Normalized to: Marchal, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09382 [pdf] - 2078647
Gaia Data Release 2: Variable stars in the colour-absolute magnitude
diagram
Gaia Collaboration;
Eyer, L.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Audard, M.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Glass, F.;
Marchal, O.;
Grenon, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Holl, B.;
Clementini, G.;
Aerts, C.;
Mazeh, T.;
Evans, D. W.;
Szabados, L.;
co-authors, 438
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2020-04-16
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than 1.6
billion sources with G ~ 21 mag. We showcase stellar variability across the
Galactic colour-absolute magnitude diagram (CaMD), focusing on pulsating,
eruptive, and cataclysmic variables, as well as on stars exhibiting variability
due to rotation and eclipses. We illustrate the locations of variable star
classes, variable object fractions, and typical variability amplitudes
throughout the CaMD and illustrate how variability-related changes in colour
and brightness induce `motions' using 22 months worth of calibrated
photometric, spectro-photometric, and astrometric Gaia data of stars with
significant parallax. To ensure a large variety of variable star classes to
populate the CaMD, we crossmatch Gaia sources with known variable stars. We
also used the statistics and variability detection modules of the Gaia
variability pipeline. Corrections for interstellar extinction are not
implemented in this article. Gaia enables the first investigation of Galactic
variable star populations across the CaMD on a similar, if not larger, scale
than previously done in the Magellanic Clouds. Despite observed colours not
being reddening corrected, we clearly see distinct regions where variable stars
occur and determine variable star fractions to within Gaia's current detection
thresholds. Finally, we show the most complete description of
variability-induced motion within the CaMD to date. Gaia enables novel insights
into variability phenomena for an unprecedented number of stars, which will
benefit the understanding of stellar astrophysics. The CaMD of Galactic
variable stars provides crucial information on physical origins of variability
in a way previously accessible only for Galactic star clusters or external
galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.03919 [pdf] - 1885473
Gaia Data Release 2: All-sky classification of high-amplitude pulsating
stars
Rimoldini, L.;
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Roelens, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Regibo, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Plachy, E.;
Juhász, Á.;
Szabados, L.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Teyssier, D.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-11-09, last modified: 2019-05-14
More than half a million of the 1.69 billion sources in Gaia Data Release 2
(DR2) are published with photometric time series that exhibit light variations
during the 22 months of observation. An all-sky classification of common
high-amplitude pulsators (Cepheids, long-period variables, Delta Scuti / SX
Phoenicis, and RR Lyrae stars) is provided for stars with brightness variations
greater than 0.1 mag in G band. A semi-supervised classification approach was
employed, firstly training multi-stage random forest classifiers with sources
of known types in the literature, followed by a preliminary classification of
the Gaia data and a second training phase that included a selection of the
first classification results to improve the representation of some classes,
before the improved classifiers were applied to the Gaia data. Dedicated
validation classifiers were used to reduce the level of contamination in the
published results. A relevant fraction of objects were not yet sufficiently
sampled for reliable Fourier series decomposition, consequently classifiers
were based on features derived from statistics of photometric time series in
the G, BP, and RP bands, as well as from some astrometric parameters. The
published classification results include 195,780 RR Lyrae stars, 150,757
long-period variables, 8550 Cepheids, and 8882 Delta Scuti / SX Phoenicis
stars. All of these results represent candidates whose completeness and
contamination are described as a function of variability type and
classification reliability. Results are expressed in terms of class labels and
classification scores, which are available in the vari_classifier_result table
of the Gaia archive.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02079 [pdf] - 1911148
Gaia Data Release 2: Specific characterisation and validation of all-sky
Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Holl, B.;
Leccia, S.;
Marconi, M.;
Musella, I.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Eyer, L.;
De Ridder, J.;
Regibo, S.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Szabados, L.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-10-29
The Gaia second Data Release (DR2) presents a first mapping of full-sky RR
