Normalized to: Martens, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.08061 [pdf] - 1828815
Effects of NII and H$\alpha$ Line Blending on the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift
Survey
Submitted: 2018-04-21, last modified: 2019-02-07
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will conduct a galaxy
redshift survey using the H$\alpha$ emission line primarily for spectroscopic
redshift determination. Due to the modest spectroscopic resolution of the
grism, the H$\alpha$ and the neighboring [NII] lines are blended, leading to a
redshift bias that depends on the [NII]/H$\alpha$ ratio, which is correlated
with a galaxy's metallicity, hence mass and ultimately environment. We
investigate how this bias propagates into the galaxy clustering and
cosmological parameters obtained from the WFIRST. Using simulation, we explore
the effect of line blending on redshift-space distortion and baryon acoustic
oscillation (BAO) measurements. We measure the BAO parameters
$\alpha_{\parallel}$, $\alpha_{\perp}$, the logarithmic growth factor $f_{v}$,
and calculate their errors based on the correlations between the line ratio and
large-scale structure. We find $\Delta\alpha_{\parallel} = 0.31 \pm 0.23 \%$
($0.26\pm0.17\%$), $\Delta\alpha_{\perp} = -0.10\pm0.10\%$ ($-0.12 \pm 0.11
\%$), and $\Delta f_{v} = 0.17\pm0.33\%$ ($-0.20 \pm 0.30\%$) for redshift
1.355--1.994 (0.700--1.345), which use approximately 18$\%$, 9$\%$, and 7$\%$
of the systematic error budget in a root-sum-square sense. These errors may
already be tolerable but further mitigations are discussed. Biases due to the
environment-independent redshift error can be mitigated by measuring the
redshift error probability distribution function. High-spectral-resolution
re-observation of a few thousand galaxies would be required (if by direct
approach) to reduce them to below 25$\%$ of the error budget. Finally, we
outline the next steps to improve the modeling of [NII]-induced blending biases
and their interaction with other redshift error sources.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.07708 [pdf] - 1682587
A Radial Measurement of the Galaxy Tidal Alignment Magnitude with BOSS
Data
Submitted: 2018-02-21
The anisotropy of galaxy clustering in redshift space has long been used to
probe the rate of growth of cosmological perturbations. However, if galaxies
are aligned by large-scale tidal fields, then a sample with an
orientation-dependent selection effect has an additional anisotropy imprinted
onto its correlation function. We use the LOWZ and CMASS catalogs of SDSS-III
BOSS Data Release 12 to divide galaxies into two sub-samples based on their
offset from the Fundamental Plane, which should be correlated with orientation.
These sub-samples must trace the same underlying cosmology, but have opposite
orientation-dependent selection effects. We measure the clustering parameters
of each sub-sample and compare them in order to calculate the dimensionless
parameter $B$, a measure of how strongly galaxies are aligned by gravitational
tidal fields. We found that for CMASS (LOWZ), the measured $B$ was $-0.024 \pm
0.015$ ($-0.030 \pm 0.016$). This result can be compared to the theoretical
predictions of Hirata 2009, who argued that since galaxy formation physics does
not depend on the direction of the observer, the same intrinsic alignment
parameters that describe galaxy-ellipticity correlations should also describe
intrinsic alignments in the radial direction. We find that the ratio of
observed to theoretical values is $0.51\pm 0.32$ ($0.77\pm0.41$) for CMASS
(LOWZ). We combine the results to obtain a total ${\rm {Obs}/{Theory}} =
0.61\pm 0.26$. This measurement constitutes evidence (between 2 and 3$\sigma$)
for radial intrinsic alignments, and is consistent with theoretical
expectations ($<2\sigma$ difference).