Normalized to: Michalik, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.04272 [pdf] - 2072607
Broadband, millimeter-wave antireflection coatings for large-format,
cryogenic aluminum oxide optics
Nadolski, A.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bryant, L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cheshire, J. R.;
Chesmore, G. E.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Dierickx, M.;
Ding, J.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Farwick, J.;
Ferguson, K. R.;
Florez, L.;
Foster, A.;
Fu, J.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gambrel, A. E.;
Gardner, R. W.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S.;
Guyser, R.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Harris, R. J.;
Henning, J. W.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Howe, D.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Korman, M.;
Kovac, J.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
McMahon, J.;
Meier, J.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Paschos, P.;
Pearson, J.;
sada, C. M. Po;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Riebel, D.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Stark, A. A.;
Stephen, J.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tandoi, C.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2019-12-06, last modified: 2020-03-02
We present two prescriptions for broadband (~77 - 252 GHz), millimeter-wave
antireflection coatings for cryogenic, sintered polycrystalline aluminum oxide
optics: one for large-format (700 mm diameter) planar and plano-convex
elements, the other for densely packed arrays of quasi-optical elements, in our
case 5 mm diameter half-spheres (called "lenslets"). The coatings comprise
three layers of commercially-available, polytetrafluoroethylene-based,
dielectric sheet material. The lenslet coating is molded to fit the 150 mm
diameter arrays directly while the large-diameter lenses are coated using a
tiled approach. We review the fabrication processes for both prescriptions then
discuss laboratory measurements of their transmittance and reflectance. In
addition, we present the inferred refractive indices and loss tangents for the
coating materials and the aluminum oxide substrate. We find that at 150 GHz and
300 K the large-format coating sample achieves (97 +/- 2)% transmittance and
the lenslet coating sample achieves (94 +/- 3)% transmittance.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.08047 [pdf] - 2000343
Particle Physics with the Cosmic Microwave Background with SPT-3G
Avva, J. S.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Aylor, K.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bocquet, S.;
Bryant, L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Ferguson, K. R.;
Foster, A.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gambrel, A. E.;
Gardner, R. W.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Holder, G. P.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Howe, D.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Paschos, P.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Raghunathan, S.;
Rahlin, A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Riebel, D.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Stephen, J.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2019-11-18
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) encodes information about the content
and evolution of the universe. The presence of light, weakly interacting
particles impacts the expansion history of the early universe, which alters the
temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. In this way, current
measurements of the CMB place interesting constraints on the neutrino energy
density and mass, as well as on the abundance of other possible light
relativistic particle species. We present the status of an on-going 1500 sq.
deg. survey with the SPT-3G receiver, a new mm-wavelength camera on the 10-m
diameter South Pole Telescope (SPT). The SPT-3G camera consists of 16,000
superconducting transition edge sensors, a 10x increase over the previous
generation camera, which allows it to map the CMB with an unprecedented
combination of sensitivity and angular resolution. We highlight projected
constraints on the abundance of sterile neutrinos and the sum of the neutrino
masses for the SPT-3G survey, which could help determine the neutrino mass
hierarchy.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.08028 [pdf] - 1981876
ESA Voyage 2050 white paper -- Faint objects in motion: the new frontier
of high precision astrometry
Malbet, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Alves, J.;
Boehm, C.;
Brown, W.;
Chemin, L.;
Correia, A.;
Courbin, F.;
Darling, J.;
Diaferio, A.;
Fortin, M.;
Fridlund, M.;
Gnedin, O.;
Holl, B.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Léger, A.;
Labadie, L.;
Laskar, J.;
Mamon, G.;
McArthur, B.;
Michalik, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Oertel, M.;
Ostorero, L.;
Schneider, J.;
Scott, P.;
Shao, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Tomsick, J.;
Valluri, M.;
Wyse, R.
