sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Maasilta, Ilari J.

Normalized to: Maasilta, I.

2 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 2,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.05643  [pdf] - 1960446
Simultaneous Noise and Impedance Fitting to Transition-Edge Sensor Data using Differential Evolution
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-09-03
We discuss a robust method to simultaneously fit a complex model both to the complex impedance and the noise data for transition-edge sensors (TES). It is based on a differential evolution (DE) algorithm, providing accurate and repeatable results with only a small increase in computational cost compared to the standard least squares (LS) fitting method. Test fits are made using both DE and LS methods, and the results compared with previously determined best fits, with varying initial value deviations and limit ranges for the parameters. The robustness of DE is demonstrated with successful fits even when parameter limits up to a factor of 5 from the known values were used. It is shown that the least squares fitting becomes unreliable beyond a 10% deviation from the known values.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1205.5693  [pdf] - 581401
Complex impedance, responsivity and noise of transition-edge sensors: analytical solutions for two- and three-block thermal models
Comments: 33 p. 12 fig version 2, final, AIP Advances, in press (2012)
Submitted: 2012-05-25, last modified: 2012-10-02
The responsivity and noise of a voltage-biased superconducting transition-edge sensor depends strongly on the details of its thermal model, and the simplest theory for TES response assumes a single heat capacity connected to the heat bath. Here, analytical results are derived and discussed for the complex impedance, the responsivity and the noise of a transition-edge sensor, when the thermal model is not simple but consists of either two or three connected heat capacities. The implications of the differences of the models are discussed, as well.