Normalized to: Macpherson, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05846 [pdf] - 1608506
Follow up of GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart by
Australian-led observing programs
Andreoni, I.;
Ackley, K.;
Cooke, J.;
Acharyya, A.;
Allison, J. R.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Ashley, M. C. B.;
Baade, D.;
Bailes, M.;
Bannister, K.;
Beardsley, A.;
Bessell, M. S.;
Bian, F.;
Bland, P. A.;
Boer, M.;
Booler, T.;
Brandeker, A.;
Brown, I. S.;
Buckley, D.;
Chang, S. -W.;
Coward, D. M.;
Crawford, S.;
Crisp, H.;
Crosse, B.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Cupák, M.;
de Gois, J. S.;
Deller, A.;
Devillepoix, H. A. R.;
Dobie, D.;
Elmer, E.;
Emrich, D.;
Farah, W.;
Farrell, T. J.;
Franzen, T.;
Gaensler, B. M.;
Galloway, D. K.;
Gendre, B.;
Giblin, T.;
Goobar, A.;
Green, J.;
Hancock, P. J.;
Hartig, B. A. D.;
Howell, E. J.;
Horsley, L.;
Hotan, A.;
Howie, R. M.;
Hu, L.;
Hu, Y.;
James, C. W.;
Johnston, S.;
Johnston-Hollitt, M.;
Kaplan, D. L.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Keane, E. F.;
Kenney, D.;
Klotz, A.;
Lau, R.;
Laugier, R.;
Lenc, E.;
Li, X.;
Liang, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Luvaul, L. C.;
Lynch, C.;
Ma, B.;
Macpherson, D.;
Mao, J.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCully, C.;
Möller, A.;
Morales, M. F.;
Morris, D.;
Murphy, T.;
Noysena, K.;
Onken, C. A.;
Orange, N. B.;
Oslowski, S.;
Pallot, D.;
Paxman, J.;
Potter, S. B.;
Pritchard, T.;
Raja, W.;
Ridden-Harper, R.;
Romero-Colmenero, E.;
Sadler, E. M.;
Sansom, E. K.;
Scalzo, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seghouani, N.;
Shang, Z.;
Shannon, R. M.;
Shao, L.;
Shara, M. M.;
Sharp, R.;
Sokolowski, M.;
Sollerman, J.;
Staff, J.;
Steele, K.;
Sun, T.;
Suntzeff, N. B.;
Tao, C.;
Tingay, S.;
Towner, M. C.;
Thierry, P.;
Trott, C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Väisänen, P.;
Krishnan, V. Venkatraman;
Walker, M.;
Wang, L.;
Wang, X.;
Wayth, R.;
Whiting, M.;
Williams, A.;
Williams, T.;
Wolf, C.;
Wu, C.;
Wu, X.;
Yang, J.;
Yuan, X.;
Zhang, H.;
Zhou, J.;
Zovaro, H.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
The discovery of the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational
wave signal has generated follow-up observations by over 50 facilities
world-wide, ushering in the new era of multi-messenger astronomy. In this
paper, we present follow-up observations of the gravitational wave event
GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart SSS17a/DLT17ck (IAU label
AT2017gfo) by 14 Australian telescopes and partner observatories as part of
Australian-based and Australian-led research programs. We report early- to
late-time multi-wavelength observations, including optical imaging and
spectroscopy, mid-infrared imaging, radio imaging, and searches for fast radio
bursts. Our optical spectra reveal that the transient source afterglow cooled
from approximately 6400K to 2100K over a 7-day period and produced no
significant optical emission lines. The spectral profiles, cooling rate, and
photometric light curves are consistent with the expected outburst and
subsequent processes of a binary neutron star merger. Star formation in the
host galaxy probably ceased at least a Gyr ago, although there is evidence for
a galaxy merger. Binary pulsars with short (100 Myr) decay times are therefore
unlikely progenitors, but pulsars like PSR B1534+12 with its 2.7 Gyr
coalescence time could produce such a merger. The displacement (about 2.2 kpc)
of the binary star system from the centre of the main galaxy is not unusual for
stars in the host galaxy or stars originating in the merging galaxy, and
therefore any constraints on the kick velocity imparted to the progenitor are
poor.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.03891 [pdf] - 1273152
Gamma-ray burst radio afterglows from Population III stars: Simulation
methods and detection prospects with SKA precursors
Submitted: 2015-06-11
We investigate the prospects of detecting radio afterglows from long
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) from Population III (Pop III) progenitors using the SKA
precursor instruments WMA (Murchison Widefield Array) and ASKAP (Australian SKA
Pathfinder). We derive a realistic model of GRB afterglows that encompasses the
widest range of plausible physical parameters and observation angles. We define
the best case scenario of Pop III GRB energy and redshift distributions. Using
probability distribution functions fitted to the observed microphysical
parameters of long GRBs, we simulate a large number of Pop III GRB afterglows
to find the global probability of detection. We find that ASKAP may be able to
detect 35% of Pop III GRB afterglows in the optimistic case, and 27% in the
pessimistic case. A negligible number will be detectable by MWA in either case.