Submitted: 2019-10-12
Sky survey telescopes and powerful targeted telescopes play complementary
roles in astronomy. In order to investigate the nature and characteristics of
the motions of very faint objects, a flexibly-pointed instrument capable of
high astrometric accuracy is an ideal complement to current astrometric surveys
and a unique tool for precision astrophysics. Such a space-based mission will
push the frontier of precision astrometry from evidence of earth-massed
habitable worlds around the nearest starts, and also into distant Milky way
objects up to the Local Group of galaxies. As we enter the era of the James
Webb Space Telescope and the new ground-based, adaptive-optics-enabled giant
telescopes, by obtaining these high precision measurements on key objects that
Gaia could not reach, a mission that focuses on high precision astrometry
science can consolidate our theoretical understanding of the local universe,
enable extrapolation of physical processes to remote redshifts, and derive a
much more consistent picture of cosmological evolution and the likely fate of
our cosmos. Already several missions have been proposed to address the science
case of faint objects in motion using high precision astrometry ESA missions:
NEAT for M3, micro-NEAT for S1 mission, and Theia for M4 and M5. Additional new
mission configurations adapted with technological innovations could be
envisioned to pursue accurate measurements of these extremely small motions.
The goal of this white paper is to address the fundamental science questions
that are at stake when we focus on the motions of faint sky objects and to
briefly review quickly instrumentation and mission profiles.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.01652 [pdf] - 1973757
A Dynamical Mass of $70 \pm 5$ Jupiter Masses for Gliese 229B, the First
Imaged T Dwarf
Submitted: 2019-10-03
We combine Keck/HIRES radial velocities, imaging with HiCIAO/Subaru and the
Hubble Space Telescope, and absolute astrometry from Hipparcos and Gaia to
measure a dynamical mass of $70 \pm 5$ $M_{\rm Jup}$ for the brown dwarf
companion to Gl 229. Gl 229B was the first imaged brown dwarf to show clear
signs of methane in its atmosphere. Cooling models have been used to estimate a
mass in the range of 20-55 $M_{\rm Jup}$, much lower than our measured value.
We argue that our high dynamical mass is unlikely to be due to perturbations
from additional unseen companions or to Gl 229B being itself a binary, and we
find no evidence of a previously claimed radial velocity planet around Gl 229A.
Future Gaia data releases will confirm the reliability of the absolute
astrometry, though the data pass all quality checks in both Hipparcos and Gaia.
Our dynamical mass implies a very old age for Gl 229, in some tension with
kinematic and activity age indicators, and/or shortcomings in brown dwarf
cooling models. Gl 229B joins a small but growing list of T dwarfs with masses
approaching the minimum mass for core hydrogen ignition.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.11976 [pdf] - 2025648
Performance of Al-Mn Transition-Edge Sensor Bolometers in SPT-3G
Anderson, A. J.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Avva, J. S.;
Barry, P. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bryant, L.;
Byrum, K.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H. -M.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Denison, E. V.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Ferguson, K. R.;
Foster, A.;
Fu, J.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gambrel, A. E.;
Gardner, R. W.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S.;
Guyser, R.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Howe, D.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Paschos, P.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Riebel, D.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Stephen, J.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vale, L. R.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2019-07-27
SPT-3G is a polarization-sensitive receiver, installed on the South Pole
Telescope, that measures the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) from degree to arcminute scales. The receiver consists of ten
150~mm-diameter detector wafers, containing a total of 16,000 transition-edge
sensor (TES) bolometers observing at 95, 150, and 220 GHz. During the 2018-2019
austral summer, one of these detector wafers was replaced by a new wafer
fabricated with Al-Mn TESs instead of the Ti/Au design originally deployed for
SPT-3G. We present the results of in-lab characterization and on-sky
performance of this Al-Mn wafer, including electrical and thermal properties,
optical efficiency measurements, and noise-equivalent temperature. In addition,
we discuss and account for several calibration-related systematic errors that
affect measurements made using frequency-domain multiplexing readout
electronics.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.10947 [pdf] - 2025643
On-sky performance of the SPT-3G frequency-domain multiplexed readout
Bender, A. N.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Barry, P. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Benson, B. A.;
Bryant, L.;
Byrum, K.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H. -M.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Denison, E. V.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Ferguson, K. R.;
Foster, A.;
Fu, J.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gambrel, A. E.;
Gardner, R. W.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S.;
Guyser, R.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Howe, D.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Paschos, P.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Riebel, D.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Stephen, J.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vale, L. R.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2019-07-25
Frequency-domain multiplexing (fMux) is an established technique for the
readout of large arrays of transition edge sensor (TES) bolometers. Each TES in
a multiplexing module has a unique AC voltage bias that is selected by a
resonant filter. This scheme enables the operation and readout of multiple
bolometers on a single pair of wires, reducing thermal loading onto sub-Kelvin
stages. The current receiver on the South Pole Telescope, SPT-3G, uses a 68x
fMux system to operate its large-format camera of $\sim$16,000 TES bolometers.
