Normalized to: Makela, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.13318 [pdf] - 2025660
On the Shock Source of Sustained Gamma-Ray Emission from the Sun
Submitted: 2019-07-31
It has recently been shown that the spatially and temporally extended
gamma-ray emission in solar eruptions are caused by greater than 300 MeV
protons precipitating on the Sun from shocks driven by coronal mass ejections
(CMEs). The gamma-rays result from the decay of neutral pions produced in the
proton-proton interaction when the greater than 300 MeV protons collide with
those in the chromosphere. The evidence comes from the close correlation
between the durations of the sustained gamma-ray emission (SGRE) and the
associated interplanetary (IP) type II radio bursts. In this paper, we provide
further evidence that support the idea that protons accelerated in IP shocks
driven by CMEs propagate toward the Sun, precipitate in the chromosphere to
produce the observed SGRE. We present the statistical properties of the SGRE
events and the associated CMEs, flares, and type II radio bursts. It is found
that the SGRE CMEs are similar to those associated with ground level
enhancement events. The CME speed is well correlated with the SGRE fluence.
High CME speed is an important requirement for the occurrence of SGRE, while
the flare size is not. Based on these results, we present a schematic model
illustrating the spatially and temporally extended nature of SGRE related to
the CME flux rope-shock structure.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.08958 [pdf] - 1770841
Fermi, Wind, and SOHO Observations of Sustained Gamma-Ray Emission from
the Sun
Submitted: 2018-10-21
We report on the linear relationship between the durations of two types of
electromagnetic emissions associated with shocks driven by coronal mass
ejections: sustained gamma-ray emission (SGRE) and interplanetary type II radio
bursts. The relationship implies that shocks accelerate about 10 keV electrons
(for type II bursts) and greater than 300 MeV protons (for SGRE) roughly over
the same duration. The SGRE events are from the Large Area Telescope (LAT) on
board the Fermi satellite, while the type II bursts are from the Radio and
Plasma Wave Experiment (WAVES) on board the Wind spacecraft. Here we consider
five SGRE events that were not included in a previous study of events with
longer duration (greater than 5 hours). The five events are selected by
relaxing the minimum duration to 3 hours. We found that some SGRE events had a
tail that seems to last until the end of the associated type II burst. We pay
special attention to the 2011 June 2 SGRE event that did not have a large solar
energetic particle event at Earth or at the STEREO spacecraft that was well
connected to the eruption. We suggest that the preceding CME acted as a
magnetic barrier that mirrored protons back to Sun.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.09906 [pdf] - 1737549
Extreme Kinematics of the 2017 September 10 Solar Eruption and the
Spectral Characteristics of the Associated Energetic Particles
Submitted: 2018-07-25, last modified: 2018-08-21
We report on the 2017 September 10 ground level enhancement (GLE) event
associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME) whose initial acceleration
(~9.1km s^-2) and initial speed (~4300 km/s) were among the highest observed in
the SOHO era. The GLE event was of low intensity (~4.4% above background) and
softer-than-average fluence spectrum. We suggest that poor connectivity
(longitudinal and latitudinal) of the source to Earth compounded by the weaker
ambient magnetic field contributed to these GLE properties. Events with similar
high initial speed either lacked GLE association or had softer fluence spectra.