Detections per image for ASKAP, found by incorporating intrinsic rates with
detectable timescales, are as high as $\sim$ 6000 and as low as $\sim$ 11,
which shows the optimistic case is unrealistic. We track how the afterglow flux
density changes over various time intervals and find that, because of their
very slow variability, the cadence for blind searches of these afterglows
should be as long as possible. We also find Pop III GRBs at high redshift have
radio afterglow lightcurves that are indistinguishable from those of regular
long GRBs in the more local universe.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.6711 [pdf] - 935808
Selection biases in the gamma ray burst E$_{\rm iso}$ -- L$_{\rm opt,X}$
correlation
Submitted: 2014-11-24
Gamma ray burst (GRB) optical and X-ray afterglow luminosity is expected to
correlate with the GRB isotropic equivalent kinetic energy of the outflow in
the standard synchrotron model for GRB afterglows. Previous studies, using
prompt GRB isotropic equivalent energy ($E_{\rm iso}$) as a proxy for isotropic
equivalent kinetic energy, have generally confirmed a correlation between X-ray
and optical afterglow luminosities. Assuming that GRB afterglow luminosity does
not evolve strongly with redshift, we identify a strong Malmquist bias in GRB
optical and X-ray afterglow luminosity data. We show that selection effects
dominate the observed E$_{\rm iso}$ -- L$_{\rm opt,X}$ correlations, and have
likely been underestimated in other studies. The bias is strongest for a subset
of optically faint bursts $m>24$ at 24 hr with $z>2$. After removing this
optical selection bias, the E$_{\rm iso}$ -- L$_{\rm opt,X}$ correlation for
long GRBs is not statistically significant, but combining both long and short
GRB luminosity data the correlation is significant. Using the median of the
$E_{\rm iso}$ and $L_{\rm opt,X}$ distributions, we apply the synchrotron model
assuming the same power law index for short and long GRBs, but different
microphysical parameter distributions. Comparing the ratio of optical and X-ray
luminosities, we find tentative evidence that the fraction of post-shock energy
in magnetic fields, $\epsilon_B$, could be systematically higher in SGRBs
compared to LGRBs.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.4940 [pdf] - 779605
The Potential for Detecting Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows from Population
III Stars with the Next Generation of Infrared Telescopes
Submitted: 2013-10-18
We investigate the detectability of a proposed population of Gamma-Ray Bursts
(GRBs) from the collapse of Population III (Pop III) stars. The James Webb
Space Telescope (JWST) and Space Infrared telescope for Cosmology and
Astrophysics (SPICA) will be able to observe the late time infrared afterglows.
We have developed a new method to calculate their detectability, which takes
into account the fundamental initial mass function (IMF) and formation rates of
Pop III stars, from which we find the temporal variability of the afterglows
and ultimately the length of time JWST and SPICA can detect them. In the range
of plausible Pop III GRB parameters, the afterglows are always detectable by
these instruments during the isotropic emission, for a minimum of 55 days and a
maximum of 3.7 years. The average number of detectable afterglows will be
2.96$\times 10^{-5}$ per SPICA field of view (FOV) and 2.78$\times 10^{-6}$ per
JWST FOV. These are lower limits, using a pessimistic estimate of Pop III star
formation. An optimal observing strategy with SPICA could identify a candidate
orphan afterglow in $\sim 1.3$ years, with a 90 percent probability of
confirmation with further detailed observations. A beamed GRB will align with
the FOV of the planned GRB detector Energetic X-ray Imaging Survey Telescope
once every 9 years. Pop III GRBs will be more easily detected by their
isotropic emissions (i.e. orphan afterglows) rather than by their prompt
emissions.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.2488 [pdf] - 1151960
The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst redshift distribution: selection biases and
optical brightness evolution at high-z?
Submitted: 2012-10-09, last modified: 2012-12-20
We employ realistic constraints on astrophysical and instrumental selection
effects to model the Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) redshift distribution using {\it
Swift} triggered redshift samples acquired from optical afterglows (OA) and the
TOUGH survey. Models for the Malmquist bias, redshift desert, and the fraction
of afterglows missing because of host galaxy dust extinction, are used to show
how the "true" GRB redshift distribution is distorted to its presently observed
biased distribution. We also investigate another selection effect arising from
a correlation between $E_{{\rm iso}}$ and $L_{{\rm opt}}$. The analysis, which
accounts for the missing fraction of redshifts in the two data subsets, shows
that a combination of selection effects (both instrumental and astrophysical)
can describe the observed GRB redshift distribution. Furthermore, the observed
distribution is compatible with a GRB rate evolution that tracks the global
SFR, although the rate at high-$z$ cannot be constrained with confidence.
Taking selection effects into account, it is not necessary to invoke
high-energy GRB luminosity evolution with redshift to explain the observed GRB
rate at high-$z$.