We present here the successful implementation and performance of the SPT-3G
readout as measured on-sky. Characterization of the noise reveals a median
pair-differenced 1/f knee frequency of 33 mHz, indicating that low-frequency
noise in the readout will not limit SPT-3G's measurements of sky power on large
angular scales. Measurements also show that the median readout white noise
level in each of the SPT-3G observing bands is below the expectation for photon
noise, demonstrating that SPT-3G is operating in the photon-noise-dominated
regime.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.09640 [pdf] - 1838469
Design and Bolometer Characterization of the SPT-3G First-year Focal
Plane
Everett, W.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Austermann, J. E.;
Avva, J. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
Denison, E. V.;
de Haan, T.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dutcher, D.;
Foster, A.;
Gannon, R. N.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Khaire, T.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Rahlin, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Saunders, L. J.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirley, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Tang, Q. Y.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vale, L. R.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2019-02-25
During the austral summer of 2016-17, the third-generation camera, SPT-3G,
was installed on the South Pole Telescope, increasing the detector count in the
focal plane by an order of magnitude relative to the previous generation.
Designed to map the polarization of the cosmic microwave background, SPT-3G
contains ten 6-in-hexagonal modules of detectors, each with 269 trichroic and
dual-polarization pixels, read out using 68x frequency-domain multiplexing.
Here we discuss design, assembly, and layout of the modules, as well as early
performance characterization of the first-year array, including yield and
detector properties.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.00032 [pdf] - 1743940
Design and characterization of the SPT-3G receiver
Sobrin, J. A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Foster, A.;
Gallichio, J.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S. T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M.
Submitted: 2018-08-31
The SPT-3G receiver was commissioned in early 2017 on the 10-meter South Pole
Telescope (SPT) to map anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB).
New optics, detector, and readout technologies have yielded a multichroic,
high-resolution, low-noise camera with impressive throughput and sensitivity,
offering the potential to improve our understanding of inflationary physics,
astroparticle physics, and growth of structure. We highlight several key
features and design principles of the new receiver, and summarize its
performance to date.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.00030 [pdf] - 1848536
Broadband anti-reflective coatings for cosmic microwave background
experiments
Nadolski, A.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Foster, A.;
Fu, J.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S. T.;
Guyser, R.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2018-08-31
The desire for higher sensitivity has driven ground-based cosmic microwave
background (CMB) experiments to employ ever larger focal planes, which in turn
require larger reimaging optics. Practical limits to the maximum size of these
optics motivates the development of quasi-optically-coupled (lenslet-coupled),
multi-chroic detectors. These detectors can be sensitive across a broader
bandwidth compared to waveguide-coupled detectors. However, the increase in
bandwidth comes at a cost: the lenses (up to $\sim$700 mm diameter) and
lenslets ($\sim$5 mm diameter, hemispherical lenses on the focal plane) used in
these systems are made from high-refractive-index materials (such as silicon or
amorphous aluminum oxide) that reflect nearly a third of the incident
radiation. In order to maximize the faint CMB signal that reaches the
detectors, the lenses and lenslets must be coated with an anti-reflective (AR)