The shock-formation height inferred from the metric type II burst was ~1.4 Rs,
consistent with other GLE events. The shock height at solar particle release
(SPR) was ~4.4+/-0.38 Rs, consistent with the parabolic relationship between
the shock height at SPR and source longitude. At SPR, the eastern flank of the
shock was observed in EUV projected on the disk near the longitudes
magnetically connected to Earth: W60 to W45.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10979 [pdf] - 1740087
Sun-to-Earth Propagation of the 2015 June 21 Coronal Mass Ejection
Revealed by Optical, EUV, and Radio Observations
Submitted: 2018-07-28, last modified: 2018-08-11
We investigate the propagation of the 2015 June 21 CME-driven shock as
revealed by the type II bursts at metric and longer wavelengths and coronagraph
observations. The CME was associated with the second largest geomagnetic storm
of solar cycle 24 and a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event. The
eruption consisted of two M-class flares, with the first one being confined,
with no metric or interplanetary radio bursts. However, there was intense
microwave burst, indicating accelerated particles injected toward the Sun. The
second flare was eruptive that resulted in a halo CME. The CME was deflected
primarily by an equatorial coronal hole that resulted in the modification of
the intensity profile of the associated SEP event and the duration of the CME
at Earth. The interplanetary type II burst was particularly intense and was
visible from the corona all the way to the vicinity of the Wind spacecraft with
fundamental-harmonic structure. We computed the shock speed using the type II
drift rates at various heliocentric distances and obtained information on the
evolution of the shock that matched coronagraph observations near the Sun and
in-situ observations near Earth. The depth of the geomagnetic storm is
consistent with the 1-AU speed of the CME and the magnitude of the southward
component.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.02544 [pdf] - 1732624
Long-term Solar Activity Studies using Microwave Imaging Observations
and Prediction for Cycle 25
Submitted: 2018-04-07
We use microwave imaging observations from the Nobeyama Radioheliograph at 17
GHz for long-term studies of solar activity. In particular, we use the polar
and low-latitude brightness temperatures as proxies to the polar magnetic field
and the active-regions, respectively. We also use the location of prominence
eruptions as a proxy to the filament locations as a function of time. We show
that the polar microwave brightness temperature is highly correlated with the
polar magnetic field strength and the fast solar wind speed. We also show that
the polar microwave brightness at one cycle is correlated with the low latitude
brightness with a lag of about half a solar cycle. We use this correlation to
predict the strength of the solar cycle: the smoothed sunspot numbers in the
southern and northern hemispheres can be predicted as 89 and 59, respectively.
These values indicate that cycle 25 will not be too different from cycle 24 in
its strength. We also combined the rush to the pole data from Nobeyama
prominences with historical data going back to 1860 to study the north-south
asymmetry of sign reversal at solar poles. We find that the reversal asymmetry
has a quasi-periodicity of 3-5 cycles.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.01114 [pdf] - 1751726
A Sun-to-Earth analysis of magnetic helicity of the 17-18 March 2013
interplanetary coronal mass ejection
Submitted: 2017-12-04
We compare the magnetic helicity in the 17-18 March 2013 interplanetary
coronal mass ejection (ICME) flux-rope at 1 AU and in its solar counterpart.
The progenitor coronal mass ejection (CME) erupted on 15 March 2013 from NOAA
active region 11692 and associated with an M1.1 flare. We derive the source
region reconnection flux using post-eruption arcade (PEA) method (Gopalswamy et
al. 2017a) that uses the photospheric magnetogram and the area under the PEA.
The geometrical properties of the near-Sun flux rope is obtained by
forward-modeling of white-light CME observations. Combining the geometrical
properties and the reconnection flux we extract the magnetic properties of the
CME flux rope (Gopalswamy et al. 2017b). We derive the magnetic helicity of the
flux rope using its magnetic and geometric properties obtained near the Sun and
at 1 AU. We use a constant-{\alpha} force-free cylindrical flux rope model fit
to the in situ observations in order to derive the magnetic and geometric
information of the 1-AU ICME. We find a good correspondence in both amplitude
and sign of the helicity between the ICME and the CME assuming a semi-circular
(half torus) ICME flux rope with a length of {\pi} AU. We find that about 83%
of the total flux rope helicity at 1 AU is injected by the magnetic
reconnection in the low corona. We discuss the effect of assuming flux rope
length in the derived value of the magnetic helicity. This study connecting the
