Normalized to: Mahdi, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.11382 [pdf] - 1996668
Approximating the Lateral Distribution Function of Cherenkov Radiation
as a Function of the Particle Type for Tunka-133 Array
Submitted: 2018-10-24
The main interest of the present work is in analyzing the lateral
distribution function (LDF) of Cherenkov radiation from particles that produced
in Extensive Air Showers (EAS). The simulation of Cherenkov radiation LDF is
fulfilled by utilizing the CORSIKA program at 1 PeV of the primary energy
around the knee region for many primaries for vertical showers for Tunka-133
array conditions. Depending on the numerical simulation results of Cherenkov
light LDF, sets of parameterized polynomial functions are resetted for several
particles as a function of primary particle type. The comparison between the
approximated LDF of Cherenkov radiation with the LDF which has been simulated
using CORSIKA program for Tunka-133 array is verified for several primary
particles for vertical EAS cascade.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08428 [pdf] - 1457342
Matter in the beam: Weak lensing, substructures and the temperature of
dark matter
Submitted: 2016-05-26, last modified: 2016-05-27
Warm Dark Matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current
Cold Dark Matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to
differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely using weak lensing; this
provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all the "matter in the beam", not
just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the
diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM
clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced
$0.5$~keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak
lensing magnification, convergence and shear distributions can be used to
distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models {\em increase} the
probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to
$\gtrsim5\sigma$, while leaving no significant imprint on the shear
distribution. WDM clusters analysed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM
ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is
proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference
arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly
distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the
signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in
the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.3413 [pdf] - 1214931
Warm Dark Haloes Accretion Histories and their Gravitational Signatures
Submitted: 2014-06-12
We study clusters in Warm Dark Matter (WDM) models of a thermally produced
dark matter particle $0.5$ keV in mass. We show that, despite clusters in WDM
cosmologies having similar density profiles as their Cold Dark Matter (CDM)
counterparts, the internal properties, such as the amount of substructure,
shows marked differences. This result is surprising as clusters are at mass
scales that are {\em a thousand times greater} than that at which structure
formation is suppressed. WDM clusters gain significantly more mass via smooth
accretion and contain fewer substructures than their CDM brethren. The higher
smooth mass accretion results in subhaloes which are physically more extended
and less dense. These fine-scale differences can be probed by strong
gravitational lensing. We find, unexpectedly, that WDM clusters have {\em
higher} lensing efficiencies than those in CDM cosmologies, contrary to the
naive expectation that WDM clusters should be less efficient due to the fewer
substructures they contain. Despite being less dense, the larger WDM subhaloes
are more likely to have larger lensing cross-sections than CDM ones.
Additionally, WDM subhaloes typically reside at larger distances, which
radially stretches the critical lines associated with strong gravitational
lensing, resulting in excess in the number of clusters with large radial
cross-sections at the $\sim2\sigma$ level. Though lensing profile for an
individual cluster vary significantly with the line-of-sight, the radial arc
distribution based on a sample of $\gtrsim100$ clusters may prove to be the
crucial test for the presence of WDM.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.1644 [pdf] - 1208837
Gravitational lensing in WDM cosmologies: The cross section for giant
arcs
Submitted: 2014-04-06
The nature of the dark sector of the Universe remains one of the outstanding
problems in modern cosmology, with the search for new observational probes
guiding the development of the next generation of observational facilities.
Clues come from tension between the predictions from {\Lambda}CDM and
observations of gravitationally lensed galaxies. Previous studies showed that
galaxy clusters in the {\Lambda}CDM are not strong enough to reproduce the
observed number of lensed arcs. This work aims to constrain the warm dark
matter cosmologies by means of the lensing efficiency of galaxy clusters drawn
from these alternative models. The lensing characteristics of two samples of
simulated clusters in the warm dark matter ({\Lambda}WDM) and cold dark matter
({\Lambda}CDM) cosmologies have been studied. The results show that even though
the CDM clusters are more centrally concentrated and contain more
substructures, the WDM clusters have slightly higher lensing efficiency than
their CDM counterparts. The key difference is that WDM clusters have more
extended and more massive subhaloes than CDM analogues. These massive
substructures significantly stretch the critical lines and caustics and hence
they boost the lensing efficiency of the host halo. Despite the increase in the
lensing efficiency due to the contribution of massive substructures in the WDM
clusters, this is not enough to resolve the arc statistics problem.