sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Markovič, Katarina

Normalized to: Markovič, K.

6 article(s) in total. 159 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2007.01812  [pdf] - 2127598
Validating the Fisher approach for stage IV spectroscopic surveys
Comments: 20 pages, 10 figures, 11 tables
Submitted: 2020-07-03
In recent years forecasting activities have become a very important tool for designing and optimising large scale structure surveys. To predict the performance of such surveys, the Fisher matrix formalism is frequently used as a fast and easy way to compute constraints on cosmological parameters. Among them lies the study of the properties of dark energy which is one of the main goals in modern cosmology. As so, a metric for the power of a survey to constrain dark energy is provided by the Figure of merit (FoM). This is defined as the inverse of the surface contour given by the joint variance of the dark energy equation of state parameters $\{w_0,w_a\}$ in the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parameterisation, which can be evaluated from the covariance matrix of the parameters. This covariance matrix is obtained as the inverse of the Fisher matrix. Inversion of an ill-conditioned matrix can result in large errors on the covariance coefficients if the elements of the Fisher matrix have been estimated with insufficient precision. The conditioning number is a metric providing a mathematical lower limit to the required precision for a reliable inversion, but it is often too stringent in practice for Fisher matrices with size larger than $2\times2$. In this paper we propose a general numerical method to guarantee a certain precision on the inferred constraints, like the FoM. It consists on randomly vibrating (perturbing) the Fisher matrix elements with Gaussian perturbations of a given amplitude, and then evaluating the maximum amplitude that keeps the FoM within the chosen precision. The steps used in the numerical derivatives and integrals involved in the calculation of the Fisher matrix elements can then be chosen accordingly in order to keep the precision of the Fisher matrix elements below this maximum amplitude...
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1905.02739  [pdf] - 2087969
Using large scale structure data and a halo model to constrain Generalised Dark Matter
Comments: 27 pages, 10 figures. Updated to match published version: a few minor clarifications on the choices in the halo model construction and relation to WDM and an additional plot showing the mass function
Submitted: 2019-05-07, last modified: 2020-05-04
Constraints on the properties of the cosmological dark matter have previously been obtained in a model-independent fashion using the Generalised Dark Matter (GDM) framework. Here we extend that work in several directions: We consider the inclusion of WiggleZ matter power spectrum data, and show that this improves the constraints on the two perturbative GDM parameters, $c^2_s$ and $c^2_\text{vis}$, by a factor of 3, for a conservative choice of wavenumber range. A less conservative choice can yield an improvement of up to an order of magnitude compared to previous constraints. In order to examine the robustness of this result we develop a GDM halo model to explore how non-linear structure formation could proceed in this framework, since currently GDM has only been defined perturbatively and only linear theory has been used when generating constraints. We then examine how the halo model affects the constraints obtained from the matter power spectrum data. The less-conservative wavenumber range shows a significant difference between linear and non-linear modelling, with the latter favouring GDM parameters inconsistent with $\Lambda$CDM, underlining the importance of careful non-linear modelling when using this data. We also use this halo model to establish the robustness of previously obtained constraints, particularly those that involve weak gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background. Additionally, we show how the inclusion of neutrino mass as a free parameter affects previous constraints on the GDM parameters.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1905.05122  [pdf] - 2053990
Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering II: model validation and forecasts for Stage IV surveys
Comments: 23 pages, 21 figures, MNRAS accepted version
Submitted: 2019-05-13, last modified: 2020-02-17
Accurate modelling of non-linear scales in galaxy clustering will be crucial for data analysis of Stage IV galaxy surveys. A selection of competing non-linear models must be made based on validation studies. We provide a comprehensive set of forecasts of two different models for the halo redshift space power spectrum, namely the commonly applied TNS model and an effective field theory of large scale structure (EFTofLSS) inspired model. Using simulation data and a least-$\chi^2$ analysis, we determine ranges of validity for the models. We then conduct an exploratory Fisher analysis using the full anisotropic power spectrum to investigate parameter degeneracies. We proceed to perform an MCMC analysis utilising the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole spectra, with a restricted range of scales for the latter in order to avoid biasing our growth rate, $f$, constraint. We find that the TNS model with a Lorentzian damping and standard Eulerian perturbative modelling outperforms other variants of the TNS model. Our MCMC analysis finds that the EFTofLSS-based model may provide tighter marginalised constraints on $f$ at $z=0.5$ and $z=1$ than the TNS model, despite having additional nuisance parameters. However this depends on the range of scales used as well as the fiducial values and priors on the EFT nuisance parameters. Finally, we extend previous work to provide a consistent comparison between the Fisher matrix and MCMC forecasts using the multipole expansion formalism, and find good agreement between them.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273  [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes
