Normalized to: McMullin, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.2856 [pdf] - 1208329
Neutral interstellar helium parameters based on Ulysses/GAS and IBEX-Lo
observations: what are the reasons for the differences?
Submitted: 2014-03-12, last modified: 2014-05-19
Recent analysis of the interstellar helium fluxes measured in 2009-2010 at
Earth orbit by the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) has suggested that the
interstellar velocity (both direction and magnitude) is inconsistent with that
derived previously from Ulysses/GAS observations made in the period from 1990
to 2002 at 1.5-5.5 AU from the Sun. Both results are model-dependent and models
that were used in the analyses are different. In this paper, we perform an
analysis of the Uysses/GAS and IBEX-Lo data using our state-of-the-art 3D
time-dependent kinetic model of interstellar atoms in the heliosphere. For the
first time we analyze Ulysses/GAS data from year 2007, the closest available
Ulysses/GAS observations in time to the IBEX observations.
We show that the interstellar velocity derived from the Ulysses 2007 data is
consistent with previous Ulysses results and does not agree with the velocity
derived from IBEX. This conclusion is very robust since, as is shown in the
paper, it does not depend on the ionization rates adopted in theoretical
models.
We conclude that Ulysses data are not consistent with the new LISM velocity
vector from IBEX. In contrast, IBEX data, in principle, could be explained with
the LISM velocity vector derived from the Ulysses data. This is possible for
the models with the interstellar temperature increased from 6300 K to 9000 K.
There is a need to perform further study of possible reasons for the broadening
of the helium signal core measured by IBEX. This could be an instrumental
effect or due to unconsidered physical processes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.5488 [pdf] - 654351
On-Orbit Degradation of Solar Instruments
BenMoussa, A.;
Gissot, S.;
Schühle, U.;
Del Zanna, G.;
Auchère, F.;
Mekaoui, S.;
Jones, A. R.;
Walton, D.;
Eyles, C. J.;
Thuillier, G.;
Seaton, D.;
Dammasch, I. E.;
Cessateur, G.;
Meftah, M.;
Andretta, V.;
Berghmans, D.;
Bewsher, D.;
Bolsée, D.;
Bradley, L.;
Brown, D. S.;
Chamberlin, P. C.;
Dewitte, S.;
Didkovsky, L. V.;
Dominique, M.;
Eparvier, F. G.;
Foujols, T.;
Gillotay, D.;
Giordanengo, B.;
Halain, J. -P.;
Hock, R. A.;
Irbah, A.;
Jeppesen, C.;
Judge, D. L.;
Kretzschmar, M.;
McMullin, D. R.;
Nicula, B.;
Schmutz, W.;
Ucker, G.;
Wieman, S.;
Woodraska, D.;
Woods, T. N.
Submitted: 2013-04-19
We present the lessons learned about the degradation observed in several
space solar missions, based on contributions at the Workshop about On-Orbit
Degradation of Solar and Space Weather Instruments that took place at the Solar
Terrestrial Centre of Excellence (Royal Observatory of Belgium) in Brussels on
3 May 2012. The aim of this workshop was to open discussions related to the
degradation observed in Sun-observing instruments exposed to the effects of the
space environment. This article summarizes the various lessons learned and
offers recommendations to reduce or correct expected degradation with the goal
of increasing the useful lifespan of future and ongoing space missions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.0870 [pdf] - 30299
Minima of Solar Cycles 22/23 and 23/24 as Seen in SOHO/CELIAS/SEM
Absolute Solar EUV Flux
Submitted: 2009-11-04
Verified and updated calibrated absolute solar flux in the He II 30.4 nm
spectral band-pass as measured by the Solar EUV Monitor (SEM) allows us to
study variations of the solar EUV irradiance near the minima of Solar Cycles
22/23 and 23/24. Based on eight (1996 to 2007) NASA sounding rocket flights, a
comparison of SEM data with the measurements from three independent EUV
instruments was performed to verify and confirm the accuracy of the published
SEM data. SEM calibrated data were analyzed to determine and compare minima for
solar cycles 22/23 and 23/24. The minima points were calculated using SEM first
order daily averaged flux smoothed by a running mean (RM) filter with the
window of averaging equal to 365 days. These minima occurred on June 2, 1996
(22/23) and November 28, 2008 (23/24). The 23/24 minimum showed about 15% lower
EUV flux in the 30.4 nm band-pass than the 22/23 minimum. The 365-day RM curve
around the 23/24 minimum has significant asymmetry (fast decrease of the EUV
flux to the minimum and a long, near-horizontal profile after the minimum).
This profile is quite different from the much faster and symmetrical change of
the flux around the 22/23 minimum. SEM flux was compared with both high
spectral resolution (0.1 nm) Mg II index calculated from the Solar Radiation
and Climate Experiment (SORCE) using the Solar Stellar Irradiance Comparison
Experiment (SOLSTICE) data and with the NOAA composite Mg II index spectrum.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610123 [pdf] - 85547
Correction of SOHO CELIAS/SEM EUV Measurements saturated by extreme
solar flare events
Submitted: 2006-10-04
The solar irradiance in the Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) spectral bands has been
observed with a 15 sec cadence by the SOHO Solar EUV Monitor (SEM) since 1995.
During remarkably intense solar flares the SEM EUV measurements are saturated
in the central (zero) order channel (0.1 -- 50.0 nm) by the flare soft X-ray
and EUV flux. The first order EUV channel (26 -- 34 nm) is not saturated by the
flare flux because of its limited bandwidth, but it is sensitive to the arrival
of Solar Energetic Particles (SEP). While both channels detect nearly equal SEP
fluxes, their contributions to the count rate is sensibly negligible in the
zero order channel but must be accounted for and removed from the first channel
count rate. SEP contribution to the measured SEM signals usually follows the
EUV peak for the gradual solar flare events. Correcting the extreme solar flare
SEM EUV measurements may reveal currently unclear relations between the flare
magnitude, dynamics observed in different EUV spectral bands, and the measured
Earth atmosphere response. A simple and effective correction technique based on
analysis of SEM count-rate profiles, GOES X-ray, and GOES proton data has been
developed and used for correcting EUV measurements for the five extreme solar
flare events of July 14, 2000, October 28, November 2, November 4, 2003, and
January 20, 2005. Although none of the 2000 and 2003 flare peaks were
contaminated by the presence of SEPs, the January 20, 2005 SEPs were unusually
prompt and contaminated the peak. The estimated accuracy of the correction is
about 7.5% for large X-class events.