Normalized to: Markovic, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.11448 [pdf] - 2005415
Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering I: unbiased growth
forecasts from multipole expansion
Submitted: 2019-04-25, last modified: 2019-11-05
We assess the performance of the Taruya, Nishimichi and Saito (TNS) model for
the halo redshift space power spectrum, focusing on utilising mildly non-linear
scales to constrain the growth rate of structure f. Using simulations with
volume and number density typical of forthcoming Stage IV galaxy surveys, we
determine ranges of validity for the model at redshifts z = 0.5 and z = 1. We
proceed to perform a Bayesian MCMC analysis utilising the monopole, quadrupole,
and hexadecapole spectra, followed by an exploratory Fisher matrix analysis. As
previously noted in other forecasts as well as in real data analyses, we find
that including the hexadecapole can significantly improve the constraints.
However, a restricted range of scales is required for the hexadecapole in order
for the growth parameter estimation to remain unbiased, limiting the
improvement. We consistently quantify these effects by employing the multipole
expansion formalism in both our Fisher and MCMC forecasts.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.08489 [pdf] - 1605025
Scientific Synergy Between LSST and Euclid
Rhodes, Jason;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Aubourg, Éric;
Bean, Rachel;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Bremer, Malcolm N.;
Capak, Peter;
Cardone, Vincenzo;
Carry, Benoît;
Conselice, Christopher J.;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cuillandre, Jean-Charles;
Hatch, N. A.;
Helou, George;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Hildebrandt, Hendrik;
Hložek, Renée;
Jones, Lynne;
Kahn, Steven;
Kiessling, Alina;
Kitching, Thomas;
Lupton, Robert;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Markovic, Katarina;
Marshall, Phil;
Massey, Richard;
Maughan, Ben J.;
Melchior, Peter;
Mellier, Yannick;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Robertson, Brant;
Sauvage, Marc;
Schrabback, Tim;
Smith, Graham P.;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Taylor, Andy;
Von Der Linden, Anja
Submitted: 2017-10-23, last modified: 2017-11-29
Euclid and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) are poised to
dramatically change the astronomy landscape early in the next decade. The
combination of high cadence, deep, wide-field optical photometry from LSST with
high resolution, wide-field optical photometry and near-infrared photometry and
spectroscopy from Euclid will be powerful for addressing a wide range of
astrophysical questions. We explore Euclid/LSST synergy, ignoring the political
issues associated with data access to focus on the scientific, technical, and
financial benefits of coordination. We focus primarily on dark energy
cosmology, but also discuss galaxy evolution, transient objects, solar system
science, and galaxy cluster studies. We concentrate on synergies that require
coordination in cadence or survey overlap, or would benefit from pixel-level
co-processing that is beyond the scope of what is currently planned, rather
than scientific programs that could be accomplished only at the catalog level
without coordination in data processing or survey strategies. We provide two
quantitative examples of scientific synergies: the decrease in photo-z errors
(benefitting many science cases) when high resolution Euclid data are used for
LSST photo-z determination, and the resulting increase in weak lensing
signal-to-noise ratio from smaller photo-z errors. We briefly discuss other
areas of coordination, including high performance computing resources and
calibration data. Finally, we address concerns about the loss of independence
and potential cross-checks between the two missions and potential consequences
of not collaborating.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.07061 [pdf] - 1548136
Large-scale retrospective relative spectro-photometric self-calibration
in space
Markovic, Katarina;
Percival, Will J.;
Scodeggio, Marco;
Ealet, Anne;
Wachter, Stefanie;
Garilli, Bianca;
Guzzo, Luigi;
Scaramella, Roberto;
Maiorano, Elisabetta;
Amiaux, Jerome
Submitted: 2016-06-22, last modified: 2017-01-31
We consider the application of relative self-calibration using overlap
regions to spectroscopic galaxy surveys that use slit-less spectroscopy. This
method is based on that developed for the SDSS by Padmanabhan at al. (2008) in
that we consider jointly fitting and marginalising over calibrator brightness,
rather than treating these as free parameters. However, we separate the
calibration of the detector-to-detector from the full-focal-plane
exposure-to-exposure calibration. To demonstrate how the calibration procedure
will work, we simulate the procedure for a potential implementation of the
spectroscopic component of the wide Euclid survey. We study the change of
coverage and the determination of relative multiplicative errors in flux
measurements for different dithering configurations. We use the new method to
study the case where the flat-field across each exposure or detector is
measured precisely and only exposure-to-exposure or detector-to-detector
variation in the flux error remains. We consider several base dither patterns
and find that they strongly influence the ability to calibrate, using this
methodology. To enable self-calibration, it is important that the survey
strategy connects different observations with at least a minimum amount of
overlap, and we propose an "S"-pattern for dithering that fulfills this
requirement. The final survey strategy adopted by Euclid will have to optimise
for a number of different science goals and requirements. The large-scale
