Martinez-Ruby, O.
Normalized to: Martinez-Ruby, O.
1 article(s) in total. 93 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 5,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.0393 [pdf] - 571396
The LOFAR radio environment
Offringa, A. R.;
de Bruyn, A. G.;
Zaroubi, S.;
van Diepen, G.;
Martinez-Ruby, O.;
Labropoulos, P.;
Brentjens, M. A.;
Ciardi, B.;
Daiboo, S.;
Harker, G.;
Jelic, V.;
Kazemi, S.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Mellema, G.;
Pandey, V. N.;
Pizzo, R. F.;
Schaye, J.;
Vedantham, H.;
Veligatla, V.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Yatawatta, S.;
Zarka, P.;
Alexov, A.;
Anderson, J.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, M.;
Beck, R.;
Bell, M.;
Bell, M. R.;
Bentum, M.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Birzan, L.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breitling, F.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Bruggen, M.;
Butcher, H.;
Conway, J.;
de Vos, M.;
Dettmar, R. J.;
Eisloeffel, J.;
Falcke, H.;
Fender, R.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Gerbers, M.;
Griessmeier, J. M.;
Gunst, A. W.;
Hassall, T. E.;
Heald, G.;
Hessels, J.;
Hoeft, M.;
Horneffer, A.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Kondratiev, V.;
Koopman, Y.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Kuper, G.;
Maat, P.;
Mann, G.;
McKean, J.;
Meulman, H.;
Mevius, M.;
Mol, J. D.;
Nijboer, R.;
Noordam, J.;
Norden, M.;
Paas, H.;
Pandey, M.;
Pizzo, R.;
Polatidis, A.;
Rafferty, D.;
Rawlings, S.;
Reich, W.;
Rottgering, H. J. A.;
Schoenmakers, A. P.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Sobey, C.;
Stappers, B.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Swinbank, J.;
Tagger, M.;
Tang, Y.;
Tasse, C.;
van Ardenne, A.;
van Cappellen, W.;
van Duin, A. P.;
van Haarlem, M.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Wise, M.;
Wucknitz, O.
Submitted: 2012-10-01
Aims: This paper discusses the spectral occupancy for performing radio
astronomy with the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR), with a focus on imaging
observations. Methods: We have analysed the radio-frequency interference (RFI)
situation in two 24-h surveys with Dutch LOFAR stations, covering 30-78 MHz
with low-band antennas and 115-163 MHz with high-band antennas. This is a
subset of the full frequency range of LOFAR. The surveys have been observed
with a 0.76 kHz / 1 s resolution. Results: We measured the RFI occupancy in the
low and high frequency sets to be 1.8% and 3.2% respectively. These values are
found to be representative values for the LOFAR radio environment. Between day
and night, there is no significant difference in the radio environment. We find
that lowering the current observational time and frequency resolutions of LOFAR
results in a slight loss of flagging accuracy. At LOFAR's nominal resolution of
0.76 kHz and 1 s, the false-positives rate is about 0.5%. This rate increases
approximately linearly when decreasing the data frequency resolution.
Conclusions: Currently, by using an automated RFI detection strategy, the LOFAR
radio environment poses no perceivable problems for sensitive observing. It
remains to be seen if this is still true for very deep observations that
integrate over tens of nights, but the situation looks promising. Reasons for
the low impact of RFI are the high spectral and time resolution of LOFAR;
accurate detection methods; strong filters and high receiver linearity; and the
proximity of the antennas to the ground. We discuss some strategies that can be
used once low-level RFI starts to become apparent. It is important that the
frequency range of LOFAR remains free of broadband interference, such as DAB
stations and windmills.
