Normalized to: Maksyutenko, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09720 [pdf] - 1871551
Desorption Kinetics and Binding Energies of Small Hydrocarbons
Submitted: 2019-03-22
Small hydrocarbons are an important organic reservoir in protostellar and
protoplanetary environments. Constraints on desorption temperatures and binding
energies of such hydrocarbons are needed for accurate predictions of where
these molecules exist in the ice vs. gas-phase during the different stages of
star and planet formation. Through a series of temperature programmed
desorption (TPD) experiments, we constrain the binding energies of 2 and
3-carbon hydrocarbons (C$_{2}$H$_{2}$ - acetylene, C$_{2}$H$_{4}$ - ethylene,
C$_{2}$H$_{6}$ - ethane, C$_{3}$H$_{4}$ - propyne, C$_{3}$H$_{6}$ - propene,
and C$_{3}$H$_{8}$ - propane) to 2200-4200 K in the case of pure amorphous
ices, to 2400-4400 K on compact amorphous H$_{2}$O, and to 2800-4700 K on
porous amorphous H$_{2}$O. The 3-carbon hydrocarbon binding energies are always
larger than the 2-carbon hydrocarbon binding energies. Within the 2- and
3-carbon hydrocarbon families, the alkynes (i.e., least-saturated) hydrocarbons
exhibit the largest binding energies, while the alkane and alkene binding
energies are comparable. Binding energies are $\sim$5-20% higher on water ice
substrates compared to pure ices, which is a small increase compared to what
has been measured for other volatile molecules such as CO and N$_{2}$. Thus in
the case of hydrocarbons, H$_{2}$O has a less pronounced effect on sublimation
front locations (i.e., snowlines) in protoplanetary disks.