Euclid Collaboration; Blanchard, A.; Camera, S.; Carbone, C.; Cardone, V. F.; Casas, S.; Ilić, S.; Kilbinger, M.; Kitching, T.; Kunz, M.; Lacasa, F.; Linder, E.; Majerotto, E.; Markovič, K.; Martinelli, M.; Pettorino, V.; Pourtsidou, A.; Sakr, Z.; Sánchez, A. G.; Sapone, D.; Tutusaus, I.; Yahia-Cherif, S.; Yankelevich, V.; Andreon, S.; Aussel, H.; Balaguera-Antolínez, A.; Baldi, M.; Bardelli, S.; Bender, R.; Biviano, A.; Bonino, D.; Boucaud, A.; Bozzo, E.; Branchini, E.; Brau-Nogue, S.; Brescia, M.; Brinchmann, J.; Burigana, C.; Cabanac, R.; Capobianco, V.; Cappi, A.; Carretero, J.; Carvalho, C. S.; Casas, R.; Castander, F. J.; Castellano, M.; Cavuoti, S.; Cimatti, A.; Cledassou, R.; Colodro-Conde, C.; Congedo, G.; Conselice, C. J.; Conversi, L.; Copin, Y.; Corcione, L.; Coupon, J.; Courtois, H. M.; Cropper, M.; Da Silva, A.; de la Torre, S.; Di Ferdinando, D.; Dubath, F.; Ducret, F.; Duncan, C. A. J.; Dupac, X.; Dusini, S.; Fabbian, G.; Fabricius, M.; Farrens, S.; Fosalba, P.; Fotopoulou, S.; Fourmanoit, N.; Frailis, M.; Franceschi, E.; Franzetti, P.; Fumana, M.; Galeotta, S.; Gillard, W.; Gillis, B.; Giocoli, C.; Gómez-Alvarez, P.; Graciá-Carpio, J.; Grupp, F.; Guzzo, L.; Hoekstra, H.; Hormuth, F.; Israel, H.; Jahnke, K.; Keihanen, E.; Kermiche, S.; Kirkpatrick, C. C.; Kohley, R.; Kubik, B.; Kurki-Suonio, H.; Ligori, S.; Lilje, P. B.; Lloro, I.; Maino, D.; Maiorano, E.; Marggraf, O.; Martinet, N.; Marulli, F.; Massey, R.; Medinaceli, E.; Mei, S.; Mellier, Y.; Metcalf, B.; Metge, J. J.; Meylan, G.; Moresco, M.; Moscardini, L.; Munari, E.; Nichol, R. C.; Niemi, S.; Nucita, A. A.; Padilla, C.; Paltani, S.; Pasian, F.; Percival, W. J.; Pires, S.; Polenta, G.; Poncet, M.; Pozzetti, L.; Racca, G. D.; Raison, F.; Renzi, A.; Rhodes, J.; Romelli, E.; Roncarelli, M.; Rossetti, E.; Saglia, R.; Schneider, P.; Scottez, V.; Secroun, A.; Sirri, G.; Stanco, L.; Starck, J. -L.; Sureau, F.; Tallada-Crespí, P.; Tavagnacco, D.; Taylor, A. N.; Tenti, M.; Tereno, I.; Toledo-Moreo, R.; Torradeflot, F.; Valenziano, L.; Vassallo, T.; Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes; Viel, M.; Wang, Y.; Zacchei, A.; Zoubian, J.; Zucca, E.
Comments: 75 pages, 13 figures, 18 tables. Acknowledgements include Authors' contributions. Abstract abridged
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations, reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at least a factor of three.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1311.5223  [pdf] - 784751
Lyman-{\alpha} Forest and Cosmic Weak Lensing in a Warm Dark Matter Universe
Comments: 24 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables, Review accepted to be published in PASA (2013)
Submitted: 2013-11-20
We review the current state of the theory of large scale structure in a warm dark matter (WDM) cosmological model. In particular, we focus on the non-linear modelling of the matter power spectrum and on the mass function of dark matter haloes. We describe the results of N-body simulations with WDM and mention the effects that could be induced by baryonic physics. We also examine the halo model of large scale structure and its recently suggested modifications for a WDM cosmology, which account for the small scale smoothness of the initial matter density field and better fit the results of N-body simulations. Having described the theoretical models, we discuss the current lower limits on the WDM particle mass, m_w, which correspond to upper limits on the WDM temperature under the assumption that the particles are thermal relics. The best such constraints come from the Ly{\alpha} forest and exclude all masses below 3.3 keV at the 2{\sigma} confidence level. We finally review the forecasts for future lensing surveys, which will be of the same order of magnitude as the already existing constraints from the Ly{\alpha} forest data but explore a different redshift regime.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.0218  [pdf] - 300252
Constraining warm dark matter with cosmic shear power spectra
Comments: 26 pages, 9 figures, minor changes to match the version accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2010-09-01, last modified: 2011-01-24
We investigate potential constraints from cosmic shear on the dark matter particle mass, assuming all dark matter is made up of light thermal relic particles. Given the theoretical uncertainties involved in making cosmological predictions in such warm dark matter scenarios we use analytical fits to linear warm dark matter power spectra and compare (i) the halo model using a mass function evaluated from these linear power spectra and (ii) an analytical fit to the non-linear evolution of the linear power spectra. We optimistically ignore the competing effect of baryons for this work. We find approach (ii) to be conservative compared to approach (i). We evaluate cosmological constraints using these methods, marginalising over four other cosmological parameters. Using the more conservative method we find that a Euclid-like weak lensing survey together with constraints from the Planck cosmic microwave background mission primary anisotropies could achieve a lower limit on the particle mass of 2.5 keV.