Malygin, Eugene
Normalized to: Malygin, E.
2 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,5.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.10984 [pdf] - 2038350
Medium-band photometric reverberation mapping of AGNs at $0.1 < z <
0.8$. Techniques and sample
Submitted: 2019-11-21
The most popular method of the broad-line region size estimation in active
galactic nuclei (AGN) is the reverberation mapping based on measuring the time
delay between the continuum flux and the flux in the emission lines. In our
work, we apply the method of photometric reverberation mapping in mid-band
filters, adapted for observations on the 1-m Zeiss-1000 telescope of Special
Astrophysical Observatory of Russian Academy of Sciences, for the study of AGN
with broad lines in the range of redshifts $0.1 < z < 0.8$. This paper provides
a sample of 8 objects, describes the technique of observations and data
processing for 2 studied objects to demonstrate the stability of the used
method.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04073 [pdf] - 2026294
Photometric reverberation mapping of AGNs at 0.1 < z < 0.8: I.
Observational technique
Submitted: 2019-11-10
The improvement of the calibration relation for determining the size of the
broad-line region from the observed optical luminosity of active galactic
nuclei (AGN) is a necessary task to study fundamental parameters of distant
AGNs such as mass of the central supermassive black hole. The most popular
method of the BLR size estimation is the reverberation mapping based on
measuring the time delay between the continuum flux and the flux in the
emission lines. In our work, we apply the method of photometric reverberation
mapping in medium-band filters, adapted for observations at the Zeiss-1000
telescope of the SAO RAS, for the study of AGN with broad lines in the range of
redshifts $0.1 < z < 0.8$. This paper describes the technique of observations
and data processing, provides a sample of objects and demonstrates the
stability of the used method. As a preliminary result for 2MASX
J08535955+7700543 at $z=0.1$ we have obtained time delay estimates of $\tau
(ICCF)=32.2^{\pm10.6}$ days and $\tau(JAVELIN)=39.5_{-15.8}^{+23.0}$ days that
are consistent with each other and also within the accuracy of the existing
calibration relations.