material. The AR coating must maximize radiation transmission in scientifically
interesting bands and be cryogenically stable. Such a coating was developed for
the third generation camera, SPT-3G, of the South Pole Telescope (SPT)
experiment, but the materials and techniques used in the development are
general to AR coatings for mm-wave optics. The three-layer
polytetrafluoroethylene-based AR coating is broadband, inexpensive, and can be
manufactured with simple tools. The coating is field tested; AR coated focal
plane elements were deployed in the 2016-2017 austral summer and AR coated
reimaging optics were deployed in 2017-2018.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.00033 [pdf] - 1743941
Characterization and performance of the second-year SPT-3G focal plane
Dutcher, D.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Bender, A. N.;
Benson, B. A.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W.;
Foster, A.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S. T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Rahlin, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2018-08-31
The third-generation instrument for the 10-meter South Pole Telescope,
SPT-3G, was first installed in January 2017. In addition to completely new
cryostats, secondary telescope optics, and readout electronics, the number of
detectors in the focal plane has increased by an order of magnitude from
previous instruments to ~16,000. The SPT-3G focal plane consists of ten
detector modules, each with an array of 269 trichroic, polarization-sensitive
pixels on a six-inch silicon wafer. Within each pixel is a broadband,
dual-polarization sinuous antenna; the signal from each orthogonal linear
polarization is divided into three frequency bands centered at 95, 150, and 220
GHz by in-line lumped element filters and transmitted via superconducting
microstrip to Ti/Au transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometers. Properties of the
TES film, microstrip filters, and bolometer island must be tightly controlled
to achieve optimal performance. For the second year of SPT-3G operation, we
have replaced all ten wafers in the focal plane with new detector arrays tuned
to increase mapping speed and improve overall performance. Here we discuss the
TES superconducting transition temperature and normal resistance, detector
saturation power, bandpasses, optical efficiency, and full array yield for the
2018 focal plane.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.00036 [pdf] - 1743942
Year two instrument status of the SPT-3G cosmic microwave background
receiver
Bender, A. N.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Ahmed, Z.;
Anderson, A. J.;
Avva, J. S.;
Aylor, K.;
Barry, P. S.;
Thakur, R. Basu;
Benson, B. A.;
Bleem, L. S.;
Bocquet, S.;
Byrum, K.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Carter, F. W.;
Cecil, T. W.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H. -M.;
Cliche, J. F.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Cukierman, A.;
de Haan, T.;
Denison, E. V.;
Ding, J.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Dutcher, D.;
Everett, W.;
Foster, A.;
Gallicchio, J.;
Gilbert, A.;
Groh, J. C.;
Guns, S. T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harke-Hosemann, A. H.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Henning, J. W.;
Hilton, G. C.;
Holder, G. P.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Huang, N.;
Irwin, K. D.;
Jeong, O. B.;
Jonas, M.;
Jones, A.;
Khaire, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Kofman, A. M.;
Korman, M.;
Kubik, D. L.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuo, C. -L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lowitz, A. E.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Michalik, D.;
Montgomery, J.;
Nadolski, A.;
Natoli, T.;
Nguyen, H.;
Noble, G. I.;
Novosad, V.;
Padin, S.;
Pan, Z.;
Pearson, J.;
Posada, C. M.;
Quan, W.;
Raghunathan, S.;
Rahlin, A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smecher, G.;
Sobrin, J. A.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suzuki, A.;
Thompson, K. L.;
Tucker, C.;
Vale, L. R.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wang, G.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yefremenko, V.;
Yoon, K. W.;
Young, M. R.