helicity of magnetic flux ropes through the Sun-Earth system has important
implications for the origin of helicity in the interplanetary medium and the
topology of ICME flux ropes at 1 AU and hence their space weather consequences.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.08171 [pdf] - 1502140
Energy Dependence of SEP Electron and Proton Onset Times
Submitted: 2016-09-26
We study the large solar energetic particle (SEP) events that were detected
by GOES in the $>$ 10 MeV energy channel during December 2006 to March 2014. We
derive and compare solar particle release (SPR) times for the 0.25--10.4 MeV
electrons and 10--100 MeV protons for the 28 SEP events. In the study, the
electron SPR times are derived with the time-shifting analysis (TSA) and the
proton SPR times are derived using both the TSA and the velocity dispersion
analysis (VDA). Electron anisotropies are computed to evaluate the amount of
scattering for the events under study. Our main results include:
1)near-relativistic electrons and high-energy protons are released at the same
time within 8 min for most (16 of 23) SEP events. 2)There exists a good
correlation between electron and proton acceleration, peak intensity and
intensity time profiles. 3) The TSA SPR times for 90.5 MeV and 57.4 MeV protons
have maximum errors of 6 min and 10 min compared to the proton VDA release
times, respectively, while the maximum error for 15.4 MeV protons can reach to
32 min. 4) For 7 low-intensity events of the 23, large delays occurred between
6.5 MeV electrons and 90.5 MeV protons relative to 0.5 MeV electrons. Whether
these delays are due to times needed for the evolving shock to be strengthened
or due to particle transport effects remains unresolved.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.01603 [pdf] - 1259978
The Mild Space Weather in Solar Cycle 24
Submitted: 2015-08-07
The space weather is extremely mild during solar cycle 24: the number of
major geomagnetic storms and high-energy solar energetic particle events are at
the lowest since the dawn of the space age. Solar wind measurements at 1 AU
using Wind and ACE instruments have shown that there is a significant drop in
the density, magnetic field, total pressure, and Alfven speed in the inner
heliosphere as a result of the low solar activity. The drop in large space
weather events is disproportionately high because the number of energetic
coronal mass ejections that cause these events has not decreased significantly.
For example, the rate of halo CMEs, which is a good indicator of energetic
CMEs, is similar to that in cycle 23, even though the sunspot number has
declined by about 40%. The mild space weather seems to be a consequence of the
anomalous expansion of CMEs due to the low ambient pressure in the heliosphere.
The anomalous expansion results in the dilution of the magnetic contents of
CMEs, so the geomagnetic storms are generally weak. CME driven shocks
propagating through the weak heliospheric field are less efficient in
accelerating energetic particles, so the particles do not attain high energies.
Finally, we would like to point out that extreme events such as the 2012 July
23 CMEs that occurred on the backside of the Sun and did not affect Earth
except for a small proton event.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.06162 [pdf] - 1300240
High-energy solar particle events in cycle 24
Submitted: 2015-07-22
The Sun is already in the declining phase of cycle 24, but the paucity of
high-energy solar energetic particle (SEP) events continues with only two
ground level enhancement (GLE) events as of March 31, 2015. In an attempt to
understand this, we considered all the large SEP events of cycle 24 that
occurred until the end of 2014. We compared the properties of the associated
CMEs with those in cycle 23. We found that the CME speeds in the sky plane were
similar, but almost all those cycle-24 CMEs were halos. A significant fraction
of (16%) of the frontside SEP events were associated with eruptive prominence
events. CMEs associated with filament eruption events accelerate slowly and
attain peak speeds beyond the typical GLE release heights. When we considered
only western hemispheric events that had good connectivity to the CME nose,
there were only 8 events that could be considered as GLE candidates. One turned
out to be the first GLE event of cycle 24 (2012 May 17). In two events, the
CMEs were very fast (>2000 km/s) but they were launched into a tenuous medium
(high Alfven speed). In the remaining five events, the speeds were well below
the typical GLE CME speed (~2000 km/s). Furthermore, the CMEs attained their
peak speeds beyond the typical heights where GLE particles are released. We
conclude that several factors contribute to the low rate of high-energy SEP
events in cycle 24: (i) reduced efficiency of shock acceleration (weak
heliospheric magnetic field), (ii) poor latitudinal and longitudinal
connectivity), and (iii) variation in local ambient conditions (e.g., high
Alfven speed).
