Normalized to: Majer, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.07118 [pdf] - 1698052
Reconstruction of the two-dimensional gravitational potential of galaxy
clusters from X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich measurements
Tchernin, C.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Huber, K.;
Dekel, A.;
Hurier, G.;
Majer, C. L.;
Meyer, S.;
Zinger, E.;
Eckert, D.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Merten, J.
Submitted: 2018-02-20
The mass of galaxy clusters is not a direct observable, nonetheless it is
commonly used to probe cosmological models. Based on the combination of all
main cluster observables, that is, the X-ray emission, the thermal
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signal, the velocity dispersion of the cluster
galaxies, and gravitational lensing, the gravitational potential of galaxy
clusters can be jointly reconstructed. We derive the two main ingredients
required for this joint reconstruction: the potentials individually
reconstructed from the observables and their covariance matrices, which act as
a weight in the joint reconstruction. We show here the method to derive these
quantities. The result of the joint reconstruction applied to a real cluster
will be discussed in a forthcoming paper. We apply the Richardson-Lucy
deprojection algorithm to data on a two-dimensional (2D) grid. We first test
the 2D deprojection algorithm on a $\beta$-profile. Assuming hydrostatic
equilibrium, we further reconstruct the gravitational potential of a simulated
galaxy cluster based on synthetic SZ and X-ray data. We then reconstruct the
projected gravitational potential of the massive and dynamically active cluster
Abell 2142, based on the X-ray observations collected with XMM-Newton and the
SZ observations from the Planck satellite. Finally, we compute the covariance
matrix of the projected reconstructed potential of the cluster Abell 2142 based
on the X-ray measurements collected with XMM-Newton. The gravitational
potentials of the simulated cluster recovered from synthetic X-ray and SZ data
are consistent, even though the potential reconstructed from X-rays shows
larger deviations from the true potential. Regarding Abell 2142, the projected
gravitational cluster potentials recovered from SZ and X-ray data reproduce
well the projected potential inferred from gravitational-lensing observations.
(abridged)
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.03080 [pdf] - 933068
Reconstructing the projected gravitational potential of Abell 1689 from
X-ray measurements
Submitted: 2015-01-13
Context. Galaxy clusters can be used as cosmological probes, but to this end,
they need to be thoroughly understood. Combining all cluster observables in a
consistent way will help us to understand their global properties and their
internal structure. Aims. We provide proof of the concept that the projected
gravitational potential of galaxy clusters can directly be reconstructed from
X-ray observations. We also show that this joint analysis can be used to
locally test the validity of the equilibrium assumptions in galaxy clusters.
Methods. We used a newly developed reconstruction method, based on
Richardson-Lucy deprojection, that allows reconstructing projected
gravitational potentials of galaxy clusters directly from X-ray observations.
We applied this algorithm to the well-studied cluster Abell 1689 and compared
the gravitational potential reconstructed from X-ray observables to the
potential obtained from gravitational lensing measurements. [...] Results.
Assuming spherical symmetry and hydrostatic equilibrium, the potentials
recovered from gravitational lensing and from X-ray emission agree very well
beyond 500 kpc. Owing to the fact that the Richardson-Lucy deprojection
algorithm allows deprojecting each line of sight independently, this result may
indicate that non-gravitational effects and/or asphericity are strong in the
central regions of the clusters. Conclusions. We demonstrate the robustness of
the potential reconstruction method based on the Richardson-Lucy deprojection
algorithm and show that gravitational lensing and X-ray emission lead to
consistent gravitational potentials. Our results illustrate the power of
combining galaxy-cluster observables in a single, non-parametric, joint
reconstruction of consistent cluster potentials that can be used to locally
constrain the physical state of the gas.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.7681 [pdf] - 1166284
Reconstructing the projected gravitational potential of galaxy clusters
from galaxy kinematics
Submitted: 2013-04-29
We develop a method for reconstructing the two-dimensional, projected
gravitational potential of galaxy clusters from observed line-of-sight velocity
dispersions of cluster galaxies. It is the third of an intended series of
papers aiming at a unique reconstruction method for cluster potentials
combining lensing, X-ray, Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and kinematic data. The observed
galaxy velocity dispersions are deprojected using the Richardson-Lucy
algorithm. The obtained radial velocity dispersions are then related to the
gravitational potential by using the tested assumption of a polytropic relation
between the effective galaxy pressure and the density. Once the gravitational
potential is obtained in three dimensions, projection along the line-of-sight
yields the two-dimensional potential. For simplicity we adopt spherical
symmetry and a known profile for the anisotropy parameter of the galaxy
velocity dispersions. We test the method with a numerically simulated galaxy
cluster and galaxies identified therein. We extract a projected
velocity-dispersion profile from the simulated cluster and pass it through our
algorithm, showing that the deviation between the true and the reconstructed
gravitational potential is less then 10% within approximately 1.2 Mpc/h from
the cluster centre.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.6522 [pdf] - 656181
Joint reconstruction of galaxy clusters from gravitational lensing and
thermal gas. II. Inversion of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect
Submitted: 2013-04-24
This paper continues a series in which we intend to show how all observables
of galaxy clusters can be combined to recover the two-dimensional, projected
gravitational potential of individual clusters. Our goal is to develop a
non-parametric algorithm for joint cluster reconstruction taking all cluster
observables into account. In this paper, we begin with the relation between the
Compton-y parameter and the Newtonian gravitational potential, assuming
hydrostatic equilibrium and a polytropic stratification of the intracluster
gas. We show how Richardson-Lucy deconvolution can be used to convert the
intensity change of the CMB due to the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect into
an estimate for the two-dimensional gravitational potential. Synthetic data
simulated with characteristics of the ALMA telescope show that the
two-dimensional potential of a cluster with mass 5*10^14 M_sun/h at redshift
0.2 is possible with an error of < 5% between the cluster centre and a radius r
< 0.9 Mpc/h.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.5443 [pdf] - 1166108
Joint reconstruction of galaxy clusters from gravitational lensing and
thermal gas I. Outline of a non-parametric method
Submitted: 2013-04-19
We present a method to estimate the lensing potential from massive galaxy
clusters for given observational X-ray data. The concepts developed and applied
in this work can easily be combined with other techniques to infer the lensing
potential, e.g. weak gravitational lensing or galaxy kinematics, to obtain an
overall best fit model for the lensing potential. After elaborating on the
physical details and assumptions the method is based on, we explain how the
numerical algorithm itself is implemented with a Richardson-Lucy algorithm as a
central part. Our reconstruction method is tested on simulated galaxy clusters
with a spherically symmetric NFW density profile filled with gas in hydrostatic
equilibrium. We describe in detail how these simulated observational data sets
are created and how they need to be fed into our algorithm. We test the
robustness of the algorithm against small parameter changes and estimate the
quality of the reconstructed lensing potentials. As it turns out we achieve a
very high degree of accuracy in reconstructing the lensing potential. The
statistical errors remain below 2.0% whereas the systematical error does not
exceed 1.0%.