Submitted: 2018-08-31
The South Pole Telescope (SPT) is a millimeter-wavelength telescope designed
for high-precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The
SPT measures both the temperature and polarization of the CMB with a large
aperture, resulting in high resolution maps sensitive to signals across a wide
range of angular scales on the sky. With these data, the SPT has the potential
to make a broad range of cosmological measurements. These include constraining
the effect of massive neutrinos on large-scale structure formation as well as
cleaning galactic and cosmological foregrounds from CMB polarization data in
future searches for inflationary gravitational waves. The SPT began observing
in January 2017 with a new receiver (SPT-3G) containing $\sim$16,000
polarization-sensitive transition-edge sensor bolometers. Several key
technology developments have enabled this large-format focal plane, including
advances in detectors, readout electronics, and large millimeter-wavelength
optics. We discuss the implementation of these technologies in the SPT-3G
receiver as well as the challenges they presented. In late 2017 the
implementations of all three of these technologies were modified to optimize
total performance. Here, we present the current instrument status of the SPT-3G
receiver.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03219 [pdf] - 1679898
Optical Characterization of the SPT-3G Focal Plane
Pan, Zhaodi;
Ade, Peter;
Ahmed, Zeeshan;
Adam, Anderson;
Austermann, Jason;
Avva, Jessica;
Thakur, Ritoban Basu;
Amy, Bender;
Benson, Bradford;
Carlstrom, John;
Carter, Faustin;
Cecil, Thomas;
Chang, Clarence;
Cliche, Jean-Francois;
Cukierman, Ariel;
Denison, Edward;
de Haan, Tijmen;
Ding, Junjia;
Dobbs, Matt;
Dutcher, Daniel;
Everett, Wendeline;
Foster, Allen;
Gannon, Renae;
Gilbert, Adam;
Groh, John;
Halverson, Nils;
Harke-Horsemann, Angelina;
Harrington, Nicholas;
Henning, Jaosn;
Hilton, Gene;
Holzapfel, William;
Huang, Nicholas;
Irwin, Kent;
Jeong, Oliver;
Jonas, Michalle;
Khaire, Trupti;
Kofman, Anna;
Korman, Milo;
Kubik, Donna;
Kuhlmann, Steve;
Kuo, Chaolin;
Lee, Adrian;
Lowitz, Amy;
Meyer, Stephan;
Michalik, Daniel;
Montgomery, Joshua;
Nadolski, Andrew;
Natoli, Tyler;
Nguyen, Hogan;
Noble, Gavin;
Novosad, Valentyn;
Padin, Stephan;
Pearson, John;
Posada, Chrystian;
Rahlin, Alexandra;
Ruhl, John;
Saunders, Lauren;
Sayre, James;
Shirley, Ian;
Shirokoff, Erik;
Smecher, Graeme;
Sobrin, Joshua;
Stark, Antony;
Story, Kyle;
Suzuki, Aritoki;
Tang, Qingyang;
Thompson, Keith;
Tucker, Carole;
Vale, Leila;
Vanderlinde, Keith;
Vieira, Joaquin;
Wang, Gensheng;
Whitehorn, Nathan;
Yefremenko, Volodymyr;
Yoon, Ki Won;
Young, Matt
Submitted: 2018-05-08
The third-generation South Pole Telescope camera is designed to measure the
cosmic microwave background across three frequency bands (95, 150 and 220 GHz)
with ~16,000 transition-edge sensor (TES) bolometers. Each multichroic pixel on
a detector wafer has a broadband sinuous antenna that couples power to six
TESs, one for each of the three observing bands and both polarization
directions, via lumped element filters. Ten detector wafers populate the focal
plane, which is coupled to the sky via a large-aperture optical system. Here we
present the frequency band characterization with Fourier transform
spectroscopy, measurements of optical time constants, beam properties, and
optical and polarization efficiencies of the focal plane. The detectors have
frequency bands consistent with our simulations, and have high average optical
efficiency which is 86%, 77% and 66% for the 95, 150 and 220 GHz detectors. The
time constants of the detectors are mostly between 0.5 ms and 5 ms. The beam is
round with the correct size, and the polarization efficiency is more than 90%
for most of the bolometers
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01348 [pdf] - 1585537
Theia: Faint objects in motion or the new astrometry frontier
The Theia Collaboration;
Boehm, Celine;
Krone-Martins, Alberto;
Amorim, Antonio;
Anglada-Escude, Guillem;
Brandeker, Alexis;
Courbin, Frederic;
Ensslin, Torsten;
Falcao, Antonio;
Freese, Katherine;
Holl, Berry;
Labadie, Lucas;
Leger, Alain;
Malbet, Fabien;
Mamon, Gary;
McArthur, Barbara;
Mora, Alcione;
Shao, Michael;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Spolyar, Douglas;
Villaver, Eva;
Albertus, Conrado;
Bertone, Stefano;
Bouy, Herve;
Boylan-Kolchin, Michael;
Brown, Anthony;
Brown, Warren;
Cardoso, Vitor;
Chemin, Laurent;
Claudi, Riccardo;
Correia, Alexandre C. M.;
Crosta, Mariateresa;
Crouzier, Antoine;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
Damasso, Mario;
da Silva, Antonio;
Davies, Melvyn;
Das, Payel;
Dayal, Pratika;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Diaferio, Antonaldo;