Lyrae stars and Cepheids observed by the spacecraft during the initial 22
months of science operations. The Specific Object Study (SOS) pipeline,
developed to validate and fully characterise Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars (SOS
Cep&RRL) observed by Gaia, has been presented in the documentation and papers
accompanying the Gaia first Data Release. Here we describe how the SOS pipeline
was modified to allow for processing the Gaia multiband (G, G_BP and G_RP) time
series photometry of all-sky candidate variables and produce specific results
for confirmed RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids that are published in the DR2
catalogue. The SOS Cep&RRL processing uses tools such as the period-amplitude
and the period-luminosity relations in the G band. For the analysis of the Gaia
DR2 candidates we also used tools based on the G_BP and G_RP photometry, such
as the period-Wesenheit relation in (G,G_RP). Multiband time series photometry
and characterisation by the SOS Cep&RRL pipeline are published in Gaia DR2 for
150,359 such variables (9,575 classified as Cepheids and 140,784 as RR Lyrae
stars) distributed all over the sky. The sample includes variables in 87
globular clusters and 14 dwarf galaxies. To the best of our knowledge, as of 25
April 2018, variability of 50,570 of these sources (350 Cepheids and 50,220 RR
Lyrae stars) is not known in the literature, hence likely they are new
discoveries by Gaia. An estimate of the interstellar absorption is published
for 54,272 fundamental-mode RR Lyrae stars from a relation based on the G-band
amplitude and the pulsation period. Metallicities derived from the Fourier
parameters of the light curves are also released for 64,932 RR Lyrae stars and
3,738 fundamental-mode classical Cepheids with period shorter than 6.3 days.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00747 [pdf] - 1799831
Gaia Data Release 2. Short-timescale variability processing and analysis
Roelens, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Guy, L.;
Holl, B.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2018-05-02, last modified: 2018-08-27
The Gaia DR2 sample of short-timescale variable candidates results from the
investigation of the first 22 months of Gaia photometry for a subsample of
sources at the Gaia faint end. For this exercise, we limited ourselves to the
case of suspected rapid periodic variability. Our study combines
fast-variability detection through variogram analysis, high-frequency search by
means of least-squares periodograms, and empirical selection based on the
investigation of specific sources seen through the Gaia eyes (e.g. known
variables or visually identified objects with peculiar features in their light
curves). The progressive definition and validation of this selection criterion
also benefited from supplementary ground-based photometric monitoring of a few
preliminary candidates, performed at the Flemish Mercator telescope (Canary
Islands, Spain) between August and November 2017. We publish a list of 3,018
short-timescale variable candidates, spread throughout the sky, with a
false-positive rate up to 10-20% in the Magellanic Clouds, and a more
significant but justifiable contamination from longer-period variables between
19% and 50%, depending on the area of the sky. Although its completeness is
limited to about 0.05%, this first sample of Gaia short-timescale variables
recovers some very interesting known short-period variables, such as
post-common envelope binaries or cataclysmic variables, and brings to light
some fascinating, newly discovered variable sources. In the perspective of
future Gaia data releases, several improvements of the short-timescale
variability processing are considered, by enhancing the existing variogram and
period-search algorithms or by classifying the identified candidates.
Nonetheless, the encouraging outcome of our Gaia DR2 analysis demonstrates the
power of this mission for such fast-variability studies, and opens great
perspectives for this domain of astrophysics.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02035 [pdf] - 1767420
Gaia Data Release 2: The first Gaia catalogue of long-period variable
candidates
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lorenz, D.;
Audard, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Regibo, S.;
Roelens, M.;
Sarro, L. M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-07-27
Gaia DR2 provides a unique all-sky catalogue of 550'737 variable stars, of
which 151'761 are long-period variable (LPV) candidates with G variability
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag (5-95% quantile range). About one-fifth of the
LPV candidates are Mira candidates, the majority of the rest are semi-regular
variable candidates. For each source, G, BP , and RP photometric time-series
are published, together with some LPV-specific attributes for the subset of
89'617 candidates with periods in G longer than 60 days. We describe this first
Gaia catalogue of LPV candidates, and present various validation checks.
