Normalized to: McCann, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.0132 [pdf] - 1126159
Einstein's steady-state theory: an abandoned model of the cosmos
Submitted: 2014-02-01, last modified: 2014-05-22
We present a translation and analysis of an unpublished manuscript by Albert
Einstein in which he attempted to construct a 'steady-state' model of the
universe. The manuscript, which appears to have been written in early 1931,
demonstrates that Einstein once explored a cosmic model in which the mean
density of matter in an expanding universe is maintained constant by the
continuous formation of matter from empty space. This model is very different
to previously known Einsteinian models of the cosmos (both static and dynamic)
but anticipates the later steady-state cosmology of Hoyle, Bondi and Gold in
some ways. We find that Einstein's steady-state model contains a fundamental
flaw and suggest that it was abandoned for this reason. We also suggest that he
declined to explore a more sophisticated version because he found such theories
rather contrived. The manuscript is of historical interest because it reveals
that Einstein debated between steady-state and evolving models of the cosmos
decades before a similar debate took place in the cosmological community.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.2192 [pdf] - 1126158
Einstein's cosmic model of 1931 revisited: an analysis and translation
of a forgotten model of the universe
Submitted: 2013-12-08, last modified: 2014-01-17
We present a translation and analysis of a cosmic model published by Einstein
in 1931. The paper, which is not widely known, features a model of a universe
that undergoes an expansion followed by a contraction, quite different to his
static model of 1917 or the monotonic Einstein-de Sitter model of 1932. The
paper offers many insights into the cosmology of Albert Einstein in the light
of the first evidence for an expanding universe, and we discuss his views of
issues such as the curvature of space, the cosmological constant, the
singularity and the timespan of the expansion. We argue that retrospective
descriptions of this model as cyclic or periodic are not historically or
mathematically accurate. We find that calculations in the paper of the matter
density and radius of the universe contain a numerical error, a finding that is
supported by writing on a blackboard used by Einstein during a lecture at
Oxford University in May 1931. Our article concludes with a general discussion
of his philosophy of cosmology.