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.00709 [pdf] - 1154883
Large Solar Energetic Particle Events Associated with Filament Eruptions
Outside of Active Regions
Submitted: 2015-04-02
We report on four large filament eruptions (FEs) from solar cycles 23 and 24
that were associated with large solar energetic particle (SEP) events and
interplanetary type II radio bursts. The post-eruption arcades corresponded to
mostly C-class soft X-ray enhancements, but an M1.0 flare was associated with
one event. However, the associated coronal mass ejections (CMEs) were fast
(speeds about 1000 km/s) and appeared as halo CMEs in the coronagraph field of
view. The interplanetary type II radio bursts occurred over a wide wavelength
range indicating the existence of strong shocks throughout the inner
heliosphere. No metric type II bursts were present in three events, indicating
that the shocks formed beyond 2 to 3 Rs. In one case, there was a metric type
II burst with low starting frequency indicating a shock formation height of
about 2 Rs. The FE-associated SEP events did have softer spectra (spectral
index greater than 4) in the 10 to 100 MeV range, but there were other
low-intensity SEP events with spectral indices >/=4. Some of these events are
likely FE-SEP events, but were not classified so in the literature because they
occurred close to active regions. Some were definitely associated with large
active region flares, but the shock formation height was large. We definitely
find a diminished role for flares and complex type III burst durations in these
large SEP events. Fast CMEs and shock formation at larger distances from the
Sun seem to be the primary characteristics of the FE-associated SEP events.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.3617 [pdf] - 1216327
Major Solar Eruptions and High Energy Particle Events during Solar Cycle
24
Submitted: 2014-08-15
We report on a study of all major solar eruptions that occurred on the
front-side of the Sun during the rise to peak phase of cycle 24 (first 62
months) in order to understand the key factors affecting the occurrence of
large solar energetic particle events (SEPs) and the ground levels enhancement
(GLE) events. The eruptions involve major flares with soft X-ray peak flux >/=
5.0 x10-5 Wm-2 (i.e., flare size >/= M5.0) and accompanying coronal mass
ejections (CMEs). The selection criterion was based on the fact that the only
front-side GLE in cycle 24 (GLE 71) had a flare size of M5.1. Only ~37% of the
major eruptions from the western hemisphere resulted in large SEP events.
Almost the same number of large SEP events was produced in weaker eruptions
(flare size <M5.0), suggesting that the soft X-ray flare is not a good
indicator of SEP or GLE events. On the other hand, the CME speed is a better
indicator of SEP and GLE events because it is consistently high supporting the
shock acceleration mechanism for SEPs and GLEs. We found the CME speed,
magnetic connectivity to Earth, and ambient conditions as the main factors that
contribute to the lack of high energy particle events during cycle 24. Several
eruptions poorly connected to Earth (eastern-hemisphere or behind-the-west-limb
events) resulted in very large SEP events detected by the STEREO spacecraft.
Some very fast CMEs, likely to have accelerated particles to GeV energies, did
not result in a GLE event because of poor latitudinal connectivity. The
stringent latitudinal requirement suggests that the highest energy particles
are likely accelerated in the nose part of shocks. There were also
well-connected fast CMEs, which did not seem to have accelerated high energy
particles due to possible unfavorable ambient conditions (high Alfven speed,
overall reduction in acceleration efficiency in cycle 24).
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.7172 [pdf] - 1215265
Ground Level Enhancement in the 2014 January 6 Solar Energetic Particle
Event
Submitted: 2014-06-27, last modified: 2014-06-30
We present a study of the 2014 January 6 solar energetic particle (SEP)
event, which produced a small ground level enhancement (GLE), making it the
second GLE of this unusual solar cycle 24. This event was primarily observed by
the South Pole neutron monitors (increase of ~2.5%) whereas a few other neutron
monitors recorded smaller increases. The associated coronal mass ejection (CME)
originated behind the western limb and had the speed of 1960 km/s. The height
of the CME at the start of the associated metric type II radio burst, which
indicates the formation of a strong shock, was measured to be 1.61 Rs using a
direct image from STEREO-A/EUVI. The CME height at the time of GLE particle
release (determined using the South Pole neutron monitor data) was directly
measured as 2.96 Rs, from the STEREO-A/COR1 white-light observations. These CME
heights are consistent with those obtained for the GLE71, the only other GLE of
the current cycle as well as cycle-23 GLEs derived using back-extrapolation.
