Normalized to: Metge, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310 [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from
the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration;
Barnett, R.;
Warren, S. J.;
Mortlock, D. J.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Conselice, C.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Willott, C. J.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dusini, S.;
Ealet, A.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S. M.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Paykari, P.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide
survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several
ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths;
we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF;
$\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further
steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating
populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an
improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the
Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to
$J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry
alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by
the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate
predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the
QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond
$z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with
$7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$,
including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be
found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to
determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m
class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will
be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate
lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with
which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but
assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273 [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological
probes
Euclid Collaboration;
Blanchard, A.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Casas, S.;
Ilić, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Linder, E.;
Majerotto, E.;
Markovič, K.;
Martinelli, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Andreon, S.;
Aussel, H.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Ducret, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gómez-Alvarez, P.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Racca, G. D.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes;
Viel, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies
to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic
structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms
of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on
different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different
observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present
validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise
for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community
with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We
describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied
to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the
required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their
development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations,
reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less
than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on
the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their
own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We
find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining
freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different
cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be
reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a
pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of
cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological
constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at
least a factor of three.