Normalized to: Maizy, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.2520 [pdf] - 1053337
Optical dropout galaxies lensed by the cluster A2667
Laporte, Nicolas;
Pelló, Roser;
Schaerer, Daniel;
Richard, Johan;
Egami, Eiichi;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Borgne, Jean-François Le;
Maizy, Alexandre;
Boone, Frederic;
Hudelot, Patrick;
Mellier, Yannick
Submitted: 2011-04-13
We investigate the nature and the physical properties of z, Y and J-dropout
galaxies selected behind the lensing cluster A2667. This field is part of our
project aimed at identifying z~7-10 candidates accessible to spectroscopic
studies, based on deep photometry with ESO/VLT HAWK-I and FORS2 (zYJH and
Ks-band images, AB(3 sigma)~26-27) on a sample of lensing clusters extracted
from our multi-wavelength combined surveys with SPITZER, HST, and Herschel. In
this paper we focus on the complete Y and J-dropout sample, as well as the
bright z-dropouts fulfilling the selection criteria by Capak et al. (2011). 10
candidates are selected within the common field of ~33 arcmin2 (effective area
once corrected for contamination and lensing dilution). All of them are
detected in H and Ks bands in addition to J and/or IRAC 3.6/4.5, with
H(AB)~23.4 to 25.2, and have modest magnification factors. Although best-fit
photometric redshifts place all these candidates at high-z, the contamination
by low-z interlopers is estimated at 50-75% level based on previous studies,
and the comparison with the blank-field WIRCAM Ultra-Deep Survey (WUDS). The
same result is obtained when photometric redshifts include a luminosity prior,
allowing us to remove half of the original sample as likely z~1.7-3 interlopers
with young stellar pulations and strong extinction. Two additional sources
among the remaining sample could be identified at low-z based on a detection at
24 microns and on the HST z_850 band. These low-z interlopers are not well
described by current templates given the large break, and cannot be easily
identified based solely on optical and near-IR photometry. Given the estimated
dust extinction and high SFRs, some of them could be also detected in the IR or
sub-mm bands. After correction for likely contaminants, the observed counts at
z>7.5 seem to be in agreement with an evolving LF. (abridged)
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0910.4910 [pdf] - 1018096
Looking for the first galaxies: Lensing or blank fields?
Submitted: 2009-10-26
The identification and study of the first galaxies remains one of the most
exciting topics in observational cosmology. The determination of the best
possible observing strategies is a very important choice in order to build up a
representative sample of spectroscopically confirmed sources at high-z (z>7),
beyond the limits of present-day observations. This paper is intended to
precisely adress the relative efficiency of lensing and blank fields in the
identification and study of galaxies at 6<z<12. The detection efficiency and
field-to-field variance are estimated from direct simulations of both blank and
lensing fields observations. The presence of a strong-lensing cluster along the
line of sight has a dramatic effect on the number of observed sources, with a
positive magnification bias in typical ground-based ``shallow'' surveys
(AB<~25.5). The positive magnification bias increases with the redshift of
sources and decreases with both depth of the survey and the size of the
surveyed area. The maximum efficiency is reached for lensing clusters at
z~0.1-0.3. Observing blank fields in shallow surveys is particularly
inefficient as compared to lensing fields if the UV LF for LBGs is strongly
evolving at z>~7. Also in this case, the number of z>8 sources expected at the
typical depth of JWST (AB~28-29) is much higher in lensing than in blank fields
(e.g. a factor of ~10 for AB<~28). Blank field surveys with a large field of
view are needed to prove the bright end of the LF at z>6-7, whereas lensing
clusters are particularly useful for exploring the mid to faint end of the LF.