GLE72 is of special interest because it is one of the only two GLEs of cycle
24, one of the two behind-the-limb GLEs and one of the two smallest GLEs of
cycles 23 and 24.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.8506 [pdf] - 740560
Latitudinal Connectivity of Ground Level Enhancement Events
Submitted: 2013-10-31
We examined the source regions and coronal environment of the historical
ground level enhancement (GLE) events in search of evidence for non-radial
motion of the associated coronal mass ejection (CME). For the 13 GLE events
that had source latitudes >30 degrees we found evidence for possible non-radial
CME motion due to deflection by large-scale magnetic structures in nearby
coronal holes, streamers, or pseudo streamers. Polar coronal holes are the main
source of deflection in the rise and declining phases of solar cycles. In the
maximum phase, deflection by large-scale streamers or pseudo streamers
overlying high-latitude filaments seems to be important. The B0 angle reduced
the ecliptic distance of some GLE source regions and increased in others with
the net result that the average latitude of GLE events did not change
significantly. The non-radial CME motion is the dominant factor that reduces
the ecliptic distance of GLE source regions, thereby improving the latitudinal
connectivity to Earth. We further infer that the GLE particles must be
accelerated at the nose part of the CME-driven shocks, where the shock is
likely to be quasi-parallel.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.1251 [pdf] - 1165041
A Multiwavelength Study of Eruptive Events on January 23, 2012
Associated with a Major Solar Energetic Particle Event
Joshi, N. C.;
Uddin, W.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Chandra, R.;
Gopalswamy, N.;
Manoharan, P. K.;
Aschwanden, M. J.;
Choudhary, D. P.;
Jain, R.;
Nitta, N. V.;
Xie, H.;
Yashiro, S.;
Akiyama, S.;
Makela, P.;
Kayshap, P.;
Awasthi, A. K.;
Dwivedi, V. C.;
Mahalakshmi, K.
Submitted: 2013-03-05
We use multiwavelength data from space and ground based instruments to study
the solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) on January 23, 2012 that
were responsible for one of the largest solar energetic particle (SEP) events
of solar cycle 24. The eruptions consisting of two fast CMEs (1400 km/s and
2000 km/s) and M-class flares that occurred in active region 11402 located at
N28 W36. The two CMEs occurred in quick successions, so they interacted very
close to the Sun. The second CME caught up with the first one at a distance of
11-12 Rsun. The CME interaction may be responsible for the elevated SEP flux
and significant changes in the intensity profile of the SEP event. The compound
CME resulted in a double-dip moderate geomagnetic storm (Dst = -73 nT). The two
dips are due to the southward component of the interplanetary magnetic field in
the shock sheath and the ICME intervals. One possible reason for the lack of a
stronger geomagnetic storm may be that the ICME delivered a glancing blow to
Earth.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.0021 [pdf] - 1124513
Radio-loud CMEs from the disk center lacking shocks at 1 AU
Submitted: 2012-06-29
A coronal mass ejection (CME) associated with a type II burst and originating
close to the center of the solar disk typically results in a shock at Earth in
2-3 days and hence can be used to predict shock arrival at Earth. However, a
significant fraction (about 28%) of such CMEs producing type II bursts were not
associated with shocks at Earth. We examined a set of 21 type II bursts
observed by the Wind/WAVES experiment at decameter-hectometric (DH) wavelengths
that had CME sources very close to the disk center (within a central meridian
distance of 30 degrees), but did not have a shock at Earth. We find that the
near-Sun speeds of these CMEs average to ~644 km/s, only slightly higher than
the average speed of CMEs associated with radio-quiet shocks. However, the
fraction of halo CMEs is only ~30%, compared to 54% for the radio-quiet shocks
and 91% for all radio-loud shocks. We conclude that the disk-center radio-loud
CMEs with no shocks at 1 AU are generally of lower energy and they drive shocks
