Normalized to: Martin-Fleitas, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09830 [pdf] - 1732659
Gaia Data Release 2. Calibration and mitigation of electronic offset
effects in the data
Hambly, N. C.;
Cropper, M.;
Boudreault, S.;
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Dolding, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Collins, R.;
Cross, N.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Baker, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Marchal, O.;
Katz, D.;
de Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
Riello, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Els, S.;
Corcione, L.;
Masana, E.;
Luri, X.;
Chassat, F.;
Fusero, F.;
Pasquier, J. F.;
Vetel, C.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The European Space Agency Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2 in
December 2013. This ambitious mission has strict requirements on residual
systematic errors resulting from instrumental corrections in order to meet a
design goal of sub-10 microarcsecond astrometry. During the design and build
phase of the science instruments, various critical calibrations were studied in
detail to ensure that this goal could be met in orbit. In particular, it was
determined that the video-chain offsets on the analogue side of the
analogue-to-digital conversion electronics exhibited instabilities that could
not be mitigated fully by modifications to the flight hardware. We provide a
detailed description of the behaviour of the electronic offset levels on
microsecond timescales, identifying various systematic effects that are known
collectively as offset non-uniformities. The effects manifest themselves as
transient perturbations on the gross zero-point electronic offset level that is
routinely monitored as part of the overall calibration process. Using in-orbit
special calibration sequences along with simple parametric models, we show how
the effects can be calibrated, and how these calibrations are applied to the
science data. While the calibration part of the process is relatively
straightforward, the application of the calibrations during science data
processing requires a detailed on-ground reconstruction of the readout timing
of each charge-coupled device (CCD) sample on each device in order to predict
correctly the highly time-dependent nature of the corrections. We demonstrate
the effectiveness of our offset non-uniformity models in mitigating the effects
in Gaia data. We demonstrate for all CCDs and operating instrument and modes on
board Gaia that the video-chain noise-limited performance is recovered in the
vast majority of science samples.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04240 [pdf] - 1480663
On-orbit performance of the Gaia CCDs at L2
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Davidson, M.;
Abreu, A.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Short, A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.;
Prusti, T.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Mora, A.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Raison, F.;
Lammers, U.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Jansen, F.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
The European Space Agency's Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2
in December 2013 with a payload containing 106 large-format scientific CCDs.
The primary goal of the mission is to repeatedly obtain high-precision
astrometric and photometric measurements of one thousand million stars over the
course of five years. The scientific value of the down-linked data, and the
operation of the onboard autonomous detection chain, relies on the high
performance of the detectors. As Gaia slowly rotates and scans the sky, the
CCDs are continuously operated in a mode where the line clock rate and the
satellite rotation spin-rate are in synchronisation. Nominal mission operations
began in July 2014 and the first data release is being prepared for release at
the end of Summer 2016.
In this paper we present an overview of the focal plane, the detector system,
and strategies for on-orbit performance monitoring of the system. This is
followed by a presentation of the performance results based on analysis of data
acquired during a two-year window beginning at payload switch-on. Results for
parameters such as readout noise and electronic offset behaviour are presented
and we pay particular attention to the effects of the L2 radiation environment
on the devices. The radiation-induced degradation in the charge transfer
efficiency (CTE) in the (parallel) scan direction is clearly diagnosed;
however, an extrapolation shows that charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) effects
at end of mission will be approximately an order of magnitude less than
predicted pre-flight. It is shown that the CTI in the serial register
(horizontal direction) is still dominated by the traps inherent to the
manufacturing process and that the radiation-induced degradation so far is only
a few per cent. Finally, we summarise some of the detector effects discovered
on-orbit which are still being investigated.