Normalized to: Mancinelli, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9411022 [pdf] - 92004
Local Nonlinear Approximations to the Growth of Cosmic Structures
Submitted: 1994-11-06
Local nonlinear approximations to the growth of cosmic perturbations are
developed, resulting in relations, at a given epoch, between the peculiar
velocity and gravity fields and their gradients. Only the equation of motion is
approximated, while mass conservation and the computation of the gravitational
field are treated exactly. The second-order relation is derived for arbitrary
geometry and cosmological parameters. Solutions are developed to fourth order
for laminar spherical perturbations in an Einstein-de Sitter universe, but the
gain in accuracy for higher orders is modest. All orders become comparable when
the peculiar kinetic energy per unit mass equals the peculiar potential,
typically at relative density perturbations, $\delta \sim 4$. The general
second-order relation, while implicit, is simple to solve. \nbody\ simulations
show that it provides moderate gains in accuracy over other local
approximations. It can therefore be easily applied in the comparison of
large-scale structures and velocities in the quasi-linear regime, $\delta \sim
1 - 4$, as well as in the reconstruction of the primordial perturbations from
which they grew.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9310038 [pdf] - 91010
On Nonlinear Approximations to Cosmic Problems with Mixed Boundary
Conditions
Submitted: 1993-10-20
Nonlinear approximations to problems with mixed boundary conditions are
useful for predicting large-scale streaming velocities from the density field,
or vice-versa. We evaluate the schemes of Bernardeau \cite{bernardeau92},
Gramann \cite{gramann93}, and Nusser \etal \cite{nusser91}, using smoothed
density and velocity fields obtained from $N$-body simulations of a CDM
universe. The approximation of Nusser \etal is overall the most accurate and
robust. For Gaussian smoothing of 1000\kms\ the mean error in the approximated
relative density perturbation, $\delta$, is smaller than 0.06, and the
dispersion is 0.1. The \rms\ error in the estimated velocity is smaller than
60\kms, and the dispersion is 40\kms. For smoothing of 500\kms\ these numbers
increase by about a factor $\sim 2$ for $\delta < 4-5$, but deteriorate at
higher densities. The other approximations are comparable to those of Nusser
\etal for smoothing of 1000\kms, but are much less successful for the smaller
smoothing of 500\kms.