only close to the Sun and dissipate before arriving at Earth. There is also
evidence for other possible processes that lead to the lack of shock at 1 AU:
(i) overtaking CME shocks merge and one observes a single shock at Earth, and
(ii) deflection by nearby coronal holes can push the shocks away from the
Sun-Earth line, such that Earth misses these shocks. The probability of
observing a shock at 1 AU increases rapidly above 60% when the CME speed
exceeds 1000 km/s and when the type II bursts propagate to frequencies below 1
MHz.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4719 [pdf] - 902849
Interplanetary shocks lacking type II radio bursts
Submitted: 2009-12-23, last modified: 2010-01-15
We report on the radio-emission characteristics of 222 interplanetary (IP)
shocks. A surprisingly large fraction of the IP shocks (~34%) is radio quiet
(i.e., the shocks lacked type II radio bursts). The CMEs associated with the RQ
shocks are generally slow (average speed ~535 km/s) and only ~40% of the CMEs
were halos. The corresponding numbers for CMEs associated with radio loud (RL)
shocks are 1237 km/s and 72%, respectively. The RQ shocks are also accompanied
by lower peak soft X-ray flux. CMEs associated with RQ (RL) shocks are
generally accelerating (decelerating). The kinematics of CMEs associated with
the km type II bursts is similar to those of RQ shocks, except that the former
are slightly more energetic. Comparison of the shock The RQ shocks seem to be
mostly subcritical and quasi-perpendicular. The radio-quietness is predominant
in the rise phase and decreases through the maximum and declining phases of
solar cycle 23. The solar sources of the shock-driving CMEs follow the sunspot
butterfly diagram, consistent with the higher-energy requirement for driving
shocks.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.2776 [pdf] - 1579291
Large Geomagnetic Storms Associated with Limb Halo Coronal Mass
Ejections
Submitted: 2009-03-16
Solar cycle 23 witnessed the observation of hundreds of halo coronal mass
ejections (CMEs), thanks to the high dynamic range and extended field of view
of the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) on board the Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) mission. More than two thirds of halo CMEs
originating on the front side of the Sun have been found to be geoeffective
(Dst =< -50 nT). The delay time between the onset of halo CMEs and the peak of
ensuing geomagnetic storms has been found to depend on the solar source
location (Gopalswamy et al., 2007). In particular, limb halo CMEs (source
longitude > 45deg) have a 20% shorter delay time on the average. It was
suggested that the geomagnetic storms due to limb halos must be due to the
sheath portion of the interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) so that the shorter delay
time can be accounted for. We confirm this suggestion by examining the sheath
and ejecta portions of ICMEs from Wind and ACE data that correspond to the limb
halos. Detailed examination showed that three pairs of limb halos were
interacting events. Geomagnetic storms following five limb halos were actually
produced by other disk halos. The storms followed by four isolated limb halos
and the ones associated with interacting limb halos, were all due to the sheath
portions of ICMEs.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.1087 [pdf] - 1001577
Coronal Mass Ejections from Sunspot and non-Sunspot Regions
Submitted: 2009-03-05
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) originate from closed magnetic field regions on
the Sun, which are active regions and quiescent filament regions. The energetic
populations such as halo CMEs, CMEs associated with magnetic clouds,
geoeffective CMEs, CMEs associated with solar energetic particles and
interplanetary type II radio bursts, and shock-driving CMEs have been found to
originate from sunspot regions. The CME and flare occurrence rates are found to
be correlated with the sunspot number, but the correlations are significantly
weaker during the maximum phase compared to the rise and declining phases. We
suggest that the weaker correlation results from high-latitude CMEs from the
polar crown filament regions that are not related to sunspots.