Various samples of LPVs were used to validate the catalogue: a sample of
well-studied very bright LPVs with light curves from the AAVSO that are partly
contemporaneous with Gaia light curves, a sample of Gaia LPV candidates with
good parallaxes, the ASAS_SN catalogue of LPVs, and the OGLE catalogues of LPVs
towards the Magellanic Clouds and the Galactic bulge. The analyses of these
samples show a good agreement between Gaia DR2 and literature periods. The same
is globally true for bolometric corrections of M-type stars. The main
contaminant of our DR2 catalogue comes from young stellar objects (YSOs) in the
solar vicinity (within ~1 kpc), although their number in the whole catalogue is
only at the percent level. A cautionary note is provided about
parallax-dependent LPV attributes published in the catalogue. This first Gaia
catalogue of LPVs approximately doubles the number of known LPVs with
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag, despite the conservative candidate selection
criteria that prioritise low contamination over high completeness, and despite
the limited DR2 time coverage compared to the long periods characteristic of
LPVs. It also contains a small set of YSO candidates, which offers the
serendipitous opportunity to study these objects at an early stage of the Gaia
data releases.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09373 [pdf] - 1767409
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the variability processing & analysis
results
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Clementini, G.;
De Ridder, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Roelens, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Garofalo, A.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lopez, M.;
Molinaro, R.;
Muraveva, T.;
Panahi, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Aerts, C.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Charnas, J.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Busso, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
Glass, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Kochoska, A.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Leccia, S.;
Lorenz, D.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalk, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
Messina, S.;
Mignard, F.;
Moitinho, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Musella, I.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Ordóñez, D.;
Pagano, I.;
Palaversa, L.;
Pawlak, M.;
Plachy, E.;
Prša, A.;
Riello, M.;
Süveges, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Votruba, V.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-07-06
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): we summarise the processing and results of the
identification of variable source candidates of RR Lyrae stars, Cepheids, long
period variables (LPVs), rotation modulation (BY Dra-type) stars, delta Scuti &
SX Phoenicis stars, and short-timescale variables. In this release we aim to
provide useful but not necessarily complete samples of candidates.
The processed Gaia data consist of the G, BP, and RP photometry during the
first 22 months of operations as well as positions and parallaxes. Various
methods from classical statistics, data mining and time series analysis were
applied and tailored to the specific properties of Gaia data, as well as
various visualisation tools.
The DR2 variability release contains: 228'904 RR Lyrae stars, 11'438
Cepheids, 151'761 LPVs, 147'535 stars with rotation modulation, 8'882 delta
Scuti & SX Phoenicis stars, and 3'018 short-timescale variables. These results
are distributed over a classification and various Specific Object Studies (SOS)
tables in the Gaia archive, along with the three-band time series and
associated statistics for the underlying 550'737 unique sources. We estimate
that about half of them are newly identified variables. The variability type
completeness varies strongly as function of sky position due to the non-uniform
sky coverage and intermediate calibration level of this data. The probabilistic
and automated nature of this work implies certain completeness and
contamination rates which are quantified so that users can anticipate their
effects. This means that even well-known variable sources can be missed or
misidentified in the published data.
The DR2 variability release only represents a small subset of the processed
data. Future releases will include more variable sources and data products;
however, DR2 shows the (already) very high quality of the data and great
promise for variability studies.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00421 [pdf] - 1736369
Gaia Data Release 2: Rotational modulation in late-type dwarfs
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Distefano, E.;
Messina, S.;
Pagano, I.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, M. Audard G. J.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.