Erickcek, Adrienne;
Fairbairn, Malcolm;
Fortin, Morgane;
Fridlund, Malcolm;
Garcia, Paulo;
Gnedin, Oleg;
Goobar, Ariel;
Gordo, Paulo;
Goullioud, Renaud;
Hambly, Nigel;
Hara, Nathan;
Hobbs, David;
Hog, Erik;
Holland, Andrew;
Ibata, Rodrigo;
Jordi, Carme;
Klioner, Sergei;
Kopeikin, Sergei;
Lacroix, Thomas;
Laskar, Jacques;
Poncin-Lafitte, Christophe Le;
Luri, Xavier;
Majumdar, Subhabrata;
Makarov, Valeri;
Massey, Richard;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Michalik, Daniel;
de Almeida, Andre Moitinho;
Mourao, Ana;
Moustakas, Leonidas;
Murray, Neil;
Muterspaugh, Matthew;
Oertel, Micaela;
Ostorero, Luisa;
Perez-Garcia, Angeles;
Platais, Imants;
de Mora, Jordi Portell i;
Quirrenbach, Andreas;
Randall, Lisa;
Read, Justin;
Regos, Eniko;
Rory, Barnes;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Scott, Pat;
Schneider, Jean;
Scholtz, Jakub;
Siebert, Arnaud;
Tereno, Ismael;
Tomsick, John;
Traub, Wesley;
Valluri, Monica;
Walker, Matt;
Walton, Nicholas;
Watkins, Laura;
White, Glenn;
Evans, Dafydd Wyn;
Wyrzykowski, Lukasz;
Wyse, Rosemary
Submitted: 2017-07-02
In the context of the ESA M5 (medium mission) call we proposed a new
satellite mission, Theia, based on relative astrometry and extreme precision to
study the motion of very faint objects in the Universe. Theia is primarily
designed to study the local dark matter properties, the existence of Earth-like
exoplanets in our nearest star systems and the physics of compact objects.
Furthermore, about 15 $\%$ of the mission time was dedicated to an open
observatory for the wider community to propose complementary science cases.
With its unique metrology system and "point and stare" strategy, Theia's
precision would have reached the sub micro-arcsecond level. This is about 1000
times better than ESA/Gaia's accuracy for the brightest objects and represents
a factor 10-30 improvement for the faintest stars (depending on the exact
observational program). In the version submitted to ESA, we proposed an optical
(350-1000nm) on-axis TMA telescope. Due to ESA Technology readiness level, the
camera's focal plane would have been made of CCD detectors but we anticipated
an upgrade with CMOS detectors. Photometric measurements would have been
performed during slew time and stabilisation phases needed for reaching the
required astrometric precision.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07255 [pdf] - 1523853
Gaia Data Release 1: The reference frame and the optical properties of
ICRF sources
Mignard, F.;
Klioner, S.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Bombrun, A.;
Hernandez, J.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Biermann, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmueller, H.;
Andrei, A.;
Bourda, G.;
Charlot, P.
Submitted: 2016-09-23
As part of the data processing for Gaia Data Release~1 (Gaia DR1) a special
astrometric solution was computed, the so-called auxiliary quasar solution.
This gives positions for selected extragalactic objects, including radio
sources in the second realisation of the International Celestial Reference
Frame (ICRF2) that have optical counterparts bright enough to be observed with
Gaia. A subset of these positions was used to align the positional reference
frame of Gaia DR1 with the ICRF2. We describe the properties of the Gaia
auxiliary quasar solution for a subset of sources matched to ICRF2, and compare
their optical and radio positions at the sub-mas level. Their formal standard
errors are better than 0.76~milliarcsec (mas) for 50% of the sources and better
than 3.35~mas for 90%. Optical magnitudes are obtained in Gaia's unfiltered
photometric G band. The comparison with the radio positions of the defining
sources shows no systematic differences larger than a few tenths of a mas. The
fraction of questionable solutions, not readily accounted for by the
statistics, is less than 6%. Normalised differences have extended tails
requiring case-by-case investigations for around 100 sources, but we have not
seen any difference indisputably linked to an optical-radio offset in the
sources.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01896 [pdf] - 1347600
Quasars can be used to verify the parallax zero-point of the Tycho-Gaia
Astrometric Solution
Submitted: 2015-11-05, last modified: 2015-11-17
Context. The Gaia project will determine positions, proper motions, and
parallaxes for more than one billion stars in our Galaxy. It is known that
Gaia's two telescopes are affected by a small but significant variation of the
basic angle between them. Unless this variation is taken into account during
data processing, e.g. using on-board metrology, it causes systematic errors in
the astrometric parameters, in particular a shift of the parallax zero-point.
