Normalized to: Mailyan, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.00051 [pdf] - 2117021
The Ups & Downs of Accreting X-Ray Pulsars: Decade-long observations
with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Submitted: 2020-03-31, last modified: 2020-06-17
We review more than 10 years of continuous monitoring of accreting X-ray
pulsars with the all-sky Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) aboard the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Our work includes data from the start of GBM
operations in August 2008, through to November 2019. Pulsations from 39
accreting pulsars are observed over an energy range of $10-50\,$keV by GBM. The
GBM Accreting Pulsars Program (GAPP) performs data reduction and analysis for
each accreting pulsar and makes histories of the pulse frequency and pulsed
flux publicly available. We examine in detail the spin histories, outbursts and
torque behaviors of the persistent and transient X-ray pulsars observed by GBM.
The spin period evolution of each source is analyzed in the context of
disk-accretion and quasi-spherical settling accretion driven torque models.
Long-term pulse frequency histories are also analyzed over the GBM mission
lifetime and compared to those available from the previous BATSE all-sky
monitoring mission, revealing previously unnoticed episodes in some of the
analyzed sources (such as a torque reversal in 2S 1845-024). We obtain new, or
update known, orbital solutions for three sources. Our results demonstrate the
capabilities of GBM as an excellent instrument for monitoring accreting X-ray
pulsars and its important scientific contribution to this field.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251 [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bošnjak, Ž.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingaryan, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espiñeira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Godinović, N.;
Green, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hütten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mićanović, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Peñil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Somero, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Tosti, L.;
Vagelli, V.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Nava, L.;
Veres, P.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Arimoto, M.;
Tak, D.;
Asano, K.;
Axelsson, M.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Gill, R.;
Granot, J.;
McEnery, J.;
Razzaque, S.;
Piron, F.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Campana, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
O'Brien, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Starling, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Ursi, A.;
Tavani, M.;
Cardillo, M.;
Casentini, C.;
Piano, G.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Pittori, C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Parmiggiani, N.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Bernardi, G.;
Bolmer, J.;
Caballero-García, M. D.;
Carrasco, I. M.;
Castellón, A.;
Segura, N. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Cherukuri, S. V.;
Cockeram, A. M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Di Dato, A.;
Diretse, R.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fernández-García, E.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Greiner, J.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Heywood, I.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Jaiswal, V.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Japelj, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Klose, S.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, X. Y.;
Lotti, S.;
Maguire, K.;
Malesani, D. B.;
Manulis, I.;
Marongiu, M.;
Martin, S.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Misra, K.;
Moin, A.;
Mooley, K. P.;
Nasri, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Noschese, A.;
Novara, G.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Peretti, E.;
del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez;
Pérez-Torres, M. A.;
Perley, D. A.;
Piro, L.;
Ragosta, F.;
Resmi, L.;
Ricci, R.;
Rossi, A.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Selsing, J.;
Schulze, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, I. A.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Stevens, J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Thóne, C. C.;
Tiengo, A.;
Tremou, E.;
Troja, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vergani, S. D.;
Wieringa, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Xu, D.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets
launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are
characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in
the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from
milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the
interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves,
responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and
occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The
afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by
electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting
emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we
present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of
GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17
orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We
find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the
TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power
comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the
afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of
synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions
required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting
the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.03006 [pdf] - 2105547
Evaluation of Automated Fermi GBM Localizations of Gamma-ray Bursts
Goldstein, Adam;
Fletcher, Corinne;
Veres, Peter;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Hui, C. Michelle;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burns, Eric;
Hamburg, Rachel;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Malacaria, Christian;
Paciesas, William S.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2019-09-06, last modified: 2020-04-19
The capability of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) to localize
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is evaluated for two different automated algorithms:
the GBM Team's RoboBA algorithm and the independently developed BALROG
algorithm. Through a systematic study utilizing over 500 GRBs with known
locations from instruments like Swift and the Fermi LAT, we directly compare
the effectiveness of, and accurately estimate the systematic uncertainty for,
both algorithms. We show simple adjustments to the GBM Team's RoboBA, in
operation since early 2016, yields significant improvement in the systematic
uncertainty, removing the long tail identified in the systematic, and improves
the overall accuracy. The systematic uncertainty for the updated RoboBA
localizations is $1.8^\circ$ for 52% of GRBs and $4.1^\circ$ for the remaining
48%. Both from public reporting by BALROG and our systematic study, we find the
systematic uncertainty of $1-2^\circ$ quoted in GCN circulars for bright GRBs
localized by BALROG is an underestimate of the true magnitude of the
systematic, which we find to be $2.7^\circ$ for 74% of GRBs and $33^\circ$ for
the remaining 26%. We show that, once the systematic uncertainty is considered,
the RoboBA 90% localization confidence regions can be more than an order of
magnitude smaller in area than those produced by BALROG.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11460 [pdf] - 2078735
The Fourth Fermi-GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: A Decade of Data
von Kienlin, A.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Veres, P.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2020-02-26, last modified: 2020-04-14
We present the fourth in a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
observed with Fermi's Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM). It extends the six
year catalog by four more years, now covering the ten year time period from
trigger enabling on 2008 July 12 to 2018 July 11. During this time period GBM
triggered almost twice a day on transient events of which we identifyied 2356
as cosmic GRBs. Additional trigger events were due to solar are events,
magnetar burst activities, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. The intention of
the GBM GRB catalog series is to provide updated information to the community
on the most important observables of the GBM-detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux, and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader energy band from
10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy detectors.
Furthermore, information is given on the settings of the triggering criteria
and exceptional operational conditions during years 7 to 10 in the mission.