Submitted: 2018-05-01, last modified: 2018-06-27
We present the methods devised to identify the BY Dra variables candidates in
Gaia DR2 and infer their variability parameters. BY Dra candidates are
pre-selected from their position in the HR diagram, built from Gaia parallaxes,
$G$ magnitudes, and $(G_{BP} - G_{RP})$ colours. Since the time evolution of
the stellar active region can disrupt the coherence of the signal, segments not
much longer than their expected evolution timescale are extracted from the
entire photometric time-series and period search algorithms are applied to each
segment. For the Gaia DR2, we select sources having similar period in at least
two segments as candidates BY Dra. Results are further filtered considering the
time series phase coverage and the expected approximate light curve shape. Gaia
DR2 includes rotational periods and modulation amplitudes of 147 535 BY Dra
candidates. The data unveil the existence of two populations with distinctive
period and amplitude distributions. The sample covers 38% of the whole sky when
divided in bins (HEALPix) of $\approx$0.84 square degrees and we estimate that
represents 0.7 -- 5 % of all BY Dra stars potentially detectable by Gaia. The
preliminary data contained in Gaia DR2 illustrate the vast and unique
information that the mission is going to provide on stellar rotation and
magnetic activity. This information, complemented by Gaia exquisite parallaxes,
proper motions, and astrophysical parameter, is opening new and unique
perspectives for our understanding of the evolution of stellar angular momentum
and dynamo action.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10419 [pdf] - 1673155
Gaia confirms that SDSS J102915+172927 is a dwarf star
Bonifacio, P.;
Caffau, E.;
Spite, M.;
Spite, F.;
François, P.;
Zaggia, S.;
Arenou, F.;
Haigron, R.;
Leclerc, N.;
Marchal, O.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Plum, G.;
Sartoretti, P.
Submitted: 2018-04-27
The Gaia Data Release 2 provides a parallax of 0.734+/-0.073 mas for SDSS
J102915+172927, currently the most metal-poor known object. This parallax
implies that it is dwarf star, ruling out the scenario that it is a subgiant.
The subgiant scenario had as a corollary that the star had been formed in a
medium highly enriched in C, thus making line cooling efficient during the
collapse, that was also highly enriched in Fe by Type Ia SNe. This scenario can
also now be ruled out for this star, reinforcing the need of dust cooling and
fragmentation to explain its formation.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09369 [pdf] - 2097142
Gaia Radial Velocity Spectrometer
Cropper, M.;
Katz, D.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Chassat, F.;
Charvet, P.;
Boyadijan, J.;
Perryman, M.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.;
Erdmann, M.;
Munari, U.;
Zwitter, T.;
Wilkinson, M.;
Arenou, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Seabroke, G.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Benson, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Huckle, H.;
Smith, M.;
Dolding, C.;
Janßen, K.;
Viala, Y.;
Blomme, R.;
Baker, S.;
Boudreault, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Soubiran, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guy, L. P.;
Turon, C.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Thévenin, F.;
David, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Damerdji, Y.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
This paper presents the specification, design, and development of the Radial
Velocity Spectrometer (RVS) on the European Space Agency's Gaia mission.