Previously, we suggested an early reduction of Gaia data for the subset of
Tycho-2 stars (Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution; TGAS).
Aims. We aim to investigate whether quasars can be used to independently
verify the parallax zero-point already in early data reductions. This is not
trivially possible as the observation interval is too short to disentangle
parallax and proper motion for the quasar subset.
Methods. We repeat TGAS simulations but additionally include simulated Gaia
observations of quasars from ground-based surveys. All observations are
simulated with basic angle variations. To obtain a full astrometric solution
for the quasars in TGAS we explore the use of prior information for their
proper motions.
Results. It is possible to determine the parallax zero-point for the quasars
with a few {\mu}as uncertainty, and it agrees to a similar precision with the
zero-point for the Tycho-2 stars. The proposed strategy is robust even for
quasars exhibiting significant fictitious proper motion due to a variable
source structure, or when the quasar subset is contaminated with stars
misidentified as quasars.
Conclusions. Using prior information about quasar proper motions we could
provide an independent verification of the parallax zero-point in early
solutions based on less than one year of Gaia data.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02963 [pdf] - 1300227
Gaia astrometry for stars with too few observations - a Bayesian
approach
Submitted: 2015-07-10, last modified: 2015-08-22
Gaia's astrometric solution aims to determine at least five parameters for
each star, together with appropriate estimates of their uncertainties and
correlations. This requires at least five distinct observations per star. In
the early data reductions the number of observations may be insufficient for a
five-parameter solution, and even after the full mission many stars will remain
under-observed, including faint stars at the detection limit and transient
objects. In such cases it is reasonable to determine only the two position
parameters. Their formal uncertainties would however grossly underestimate the
actual errors, due to the neglected parallax and proper motion. We aim to
develop a recipe to calculate sensible formal uncertainties that can be used in
all cases of under-observed stars. Prior information about the typical ranges
of stellar parallaxes and proper motions is incorporated in the astrometric
solution by means of Bayes' rule. Numerical simulations based on the Gaia
Universe Model Snapshot (GUMS) are used to investigate how the prior influences
the actual errors and formal uncertainties when different amounts of Gaia
observations are available. We develop a criterion for the optimum choice of
priors, apply it to a wide range of cases, and derive a global approximation of
the optimum prior as a function of magnitude and galactic coordinates. The
feasibility of the Bayesian approach is demonstrated through global astrometric
solutions of simulated Gaia observations. With an appropriate prior it is
possible to derive sensible positions with realistic error estimates for any
number of available observations. Even though this recipe works also for
well-observed stars it should not be used where a good five-parameter
astrometric solution can be obtained without a prior. Parallaxes and proper
motions from a solution using priors are always biased and should not be used.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.8770 [pdf] - 929753
The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution. How to get 2.5 million parallaxes
with less than one year of Gaia data
Submitted: 2014-12-30
Context. The first release of astrometric data from Gaia will contain the
mean stellar positions and magnitudes from the first year of observations, and
proper motions from the combination of Gaia data with Hipparcos prior
information (HTPM).
Aims. We study the potential of using the positions from the Tycho-2
Catalogue as additional information for a joint solution with early Gaia data.
We call this the Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution (TGAS).
Methods. We adapt Gaia's Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS) to
incorporate Tycho information, and use simulated Gaia observations to
demonstrate the feasibility of TGAS and to estimate its performance.
