sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Matone, Marco

Normalized to: Matone, M.

2 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.11935  [pdf] - 2119177
The Geometrical Origin of Dark Energy
Comments: 13 pages
Submitted: 2020-06-21
The geometrical formulation of the quantum Hamilton-Jacobi theory shows that the quantum potential is never vanishing, so that it plays the role of intrinsic energy. Such a key property selects the Wheeler-DeWitt (WDW) quantum potential $Q[g_{jk}]$ as the natural candidate for the dark energy. This leads to the WDW Hamilton-Jacobi equation with a vanishing kinetic term, and with the identification $$ \Lambda=-\frac{\kappa^2}{\sqrt{\bar g}}Q[g_{jk}] \ . $$ This shows that the cosmological constant is a quantum correction of the Einstein tensor, reminiscent of the von Weizs\"acker correction to the kinetic term of the Thomas-Fermi theory. The quantum potential also defines the Madelung pressure tensor. Such a geometrical origin of the vacuum energy density, a strictly non-perturbative phenomenon, provides strong evidence that it is due to a graviton condensate. Time independence of the WDW wave-functional then would imply that the ratio between the Planck length and the Hubble radius is a time constant, providing an infrared/ultraviolet duality. This indicates that the structure of the Universe is crucial for a formulation of Quantum Gravity.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.05761  [pdf] - 1579653
Exponentiating Higgs
Comments: 16 pages. Two more sections, section on the trivial Higgs expanded. New references include work on the induced electroweak symmetry breaking. In particular, the potential in (3.10) is similar to the effective Higgs potential in arXiv:1306.6354. To appear in PLB
Submitted: 2015-06-18, last modified: 2017-07-07
We consider two related formulations for mass generation in the $U(1)$ Higgs-Kibble model and in the Standard Model (SM). In the first model there are no scalar self-interactions and, in the case of the SM, the formulation is related to the normal subgroup of $G=SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$, generated by $(e^{2\pi i/3}I,-I,e^{\pi i/3})\in G$, that acts trivially on all the fields of the SM. The key step of our construction is to relax the non-negative definiteness condition for the Higgs field due to the polar decomposition. This solves several stringent problems, that we will shortly review, both in the perturbative and non-perturbative formulations. We will show that the usual polar decomposition of the complex scalar doublet $\Phi$ should be done with $U\in SU(2)/Z_2\simeq SO(3)$, where $Z_2$ is the group generated by $-I$, and with the Higgs field $\phi\in R$ rather than $\phi\in R_{\geq0}$. As a byproduct, the investigation shows how Elitzur theorem may be avoided in the usual formulation of the SM. It follows that the simplest lagrangian density for the Higgs mechanism has the standard kinetic term in addition to the mass term, with the right sign, and to a linear term in $\phi$. The other model concerns the scalar theories with normal ordered exponential interactions. The remarkable property of these theories is that for $D>2$ the purely scalar sector corresponds to a free theory.