Normalized to: Müller, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.11061 [pdf] - 1857241
The Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on Solar Orbiter
Solanki, S. K.;
Iniesta, J. C. del Toro;
Woch, J.;
Gandorfer, A.;
Hirzberger, J.;
Alvarez-Herrero, A.;
Appourchaux, T.;
Pillet, V. Martínez;
Pérez-Grande, I.;
Kilders, E. Sanchis;
Schmidt, W.;
Cama, J. M. Gómez;
Michalik, H.;
Deutsch, W.;
Fernandez-Rico, G.;
Grauf, B.;
Gizon, L.;
Heerlein, K.;
Kolleck, M.;
Lagg, A.;
Meller, R.;
Müller, R.;
Schühle, U.;
Staub, J.;
Albert, K.;
Copano, M. Alvarez;
Beckmann, U.;
Bischoff, J.;
Busse, D.;
Enge, R.;
Frahm, S.;
Germerott, D.;
Guerrero, L.;
Löptien, B.;
Meierdierks, T.;
Oberdorfer, D.;
Papagiannaki, I.;
Ramanath, S.;
Schou, J.;
Werner, S.;
Yang, D.;
Zerr, A.;
Bergmann, M.;
Bochmann, J.;
Heinrichs, J.;
Meyer, S.;
Monecke, M.;
Müller, M. -F.;
Sperling, M.;
a, D. Álvarez Garcí;
Aparicio, B.;
Jiménez, M. Balaguer;
Rubio, L. R. Bellot;
Carracosa, J. P. Cobos;
Girela, F.;
Expósito, D. Hernández;
Herranz, M.;
Labrousse, P.;
Jiménez, A. López;
Suárez, D. Orozco;
Ramos, J. L.;
Barandiarán, J.;
Bastide, L.;
Campuzano, C.;
Cebollero, M.;
Dávila, B.;
Fernández-Medina, A.;
Parejo, P. García;
Garranzo-García, D.;
Laguna, H.;
Martín, J. A.;
Navarro, R.;
Peral, A. Núñez;
Royo, M.;
Sánchez, A.;
Silva-López, M.;
Vera, I.;
Villanueva, J.;
Fourmond, J. -J.;
de Galarreta, C. Ruiz;
Bouzit, M.;
Hervier, V.;
Clec'h, J. C. Le;
Szwec, N.;
Chaigneau, M.;
Buttice, V.;
Dominguez-Tagle, C.;
Philippon, A.;
Boumier, P.;
Cocguen, R. Le;
Baranjuk, G.;
Bell, A.;
Berkefeld, Th.;
Baumgartner, J.;
Heidecke, F.;
Maue, T.;
Nakai, E.;
Scheiffelen, T.;
Sigwarth, M.;
Soltau, D.;
Volkmer, R.;
Rodríguez, J. Blanco;
Domingo, V.;
Sabater, A. Ferreres;
Blesa, J. L. Gasent;
Martínez, P. Rodríguez;
Caudel, D. Osorno;
Bosch, J.;
Casas, A.;
Carmona, M.;
Herms, A.;
Roma, D.;
Alonso, G.;
omez-Sanjuan, A. G\';
Piqueras, J.;
Torralbo, I.;
Fiethe, B.;
Guan, Y.;
Lange, T.;
Michel, H.;
Bonet, J. A.;
Fahmy, S.;
Müller, D.;
Zouganelis, I.
Submitted: 2019-03-26
This paper describes the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager on the Solar
Orbiter mission (SO/PHI), the first magnetograph and helioseismology instrument
to observe the Sun from outside the Sun-Earth line. It is the key instrument
meant to address the top-level science question: How does the solar dynamo work
and drive connections between the Sun and the heliosphere? SO/PHI will also
play an important role in answering the other top-level science questions of
Solar Orbiter, as well as hosting the potential of a rich return in further
science.