This fourth catalog is an official product of the Fermi-GBM science team, and
the data files containing the complete results are available from the
High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12597 [pdf] - 1989056
Updates to the Fermi GBM Targeted Sub-threshold Search in Preparation
for the Third Observing Run of LIGO/Virgo
Goldstein, Adam;
Hamburg, Rachel;
Wood, Joshua;
Hui, C. Michelle;
Cleveland, William H.;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Littenberg, Tyson;
Burns, Eric;
Canton, Tito Dal;
Veres, Peter;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Malacaria, Christian;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-10-30
In this document, we detail the improvements made to the Fermi GBM targeted
sub-threshold search for counterparts to LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave
triggers. We describe the implemented changes and compare the sensitivity of
the O3 search to that of the version of the search that operated during O2.
Overall, we have improved both the sensitivity and speed of the targeted
search. Further improvements to the search have been made for the O3b observing
run, including automated upperlimits estimation and incorporating the updated
localization systematic with the new version of the search.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.06158 [pdf] - 1878715
Fermi GBM GRBs with characteristics similar to GRB 170817A
von Kienlin, A.;
Veres, P.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hamburg, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.
Submitted: 2019-01-18, last modified: 2019-04-18
We present a search for gamma-ray bursts in the Fermi-GBM 10 year catalog
that show similar characteristics to GRB 170817A, the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a GRB identified as a binary neutron star (BNS) merger via
gravitational wave observations. Our search is focused on a non-thermal pulse,
followed by a thermal component, as observed for GRB 170817A. We employ search
methods based on the measured catalog parameters and Bayesian Block analysis.
Our multi-pronged approach, which includes examination of the localization and
spectral properties of the thermal component, yields a total of 13 candidates,
including GRB 170817A and the previously reported similar burst, GRB 150101B.
The similarity of the candidates is likely caused by the same processes that
shaped the gamma-ray signal of GRB 170817A, thus providing evidence of a nearby
sample of short GRBs resulting from BNS merger events. Some of the newly
identfied counterparts were observed by other space telescopes and ground
observatories, but none of them have a measured redshift. We present an
analysis of this sub-sample, and we discuss two models. From uncovering 13
candidates during a time period of ten years we predict that Fermi-GBM will
trigger on-board on about one burst similar to GRB 170817A per year.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02866 [pdf] - 1740032
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a
Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Burns, E.;
Veres, P.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
McEnery, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Hui, C. M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mailyan, B.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Siellez, K.;
Stanbro, M.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2018-08-06
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star
merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as
GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the
closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of
a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent
two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A.
While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short
gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is
not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis
version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest
short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally
undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify
nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding
the search for kilonovae.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04901 [pdf] - 1530839
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave
Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Racusin, J. L.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Jenke, P.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Broida, J.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Ackermann, M.;
Albert, A.;
Atwood, W. B.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caragiulo, M.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Charles, E.;
Chiang, J.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costanza, F.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Jogler, T.;
Johannesson, G.;
Kamae, T.;
Kensei, S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Raino, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Scargle, J. D.;
Sgro, C.;
Simone, D.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Spada, F.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K. S.;
Wood, M.
Submitted: 2016-06-15
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope
(LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and
candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected
by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT
data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated
pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a
large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large
LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences
in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which
emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be
used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain
the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03920 [pdf] - 1439752
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Jenke, P.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
Sparke, L.;
Stanbro, M.;
Toelge, K.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2016-06-01
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst
Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic
counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of
the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914
reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event,
with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$\sigma$). This weak transient
lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear
connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or
magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent
with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient
event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large
angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector
response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this
electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is
unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and
10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint
observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the
weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance
coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary
mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07612 [pdf] - 1400531
The 3rd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Six Years
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Paciesas, William S.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Burns, Eric;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Cleveland, William H.;
Collazzi, Andrew C.;
Connaughto, Valerie;
Diekmann, Anne M.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Giles, Misty M.;
Goldstein, Adam M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Jenke, Peter A.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
McBreen, Sheila;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Sparke, Linda S.;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Veres, Peter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Zhang, Binbin
Submitted: 2016-03-24
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has
triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every
three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected
by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of
July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The
intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information to the community on
the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300~keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed, and also for a broader energy band
from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy NaI(Tl)
detectors. Using statistical methods to assess clustering, we find that the
hardness and duration of GRBs are better fitted by a two-component model with
short-hard and long-soft bursts, than by a model with three components.
Furthermore, information is provided on the settings and modifications of the
triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years five
and six in the mission. This third catalog is an official product of the Fermi
GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are
available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center
(HEASARC).
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.05206 [pdf] - 1385453
The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest
bursts in the first four years
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Preece, Robert D.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Goldstein, Adam;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Rau, Arne;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Veres, Péter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen;
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
van Eerten, Hendrik J.
Submitted: 2016-01-20
We aim to obtain high-quality time-resolved spectral fits of gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs) observed by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope. We perform time-resolved spectral analysis with high
temporal and spectral resolution of the brightest bursts observed by Fermi GBM
in its first 4 years of mission. We present the complete catalog containing
1,491 spectra from 81 bursts with high spectral and temporal resolution.
Distributions of parameters, statistics of the parameter populations,
parameter-parameter and parameter-uncertainty correlations, and their exact
values are obtained and presented as main results in this catalog. We report a
criterion that is robust enough to automatically distinguish between different
spectral evolutionary trends between bursts. We also search for plausible
blackbody emission components and find that only 3 bursts (36 spectra in total)
show evidence of a pure Planck function. It is observed that the averaged
time-resolved low-energy power-law index and peak energy are slightly harder
than the time-integrated values. Time-resolved spectroscopic results should be
used when interpreting physics from the observed spectra, instead of the
time-integrated results.