Starting with the rationale for the full six dimensions of phase space in the
dynamical modelling of the Galaxy, the scientific goals and derived top-level
instrument requirements are discussed, leading to a brief description of the
initial concepts for the instrument. The main part of the paper is a
description of the flight RVS, considering the optical design, the focal plane,
the detection and acquisition chain, and the as-built performance drivers and
critical technical areas. After presenting the pre-launch performance
predictions, the paper concludes with the post-launch developments and
mitigation strategies, together with a summary of the in-flight performance at
the end of commissioning.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09371 [pdf] - 1732650
Gaia Data Release 2: Processing the spectroscopic data
Sartoretti, P.;
Katz, D.;
Cropper, M.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Viala, Y.;
Benson, K.;
Blomme, R.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine, A.;
Huckle, H.;
Smith, M.;
Baker, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Damerdji, Y.;
David, M.;
Dolding, C.;
Fremat, Y.;
Gosset, E.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Janssen, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Plum, G.;
Soubiran, C.;
Thevenin, F.;
Ajaj, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Babusiaux, C.;
Boudreault, S.;
Chemin, L.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Fabre, C.;
Gueguen, A.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Lasne, Y.;
Meynadier, F.;
Pailler, F.;
Panem, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Royer, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Arenou, F.;
Gomez, A.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Leclerc, N.;
Morel, T.;
Munari, U.;
Turon, C.;
Zerjal, M.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The Gaia Data Release 2 contains the 1st release of radial velocities
complementing the kinematic data of a sample of about 7 million relatively
bright, late-type stars. Aims: This paper provides a detailed description of
the Gaia spectroscopic data processing pipeline, and of the approach adopted to
derive the radial velocities presented in DR2. Methods: The pipeline must
perform four main tasks: (i) clean and reduce the spectra observed with the
Radial Velocity Spectrometer (RVS); (ii) calibrate the RVS instrument,
including wavelength, straylight, line-spread function, bias non-uniformity,
and photometric zeropoint; (iii) extract the radial velocities; and (iv) verify
the accuracy and precision of the results. The radial velocity of a star is
obtained through a fit of the RVS spectrum relative to an appropriate synthetic
template spectrum. An additional task of the spectroscopic pipeline was to
provide 1st-order estimates of the stellar atmospheric parameters required to
select such template spectra. We describe the pipeline features and present the
detailed calibration algorithms and software solutions we used to produce the
radial velocities published in DR2. Results: The spectroscopic processing
pipeline produced median radial velocities for Gaia stars with narrow-band
near-IR magnitude Grvs < 12 (i.e. brighter than V~13). Stars identified as
double-lined spectroscopic binaries were removed from the pipeline, while
variable stars, single-lined, and non-detected double-lined spectroscopic
binaries were treated as single stars. The scatter in radial velocity among
different observations of a same star, also published in DR2, provides
information about radial velocity variability. For the hottest (Teff > 7000 K)
and coolest (Teff < 3500 K) stars, the accuracy and precision of the stellar
parameter estimates are not sufficient to allow selection of appropriate
templates. [Abridged]
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09372 [pdf] - 1838132
Gaia Data Release 2: Properties and validation of the radial velocities
Katz, D.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Cropper, M.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Viala, Y.;
Benson, K.;
Blomme, R.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine, A.;
Huckle, H.;
Smith, M.;
Baker, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Damerdji, Y.;
David, M.;
Dolding, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
Gosset, E.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Janßen, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Plum, G.;
Soubiran, C.;
Thévenin, F.;
Ajaj, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Babusiaux, C.;
Boudreault, S.;
Chemin, L.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Fabre, C.;
Gueguen, A.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Lasne, Y.;
Meynadier, F.;
Pailler, F.;
Panem, C.;
Royer, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Arenou, F.;
Bossini, D.;
Gomez, A.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Leclerc, N.;
Morel, T.;
Munari, U.;
Turon, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Žerjal, M.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
For Gaia DR2 (GDR2), 280 million spectra, collected by the RVS instrument
on-board Gaia, were processed and median radial velocities were derived for 9.8
million sources brighter than Grvs = 12 mag. This paper describes the
validation and properties of the median radial velocities published in GDR2.
Quality tests and filters are applied to select, from the 9.8 million radial
velocities, those with the quality to be published in GDR2. The accuracy of the
selected sample is assessed with respect to ground-based catalogues. Its
precision is estimated using both ground-based catalogues and the distribution
of the Gaia radial velocity uncertainties. GDR2 contains median radial
velocities for 7 224 631 stars, with Teff in the range [3550, 6900] K, which
passed succesfully the quality tests. The published median radial velocities
provide a full sky-coverage and have a completness with respect to the
astrometric data of 77.2\% (for $G \leq 12.5$ mag). The median radial velocity
residuals with respect to the ground-based surveys vary from one catalogue to
another, but do not exceed a few 100s m/s. In addition, the Gaia radial
velocities show a positive trend as a function of magnitude, which starts
around Grvs $\sim 9$ mag and reaches about $+500$ m/s at Grvs $= 11.75$ mag.