SO/PHI measures the Zeeman effect and the Doppler shift in the FeI 617.3nm
spectral line. To this end, the instrument carries out narrow-band imaging
spectro-polarimetry using a tunable LiNbO_3 Fabry-Perot etalon, while the
polarisation modulation is done with liquid crystal variable retarders (LCVRs).
The line and the nearby continuum are sampled at six wavelength points and the
data are recorded by a 2kx2k CMOS detector. To save valuable telemetry, the raw
data are reduced on board, including being inverted under the assumption of a
Milne-Eddington atmosphere, although simpler reduction methods are also
available on board. SO/PHI is composed of two telescopes; one, the Full Disc
Telescope (FDT), covers the full solar disc at all phases of the orbit, while
the other, the High Resolution Telescope (HRT), can resolve structures as small
as 200km on the Sun at closest perihelion. The high heat load generated through
proximity to the Sun is greatly reduced by the multilayer-coated entrance
windows to the two telescopes that allow less than 4% of the total sunlight to
enter the instrument, most of it in a narrow wavelength band around the chosen
spectral line.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.05312 [pdf] - 1459051
The MIRI Medium Resolution Spectrometer calibration pipeline
Labiano, A.;
Azzollini, R.;
Bailey, J. I.;
Beard, S.;
Dicken, D.;
García-Marín, M.;
Geers, V.;
Glasse, A.;
Glauser, A.;
Gordon, K.;
Justtanont, K.;
Klaassen, P.;
Lahuis, F.;
Law, D.;
Morrison, J.;
Müller, M.;
Rieke, G.;
Vandenbussche, B.;
Wright, G.
Submitted: 2016-08-18
The Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) Medium Resolution Spectrometer (MRS) is
the only mid-IR Integral Field Spectrometer on board James Webb Space
Telescope. The complexity of the MRS requires a very specialized pipeline, with
some specific steps not present in other pipelines of JWST instruments, such as
fringe corrections and wavelength offsets, with different algorithms for point
source or extended source data. The MRS pipeline has also two different
variants: the baseline pipeline, optimized for most foreseen science cases, and
the optimal pipeline, where extra steps will be needed for specific science
cases. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the MRS Calibration
Pipeline from uncalibrated slope images to final scientific products, with
brief descriptions of its algorithms, input and output data, and the accessory
data and calibration data products necessary to run the pipeline.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.6662 [pdf] - 1084526
Post common envelope binaries from SDSS. XII: The orbital period
distribution
Gómez-Morán, A. Nebot;
Gänsicke, B. T.;
Schreiber, M. R.;
Rebassa-Mansergas, A.;
Schwope, A. D.;
Southworth, J.;
Aungwerojwit, A.;
Bothe, M.;
Davis, P. J.;
Kolb, U.;
Müller, M.;
Papadaki, C.;
Pyrzas, S.;
Rabitz, A.;
Rodríguez-Gil, P.;
Schmidtobreick, L.;
Schwarz, R.;
Tappert, C.;
Toloza, O.;
Vogel, J.;
Zorotovic, M.
Submitted: 2011-09-29
The complexity of the common envelope phase and of magnetic stellar wind
braking currently limits our understanding of close binary evolution. Because
of their intrinsically simple structure, observational population studies of
white dwarf plus main sequence (WDMS) binaries hold the potential to test
theoretical models and constrain their parameters. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey
(SDSS) has provided a large and homogeneously selected sample of WDMS binaries,
which we are characterising in terms of orbital and stellar parameters. We have
obtained radial velocity information for 385 WDMS binaries from follow-up
spectroscopy, and for an additional 861 systems from the SDSS sub-spectra.
