sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Mao, Tian-Xiang

Normalized to: Mao, T.

2 article(s) in total. 12 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.10218  [pdf] - 2053456
Baryon acoustic oscillations reconstruction using convolutional neural networks
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-02-24
Here we propose a new scheme to reconstruct the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) signal, with key cosmological information, based on deep convolutional neural networks. After training the network with almost no fine-tuning, in the test set, the network recovers large-scale modes accurately: the correlation coefficient between the ground truth and recovered initial conditions still reach $90\%$ at $k \leq 0.2~ h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, which significantly improves the BAO signal-to-noise ratio until the scale $k=0.4~ h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$. Furthermore, our scheme is independent of the survey boundary since it reconstructs initial condition based on local density distribution in configuration space, which means that we can gain more information from the whole survey space. Finally, we found our trained network is not sensitive to the cosmological parameters and works very well in those cosmologies close to that of our training set. This new scheme will possibly help us dig out more information from the current, on-going and future galaxy surveys.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.01400  [pdf] - 1674716
Resolution of the apparent discrepancy between the number of massive subhaloes in Abell 2744 and {\Lambda}CDM
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS Letter
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-01
Schwinn et al. (2017) have recently compared the abundance and distribution of massive substructures identified in a gravitational lensing analysis of Abell 2744 by Jauzac et al. (2016) and N-body simulation and found no cluster in {\Lambda}CDM simulation that is similar to Abell 2744. Schwinn et al.(2017) identified the measured projected aperture masses with the actual masses associated with subhaloes in the MXXL N-body simulation. We have used the high resolution Phoenix cluster simulations to show that such an identification is incorrect: the aperture mass is dominated by mass in the body of the cluster that happens to be projected along the line-of-sight to the subhalo. This enhancement varies from factors of a few to factors of more than 100, particularly for subhaloes projected near the centre of the cluster. We calculate aperture masses for subhaloes in our simulation and compare them to the measurements for Abell 2744. We find that the data for Abell 2744 are in excellent agreement with the matched predictions from {\Lambda}CDM. We provide further predictions for aperture mass functions of subhaloes in idealized surveys with varying mass detection thresholds.