Normalized to: Marler, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08213 [pdf] - 1853150
Unlocking the Capabilities of Future High-Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy
Missions Through Laboratory Astrophysics
Betancourt-Martinez, Gabriele;
Akamatsu, Hiroki;
Barret, Didier;
Bautista, Manuel;
Bernitt, Sven;
Bianchi, Stefano;
Bodewits, Dennis;
Brickhouse, Nancy;
Brown, Gregory V.;
Costantini, Elisa;
Coreno, Marcello;
López-Urrutia, José R. Crespo;
Cumbee, Renata;
Eckart, Megan;
Ferland, Gary;
Fiore, Fabrizio;
Fogle, Michael;
Foster, Adam;
Garcia, Javier;
Gorczyca, Tom;
Grinberg, Victoria;
Grosso, Nicolas;
Gu, Liyi;
Gu, Ming Feng;
Guainazzi, Matteo;
Hell, Natalie;
Herder, Jan-Willem den;
Kaastra, Jelle;
Kallman, Timothy;
Lee, Julia;
Leutenegger, Maurice;
Marler, Joan;
McCammon, Dan;
Nakashima, Shinya;
Nicastro, Fabrizio;
Paerels, Frits;
Pajot, François;
Pointecouteau, Etienne;
Porquet, Delphine;
Porter, F. Scott;
Savin, Daniel Wolf;
Sawada, Makoto;
Shah, Chintan;
Simionescu, Aurora;
de Simone, Monica;
Sosolik, Chad;
Stancil, Phillip;
Steinbrügge, René;
Yamaguchi, Hiroya
Submitted: 2019-03-19
Thanks to high-resolution and non-dispersive spectrometers onboard future
X-ray missions such as XRISM and Athena, we are finally poised to answer
important questions about the formation and evolution of galaxies and
large-scale structure. However, we currently lack an adequate understanding of
many atomic processes behind the spectral features we will soon observe. Large
error bars on parameters as critical as transition energies and atomic cross
sections can lead to unacceptable uncertainties in the calculations of e.g.,
elemental abundance, velocity, and temperature. Unless we address these issues,
we risk limiting the full scientific potential of these missions. Laboratory
astrophysics, which comprises theoretical and experimental studies of the
underlying physics behind observable astrophysical processes, is therefore
central to the success of these missions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02574 [pdf] - 1844448
X-rays Studies of the Solar System
Snios, Bradford;
Dunn, William R.;
Lisse, Carey M.;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Dennerl, Konrad;
Bhardwaj, Anil;
Gladstone, G. Randall;
Nulsen, Susan;
Bodewits, Dennis;
Jackman, Caitriona M.;
Alvarado-Gómez, Julián D.;
Bunce, Emma J.;
Combi, Michael R.;
Cravens, Thomas E.;
Cumbee, Renata S.;
Drake, Jeremy J.;
Elsner, Ronald F.;
Grodent, Denis;
Hong, Jae Sub;
Kharchenko, Vasili;
Kraft, Ralph P.;
Marler, Joan P.;
Moschou, Sofia P.;
Mullen, Patrick D.;
Wolk, Scott J.;
Yao, Zhonghua
Submitted: 2019-03-06
X-ray observatories contribute fundamental advances in Solar System studies
by probing Sun-object interactions, developing planet and satellite surface
composition maps, probing global magnetospheric dynamics, and tracking
astrochemical reactions. Despite these crucial results, the technological
limitations of current X-ray instruments hinder the overall scope and impact
for broader scientific application of X-ray observations both now and in the
coming decade. Implementation of modern advances in X-ray optics will provide
improvements in effective area, spatial resolution, and spectral resolution for
future instruments. These improvements will usher in a truly transformative era
of Solar System science through the study of X-ray emission.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06157 [pdf] - 1785914
Perspectives on Astrophysics Based on Atomic, Molecular, and Optical
(AMO) Techniques
Savin, Daniel Wolf;
Babb, James F.;
Bellan, Paul M.;
Brogan, Crystal;
Cami, Jan;
Caselli, Paola;
Corrales, Lia;
Dominguez, Gerardo;
Federman, Steven R.;
Fontes, Chris J.;
Freedman, Richard;
Gibson, Brad;
Golub, Leon;
Gorczyca, Thomas W.;
Hahn, Michael;
Hörst, Sarah M.;
Hudson, Reggie L.;
Kuhn, Jeffrey;
Lawler, James E.;
Leutenegger, Maurice A.;
Marler, Joan P.;
McCarthy, Michael C.;
McGuire, Brett A.;
Milam, Stefanie N.;
Murphy, Nicholas A.;
Nave, Gillian;
Norton, Aimee A.;
Papol, Anthony;
Raymond, John C.;
Salama, Farid;
Sciamma-O'Brien, Ella M.;
Smith, Randall;
Sosolik, Chad;
Sousa-Silva, Clara;
Stancil, Phillip C.;
Timmes, Frank;
Trimble, Virginia L.;
Wargelin, Bradford J.
Submitted: 2018-11-14
About two generations ago, a large part of AMO science was dominated by
experimental high energy collision studies and perturbative theoretical
methods. Since then, AMO science has undergone a transition and is now
dominated by quantum, ultracold, and ultrafast studies. But in the process, the
field has passed over the complexity that lies between these two extremes. Most
of the Universe resides in this intermediate region. We put forward that the
next frontier for AMO science is to explore the AMO complexity that describes
most of the Cosmos.