Radial velocity variations identify 191 of these WDMS binaries as post common
envelope binaries (PCEBs). Orbital periods of 58 PCEBs were subsequently
measured, predominantly from time-resolved spectroscopy, bringing the total
number of SDSS PCEBs with orbital parameters to 79. Observational biases
inherent to this PCEB sample were evaluated through extensive Monte Carlo
simulations. We find that 21-24% of all SDSS WDMS binaries have undergone
common envelope evolution, which is in good agreement with published binary
population models and high-resolution HST imaging of WDMS binaries unresolved
from the ground. The bias corrected orbital period distribution of PCEBs ranges
from 1.9 h to 4.3 d and follows approximately a normal distribution in
log(Porb), peaking at ~10.3 h. There is no observational evidence for a
significant population of PCEBs with periods in the range of days to weeks. The
large and homogeneous sample of SDSS WDMS binaries provides the means to test
fundamental predictions of binary population models, and hence to
observationally constrain the evolution of all close compact binaries.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9904204 [pdf] - 106101
Prediction of the In-Situ Dust Measurements of the Stardust Mission to
Comet 81P/Wild 2
Submitted: 1999-04-15
We predict the amount of cometary, interplanetary, and interstellar cosmic
dust that is to be measured by the Cometary and Interstellar Dust Analyzer
(CIDA) and the aerogel collector on-board the Stardust spacecraft during its
fly-by of comet P/Wild 2 and during the interplanetary cruise phase. We give
the dust flux on the spacecraft during the encounter with the comet using both,
a radially symmetric and an axially symmetric coma model. At closest approach,
we predict a total dust flux of $10^{6.0} m^{-2} s^{-1}$ for the radially
symmetric case and $10^{6.5} m^{-2} s^{-1}$ for the axially symmetric case.
This prediction is based on an observation of the comet at a heliocentric
distance of $1.7 {\rm AU}$. We reproduce the measurements of the Giotto and
VEGA missions to comet P/Halley using the same model as for the Stardust
predictions. The planned measurements of {\em interstellar} dust by Stardust
have been triggered by the discovery of interstellar dust impacts in the data
collected by the Ulysses and Galileo dust detector. Using the Ulysses and
Galileo measurements we predict that 25 interstellar particles, mainly with
masses of about $10^{-12} g$, will hit the target of the CIDA experiment. The
interstellar side of the aerogel collector will contain 120 interstellar
particles, 40 of which with sizes greater than $1 \mu m$. We furthermore
investigate the ``contamination'' of the CIDA and collector measurements by
interplanetary particles during the cruise phase.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9812171 [pdf] - 104278
Isophot Observations of Comet Hale-Bopp: Initial Data Reduction
Grün, E.;
Peschke, S. B.;
Stickel, M.;
Müller, T.;
Krüger, H.;
Böhnhardt, H.;
Brooke, T. Y.;
Campins, H.;
Crovisier, J.;
Hanner, M. S.;
Heinrichsen, I.;
Keller, H. U.;
Knacke, R.;
Lamy, P.;
Leinert, Ch.;
Lemke, D.;
Lisse, C. M.;
Müller, M.;
Osip, D. J.;
Solc, M.
Submitted: 1998-12-09
Comet Hale-Bopp was observed five times with ISOPHOT, the photometer on board
the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO). Each time broadband photometry was
performed using 4 different detectors, 5 apertures and, 10 filters covering the
range between 3.6 to 175 $\mu$m. Calibration measurements using the internal
Fine Calibration Source were done together with each individual measurement.
Background observations were performed with identical instrument settings at
the same positions on the sky several days after the comet observations. The
observation strategy and the initial data reduction steps are described in some
detail and the resulting in-band power values of the Hale-Bopp observations and
their uncertainties are derived. Initial reduction of these measurements was
performed in 3 steps: (1) processing of raw data by removing instrumental and
energetic particle effects, (2) averaging of the individual signals, and (3)
determination of the detector responsivities and their uncertainties. The
detector signal is determined by two different methods and the best value is
chosen. At the present level of processing uncertainties range from 10% to a
factor of 3 for the low power levels at short wavelengths. The in-band power
levels at different wavelengths varied over 3 orders of magnitude.