The overall precision, estimated from the median of the Gaia radial velocity
uncertainties, is 1.05 km/s. The radial velocity precision is function of many
parameters, in particular the magnitude and effective temperature. For bright
stars, Grvs in [4, 8] mag, the precision is in the range 200-350 m/s, which is
about 3 to 5 times more precise than the pre-launch specification of 1 km/s. At
the faint end, Grvs = 11.75 mag, the precisions for Teff = 5000 K and 6500 K
are respectively 1.4 km/s and 3.7 km/s.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09830 [pdf] - 1732659
Gaia Data Release 2. Calibration and mitigation of electronic offset
effects in the data
Hambly, N. C.;
Cropper, M.;
Boudreault, S.;
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Dolding, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Collins, R.;
Cross, N.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Baker, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Marchal, O.;
Katz, D.;
de Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
Riello, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Els, S.;
Corcione, L.;
Masana, E.;
Luri, X.;
Chassat, F.;
Fusero, F.;
Pasquier, J. F.;
Vetel, C.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The European Space Agency Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2 in
December 2013. This ambitious mission has strict requirements on residual
systematic errors resulting from instrumental corrections in order to meet a
design goal of sub-10 microarcsecond astrometry. During the design and build
phase of the science instruments, various critical calibrations were studied in
detail to ensure that this goal could be met in orbit. In particular, it was
determined that the video-chain offsets on the analogue side of the
analogue-to-digital conversion electronics exhibited instabilities that could
not be mitigated fully by modifications to the flight hardware. We provide a
detailed description of the behaviour of the electronic offset levels on
microsecond timescales, identifying various systematic effects that are known
collectively as offset non-uniformities. The effects manifest themselves as
transient perturbations on the gross zero-point electronic offset level that is
routinely monitored as part of the overall calibration process. Using in-orbit
special calibration sequences along with simple parametric models, we show how
the effects can be calibrated, and how these calibrations are applied to the
science data. While the calibration part of the process is relatively
straightforward, the application of the calibrations during science data
processing requires a detailed on-ground reconstruction of the readout timing
of each charge-coupled device (CCD) sample on each device in order to predict
correctly the highly time-dependent nature of the corrections. We demonstrate
the effectiveness of our offset non-uniformity models in mitigating the effects
in Gaia data. We demonstrate for all CCDs and operating instrument and modes on
board Gaia that the video-chain noise-limited performance is recovered in the
vast majority of science samples.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09370 [pdf] - 1736358
Gaia Data Release 2: The catalogue of radial velocity standard stars
Soubiran, C.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Chemin, L.;
Zurbach, C.;
Brouillet, N.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Katz, D.;
Campion, J. -F. Le;
Marchal, O.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Thévenin, F.;
Crifo, F.;
Udry, S.;
Cropper, M.;
Seabroke, G.;
Viala, Y.;
Benson, K.;
Blomme, R.;
Jean-Antoine, A.;
Huckle, H.;
Smith, M.;
Baker, S. G.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dolding, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
Gosset, E.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Janßen, K.;
Plum, G.;
Fabre, C.;
Lasne, Y.;
Pailler, F.;
Panem, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Royer, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Zwitter, T.;
Gueguen, A.;
Turon, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Aims. The Radial Velocity Spectrometer (RVS) on board the ESA satellite
mission Gaia has no calibration device. Therefore, the radial velocity zero
point needs to be calibrated with stars that are proved to be stable at a level
of 300 m/s during the Gaia observations. Methods. We compiled a dataset of
~71000 radial velocity measurements from five high-resolution spectrographs. A
catalogue of 4813 stars was built by combining these individual measurements.
