data
reduction development.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9805180 [pdf] - 1235217
GAIA: Origin and Evolution of the Milky Way
Gilmore, Gerry;
Perryman, Michael;
Lindegren, L;
Favata, F;
Hoeg, E;
Lattanzi, M;
Luri, X;
Mignard, F;
Roeser, S;
deZeeuw, P. T.
Submitted: 1998-05-13
GAIA is a short-listed candidate for the ESA Cornerstone mission C5, meeting
the ESA Survey Committee requirement for an observatory mission, dedicated to
astrometry, providing 10 micro-arcsecond accuracy at 15th magnitude. The GAIA
mission concept follows the dramatic success of the ESA HIPPARCOS mission,
utilising a continuously scanning spacecraft, accurately measuring 1-D
coordinates along great circles, in (at least) two simultaneous fields of view,
separated by a known angle. These 1-D relative coordinates are later converted
to the five astrometric parameters of position and motions in a global
analysis. GAIA will provide precise astrometry and multi-colour photometry for
all the one billion stars, quasars, and compact galaxies to I=20 on the sky.
GAIA will additionally provide the sixth phase-space parameter, radial
velocity, from a slitless spectroscopic survey of most stars brighter than
about magnitude 17. The technical challenges are considerable, but achievable.
The scientific returns are spectacular, with greatest impact in the study of
stellar populations and dynamical structure of the galaxies of our Local Group,
and in providing the first complete census of the stars and massive planets in
the Solar neighbourhood. GAIA will revolutionise our knowledge of the origin
and evolution of our Milky Way Galaxy, and of the distribution of planetary
systems around other stars.