calibration of the spectroscopic galaxy survey is clearly cosmologically
crucial, but is not the only one.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.1225 [pdf] - 1298080
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
Amendola, Luca;
Appleby, Stephen;
Bacon, David;
Baker, Tessa;
Baldi, Marco;
Bartolo, Nicola;
Blanchard, Alain;
Bonvin, Camille;
Borgani, Stefano;
Branchini, Enzo;
Burrage, Clare;
Camera, Stefano;
Carbone, Carmelita;
Casarini, Luciano;
Cropper, Mark;
deRham, Claudia;
di Porto, Cinzia;
Ealet, Anne;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Finelli, Fabio;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Guzzo, Luigi;
Heavens, Alan;
Heisenberg, Lavinia;
Heymans, Catherine;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Hollenstein, Lukas;
Holmes, Rory;
Horst, Ole;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kitching, Thomas D.;
Koivisto, Tomi;
Kunz, Martin;
La Vacca, Giuseppe;
March, Marisa;
Majerotto, Elisabetta;
Markovic, Katarina;
Marsh, David;
Marulli, Federico;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Mota, David F.;
Nunes, Nelson;
Percival, Will;
Pettorino, Valeria;
Porciani, Cristiano;
Quercellini, Claudia;
Read, Justin;
Rinaldi, Massimiliano;
Sapone, Domenico;
Scaramella, Roberto;
Skordis, Constantinos;
Simpson, Fergus;
Taylor, Andy;
Thomas, Shaun;
Trotta, Roberto;
Verde, Licia;
Vernizzi, Filippo;
Vollmer, Adrian;
Wang, Yun;
Weller, Jochen;
Zlosnik, Tom
Submitted: 2012-06-06, last modified: 2015-10-22
Euclid is a European Space Agency medium class mission selected for launch in
2019 within the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme. The main goal of Euclid is
to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Euclid
will explore the expansion history of the Universe and the evolution of cosmic
structures by measuring shapes and redshifts of galaxies as well as the
distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky. Although
the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers
a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary
research. In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a
strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models. We discuss five
broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial
conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data
analysis. This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid's Theory
Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that
will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid
mission.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4094 [pdf] - 1078114
The Non-Linear Matter Power Spectrum in Warm Dark Matter Cosmologies
Submitted: 2011-07-20, last modified: 2011-10-26
We investigate the non-linear evolution of the matter power spectrum by using
a large set of high-resolution N-body/hydrodynamic simulations. The linear
matter power in the initial conditions is consistently modified to accommodate
warm dark matter particles which induce a small scale cut-off in the power as
compared to standard cold dark matter scenarios. The impact of such thermal
relics is addressed at small scales with k > 1 h/Mpc and at z < 5, which are
particularly important for the next generation of Lyman-alpha forest, weak
lensing and galaxy clustering surveys. We quantify the mass and redshift
dependence of the warm dark matter non-linear matter power and we provide a
fitting formula which is accurate at the ~2% level below z=3 and for masses
m_wdm > 0.5 keV. The role of baryonic physics (cooling, star formation and
feedback recipes) on the warm dark matter induced suppression is also
quantified. Furthermore, we compare our findings with the halo model and show
their impact on the cosmic shear power spectra.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.2134 [pdf] - 669503
Testing the Warm Dark Matter paradigm with large-scale structures
Submitted: 2011-03-10, last modified: 2011-08-08
We explore the impact of a LWDM cosmological scenario on the clustering
properties of large-scale structure in the Universe. We do this by extending
the halo model. The new development is that we consider two components to the
mass density: one arising from mass in collapsed haloes, and the second from a
smooth component of uncollapsed mass. Assuming that the nonlinear clustering of
dark matter haloes can be understood, then from conservation arguments one can
precisely calculate the clustering properties of the smooth component and its
cross-correlation with haloes. We then explore how the three main ingredients
of the halo calculations, the mass function, bias and density profiles are
affected by WDM. We show that, relative to CDM: the mass function is suppressed
by ~50%, for masses ~100 times the free-streaming mass-scale; the bias of low
mass haloes can be boosted by up to 20%; core densities of haloes can be
suppressed. We also examine the impact of relic thermal velocities on the
density profiles, and find that these effects are constrained to scales r<1
kpc/h, and hence of little importance for dark matter tests, owing to
uncertainties in the baryonic physics. We use our modified halo model to
calculate the non-linear matter power spectrum, and find significant
small-scale power in the model. However, relative to the CDM case, the power is
suppressed. We then calculate the expected signal and noise that our set of
LWDM models would give for a future weak lensing mission. We show that the
models should in principle be separable at high significance. Finally, using
the Fisher matrix formalism we forecast the limit on the WDM particle mass for
a future full-sky weak lensing mission like Euclid or LSST. With Planck priors
and using multipoles l<5000, we find that a lower limit of 2.6 keV should be
easily achievable.