sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Martens, Daniel

Normalized to: Martens, D.

2 article(s) in total. 7 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.08061  [pdf] - 1828815
Effects of NII and H$\alpha$ Line Blending on the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift Survey
Comments: 19 pages, 11 figures, minor changes, matched with MNRAS accepted version
Submitted: 2018-04-21, last modified: 2019-02-07
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will conduct a galaxy redshift survey using the H$\alpha$ emission line primarily for spectroscopic redshift determination. Due to the modest spectroscopic resolution of the grism, the H$\alpha$ and the neighboring [NII] lines are blended, leading to a redshift bias that depends on the [NII]/H$\alpha$ ratio, which is correlated with a galaxy's metallicity, hence mass and ultimately environment. We investigate how this bias propagates into the galaxy clustering and cosmological parameters obtained from the WFIRST. Using simulation, we explore the effect of line blending on redshift-space distortion and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements. We measure the BAO parameters $\alpha_{\parallel}$, $\alpha_{\perp}$, the logarithmic growth factor $f_{v}$, and calculate their errors based on the correlations between the line ratio and large-scale structure. We find $\Delta\alpha_{\parallel} = 0.31 \pm 0.23 \%$ ($0.26\pm0.17\%$), $\Delta\alpha_{\perp} = -0.10\pm0.10\%$ ($-0.12 \pm 0.11 \%$), and $\Delta f_{v} = 0.17\pm0.33\%$ ($-0.20 \pm 0.30\%$) for redshift 1.355--1.994 (0.700--1.345), which use approximately 18$\%$, 9$\%$, and 7$\%$ of the systematic error budget in a root-sum-square sense. These errors may already be tolerable but further mitigations are discussed. Biases due to the environment-independent redshift error can be mitigated by measuring the redshift error probability distribution function. High-spectral-resolution re-observation of a few thousand galaxies would be required (if by direct approach) to reduce them to below 25$\%$ of the error budget. Finally, we outline the next steps to improve the modeling of [NII]-induced blending biases and their interaction with other redshift error sources.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.07708  [pdf] - 1682587
A Radial Measurement of the Galaxy Tidal Alignment Magnitude with BOSS Data
Comments: 23 pages, 18 figures, to be submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2018-02-21
The anisotropy of galaxy clustering in redshift space has long been used to probe the rate of growth of cosmological perturbations. However, if galaxies are aligned by large-scale tidal fields, then a sample with an orientation-dependent selection effect has an additional anisotropy imprinted onto its correlation function. We use the LOWZ and CMASS catalogs of SDSS-III BOSS Data Release 12 to divide galaxies into two sub-samples based on their offset from the Fundamental Plane, which should be correlated with orientation. These sub-samples must trace the same underlying cosmology, but have opposite orientation-dependent selection effects. We measure the clustering parameters of each sub-sample and compare them in order to calculate the dimensionless parameter $B$, a measure of how strongly galaxies are aligned by gravitational tidal fields. We found that for CMASS (LOWZ), the measured $B$ was $-0.024 \pm 0.015$ ($-0.030 \pm 0.016$). This result can be compared to the theoretical predictions of Hirata 2009, who argued that since galaxy formation physics does not depend on the direction of the observer, the same intrinsic alignment parameters that describe galaxy-ellipticity correlations should also describe intrinsic alignments in the radial direction. We find that the ratio of observed to theoretical values is $0.51\pm 0.32$ ($0.77\pm0.41$) for CMASS (LOWZ). We combine the results to obtain a total ${\rm {Obs}/{Theory}} = 0.61\pm 0.26$. This measurement constitutes evidence (between 2 and 3$\sigma$) for radial intrinsic alignments, and is consistent with theoretical expectations ($<2\sigma$ difference).