The zero point was established using asteroids. Results. The resulting
catalogue has seven observations per star on average on a typical time baseline
of six years, with a median standard deviation of 15 m/s. A subset of the most
stable stars fulfilling the RVS requirements was used to establish the radial
velocity zero point provided in Gaia Data Release 2. The stars that were not
used for calibration are used to validate the RVS data.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.04079 [pdf] - 1664617
All-sky RR Lyrae Stars in the Gaia Data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Holl, Berry;
Audard, Marc;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Marchal, Olivier;
Clementini, Gisella;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Garofalo, Alessia;
Molinaro, Roberto;
Muraveva, Tatiana;
Poretti, Ennio;
Molnár, László;
Plachy, Emese;
Juhász, Áron L.;
Szabados, László;
De Ridder, Joris;
Regibo, Sara;
Baro, Luis Manuel Sarro;
del Fresno, Mauro López
Submitted: 2018-04-11
The second Gaia data release is expected to contain data products from about
22 months of observation. Based on these data, we aim to provide an advance
publication of a full-sky Gaia map of RR Lyrae stars. Although comprehensive,
these data still contain a significant fraction of sources which are
insufficiently sampled for Fourier series decomposition of the periodic light
variations. The challenges in the identification of RR Lyrae candidates with
(much) fewer than 20 field-of-view transits are described. General
considerations of the results, their limitations, and interpretation are
presented together with prospects for improvement in subsequent Gaia data
releases.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.03575 [pdf] - 1479497
The Milky Way's halo in 6D: Gaia's Radial Velocity Spectrometer
performance
Seabroke, George;
Cropper, Mark;
Katz, David;
Sartoretti, Paola;
Panuzzo, Pasquale;
Marchal, Olivier;
Gueguen, Alain;
Benson, Kevin;
Dolding, Chris;
Huckle, Howard;
Smith, Mike;
Baker, Steve
Submitted: 2016-09-12
Gaia's Radial Velocity Spectrometer (RVS) has been operating in routine phase
for over one year since initial commissioning. RVS continues to work well but
the higher than expected levels of straylight reduce the limiting magnitude.
The end-of-mission radial-velocity (RV) performance requirement for G2V stars
was 15 km/s at V = 16.5 mag. Instead, 15 km/s precision is achieved at 15 < V <
16 mag, consistent with simulations that predict a loss of 1.4 mag. Simulations
also suggest that changes to Gaia's onboard software could recover ~0.14 mag of
this loss. Consequently Gaia's onboard software was upgraded in April 2015. The
status of this new commissioning period is presented, as well as the latest
scientific performance of the on-ground processing of RVS spectra. We
illustrate the implications of the RVS limiting magnitude on Gaia's view of the
Milky Way's halo in 6D using the Gaia Universe Model Snapshot (GUMS).
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.3729 [pdf] - 1215653
Gaia on-board metrology: basic angle and best focus
Mora, A.;
Biermann, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Busonero, D.;
Carminati, L.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Chassat, F.;
Erdmann, M.;
Gielesen, W. L. M.;
Jordi, C.;
Katz, D.;
Kohley, R.;
Lindegren, L.;
Loeffler, W.;
Marchal, O.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Seabroke, G.;
Sahlmann, J.;
Serpell, E.;
Serraller, I.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
van Reeven, W.;
Dool, T. C. van den;
Vosteen, L. L. A.
Submitted: 2014-07-14
The Gaia payload ensures maximum passive stability using a single material,
SiC, for most of its elements. Dedicated metrology instruments are, however,
required to carry out two functions: monitoring the basic angle and refocusing
the telescope. Two interferometers fed by the same laser are used to measure
the basic angle changes at the level of $\mu$as (prad, micropixel), which is
the highest level ever achieved in space. Two Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors,
combined with an ad-hoc analysis of the scientific data are used to define and
reach the overall best-focus. In this contribution, the systems, data analysis,
procedures and performance achieved during commissioning are presented