Results. Using six to twelve months of Gaia data, TGAS could deliver
positions, parallaxes and annual proper motions for the 2.5 million Tycho-2
stars, with sub-milliarcsecond accuracy. TGAS overcomes some of the limitations
of the HTPM project and allows its execution half a year earlier. Furthermore,
if the parallaxes from Hipparcos are not incorporated in the solution, they can
be used as a consistency check of the TGAS/HTPM solution.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4025 [pdf] - 903562
Joint astrometric solution of Hipparcos and Gaia: A recipe for the
Hundred Thousand Proper Motions project
Submitted: 2014-07-15, last modified: 2014-07-29
The first release of astrometric data from Gaia is expected in 2016. It will
contain the mean stellar positions and magnitudes from the first year of
observations. For more than 100 000 stars in common with the Hipparcos
Catalogue it will be possible to compute very accurate proper motions due to
the time difference of about 24 years between the two missions. This Hundred
Thousand Proper Motions (HTPM) project will be part of the first release. Our
aim is to investigate how early Gaia data can be optimally combined with
information from the Hipparcos Catalogue in order to provide the most accurate
and reliable results for HTPM. The Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS)
was developed to compute the astrometric core solution based on the Gaia
observations and will be used for all releases of astrometric data from Gaia.
We adapt AGIS to process Hipparcos data in addition to Gaia observations, and
use simulations to verify and study the joint solution method. For the HTPM
stars we predict proper motion accuracies between 14 and 134 muas/yr, depending
on stellar magnitude and amount of Gaia data available. Perspective effects
will be important for a significant number of HTPM stars, and in order to treat
these effects accurately we introduce a scaled model of kinematics. We define a
goodness-of-fit statistic which is sensitive to deviations from uniform space
motion, caused for example by binaries with periods of 10-50 years. HTPM will
significantly improve the proper motions of the Hipparcos Catalogue well before
highly accurate Gaia- only results become available. Also, HTPM will allow us
to detect long period binary and exoplanetary candidates which would be
impossible to detect from Gaia data alone. The full sensitivity will not be
reached with the first Gaia release but with subsequent data releases.
Therefore HTPM should be repeated when more Gaia data become available.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4270 [pdf] - 878447
Improving distances to nearby bright stars: Combining astrometric data
from Hipparcos, Nano-JASMINE and Gaia
Submitted: 2014-07-16
Starting in 2013, Gaia will deliver highly accurate astrometric data, which
eventually will supersede most other stellar catalogues in accuracy and
completeness. It is, however, lim- ited to observations from magnitude 6 to 20
and will therefore not include the brightest stars. Nano-JASMINE, an ultrasmall
Japanese astrometry satellite, will observe these bright stars, but with much
lower accuracy. Hence, the Hipparcos catalogue from 1997 will likely remain the
main source of accurate distances to bright nearby stars. We are investigating
how this might be improved by optimally combining data from all three missions
in a joint astrometric solu- tion. This would take advantage of the unique
features of each mission: the historic bright-star measurements of Hipparcos,
the updated bright-star observations of Nano-JASMINE, and the very accurate
reference frame of Gaia. The long temporal baseline between the missions pro-
vides additional benefits for the determination of proper motions and binary
detection, which indirectly improve the parallax determination further. We
present a quantitative analysis of the expected gains based on simulated data
for all three missions.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.2849 [pdf] - 463778
Combining and comparing astrometric data from different epochs: A case
study with Hipparcos and Nano-JASMINE
Submitted: 2012-01-13
The Hipparcos mission (1989-1993) resulted in the first space-based stellar
catalogue including measurements of positions, parallaxes and annual proper
motions accurate to about one milli-arcsecond. More space astrometry missions
will follow in the near future. The ultra-small Japanese mission Nano-JASMINE
(launch in late 2013) will determine positions and annual proper motions with
some milli-arcsecond accuracy. In mid 2013 the next-generation ESA mission Gaia
will deliver some tens of micro-arcsecond accurate astrometric parameters.
Until the final Gaia catalogue is published in early 2020 the best way of
improving proper motion values is the combination of positions from different
missions separated by long time intervals. Rather than comparing positions from
separately reduced catalogues, we propose an optimal method to combine the
information from the different data sets by making a joint astrometric
solution. This allows to obtain good results even when each data set alone is
insufficient for an accurate reduction. We demonstrate our method by combining
Hipparcos and simulated Nano-JASMINE data in a joint solution. We show a
significant improvement over the conventional catalogue combination.